Open Access

Rheumatoid arthritis as a hyper-endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation disease

  • Satoshi Yamasaki1,
  • Naoko Yagishita1,
  • Kaneyuki Tsuchimochi1,
  • Kusuki Nishioka2 and
  • Toshihiro Nakajima1Email author
Arthritis Research & Therapy20057:181

https://doi.org/10.1186/ar1808

Published: 17 August 2005

Abstract

We introduce Synoviolin as a novel pathogenic factor in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Experimental studies indicate that this endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-resident E3 ubiquitin ligase has important functions in the ER-associated degradation (ERAD) system, an essential system for ER homeostasis. Overexpression of Synoviolin in mice causes arthropathy with synovial hyperplasia, whereas heterozygous knockdown results in increased apoptosis of synovial cells and resistance to collagen-induced arthritis in mice. On the basis of these experimental data, we propose that excess elimination of unfolded proteins (that is, 'hyper-ERAD') by overexpression of Synoviolin triggers synovial cell overgrowth and hence a worsening of RA. Further analysis of the hyper-ERAD system may permit the complex pathomechanisms of RA to be uncovered.

Introduction

There is a general agreement that synovial cells have a crucial function in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by forming a mass of synovial tissue, which promotes the production of matrix-degrading proteases and osteoclast activation that lead to joint destruction [16]. In a series of experiments that focused on synovial cells, we determined that human T cell leukemia virus type I (HTLV-I) causes arthropathy [7], and that tax, the viral transforming gene of HTLV-1, and its product, pp40Tax, could transform synovial cells of patients as well as those of tax-overexpressing mice [810]. These results suggest that synoviocytes can acquire the ability to overgrow autonomously in RA.

Here we discuss the role of a novel pathogenic factor for RA named 'Synoviolin' (GenBank accession no. AB024690) [11]. This novel molecule is an endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-resident ubiquitin ligase and is involved in the ER-associated degradation (ERAD) system [1217]. ERAD is an important processing system for ER homeostasis, and its disruption is known to result in cellular apoptosis [18]. Surprisingly, both the amount and enzymatic activity of Synoviolin regulate synovial cell proliferation and apoptosis, at least in mice [11].

Cloning of Synoviolin

We identified Synoviolin from a human cDNA library of rheumatoid synovial cells (RSC) by immunoscreening with anti-RSC antibodies to isolate a molecule promoting the autonomous proliferation and activation of synovial cells in RA [11]. Structurally, Synoviolin has a putative six-transmembrane domain and a RING-H2 motif (Fig. 1). As reported previously, proteins with a RING finger domain act as E3 ubiquitin ligases [19], Synoviolin also exhibits a clear auto-ubiquitination activity [11]. By using immunostaining, we also determined that Synoviolin is located in the ER of synovial cells. We therefore concluded that Synoviolin is an ER-resident E3 ubiquitin ligase [11].
Figure 1

Synoviolin is a RING type E3 ubiquitin ligase. Top, schematic diagram of the primary structure of Synoviolin. a.a., amino acid residues; PR, proline-rich domain; RING, RING finger domain; TM, transmembrane domain. Bottom, consensus sequence of the RING finger domain. Mutations in consensus cysteine or histidine abolish the enzymatic activity of Synoviolin.

Previous studies in yeast and human cells concluded that ER-resident E3 ubiquitin ligases are important for ER homeo-stasis [20]. Because it is estimated that 30 to 40% of the newly synthesized proteins fail to fold properly in the ER [21], these unfolded proteins eventually induce severe damage of the ER (so-called ER stress) or even apoptosis of the cell (ER stress-induced apoptosis) unless two biological processes, unfolded protein response (UPR) and ERAD, work properly [20, 22, 23]. In brief, UPR contains two systems involved in the attenuation of global translation to stop the influx of proteins into the ER and increasing the transcription of chaperones to refold the unfolded proteins in the ER again. In contrast, the ERAD system eliminates unfolded proteins that accumulate in the ER through the ubiquitin–proteasome system (Fig. 2) [18, 20].
Figure 2

Schematic representation of the proposed biological functions of Synoviolin. Synoviolin has important functions in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-associated degradation (ERAD) system. Synoviolin maintains ER function by eliminating unfolded proteins. ATF6, activating transcription factor 6; IRE1, inositol-requiring enzyme 1; PERK, PKR-like ER kinase; Ub, ubiquitin; UPR, unfolded protein response.

