Skip to main content
Download PDF

Impact of IL6R genetic variants on treatment efficacy and toxicity response to sarilumab in rheumatoid arthritis

Arthritis Research & Therapy volume 25, Article number: 226 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Sarilumab, an IL-6 receptor antagonist, is a first-line biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug for rheumatoid arthritis. The identification of genetic biomarkers as predictors of response to sarilumab could allow for a personalized treatment strategy to improve clinical outcomes.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 62 patients treated with sarilumab to determine whether single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in the IL6R gene could predict efficacy and toxicity responses. Six SNPs previously described in the IL6R gene (rs12083537, rs11265618, rs4329505, rs2228145, rs4537545, and rs4845625) were genotyped in DNA samples obtained from these patients. Using parametric tests, we evaluated the association between these polymorphisms and clinicopathological features. Treatment response was assessed six months after treatment initiation. Satisfactory response was based on EULAR criteria. Low disease activity was determined according to DAS28 and CDAI and quantitative improvements in DAS28 and CDAI scores.

Results

Three SNPs (rs4845625, rs4329505 and rs11265618) were significantly associated with response outcomes. All of the SNPs, except for rs12083537, had at least one significant association with dyslipidemia or hepatotoxicity.

Conclusions

These findings support the potential clinical value of SNPs, particularly rs4845625, as potentially useful biomarkers to predict response to sarilumab in patients with RA.

Introduction

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a highly prevalent chronic systemic inflammatory disease. Clinically, RA is characterized by symmetrical peripheral polyarthritis with extraarticular manifestations [1]. The natural course of this disease may lead to progressive disability, systemic complications, and reduced quality of life [2, 3].

The principal aim of current therapeutic strategies is to achieve clinical remission or a state of low disease activity (LDA). If neither of these objectives are achieved, then the recommended approach is to adjust the treatment strategy, usually by switching to disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) [4]. In recent decades many highly effective biologic (bDMARD) and non-biologic therapies have been developed, leading to better disease control in many patients. Nonetheless, only limited progress has been made in identifying reliable biomarkers that could allow for personalized selection of the optimal DMARDs. At present, however, most of the available DMARDs lack robust supporting data [5]. Therefore, although the treatment selection process must take into account comorbidities and the costs of treatment, in most cases the treating physician can select treatment according to his or her professional experience, using a trial-and-error approach [6,7,8].

In recent years, interest in pharmacogenomics has grown due to its potential to explain much of the inter-individual differences in treatment response and predisposition to drug toxicity. The vast majority of studies published to date have focused on single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) as genetic biomarkers for methotrexate [9,10,11,12] and/or anti-TNF [13,14,15,16,17,18,19], and on new therapies, such as the IL-6R antagonist tocilizumab (TCZ) [20,21,22,23,24,25,26].

Sarilumab is a biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) that exhibits specific binding affinity to both soluble and membrane-bound IL-6 receptors (IL-6R), thereby inhibiting IL-6 mediated signaling. In the last few years, this drug has received regulatory approval for the treatment of patients with moderately to severely active RA who are either intolerant or unresponsive to at least one conventional synthetic (cs)DMARD. Placebo-controlled clinical trials [27, 28] have reported response rates (ACR50 criteria) ranging from 40 to 45% at 6 months. Despite this notable efficacy, only 28–34% of patients in those studies achieved the therapeutic goal of DAS28-CRP (c-reactive protein) remission.

In this context, and in line with findings from pharmacogenetic studies on TCZ [20,21,22,23,24,25,26], we hypothesized that functional variations in the interleukin-6 receptor (IL6R) gene could affect treatment outcomes with sarilumab. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to assess whether genetic variants in the IL6R gene are associated with response to sarilumab and treatment-related toxicity in patients diagnosed with RA.

Materials and methods

Study population

We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study involving RA patients recruited from a tertiary referral hospital. Potential participants were identified through a search of pharmacy registries, in which we identified all patients who received sarilumab treatment between January 2018 and December 2021.

The inclusion criteria were as follows: confirmed diagnosis of RA based on the American College of Rheumatology /European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) 2010 criteria [29]; prescription of sarilumab for RA; and age ≥ 18 years. Exclusion criteria were: presence of other rheumatic conditions (including connective tissue diseases or vasculitis) and loss of patient to follow-up.

Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected from electronical medical records. The following variables were assessed: age; sex; age at diagnosis; body mass index (BMI); previous treatments; comorbidities; baseline c-reactive protein (CRP) level; rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) status; and sarilumab initiation and withdrawal dates.

The Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at treatment initiation and at 6-months were used to evaluate treatment response. Response was further evaluated based on the following parameters: satisfactory response (EULAR criteria); achievement of LDA, which was defined as a DAS28 score ≤ 3.2 or CDAI score ≤ 10, as well as quantifiable improvements in DAS28 and CDAI values at 6 months. Following EULAR guidelines, a satisfactory EULAR response was defined as a DAS28 improvement > 1.2 with a resulting DAS28 score ≤ 3.2. [30, 31].

Adverse effects (AE) were registered and classified by type [32] and by severity according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, v 6.0). AEs were further categorized into specific groups, as follows: hepatotoxicity, infections, hypersensitivity, gastrointestinal, hematological and dyslipidemia. To assess hepatotoxicity, hematological alterations, and dyslipidemia, we retrospectively reviewed the results of routine blood tests performed during follow-up every 6 months. Numeric values for transaminases, leukocytes, neutrophils, platelets, and lipids levels were recorded at the time any AE was detected.

The study protocol was approved by the respective institutional ethics committees and registered at clinicaltrials.gov (protocol code: IIBSP-IIL-2020–148). Prior to participation, all participants provided written informed consent for the collection of blood samples and subsequent genetic analyses.

Genetic studies

Selection of the specific SNPs for analysis was based on the available literature and SNP functionality in the IL6R gene. The following SNPs were selected: rs12083537, rs11265618, rs4329505, rs2228145, rs4537545, and rs4845625 (Table 1). The rationale behind the selection of these SNPs has been described elsewhere [20,21,22,23,24, 26, 33]. Importantly, all of the chosen SNPs have a minor allele frequency (MAF) > 0.10 in the European population according to the Allele Frequency Aggregator (ALFA) [34].

Table 1 Selected functional polymorphisms in the IL6R gene
Full size table

Genomic DNA was automatically extracted from peripheral whole-blood samples using the Autopure LS system (Qiagen; Hilden, Germany). Genotyping of the selected SNPs was performed through real-time PCR using TaqMan® SNP genotyping assays (Applied Biosystems; Foster City, CA, USA). All cases were successfully genotyped.

Statistical analyses

The Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium for all SNPs was assessed with the chi-square test. Associations between the SNPs and treatment outcome variables were examined considering various models of inheritance—including codominant, dominant, and recessive models—as appropriate.

Quantitative data are presented as means (standard deviation [SD]) for normally distributed variables. The Shapiro–Wilks test was applied to assess distribution normality. Student’s T test or ANOVA was employed for normally distributed variables, depending on the number of groups being compared. For qualitative dichotomous variables, bivariate associations were evaluated with Pearson’s chi-square (χ2) or Fisher’s exact test. Associations between the SNPs and qualitative response variables were tested using χ2 tests.

All statistical tests were two-sided, with the cut-off for statistical significance set at 5% (α = 0.05). The IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, v. 26.0 (IBM Corp. Armonk, NY, USA: IBM Corp) was used to perform all statistical analyses.

Results

Patient population

A total of 62 patients were included in the study. Table 2 summarizes the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of these patients. The mean (SD) disease duration at initiation of sarilumab was 17.1 (10.9) years. At the end of the data collection period (at six months of follow-up), one-third of the patients (20/62, 32.3%) were still actively receiving sarilumab.

Table 2 Baseline patient characteristics (n = 62)
Full size table

Effectiveness.

Of the 62 patients initially included in the study, seven (11.3%) were excluded from the efficacy analysis due to premature treatment discontinuation caused by early toxicity (6 patients) or because the results of the disease activity assessment were not recorded in the electronic medical records (one patient).

At the 6-month follow up, the mean (SD) decrease in DAS28 and CDAI scores was 2.6 (1.3) and 10.6 (9.3), respectively. A satisfactory EULAR response rate was achieved in 76.4% of cases. LDA for DAS28 and CDAI was achieved in 68.5% and 63.5% of patients, respectively. The mean (SD) duration of treatment was 18.2 months (14.4).

