Skip to main content
Download PDF

Long-term effects of vitamin D supplementation and maintaining sufficient vitamin D on knee osteoarthritis over 5 years

Arthritis Research & Therapy volume 25, Article number: 178 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to investigate the long-term effect of vitamin D supplementation compared to placebo over 5 years in participants with knee osteoarthritis (OA). We also aimed to describe the effect of maintaining sufficient serum vitamin D levels over five years in knee OA.

Methods

Participants (n = 173) from the Hobart centre of the Vitamin D Effects on Osteoarthritis (VIDEO) trial were extensively followed up 3 years after the cessation of 2-year investigational treatment. Participants were classified as maintaining sufficient vitamin D (n = 79) and not maintaining sufficient vitamin D (n = 61) groups.

Results

There was no significant difference in change in the knee symptoms, depression, and serum levels of IL6 and hs-CRP between both comparisons after 3 years of cessation of the clinical trial. However, among participants who reported no knee surgery (KS), there was a significant improvement in WOMAC function (β: − 83.7, 95% CI: − 167.3, 0) and depression scores (β: − 1.3, 95% CI: − 2.3, − 0.2) in vitamin D group compared to the placebo group. Similarly, those who maintained adequate vitamin D levels over 5 years had significantly less WOMAC knee pain (β: − 33.9, 95% CI: − 65.7, − 2) and physical dysfunction (β: − 105.5, 95% CI: − 198.2, − 12.8) than participants with vitamin D deficiency over 5 years.

Conclusion

Vitamin D supplementation over 2 years or maintaining vitamin D sufficiency for 5 years was not associated with statistically significant differences in change in knee symptom scores over 5 years. However, among participants who did not report KS, 2-year vitamin D supplementation and maintaining sufficient vitamin D was linked to modest improvements in knee symptoms and depression scores in knee OA.

Highlights

• Serum vitamin D levels regressed to the mean value of around 61.4 nmol/L after 3 years of the cessation of the VIDEO trial. However, this was significantly higher than the mean baseline vitamin D levels (42.7 nmol/L) before starting the trial. Vitamin D levels decreased in the original vitamin D supplementation group and slightly increased in the placebo group over 5 years.

• Among knee osteoarthritis participants without knee surgery, vitamin D supplementation was linked to modest improvement in knee symptoms over 5 years.

• Among participants without knee surgery, maintaining sufficient vitamin D was associated with a reduction in knee symptoms over 5 years.

Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common joint disorder in adults around the world. Being a debilitating disease characterised by joint pain and physical dysfunction, OA induces some long-term consequences and comorbidities, including depression, impaired sleep, reduced work participation, and increased mortality [1, 2]. Current guidelines recommend education, structured exercise, and weight loss as core management strategies [3, 4]. There are only limited pharmacological options for the management of OA, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), commonly used by OA patients, are often associated with adverse events and suboptimal treatment effects.

Vitamin D plays an essential role in calcium homeostasis and bone metabolism [5]. After cutaneous synthesis or diet intake, vitamin D is converted to 25-hydroxy-vitamin D (25(OH)D) and subsequently to the active form 1,25(OH)2D [6]. By acting on vitamin D receptors, vitamin D has various biological activities in cartilage, bone, and muscle and may protect the degeneration of joint tissues in OA [7, 8]. Vitamin D deficiency [commonly defined as a serum level of 25(OH)D < 50 nmol/l] is prevalent in older people. In Australia, up to 80% of women and 70% of men living in hostels or nursing homes were deficient in vitamin D [9]. Epidemiological studies have suggested moderate evidence of association between vitamin D deficiency and progression of OA [10, 11]. Our systematic review reported a moderate evidence of the association between low vitamin D levels and progression of radiographic knee OA [12], including knee joint space narrowing (JSN) [13].