Synoviolin transgenic mice and arthropathy

To study the role of Synoviolin in RA, we reported previously the establishment of Synoviolin-overexpressing and Synoviolin knockout mice [11]. Analyses of these mice demonstrated both the induction of arthritis by overexpression and the inhibition of arthritis by knockout of a single gene, that encoding Synoviolin.

First, we established human Synoviolin-overexpressing mice by using a β-actin promoter to drive systemic expression of the gene, because a northern blot analysis demonstrated that the tissue distribution of Synoviolin in the mouse is ubiquitous. Surprisingly, 10 of 33 Synoviolin-overexpressing mice developed spontaneous arthropathy after 20 weeks of age [11], and a histological analysis of joints of these mice demonstrated synovial cell hyperplasia and bone destruction, which resembled typical pathological features of RA joints. It should be noted that no other abnormalities are apparent in these mice throughout their life.

Next, we attempted to verify the hypothesis that Synoviolin is important for the development of arthritis using Synoviolin-knockout mice; that is, a 'loss-of-function' study. Collagen injection can induce arthritis in experimental mice, a model known as collagen-induced arthritis (CIA). Because Synoviolin homozygous knockout (syno-/-) mice die in utero [24], the 'loss-of-function' experiments were conducted in Synoviolin heterozygous knockout (syno+/-) mice. The incidence of arthritis in syno+/- mice (7%) was significantly lower than that in wild-type counterparts (syno+/+) (65%). Examination of the joints by soft X-ray revealed that bone destruction in syno+/- mice was much milder than that in syno+/+ mice. Immunological responses, including the production of type II collagen antibody, inflammatory cell infiltration, and elevation of inflammatory cytokine levels, were not impaired in syno+/- mice. Histological analysis of synovial tissues showed marked differences between syno+/+ and syno+/- mice. No advanced synovial cell hyperplasia was detected in CIA-syno+/- mice, even though inflammatory cell infiltration was clearly observed in them. Detailed analysis of synovial tissues showed that the number of proliferating-cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)-positive cells in CIA-syno+/- mice was not different from that in syno+/+ mice, but TdT-mediated dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL) analysis demonstrated a significant increment of apoptotic cells in CIA-syno+/- mice. Consistent with these results, synoviolin homozygous knockout was associated with aberrantly increased apoptosis of liver and severe impairment of erythrogenesis, and embryonic death [24]. These data suggested the importance of Synoviolin in inhibiting apoptosis.

Synoviolin in human synovial cells

Because Synoviolin-overexpressing mice show synovial cell hyperplasia, and syno+/- mice are resistant to CIA because of increased apoptosis of synovial cells, we expected that Synoviolin has both cell-proliferating and anti-apoptotic effects. In a small-scale study we showed that suppression of Synoviolin by small interfering RNA (siRNA) inhibited the growth of RSC, even under mitogenic stimulation by tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interleukin-1β [11]. These results suggested the possible role of Synoviolin in cell proliferation. We also examined the effect of tunicamycin (a glycosylation inhibitor that inhibits proper protein folding in ER) on RSC treated with siRNA to test whether the downregulation of Synoviolin increases their susceptibility to apoptosis caused by disruption of ER function. TUNEL staining of RSC revealed enhanced susceptibility to tunicamycin-induced apoptosis, similar to Synoviolin knock-down [11], implicating the anti-apoptotic effect of Synoviolin in ER stress. Further, larger, studies are needed to confirm the relevance of Synoviolin to human RA. It is also important to explain the molecular basis of these Synoviolin-induced cellular regulatory processes to determine the underlying pathomechanism of synovial cell overgrowth in RA.

Results of a preliminary study from our laboratories suggest that RSC are basically refractory to ER stress-induced apoptosis: the concentration of tunicamycin necessary to induce apoptosis of RSC was about tenfold that required by other human cell lines such as HEK-293 or HeLa cells. In addition, among synovial cells, RA synovial cells (n = 5) were more refractory to ER stress-induced apoptosis than OA synovial cells (n = 5) (Yamasaki S, Yagishita N, Tsuchimochi K, Kato Y, Sasaki T, Amano T, Beppu M, Nakamura H, Nishioka K, Nakajima T, unpublished data). These results suggest that RA synovial cells are refractory to ER stress-induced apoptosis. Accordingly, our working hypothesis in human RA is that Synoviolin promotes synovial cell proliferation and inhibits ER stress-induced apoptosis, leading to RA progression.