No significant differences in treatment response variables were observed according to sex, seropositivity, number of previous cDMARDs or bDMARDs, age at diagnosis, or BMI. Although ex-smokers (n = 11) and current smokers (n = 5) had a better response than never-smokers (n = 36) in terms of achieving.

DAS28-LDA (90.9% and 100% vs 58.3%, p = 0.02), no differences in CDAI-

LDA rates were found.

Adverse events

Table 3 summarizes the frequency and severity of AEs for the 62 patients. All AEs were mild or moderate; no severe AEs were reported. The two most common types of AE were hematological alterations and dyslipidemia. Of the 24 hematological AEs registered, 11 were mild and 13 moderate. In most cases, these were managed by observation (n = 9), temporary discontinuation of sarilumab (n = 3), or dose reduction (n = 7). The most common hematological AE was neutropenia (22 cases), with a median (SD) value of 1.06 × 109/L (360). In terms of dyslipidemia, the median (SD) total cholesterol value was 284.6 (43.9) mg/dL. Only three patients required initiation of cholesterol lowering therapy due to sarilumab.

Table 3 Sarilumab-related adverse events (62 patients)
Full size table

Genetic determinants and response to treatment

The genotypic frequencies of all six SNPs were in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. A linked inheritance was observed between rs4329505 and rs11265618, as all individuals carrying the T allele for rs4329505 also had the C allele for rs11265618, and vice versa. Consequently, the results for both of those SNPs were analogous.

On the univariate analysis, three SNPs (rs4845625, rs4329505, rs11265618) were significantly associated with response outcomes (Table 4). In Fig. 1, the dot plot graphs for CDAI at 6 months, which is used to determine the CDAI-LDA, for these three SNPs are shown.

Table 4 Associations between the six SNPs and response outcomes at 6 months
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Dot plot of CDAI at 6 months for genotypes of rs4845625, rs11265618, and rs4329505. The line at each genotype represents the median. The consideration of CDAI-LDA at 6 months was considered when the CDAI score was equal or under 10. Abbreviations: CDAI: Clinical Disease Activity Index; LDA: Low Disease Activity

Full size image

Patients carrying the CC genotype for rs4845625 had worse response rates to sarilumab as measured by CDAI and DAS28 LDA rates (45.5% and 52.4% vs. 76.7% and 80% in the CT + TT genotypes, respectively; p = 0.021 and p = 0.037). CC carriers showed less improvement in DAS28 (2.34 vs. 2.8, p = 0.27) and CDAI (10.7 vs. 16.7, p = 0.066), although these differences were not statistically significant. These findings are consistent with a recessive genetic model.

For rs4329505 and rs11265618, the genetic model that best fit the data was the dominant model, as patients homozygous for the wild-type allele (TT for rs4329505 and CC for rs11265618) showed better remission rates than the other patients; specifically, remission rates (CDAI-LDA) were 73.5% vs. 44.4% (p = 0.039) and the quantitative improvement in DAS28 was 2.9 vs. 2.0 (p = 0.048). No significant differences were found for DAS28 LDA, CDAI improvement, and/or EULAR response rates.

No statistically significant associations were observed for the remaining three SNPs (rs12083537, rs2228145, rs4537545).

Genetic determinants and adverse effects

On the univariate analysis, all SNPs (except for rs12083537) were significantly associated with dyslipidemia and/or hepatotoxicity (Table 5). None of the SNPs showed a statistically significant association with any of the other AEs observed during the study period.

Table 5 Associations between the SNPs and hepatotoxicity and dyslipidemia
Full size table

Compared to AC + CC carriers, patients carrying the AA genotype for rs2228145 had a higher incidence of dyslipidemia (50% vs. 17.5%, p = 0.008). Similarly, for rs4537545, the incidence of dyslipidemia was greater in CC carriers than for CT + TT genotypes (50% vs. 19%, p = 0.014).

Both rs4329505 and rs11265618 were significantly associated with hepatotoxicity. More specifically, TT carriers for rs4329505 and CC carriers for rs11265618 had higher rates of hepatotoxicity compared to the other genotypes (14.3% vs. 0%, p = 0.026).