Randomised clinical trials (RCT) of vitamin D supplementation effects on symptoms and structural damage in knee OA have yielded mixed results [14], with some reporting null results [15, 16], while one study reporting a modest but statistically significant benefits [17]. Vitamin D Effects on Osteoarthritis (VIDEO) RCT from our group suggested that vitamin D treatment did not result in significant changes in MRI-measured tibial cartilage volume or knee pain over 2 years in participants with symptomatic knee OA and low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels [18]. One possible reason for the lack of efficacy in our RCT may be that the VIDEO trial participants were only followed up for 2 years and the vitamin D treatment effect may have a prolonged effect [11]. Besides, an elevated vitamin D level in the placebo group (62% of participants in the VIDEO trial achieved vitamin D sufficiency over 2 years) could have diluted the differences in effects between vitamin D and placebo groups [11]. The post hoc analysis from the VIDEO trial reported beneficial effects of maintaining vitamin D sufficiency over 2 years on lower tibial cartilage volume loss, lower increase in effusion-synovitis volume, and improvement in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) assessed physical function [19].

Most of the vitamin D trials in knee OA indicated a consistent improvement in the knee pain score beyond the 12-month mark, as demonstrated by the data presented in their figures [11]. Conversely, the placebo group in these trials did not show any change in their knee pain score beyond 12 months [18]. Additionally, the alteration in X-ray-detected joint space narrowing, measured after 12 months, remained steady in the vitamin D group but deteriorated in the placebo group in the Oxford VIDEO trial [15]. It is worth noting that none of these studies reported a significant interaction between the treatment time and the treatment effect. While it is not possible to definitively ascertain the outcomes that might have emerged from a longer treatment duration, the potential for vitamin D to exhibit effectiveness at a later stage should not be dismissed [11].

Vitamin D supplementation may exert long-term health benefits [8]. One study indicates that buildup of reserves of vitamin D, presumably in body fat, may explain serum 25(OH)D continues to rise over several months while vitamin D3 plateaus [20]. This means vitamin D reserves in the body can help maintain adequate vitamin D levels even with temporary decreases in intake/synthesis. Vitamin D supplementation also has prolonged effects, including but not limited to, reducing the risk of falls and fractures after vitamin D supplementation from the ViDA trial [21], lowering central blood pressure parameters among vitamin D deficient participants [22], and decreasing the risk of overall mortality [23]. However, evidence for long-term effects of vitamin D supplementation on OA symptoms is scarce. Therefore, we hypothesise that the VIDEO trial participants may have a prolonged beneficial effect from vitamin D supplementation for more than 2 years.

Regardless of how adequate vitamin D levels were achieved (through supplementation or other factors), combining both vitamin D and placebo groups shows the impact of vitamin D status itself, as serum 25(OH)D is considered the ideal biomarker of vitamin D status [24]. RCTs of vitamin D routinely analyse results pooling treatment arms based on achieved 25(OH)D levels [25]. An ancillary study of the Vitamin D and Omega-3 Trial (VITAL) also analysed placebo group based on different 25(OH)D levels [26]. Combining groups also account for the natural fluctuation in levels of vitamin D over time. Vitamin D levels have substantial within-person fluctuations over time due to multiple factors [27]. Therefore, additional analyses based on the level maintained over 5 years rather than a single measurement better captures vitamin D status in our study.

Substantial heterogeneity of treatment effects was reported in patients with and without knee surgery (KS), including total knee replacement (TKR) and arthroscopy [28]. TKR followed by nonsurgical treatment resulted greater pain relief than nonsurgical treatment alone [29]. Certain post-surgical interventions, including physical therapy and rehabilitation, could also impact study outcomes and are not standardised across patients in an observational follow-up of RCTs. Surgical treatment also confounds and complicates interpretation of treatment effects [30]. Besides, there are innate differences between patients opting for surgical vs nonsurgical treatment for OA. TKR as a treatment for knee OA often represents “joint death” or “overhaul”; therefore, it is important to conduct a sub-group analysis by removing participants who underwent surgical interventions.

Overall, we aimed to investigate the effect of vitamin D supplementation compared to placebo over 2 years on knee symptoms, psychological health, and inflammatory markers over 5 years in participants with knee OA. We also aimed to describe the effect of maintaining sufficient serum vitamin D levels over 5 years on knee OA. Besides, we aimed to describe the long-term effect of vitamin D supplementation based on the status of knee surgical intervention during the follow-up period.

Methods

Study design and participants

This study was a 5-year extensive follow-up of the VIDEO trial [18]. The VIDEO trial was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial conducted in Hobart (Tasmania) and Melbourne (Victoria). Four hundred thirteen participants were recruited from Hobart (n = 261) and Melbourne (n = 152). Participants with knee OA were randomised (stratified by site) to the vitamin D supplementation (monthly vitamin D tablet of 50,000 IU) or an identical placebo for 2 years.