Hyper-ERAD in RA

It is generally accepted that ER-resident E3 ubiquitin ligases including Synoviolin are inherently crucial in the ERAD system, a process indispensable for elimination of unfolded proteins in the ER [1117]. Furthermore, other studies showed that disruption of the ERAD system (a hypo-ERAD system) causes cell apoptosis and can induce various human diseases such as neurodegenerative diseases [2527]. What are the consequences of an aberrantly upregulated ERAD (that is, a hyper-ERAD system), induced by Synoviolin overexpression in synovial cells, on the pathological process of RA?

First, a hyper-ERAD state could promote the excess secretion of cytokines and proteases. That is, acceleration of the ERAD system could more efficiently eliminate its client protein in ER (Fig. 3), which could result in the indirect suppression of UPR activation, because unfolded proteins that trigger UPR do not exist any more in such cells, as reported previously in detail [28, 29]. The concept of a hyper-ERAD system in RA synovial cells is conceivable because such cells have to keep producing large amounts of proteins for the progression of joint destruction. In other words, RA synovial cells require an extremely efficient ERAD system to maintain ER functions for disease progression. In addition, because UPR includes cell cycle arrest in addition to global attenuation of translation [30], UPR suppression indirectly induced by hyper-ERAD might ultimately promote synovial cell proliferation (Fig. 3). Taking these results together, a hyper-ERAD status could provide favorable cellular conditions for synovial cell overgrowth by escaping negative regulation by UPR.
Figure 3

The concept of hyper-endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-associated degradation (hyper-ERAD). In cells with functional disturbance of the ERAD system (hypo-ERAD), unfolded proteins accumulate in the ER (left). Conversely, in the hyper-ERAD status, unfolded proteins are promptly eliminated from cells, thus enhancing the ability of the ER to synthesize new proteins (right).

Second, a hyper-ERAD status could keep synovial cell functioning even in the hostile milieu of inflamed RA synovia [31]. Elevated temperature, starvation, and hypoxia increase the amount of unfolded proteins in organelles [3235], which has occasionally been observed in the RA joint. In fact, the existence of ER stress in arthritic joints has been demonstrated by the activation of activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6), an ER-resident transcriptional factor, in the nuclei of synoviocytes, because ATF6 is cleaved from ER membrane after the induction of ER stress and is translocated into the nucleus [11, 36]. It is therefore possible that hyper-ERAD could keep the ER of synovial cells functioning in inflamed joints by overcoming the environmental challenges that cause ER stress.

Third, a hyper-ERAD system could work as an anti-apoptosis system in RA synovial cells. Our previous experimental studies conducted in mice with CIA demonstrated that the downregulation of the synoviolin gene promoted the apoptosis of synovial cells in the arthritic joints [11]. Studies by other researchers also confirmed that several E3 ubiquitin ligases (such as Parkin) exhibit a protective function against ER stress-induced apoptosis in neuronal cells [26]. It is possible that Synoviolin also acts as an anti-apoptotic factor, and thus hyper-ERAD could prevent ER stress-induced apoptosis. Support for this conclusion is also provided by Synoviolin knockout; mouse embryonic fibroblasts lacking Synoviolin showed increased susceptibility to ER stress-induced apoptosis as observed in Synoviolin-ablated synovial cells [11, 24].

In all, there seems to be sufficient experimental evidence for the following consequences of a hyper-ERAD status: first, enhanced protein production and cell overgrowth; second, maintenance of ER function of synovial cells despite ER stress in the milieu of inflamed joints; and third, prevention of apoptosis induced by ER stress. Consequently, these processes could worsen the pathological process of RA.

Conclusion

The immunological aspects of RA have been studied extensively over the past several years. However, understanding these processes and their implementation in the design of new therapies for RA have not been completely successful [3740]. Here we propose a novel hypothesis for RA pathogenesis: 'hyper-ERAD', which may alter the characteristics of synovial cells in RA. Because Synoviolin knock-down does not affect the immunological pathway [11], this novel concept might explain the underlying pathogenic processes in RA, especially in patients with RA refractory to anti-TNF-α therapies. It is therefore important to investigate the expression of Synoviolin or the status of the ERAD system especially in these patients.