Patients with the TT genotype for rs4845625 had a significantly higher incidence of hepatotoxicity compared to carriers of the C allele (CT + CC) (33.3% vs. 5.7%, p = 0.03). We also observed a trend towards an association between rs4845625 and dyslipidemia, as evidenced by the higher incidence of dyslipidemia for patients carrying the T allele (TT + CT); however, this association was not statistically significant.

Discussion

This study was conducted to investigate possible associations between six different SNPs in the IL6R gene and treatment response outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with sarilumab over a 6-month period. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the pharmacogenetics of sarilumab. Significant associations were identified between three SNPs (rs4845625, rs4329505, rs11265618) and certain response outcomes (DAS28 improvement, DAS28-LDA, CDAI-LDA). Similarly, five of the six SNPs (rs2228145, rs4329505, rs11265618, rs4537545, rs4845625) were significantly associated with adverse events (hepatotoxicity and dyslipidemia).

Our findings with regard to the rs4845625 SNP are particularly noteworthy given how consistent these results were. This SNP was positively associated with LDA rates for both DAS28 and CDAI. Interestingly, there were clinically-relevant differences between the groups, with a 20–30% gap between them in terms of achieving the treatment aims (remission or LDA) (Table 4). The rs4845625 SNP is located in Chr1 (q21.3) g.154422067, in intron 7 of the IL6R gene. In silico tools such as ESE Finder predict that this SNP may alter the splicing process, thus leading to changes in the amount or functionality of the resulting protein. These changes may result in differences in treatment responses, as previous studies have indicated that RA patients with higher concentrations of soluble IL-6R tend to show poorer responses to TCZ [35]. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that other SNPs (such as rs2228145) in IL6R can influence the balance between membrane-bound IL-6R and soluble IL-6R [36].

Previous studies have shown several associations between rs4845625 and inflammatory pathways, including differences in plasma IL-6 levels [37] and basal levels of inflammatory markers in healthy cohorts [33]. Our research group was the first to report the association between rs4845625 and differences in response outcomes in patients with RA treated with tocilizumab, another IL-6 receptor antagonist [20]. In that study, patients with the CC genotype had a lower response to TCZ (as measured by DAS28-LDA) than patients with the CT + TT genotypes (58.3% vs. 82.4%, respectively). Those findings are consistent with the results of the present study with sarilumab. Moreover, the results of the present study provide further support for our earlier results with TCZ, as we have now identified the same association with another IL-6R antagonist (sarilumab), suggesting that genetic variations in IL6R can modulate treatment response. Additionally, in the present study we utilized more reliable and consistent response outcome measures, including the addition of CDAI, which is not influenced by the effect of IL-6 inhibitors on C-reactive protein [38].

Both the rs4329505 and rs11265618 SNPs exhibited similar results due to linked inheritance, which makes it challenging to identify the specific genetic changes that truly modulate treatment response. Apart from a substantial 30% variation in treatment response (CDAI-LDA), these SNPs were the only ones to demonstrate significant differences in terms of the quantitative reduction in DAS28. Enevold et al. [23] evaluated treatment response outcomes (number of swollen joints) to TCZ in patients with RA, finding similar differences for rs4329505. In that study, allele C carriers (CC + CT) also had a lower response to treatment. In our previous study with TCZ [20], we also found a trend toward better response rates (measured by DAS28 and EULAR) in patients with the TT genotype, although these differences were not statistically significant. By contrast, rs4329505 has been investigated in two retrospective studies by Maldonado-Montoro et al. [22] and Luxembourger et al. [24], without finding significant associations with response rates.

In our previous study with TCZ, we found no significant association between rs11265618 and response outcomes. By contrast, in the present study with sarilumab, we did observe a significant association, a finding that is in line with the study by Maldonado-Montoro et al. [21], who described an association with the CC genotype for rs11265618, indicating a better response in terms of LDA after 12 months of TCZ therapy. Previous studies of IL-6 inhibitors have not found consistent results for either rs4329505 or rs11265618 [21, 24]. Although our findings provide support for a coherent trend with regards to the value of those SNPs as potential biomarkers, further confirmation is warranted before they can be considered reliable biomarkers for IL-6 inhibitor therapy.

Most of the AEs reported in the present series were mild or moderate, with no severe AEs detected during follow-up (mean, 18 months). The most commonly reported AEs were hematological, but they rarely required discontinuation of sarilumab (8.1%). Additionally, we found no associations between these AEs and any genetic determinants.