As an extension of the VIDEO trial, 261 participants from Tasmania were contacted again after 3 years of completion of the VIDEO trial (i.e. 5 years from the initial date of taking either vitamin D or placebo (February to October 2017)). The flowchart of this study recruitment is shown in Supplementary Figure S1. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants in this study. This study was approved by the Tasmania Health and Medical Human Research Ethics Committee (No. H0016056).

Serum vitamin D and inflammatory markers

Blood samples were collected at the local pathology centre at baseline and months 3, 24, and 60, and vitamin D status and inflammatory markers were assessed using methods consistent with the original VIDEO trial. The time of blood collection was documented to account for seasonal variation in vitamin D levels. The 25 (OH)D levels in serum was determined using the LIAISON® assay (Cardinal Health, Dublin, Ohio, USA), which is a direct competitive chemiluminescence immunoassay. The coefficients of variance of inter- and intra-assays were both 7.0%. Inflammatory markers (hs-CRP and IL-6) were analysed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods (IBL Inc. & Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., respectively). The minimum level of detection was 0.003 ng/mL for IL-6 and was 0.178 mg/mL for hsCRP. The inter-assay and intra-assay coefficients of variances were < 10 and < 15% for all inflammatory biomarkers [31].

Vitamin D maintainers and non-maintainers

Most of the previous studies and guidelines defined vitamin D deficiency as serum 25(OH)D concentrations below 50 nmol/L and vitamin D sufficiency as serum concentrations over 50 nmol/L [32, 33]. The vitamin D status of participants (total VIDEO trial participants irrespective of their treatment allocation) was classified into two groups based on the levels of 25(OH)D at 3-month, 24-month, and 60-month follow-up: (1) maintainer [serum 25(OH)D ≥ 50 nmol/L at 3-month, 24-month, and 60-month follow-up] and (2) non-maintainer [serum 25(OH)D levels < 50 nmol/L at any of the three follow-ups].

Knee symptoms

A self-administered questionnaire, WOMAC, was employed to assess knee pain, function, and stiffness at baseline and months 3, 4, 6, 12, 24, and 60 [34]. A 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS) questionnaire was also used to assess participants’ knee pain.

Other questionnaires

Participants’ history of KS or TKR between month-24 and month-60 was documented by asking: “Have you had a knee surgery, including total or partial knee replacement, after completion of the VIDEO trial?” Regular use of vitamin D supplements (taking supplements at least five times per week for more than 9 months of the year) was also asked in the questionnaire. At baseline and months 3, 4, 6, 12, 24, and 60, psychological health or depression scores were assessed using the Patients Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) [35], and Quality of life (AQol-4D) was also assessed, from which utility values (0–1) were derived [36]. Physical activity was measured by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) short version at baseline and months 24 and 60 [37].

Sample size

The sample size calculations were based on the VAS pain change in the original VIDEO study (VAS pain in the placebo group was − 9.4 mm ± 21.1). We expected a VAS pain difference of 9 mm between the groups over 5 years (5.4 mm over 2 years). Assuming 80% power and two-sided significance level of 0.05, we need 88 participants per group (total of 176 participants). This is a feasible sample size even if we account for 70% response rate from Hobart centre (n = 261) participants of VIDEO study.

Statistical methods

The independent students’ t-tests were used to compare differences in characteristics between two groups (vitamin D versus placebo; maintainer versus non-maintainer groups). Logistic regression was employed to compare the differences in the incidence of KS or TKR. The between-group difference in change in symptoms was analysed using repeated measures mixed-effects model with fixed terms for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), KS, physical activity [38], and treatment status or vitamin D maintainer status. The correlation within the repeated measures was addressed by using patient identification as a random effect. The effect of treatment or maintaining vitamin D sufficiency was estimated by the visit × treatment or maintaining vitamin D sufficiency status interaction terms.

We performed a subgroup analysis by excluding participants who underwent KS, using a similar analytical model above. KS as a treatment for knee OA often represents “joint death” or “overhaul”, and we performed subgroup analyses by removing participants who underwent KS. Surgery, including TKR occurred during the 24- and 60-month observational period, and their symptoms, utility, and depression scores were obtained at the 60-month follow-up only, which was after the surgery. Due to the observational nature of this study, removing KS patients represent a natural progression or trajectory of symptoms.