Two questions have to be answered before the design of any new therapies that target Synoviolin and the suppression of the hyper-ERAD. First, what are the mechanism(s) that activate Synoviolin? Second, by what mechanism(s) does Synoviolin regulate cell proliferation and apoptosis? Because the amount of Synoviolin is critical for arthritis [11], a detailed analysis of Synoviolin production and/or activation is also important for its quantity control (Fig. 4). With this in mind, we recently identified the transcriptional regulation of synoviolin, which could help in identifying the regulatory pathway that leads to the activation of synoviolin in RA synovial cells [41]. Furthermore, these studies could allow the development of decoy nucleic acid-based or siRNA-based therapies (Fig. 4a,b). Thus, in the next step, we need to define the molecular mechanism(s) that activate Synoviolin in RA synoviocytes. The current thinking is that the enzymatic activity of Synoviolin could be regulated by auto-ubiquitination or other forms of post-translational modification, such as phosphorylation (Fig. 4c). In such processes, cofactors required for Synoviolin activation (Fig. 4d) or interaction with substrates could be crucial for the biological effects of Synoviolin (Fig. 4e). A search for Synoviolin substrates is also indispensable for the discovery of any as yet unknown crosstalk between signaling pathways involved in the regulation of the cell cycle and/or apoptosis and Synoviolin, which could help to uncover the complex pathogenic mechanism of RA.
Figure 4

Possible therapeutic approaches against Synoviolin. Five approaches for Synoviolin regulation are described. (a,b) Regulation of the amount of Synoviolin by decoy oligonucleotides (a), anti-sense or RNA-mediated interference (b). (c) Inhibition of the signal(s) that activate Synoviolin enzyme activity. (d) Inhibition of the interaction between Synoviolin and its cofactors. (e) Inhibition of the interaction between Synoviolin and its substrates. siRNA, small interfering RNA.

In this review we have presented a new concept of the hyper-ERAD system in the pathogenic process of RA. Although this concept was formulated through several years of research involving laboratory animals and a limited number of patients with RA, the relevance to human disease remains somewhat speculative at present. More time and efforts are needed to understand the role of the ERAD system in human RA and to define other as yet unknown aspects of RA before the design of any ERAD-based therapy for the disease.

Abbreviations

CIA: 

collagen-induced arthritis

ER: 

endoplasmic reticulum

ERAD: 

endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation

RA: 

rheumatoid arthritis

RSC: 

rheumatoid synovial cells

siRNA: 

small interfering RNA

TNF: 

tumor necrosis factor

TUNEL: 

TdT-mediated dUTP nick end labelling

UPR: 

unfolded protein response.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Genome Science, Institute of Medical Science, St Marianna University School of Medicine
(2)
Rheumatology, Immunology and Genetics Program, Institute of Medical Science, St Marianna University School of Medicine