Although we found a positive association between several AEs with at least one SNP, in most cases the AEs were not clinically relevant and thus did not require a therapeutic change. With regards to hepatotoxicity, given that these cases were only of mild to moderate severity and also relatively rare (9.7%), we believe that the observed associations were only incidental findings. For dyslipidemia, we found significant associations for rs2228145, with higher rates in AA carriers, and for rs4537545, with higher rates in CC carriers. Although the clinical significance of these associations may be low, as dyslipidemia secondary to TCZ treatment has not been linked to an increased risk of cardiovascular events [39,40,41,42,43], the interplay between lipid profiles and inflammatory pathways, such as IL-6, has been extensively described [42, 44,45,46]. Therefore, it is plausible that alterations in the IL6R pathway may influence the development of dyslipidemia. In our previous study with TCZ, we observed that patients carrying the CT + TT genotype had a better response to treatment but a higher incidence of dyslipidemia. In the present study with sarilumab, we have found similar results in terms of treatment efficacy. Although we found no significant association between genotype and dyslipidemia, we did observe a trend towards a higher incidence of dyslipidemia for TT + CT genotypes than for CC genotypes (33.3% vs. 16%, p = 0.056), a finding that is consistent with the results of our previous study.

This study has several limitations that should be considered when interpreting the results. First, the retrospective design and the relatively small sample size may have limited our ability to identify a significant association between some SNPs and response outcomes, particularly in those SNPs (rs11265618 and rs4329505) with a low frequency of the mutated allele. Nonetheless, the homogeneity of this cohort and the fact that our results were comparable to those described in our previous study with TCZ, strengthen the validity of our findings. Second, we only evaluated the six most promising IL6R SNPs; other genetic variants not included in the present study could also be predictor of response to sarilumab. Another strength is that this is the first pharmacogenetic study of sarilumab. Moreover, since sarilumab is tipically used in current clinical practice after failure of at least one other bDMARD, this is the first study to provide data on this unique cohort.

The pharmacogenomics of RA is highly complex and further research is needed to obtain more robust, clinically-relevant evidence to determine the association between genetic markers and treatment response in patients with RA. However, based on our findings, we believe that rs4845625 may be a useful biomarker to help predict treatment response. However, more comprehensive research is needed before it can be considered for use in routine clinical practice.

Conclusions

The results of this study suggest that several IL6R polymorphisms—rs4845625, rs4329505 and rs11265618—may be associated with treatment response as measured by CDAI and DAS28 LDA rates and absolute improvement in DAS28 after six months of sarilumab in patients with RA. In addition, we have also shown that five SNPs (rs2228145, rs4329505, rs11265618, rs4537545, rs4845625) are associated with the development of certain adverse events—particularly hepatotoxicity and dyslipidemia—during the follow-up, even though they showed limited clinical significance. To our knowledge, these associations have not been previously reported.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to containing clinical information which could constitute potential patient identifiers, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ACPA:

Anti-citrullinated protein antibody

AE:

Adverse effects

CDAI:

Clinical disease activity index

CRP:

C-reactive protein

DAS28:

Disease activity score 28

bDMARD:

Biologic Disease-Modifying anti-rheumatic drugs

DMARD:

Disease-Modifying anti-rheumatic drugs

EULAR:

European league against rheumatism

IL-6R:

IL-6 receptors

LDA:

Low disease activity

MAF:

Minor allele frequency

RA:

Rheumatoid arthritis

RF:

Rheumatoid factor

SD:

Standard deviation

SNP:

Single nucleotide polymorphism

TCZ:

Tocilizumab

References

  1. Cross M, Smith E, Hoy D, Carmona L, Wolfe F, Vos T, et al. The global burden of rheumatoid arthritis: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(7):1316–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McInnes IB, Schett G. The pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(23):2205–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Smolen JS, Aletaha D, McInnes IB. Rheumatoid arthritis. The Lancet. 2016;388(10055):2023–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Smolen JS, Landewé RBM, Bergstra SA, Kerschbaumer A, Sepriano A, Aletaha D, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2022 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023;82(1):3–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wei K, Jiang P, Zhao J, Jin Y, Zhang R, Chang C, et al. Biomarkers to predict DMARDs efficacy and adverse effect in rheumatoid arthritis. Front Immunol. 2022;28:13.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jin Y, Desai RJ, Liu J, Choi NK, Kim SC. Factors associated with initial or subsequent choice of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2017;19(1):159.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Narváez J, Magallares B, DíazTorné C, Hernández MV, Reina D, Corominas H, et al. Predictive factors for induction of remission in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis treated with tocilizumab in clinical practice. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016;45(4):386–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pers YM, mentine Fortunet C, Constant E, Lambert J, Godfrin-Valnet M, De Jong A, et al. Predictors of response and remission in a large cohort of rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with tocilizumab in clinical practice. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/rheumatology/article/53/1/76/1781300.

  9. Cao M, Guo M, Wu DQ, Meng L. Pharmacogenomics of methotrexate: current status and future outlook. Curr Drug Metab. 2018;19(14):1182–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Salazar J, Moya P, Altés A, Díaz-Torné C, Casademont J, Cerdà-Gabaroi D, et al. Polymorphisms in genes involved in the mechanism of action of methotrexate: are they associated with outcome in rheumatoid arthritis patients? Pharmacogenomics. 2014;15(8):1079–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Moya P, Salazar J, Arranz MJ, Díaz-Torné C, del Río E, Casademont J, et al. Methotrexate pharmacokinetic genetic variants are associated with outcome in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Pharmacogenomics. 2016;17(1):25–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jekic B, Maksimovic N, Damnjanovic T. Methotrexate pharmacogenetics in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Pharmacogenomics. 2019;20(17):1235–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Márquez A, Ferreiro-Iglesias A, Dávila-Fajardo CL, Montes A, Pascual-Salcedo D, Perez-Pampin E, et al. Lack of validation of genetic variants associated with anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy response in rheumatoid arthritis: a genome-wide association study replication and meta-analysis. 2014. Available from: http://arthritis-research.com/content/16/2/R66.

  14. Sode J, Vogel U, Bank S, Andersen PS, Lund Hetland M, Locht H, et al. Genetic Variations in Pattern Recognition Receptor Loci Are Associated with Anti-TNF Response in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. 2015; Available from: www.lgcgenomics.com.

  15. Bek S, Bojesen AB, Nielsen J v, Sode J, Bank S, Vogel U, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis: pharmacogenetics of anti-TNF treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis. Nature Publishing Group. 2017;17. Available from: http://permed2020.eu/.

  16. Wysocki T, Paradowska-Gorycka A. Pharmacogenomics of Anti-TNF Treatment Response Marks a New Era of Tailored Rheumatoid Arthritis Therapy. 2022; Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23042366.