Results

A total of 173 participants (mean age 62.6, 48.6% women) were followed up 3 years after the cessation of original 2-year investigational treatment (vitamin D or placebo). The average level of 25(OH)D dropped in the vitamin D group (from 85.4 nmol/l to 63.6 nmol/l) and slightly increased in the placebo group (51.7 nmol/l to 62.8 nmol/l) 3 years after the cessation of the treatment (Fig. 1). Fifteen in the placebo group (including 11 TKR) and 16 in the vitamin D group (including 14 TKR) reported KS. There was no statistically significant difference in KS (OR 1.0 95% CI 0.5, 2.4) or TKR (OR 1.2 95% CI 0.5, 3.1) between vitamin D and placebo groups. Characteristics of the participants at 5 years follow-ups were shown in Table 1, changes from baseline and 24 months were shown in Supplementary Table S1, and characteristics of the participants based on self-reported knee surgery in the VIDEO trial at 60-month follow-up were shown in Supplementary Table S2.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Change in serum 25(OH)D levels over 60 months by the original treatment group of the VIDEO trial. Vitamin D or placebo supplementation was completed at 24 months, and the change in vitamin D from 24 to 60 months was observational data (analysed using a repeated-measures mixed-effects model with fixed terms for seasons of blood collection, treatment, and participants’ identification as random effects)

Full size image
Table 1 Characteristics of the participants based on the original allocation to vitamin D or placebo group in the VIDEO trial at 60-month follow-up
Full size table

There was no significant difference in change in WOMAC symptoms, knee VAS pain, depression scores, utility scores, and serum levels of IL6 and hs-CRP between vitamin D and placebo groups after 3 years of cessation of the clinical trial (Table 2). Among participants who reported no KS, there was a significant improvement in WOMAC function (β: − 83.7, 95% CI: − 167.3, 0.0) and depression scores (β: − 1.3, 95% CI: − 2.3, − 0.2) over 5 years in the treatment group compared to the placebo group.

Table 2 Change in clinical symptoms and inflammatory markers over 60 months based on the original allocation to vitamin D or placebo group in the VIDEO trial
Full size table

Seventy-nine participants maintained adequate vitamin D levels over 5 years, and 61 participants did not maintain adequate vitamin D levels over 5 years (Table 3 and Supplementary Table S3). Eleven in the non-maintainer group (including 10 TKR) and 11 in the maintainer group (including 8 TKR) reported KS. There was no statistically significant difference in KS (OR 0.7 95% CI 0.3, 1.8) or TKR (OR 0.6 95% CI 0.2, 1.6) between vitamin D maintainer and non-maintainer groups. There was no significant difference in change in WOMAC symptoms, knee VAS pain, depression scores, utility scores, and serum levels of IL6 and hs-CRP between vitamin D maintainer and non-maintainer groups after 3 years of cessation of the clinical trial (Table 4). Among participants who did not report KS, those who maintained adequate vitamin D levels over 5 years had significantly less WOMAC knee pain (β: − 33.9, 95% CI: − 65.7, − 2) and physical dysfunction (β: − 105.5, 95% CI: − 198.2, − 12.8) than participants with vitamin D deficiency over 5 years (Table 4).

Table 3 Characteristics of the participants among participants who maintained sufficient vitamin D levels and participants who did not maintain sufficient vitamin D levels at 60-month follow-up
Full size table
Table 4 Change in clinical symptoms and serum inflammatory markers over 60 months in participants who maintained sufficient vitamin D levels and participants who did not maintain sufficient vitamin D levels
Full size table

Discussion

To our best knowledge, this study is the first longitudinal study to investigate the long-term effects of vitamin D supplementation or maintaining sufficient serum vitamin D levels on symptoms, quality of life, psychological health, and inflammatory markers over 5 years in participants with knee OA. Two-year vitamin D supplementation or maintaining vitamin D sufficiency over 5 years was not significantly associated with improvement in symptoms of knee OA. However, among participants who did not report KS due to OA, 2-year vitamin D supplementation was associated with improved WOMAC function and depression scores over 5 years. Similarly, maintaining vitamin D sufficiency over 5 years was associated with improved WOMAC pain and function compared to participants who did not maintain sufficient vitamin D levels over 5 years.

Serum vitamin D levels regressed to the mean value of around 61.4 nmol/L after 3 years of the cessation of the VIDEO trial. However, this was significantly higher than the mean baseline vitamin D levels (42.7 nmol/L) before starting the trial. As expected, vitamin D levels decreased in the original vitamin D supplementation group and slightly increased in the placebo group. Data from the Dallas Heart Study suggests that vitamin D levels decreased after 7 years of follow-up despite an increase in vitamin D supplementation, suggesting a natural decline in the vitamin D levels [39].

The goal of grouping participants according to serum 25(OH)D levels is to evaluate the effectiveness of sufficient vitamin D levels on the outcomes, including WOMAC pain, function, quality of life, and depression status assessed by PHQ-9 scores, regardless of how the levels were achieved. Five-year follow-up of VIDEO RCT is an observational study and the original treatment and placebo groups were recontacted after 3 years of cessation the trial. Among participants who have 5-year follow-up 25(OH)D levels and were originally allocated to placebo group, 37% (22 out of 81) participants attained adequate serum 25(OH)D levels. This demonstrates that quantifying the proportion achieving adequate 25(OH)D levels in the placebo group provides important insights into explaining the negative results of vitamin D RCTs.

TKR is often considered as the ultimate outcome in RCTs, but their incidence is rare to practically conduct an appropriately powered RCT. Therefore, many RCTs in knee OA often link their patient data with joint replacement registries after the completion of the trial [40]. We found that 2-year vitamin D supplementation or maintaining sufficient vitamin D for 5 years was not associated with the incidence of KS or TKR. Previous studies have suggested that preoperative vitamin D status was associated with post-operative symptoms, but there is lack of evidence on the causal link between vitamin status and TKR [41]. Retrospective observational studies suggest that there is high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among participants scheduled for total knee replacement [42, 43].

Vitamin D could play a role in the aetiology and maintenance of chronic pain states by exerting hormonal and immunological effects on pain [44]. Other potential mechanism includes vitamin D or vitamin D receptor that may influence pain sensitisation [45]. We found no association between vitamin D supplementation over 2 years and improvement in knee symptoms over 5 years. Similarly, there was no association between maintaining sufficient vitamin D over 5 years and improvement in knee symptoms over 5 years.

Our 5-year observational cohort had participants who underwent KS or TKR (occurred between 24- and 60-month observational period only) and their symptoms, utility, and depression scores were obtained at 60 months (after the surgery or TKR). The original VIDEO trial excluded TKR at any stage of the trial. Therefore, we conducted a sub-group analysis by excluding participants (excluding “joint death” or “overhaul”) who underwent surgery to represent a natural progression of OA. We found that among participants who did not report KS, vitamin D supplementation over 2 years was associated with a modest improvement in WOMAC function (β − 83.7; 95% CI, − 167.3, 0.0) but not WOMAC pain over 5 years. This is consistent with the 2-year results of the original VIDEO trial, where we reported that the 2-year supplementation was associated with a significant improvement in WOMAC function (β − 72.9; 95% CI, − 126.4, − 19.4) but not WOMAC pain over 2 years among the whole participants [18].

Similarly, maintaining sufficient vitamin D over 5 years was associated with a modest but statistically significant improvement in WOMAC knee pain (β − 33.9; 95% CI, − 65.7, − 2) and WOMAC function (β − 105.5; 95% CI, − 198.2, − 12.8) over 5 years. The effect size on pain and function is larger than the post hoc results from the original VIDEO trial, where we reported that maintaining sufficient vitamin D levels over 2 years was associated with improvement in WOMAC pain (β − 15.4; 95% CI, − 49.9, 19.2) and WOMAC dysfunction (β − 94.2; 95% CI, − 183.8, − 4.5) over 2 years [19]. The effect size we observed may not be clinically significant but larger than the results we observed over 2 years [46]. Our results indicate that vitamin D supplementation or maintaining sufficient vitamin D levels may have a long-term modest effect on knee OA, due to either (i) longer cumulative exposure beyond 2 years or (ii) lagged effects of vitamin D exposure up to 2 years, or a combination of the two.