  17. Montes A, Perez-Pampin E, Joven B, Carreira P, Fernández-Nebro A, del Carmen OM, et al. FCGR polymorphisms in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with Fc-containing TNF inhibitors. Pharmacogenomics. 2015;16(4):333–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen W, Xu H, Wang X, Gu J, Xiong H, Shi Y. The tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 1B polymorphisms predict response to anti-TNF therapy in patients with autoimmune disease: a meta-analysis. Int Immunopharmacol. 2015;28(1):146–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Canet LM, Filipescu I, Cáliz R, Lupiañez CB, Canhão H, Escudero A, et al. Genetic variants within the TNFRSF1B gene and susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis and response to anti-TNF drugs: a multicenter study. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2015;25(7):323–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sainz L, Riera P, Moya P, Bernal S, Casademont J, Díaz-Torné C, et al. Role of IL6R genetic variants in predicting response to tocilizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14(9):1942.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Maldonado-Montoro M, Cañadas-Garre M, González-Utrilla A, Ángel C-H. Influence of IL6R gene polymorphisms in the effectiveness to treatment with tocilizumab in rheumatoid arthritis. Pharmacogenomics J. 2018;18(1):167–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Maldonado-Montoro M, Cañadas-Garre M, González-Utrilla A, Plaza-Plaza JC, Calleja-Hernández M. Genetic and clinical biomarkers of tocilizumab response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Pharmacol Res. 2016;111:264–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Enevold C, Baslund B, Linde L, Josephsen NL, Tarp U, Lindegaard H, et al. Interleukin-6-receptor polymorphisms rs12083537, rs2228145, and rs4329505 as predictors of response to tocilizumab in rheumatoid arthritis. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2014;24(8):401–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Luxembourger C, Ruyssen-Witrand A, Ladhari C, Rittore C, Degboe Y, Maillefert JF, et al. A single nucleotide polymorphism of IL6-receptor is associated with response to tocilizumab in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Pharmacogenomics J. 2019;19(4):368–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang J, Bansal AT, Martin M, Germer S, Benayed R, Essioux L, et al. Genome-wide association analysis implicates the involvement of eight loci with response to tocilizumab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Pharmacogenomics J. 2013;13(3):235–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sainz L, Riera P, Moya P, Bernal S, Casademont J, Díaz-Torné C, et al. Clinical value of IL6R gene variants as predictive biomarkers for toxicity to tocilizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Pers Med. 2022;13(1):61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Huizinga TWJ, Fleischmann RM, Jasson M, Radin AR, van Adelsberg J, Fiore S, et al. Sarilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against IL-6Rα in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: efficacy and safety results from the randomised SARIL-RA-MOBILITY Part A trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(9):1626–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Genovese MC, Fleischmann R, Kivitz AJ, Rell-Bakalarska M, Martincova R, Fiore S, et al. Sarilumab plus methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate: results of a phase III study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67(6):1424–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, Funovits J, Felson DT, Bingham CO, et al. 2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(9):2569–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. van Gestel AM, Anderson JJ, van Riel PL, Boers M, Haagsma CJ, Rich B, et al. ACR and EULAR improvement criteria have comparable validity in rheumatoid arthritis trials. American college of rheumatology European league of associations for rheumatology. J Rheumatol. 1999;26(3):705–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Aletaha D, Ward MM, Machold KP, Nell VPK, Stamm T, Smolen JS. Remission and active disease in rheumatoid arthritis defining criteria for disease activity states. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(9):2625–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0. 2017. https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocoldevelopment/electronic_applications/docs/ctcae_v5_quick_reference_5x7.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2022.

  33. Arguinano AA, Naderi E, Ndiaye NC, Stathopoulou M, Dadé S, Alizadeh B, et al. IL6R haplotype rs4845625*T/rs4537545*C is a risk factor for simultaneously high CRP. LDL and ApoB levels Genes Immun. 2017;18(3):163–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. L. Phan, Y. Jin, H. Zhang, W. Qiang, E. Shekhtman, D. Shao, D. Revoe, R. Villamarin, E. Ivanchenko, M. Kimura, Z. Y. Wang, L. Hao, N. Sharopova, M. Bihan, A. Sturcke, M. Lee, N. Popova, W. Wu, C. Bastiani, M. Ward, J. B. Holmes, V. Lyoshin, K. Kaur, E. Moyer, M. Feolo, and B. L. Kattman. “ALFA: Allele Frequency Aggregator.” National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine. 2020. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp/docs/gsr/alfa/.

  35. Diaz-Torne C, Ortiz MDA, Moya P, Hernandez MV, Reina D, Castellvi I, et al. The combination of IL-6 and its soluble receptor is associated with the response of rheumatoid arthritis patients to tocilizumab. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018;47(6):757–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ferreira RC, Freitag DF, Cutler AJ, Howson JMM, Rainbow DB, Smyth DJ, et al. Functional IL6R 358Ala allele impairs classical IL-6 receptor signaling and influences risk of diverse inflammatory diseases. PLoS Genet. 2013;9(4):e1003444.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Shah T, Zabaneh D, Gaunt T, Swerdlow DI, Shah S, Talmud PJ, et al. Gene-centric analysis identifies variants associated with interleukin-6 levels and shared pathways with other inflammation markers. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2013;6(2):163–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Smolen JS, Aletaha D. Interleukin-6 receptor inhibition with tocilizumab and attainment of disease remission in rheumatoid arthritis: the role of acute-phase reactants. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63(1):43–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hoffman E, Rahat MA, Feld J, Elias M, Rosner I, Kaly L, et al. Effects of Tocilizumab, an Anti-Interleukin-6 Receptor Antibody, on Serum Lipid and Adipokine Levels in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article. 2019; Available from: www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms. Cited 13 Oct 2022.