We have previously reported that vitamin D supplementation over 24 months may have a beneficial effect on depressive symptoms (β − 0.66, 95% CI: − 1.22 to − 0.11) than placebo in knee OA patients [47]. In this 5-year follow-up study, we found that among participants who did not report KS, vitamin D supplementation was associated with a statistically significant reduction in depressive symptoms (β − 1.3; 95% CI, − 2.3, -0.2). The effect size in this study was larger than the post hoc analysis of the original 2-year trial, indicating the potential long-term effects of vitamin D supplementation. A systematic review of observational studies has reported that low vitamin D concentration is associated with depression [48]. However, a meta-analysis of RCTs assessing the efficacy of vitamin D supplementation on depression in the general, obese, and other diseased populations has not found a significant beneficial effect [49].

A strength of this study is the long-term follow-up of a vitamin D randomised clinical trial population. However, there are limitations to this study. We did not follow-up all participants from Tasmania who were originally enrolled in the VIDEO study (lost to follow-up of 34% of the participants (88 out of 261)). However, the baseline characteristics of the participants who completed the 5-year follow-up were comparable to those who did not complete the follow-up, except that the physical activity was higher than those lost to follow-up (Supplementary Table S4). Loss to follow-up bias may still exist because we do not have further information on the participants who lost to follow-up after 2 years.

In conclusion, vitamin D supplementation over 2 years or maintaining vitamin D sufficiency for 5 years was not associated with significant differences in change in knee symptoms over 5 years. However, among participants who did not report KS, 2-year vitamin D supplementation was linked to a modest improvement in knee dysfunction and depression levels. Similarly, knee OA patients maintaining sufficient serum vitamin D levels over 5 years was associated with a modest improvement in knee pain and physical dysfunction than those who did not maintain adequate vitamin D levels, suggesting a potential beneficial effect of maintaining sufficient serum vitamin D for knee OA.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to institute policy but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

OA:

Osteoarthritis

VIDEO:

Vitamin D Effects on Osteoarthritis trial

RCT:

Randomised clinical trials

NSAIDs:

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

25(OH)D:

25-Hydroxy-vitamin D

JSN:

Joint space narrowing

WOMAC:

The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index

ELISA:

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

VAS:

Visual analogue scale

KS:

Knee surgery

TKR:

Total knee replacement

PHQ-9:

Patients Health Questionnaire-9

AQol-4D:

Quality of life

IPAQ:

International Physical Activity Questionnaire

BMI:

Body mass index

References

  1. Sharma L. Osteoarthritis of the knee. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(1):51–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Allen KD, Thoma LM, Golightly YM. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2022;30(2):184–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Arden NK, Perry TA, Bannuru RR, et al. Non-surgical management of knee osteoarthritis: comparison of ESCEO and OARSI 2019 guidelines. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2021;17(1):59–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Katz JN, Arant KR, Loeser RF. Diagnosis and treatment of hip and knee osteoarthritis: A review. JAMA. 2021;325(6):568-78.

  5. Ramasamy I. Vitamin D metabolism and guidelines for vitamin D supplementation. Clin Biochem Rev. 2020;41(3):103–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Winzenberg T, Mei Ivd, Mason RS, Nowson C, Jones G. Vitamin D: and the musculoskeletal health of older adults. Aust Fam Physician 2012;41(3):92–9.

  7. Wolff AE, Jones AN, Hansen KE. Vitamin D and musculoskeletal health. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2008;4(11):580–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bouillon R, Manousaki D, Rosen C, Trajanoska K, Rivadeneira F, Richards JB. The health effects of vitamin D supplementation: evidence from human studies. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2021;18:96–110.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Working Group of the Australian and New Zealand Bone and Mineral Society; Endocrine Society of Australia; Osteoporosis Australia. Vitamin D and adult bone health in Australia and New Zealand: a position statement. Med J Aust. 2005;182(6):281–5.

  10. Vaishya R, Vijay V, Lama P, Agarwal A. Does vitamin D deficiency influence the incidence and progression of knee osteoarthritis? - A literature review. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019;10(1):9–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Antony B, Ding C. Vitamin D and osteoarthritis: disparity between observational studies and clinical trials. Int J Rheum Dis. 2017;20(6):671–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cao Y, Winzenberg T, Nguo K, Lin J, Jones G, Ding C. Association between serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013;52(7):1323–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bergink AP, Zillikens MC, Van Leeuwen JP, Hofman A, Uitterlinden AG, van Meurs JB. 25-Hydroxyvitamin D and osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis including new data. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016;45(5):539–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Antony B, Ding C. Vitamin D deficiency in joint pain: effects of vitamin D supplementation. Nutritional Modulators of Pain in the Aging Population. 2017;1:183–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Arden NK, Cro S, Sheard S, et al. The effect of vitamin D supplementation on knee osteoarthritis, the VIDEO study: a randomised controlled trial. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2016;24(11):1858–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. McAlindon T, LaValley M, Schneider E, et al. Effect of vitamin D supplementation on progression of knee pain and cartilage volume loss in patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2013;309(2):155–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Sanghi D, Mishra A, Sharma AC, et al. Does vitamin D improve osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized controlled pilot trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(11):3556–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Jin X, Jones G, Cicuttini F, et al. Effect of vitamin D supplementation on tibial cartilage volume and knee pain among patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. JAMA. 2016;315(10):1005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zheng S, Jin X, Cicuttini F, et al. Maintaining vitamin D sufficiency is associated with improved structural and symptomatic outcomes in knee osteoarthritis. Am J Med. 2017;130(10):1211–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Heaney RP, Armas LA, Shary JR, et al. 25-Hydroxylation of vitamin D3: relation to circulating vitamin D3 under various input conditions. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87(6):1738–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Khaw KT, Stewart AW, Waayer D, et al. Effect of monthly high-dose vitamin D supplementation on falls and non-vertebral fractures: secondary and post-hoc outcomes from the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled ViDA trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5(6):438–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sluyter JD, Camargo CA Jr, Stewart AW, et al. Effect of monthly, high-dose, long-term vitamin D supplementation on central blood pressure parameters: a randomized controlled trial substudy. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6(10): e006802.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Chowdhury R, Kunutsor S, Vitezova A, et al. Vitamin D and risk of cause specific death: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational cohort and randomised intervention studies. BMJ. 2014;348: g1903.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Holick MF, Binkley NC, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, et al. Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(7):1911–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gallagher JC, Peacock M, Yalamanchili V, et al. Effects of vitamin D supplementation in older African American women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(3):1137–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. LeBoff MS, Chou SH, Ratliff KA, et al. Supplemental vitamin D and incident fractures in midlife and older adults. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(4):299–309.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Jones KS, Assar S, Harnpanich D, et al. 25(OH)D2 half-life is shorter than 25(OH)D3 half-life and is influenced by DBP concentration and genotype. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(9):3373–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Losina E, Daigle ME, Suter LG, et al. Disease-modifying drugs for knee osteoarthritis: can they be cost-effective? Osteoarthr Cartil. 2013;21(4):655–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Skou ST, Roos EM, Laursen MB, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of total knee replacement. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(17):1597–606.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Katz JN, Losina E. Surgery versus physical therapy for knee osteoarthritis: where do we go from here? Osteoarthr Cartil. 2018;26(5):587–9.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zheng S, Wang B, Han W, et al. Vitamin D supplementation and inflammatory and metabolic biomarkers in patients with knee osteoarthritis: post hoc analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Br J Nutr. 2018;120(01):41–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lips P. Vitamin D deficiency and secondary hyperparathyroidism in the elderly: Consequences for bone loss and fractures and therapeutic implications. Endocr Rev. 2001;22(4):477–501.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lips P. Which circulating level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D is appropriate? J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2004;89–90(1–5):611–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15(12):1833–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lowe B, Unutzer J, Callahan CM, Perkins AJ, Kroenke K. Monitoring depression treatment outcomes with the patient health questionnaire-9. Med Care. 2004;1:1194–201.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hawthorne G, Richardson J, Osborne R. The Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument: a psychometric measure of Health-Related Quality of Life. Qual Life Res. 1999;8(3):209–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, et al. International Physical Activity Questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(8):1381–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wanner M, Richard A, Martin B, Linseisen J, Rohrmann S. Associations between objective and self-reported physical activity and vitamin D serum levels in the US population. Cancer Causes Control. 2015;26(6):881–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Mirfakhraee S, Ayers CR, McGuire DK, Maalouf NM. Longitudinal changes in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D in the Dallas Heart Study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2017;87(3):242–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Konan S, Haddad F. Joint Registries: a Ptolemaic model of data interpretation? Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B(12):1585–6.