  40. Lukas C, Redondin M, Pane I, Soubrier M, Houvenagel E, Sibilia J, et al. Cardiovascular events and change in cholesterol levels in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tocilizumab: data from the REGATE Registry. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2021;39(3):501–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Castagné B, Viprey M, Martin J, Schott AM, Cucherat M, Soubrier M. Cardiovascular safety of tocilizumab: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(8):e0220178.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Alsulaim T, Alhassan N, Khalil H, Almutlaq A. Tocilizumab effect on lipid profile in correlation to cardiovascular events: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Rheumatol. 2021;12(2021):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Giles JT, Sattar N, Gabriel S, Ridker PM, Gay S, Warne C, et al. Cardiovascular safety of tocilizumab versus etanercept in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020;72(1):31–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Behl T, Kaur I, Sehgal A, Zengin G, Brisc C, Brisc MC, et al. The lipid paradox as a metabolic checkpoint and its therapeutic significance in ameliorating the associated cardiovascular risks in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(24):9505.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Hashizume M, Mihara M. IL-6 and lipid metabolism. Inflamm Regen. 2011;31(3):325–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Hashizume M, Yoshida H, Koike N, Suzuki M, Mihara M. Overproduced interleukin 6 decreases blood lipid levels via upregulation of very-low-density lipoprotein receptor. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(4):741–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Bradley Londres for professional English language editing.

Funding

This research was supported in part by a 2020–2021 grant by “Societat Catalana de Reumatologia”. This work was supported by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (JR20/00008 for Pau Riera).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Luis Sainz and Pau Riera contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Rheumatology Department, Hospital de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain

    Luis Sainz, Patricia Moya, Cesar Díaz-Torné, Ana Milena Millán, Hye Sang Park & Hector Corominas

  2. Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain

    Luis Sainz, Jordi Casademont, Cesar Díaz-Torné & Hector Corominas

  3. Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau (IIB SANT PAU), Barcelona, Spain

    Luis Sainz, Pau Riera, Patricia Moya, Sara Bernal, Jordi Casademont, Cesar Díaz-Torné, Adriana Lasa & Hector Corominas

  4. Pharmacy Department, Hospital de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain

    Pau Riera

  5. Biomedical Network Research Centre On Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain

    Pau Riera, Sara Bernal & Adriana Lasa

  6. Genetics Department, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques Sant Pau - Hospital de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain

    Sara Bernal & Adriana Lasa

  7. Internal Medicine Department, Hospital de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain

    Jordi Casademont

Authors
  1. Luis Sainz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pau Riera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Patricia Moya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sara Bernal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jordi Casademont
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Cesar Díaz-Torné
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ana Milena Millán
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Hye Sang Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Adriana Lasa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Hector Corominas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, L.S., P.R.,P.M., S.B. C.D-T., A.L., H.C.; methodology, L.S., P.R., P.M., S.B., I.G., H.S-P., A.L., H.C; software, I.G.; validation, P.R., P.M., S.B., A.L., L.G-Q., J.C., H.C.; formal analysis, I.G.; investigation, L.S., P.R., M.C.; resources, S.B., A.L.; writ-ing—original draft preparation, L.S., P.R.; writing—review and editing, P.M., S.B., J.C., D.L., H.C., I.C., C.D-T., A.L., B.M., AM.M., H.S-P., A.L., H.C.; visualization, L.S., P.R.; supervision, P.M., S.B., A.L., H.C., J. C.; project administration, L.S., P.R.; funding acqui-sition, L.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Pau Riera or Hector Corominas.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of “Hospital de la Santa Creu I Sant Pau” (IIBSP-IIL-2020–148; 1 March 2021). Informed consent was obtained from all patients involved in the study.

Consent for publication.

Not applicable.

Competing interests

HC has received grants for research and attendance at conferences from Grünenthal, MSD, BIogen, Galapagos, Roche, BMS and honorarium for advisory boards from Galapagos, Gebro, Abbvie, Sanofi, UCB.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sainz, L., Riera, P., Moya, P. et al. Impact of IL6R genetic variants on treatment efficacy and toxicity response to sarilumab in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 25, 226 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-023-03209-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-023-03209-1

Keywords

Arthritis Research & Therapy

ISSN: 1478-6362

Contact us