  41. Brambilla L, Peretti GM, Sirtori P, Maffulli N, Mangiavini L. Outcome of total hip and total knee arthroplasty and vitamin D homeostasis. Br Med Bull. 2020;135(1):50–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Piuzzi NS, George J, Khlopas A, et al. High prevalence and seasonal variation of hypovitaminosis D in patients scheduled for lower extremity total joint arthroplasty. Ann Transl Med. 2018;6(16):321.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Jansen JA, Haddad FS. High prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in elderly patients with advanced osteoarthritis scheduled for total knee replacement associated with poorer preoperative functional state. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2013;95(8):569–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Shipton EA, Shipton EE. Vitamin D and Pain: Vitamin D and its role in the aetiology and maintenance of chronic pain states and associated comorbidities. Pain Res Treat. 2015;2015: 904967.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Habib AM, Nagi K, Thillaiappan NB, Sukumaran V, Akhtar S. Vitamin D and its potential interplay with pain signaling pathways. Front Immunol. 2020;11:820.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Kim MS, Koh IJ, Choi KY, et al. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the WOMAC and factors related to achievement of the MCID after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy for knee osteoarthritis. Am J Sports Med. 2021;49(9):2406–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Zheng S, Tu L, Cicuttini F, et al. Effect of vitamin D supplementation on depressive symptoms in patients with knee osteoarthritis. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018;20(12):1634–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Anglin RE, Samaan Z, Walter SD, McDonald SD. Vitamin D deficiency and depression in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2013;202:100–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Gowda U, Mutowo MP, Smith BJ, Wluka AE, Renzaho AM. Vitamin D supplementation to reduce depression in adults: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutrition. 2015;31(3):421–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the VIDEO study (NHMRC) and VIDEO 5-year follow-up study (Tasmania Community Fund, Royal Hobart Hospital Research Foundation) funders, study participants, staff, and data managers. Abstract data of this manuscript has been presented previously at the 2022 Australian Rheumatology Association annual scientific meeting as abstract (P98), which can be accessed at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/imj.15756.

Funding

This study was funded by the Royal Hobart Hospital Research Foundation [RHHRF, No. E24558] and Tasmania Community Fund [TCF, No. 31Medium00176].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Clinical Research Centre, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China

    Zhiqiang Wang, Zhaohua Zhu & Changhai Ding

  2. Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia

    Zhiqiang Wang, Feng Pan, Leigh Blizzard, Changhai Ding & Benny Antony

  3. Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Arthritis Research Institute, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China

    Shuang Zheng

  4. Department of Endocrinology, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia

    Venkat Parameswaran

  5. Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

    Changhai Ding

Authors
  1. Zhiqiang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhaohua Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Feng Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shuang Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Venkat Parameswaran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Leigh Blizzard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Changhai Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Benny Antony
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

BA and DC conceived and designed the VIDEO 5 year follow-up study and obtained funding. ZW drafted the manuscript. BA collected data. ZW, ZZ, FP, SZ, LB, and BA were involved in interpreting the data. All authors critically reviewed and edited the manuscript and approved the final version.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Changhai Ding or Benny Antony.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Southern Tasmanian Health and Medical Human Research Ethics Committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Supplementary Figure S1. Flowchart of VIDEO five-year follow-up study. Supplementary Table S1. Change in WOMAC symptoms and Vitamin D levels of the participants based on the original allocation to vitamin D or placebo group in the VIDEO trial over 5 years. Supplementary Table S2. Characteristics of the participants based on self-reported knee surgery in the VIDEO trial at 60-month follow-up. Supplementary Table S3. Change in WOMAC symptoms and Vitamin D levels among participants who maintained sufficient vitamin D levels and participants who did not maintain sufficient vitamin D levels over 5 years. Supplementary Table S4. Baseline characteristics of the participants who completed the five-year follow-up and lost to follow-up.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Z., Zhu, Z., Pan, F. et al. Long-term effects of vitamin D supplementation and maintaining sufficient vitamin D on knee osteoarthritis over 5 years. Arthritis Res Ther 25, 178 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-023-03167-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-023-03167-8

Keywords

Arthritis Research & Therapy

ISSN: 1478-6362

Contact us