References

  1. Tak PP, Bresnihan B: The pathogenesis and prevention of joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis: advances from synovial biopsy and tissue analysis. Arthritis Rheum. 2000, 43: 2619-2633. 10.1002/1529-0131(200012)43:12<2619::AID-ANR1>3.0.CO;2-V.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Hofbauer LC, Heufelder AE: The role of osteoprotegerin and receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand in the pathogenesis and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2001, 44: 253-259. 10.1002/1529-0131(200102)44:2<253::AID-ANR41>3.0.CO;2-S.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Rehman Q, Lane NE: Bone loss. Therapeutic approaches for preventing bone loss in inflammatory arthritis. Arthritis Res. 2001, 3: 221-227. 10.1186/ar305.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Kaneko M, Tomita T, Nakase T, Ohsawa Y, Seki H, Takeuchi E, Takano H, Shi K, Takahi K, Kominami E, et al: Expression of proteinases and inflammatory cytokines in subchondral bone regions in the destructive joint of rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology. 2001, 40: 247-255. 10.1093/rheumatology/40.3.247.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Pap T, Muller-Ladner U, Gay RE, Gay S: Fibroblast biology. Role of synovial fibroblasts in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res. 2000, 2: 361-367. 10.1186/ar113.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Szekanecz Z, Koch AE: Update on synovitis. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2001, 3: 53-63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kitajima I, Yamamoto K, Sato K, Nakajima Y, Nakajima T, Maruyama I, Osame M, Nishioka K: Detection of human T cell lymphotropic virus type I proviral DNA and its gene expression in synovial cells in chronic inflammatory arthropathy. J Clin Invest. 1991, 88: 1315-1322.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Iwakura Y, Tosu M, Yoshida E, Takiguchi M, Sato K, Kitajima I, Nishioka K, Yamamoto K, Takeda T, Hatanaka M, et al: Induction of inflammatory arthropathy resembling rheumatoid arthritis in mice transgenic for HTLV-I. Science. 1991, 253: 1026-1028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Nakajima T, Aono H, Hasunuma T, Yamamoto K, Maruyama I, Nosaka T, Hatanaka M, Nishioka K: Overgrowth of human synovial cells driven by the human T cell leukemia virus type I tax gene. J Clin Invest. 1993, 92: 186-193.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Aono H, Fujisawa K, Hasunuma T, Marriott SJ, Nishioka K: Extracellular human T cell leukemia virus type I tax protein stimulates the proliferation of human synovial cells. Arthritis Rheum. 1998, 41: 1995-2003. 10.1002/1529-0131(199811)41:11<1995::AID-ART15>3.0.CO;2-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Amano T, Yamasaki S, Yagishita N, Tsuchimochi K, Shin H, Kawahara K, Aratani S, Fujita H, Zhang L, Ikeda R, et al: Synoviolin/Hrd1, an E3 ubiquitin ligase, as a novel pathogenic factor for arthropathy. Genes Dev. 2003, 17: 2436-2449. 10.1101/gad.1096603.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bays NW, Gardner RG, Seelig LP, Joazeiro CA, Hampton RY: Hrd1p/Der3p is a membrane-anchored ubiquitin ligase required for ER-associated degradation. Nat Cell Biol. 2001, 3: 24-29. 10.1038/35050524.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hampton RY, Gardner RG, Rine J: Role of 26S proteasome and HRD genes in the degradation of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase, an integral endoplasmic reticulum membrane protein. Mol Biol Cell. 1996, 7: 2029-2044.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Bordallo J, Plemper RK, Finger A, Wolf DH: Der3p/Hrd1p is required for endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation of misfolded lumenal and integral membrane proteins. Mol Biol Cell. 1998, 9: 209-222.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kaneko M, Ishiguro M, Niinuma Y, Uesugi M, Nomura Y: Human HRD1 protects against ER stress-induced apoptosis through ER-associated degradation. FEBS Lett. 2002, 532: 147-152. 10.1016/S0014-5793(02)03660-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Nadav E, Shmueli A, Barr H, Gonen H, Ciechanover A, Reiss Y: A novel mammalian endoplasmic reticulum ubiquitin ligase homologous to the yeast Hrd1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003, 303: 91-97. 10.1016/S0006-291X(03)00279-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kikkert M, Doolman R, Dai M, Avner R, Hassink G, van Voorden S, Thanedar S, Roitelman J, Chau V, Wiertz E: Human HRD1 is an E3 ubiquitin ligase involved in degradation of proteins from the endoplasmic reticulum. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 3525-3534. 10.1074/jbc.M307453200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hampton RY: ER-associated degradation in protein quality control and cellular regulation. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2002, 14: 476-482. 10.1016/S0955-0674(02)00358-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Joazeiro CA, Weissman AM: RING finger proteins: mediators of ubiquitin ligase activity. Cell. 2000, 102: 549-552. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00077-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kaufman RJ: Orchestrating the unfolded protein response in health and disease. J Clin Invest. 2002, 110: 1389-1398. 10.1172/JCI200216886.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Yewdell JW: Not such a dismal science: the economics of protein synthesis, folding, degradation and antigen processing. Trends Cell Biol. 2001, 11: 294-297. 10.1016/S0962-8924(01)02030-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Welihinda AA, Tirasophon W, Kaufman RJ: The cellular response to protein misfolding in the endoplasmic reticulum. Gene Expr. 1999, 7: 293-300.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ron D: Translational control in the endoplasmic reticulum stress response. J Clin Invest. 2002, 110: 1383-1388. 10.1172/JCI200216784.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Yagishita N, Ohneda K, Amano T, Yamasaki S, Sugiura A, Tsuchimochi K, Shin H, Kawahara K, Ohneda O, Ohta T, et al: Essential role of synoviolin in embryogenesis. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280: 7909-7916. 10.1074/jbc.M410863200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Imai Y, Soda M, Inoue H, Hattori N, Mizuno Y, Takahashi R: An unfolded putative transmembrane polypeptide, which can lead endoplasmic reticulum stress, is a substrate of Parkin. Cell. 2001, 105: 891-902. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00407-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Imai Y, Soda M, Takahashi R: Parkin suppresses unfolded protein stress-induced cell death through its E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase activity. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275: 35661-35664. 10.1074/jbc.C000447200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Bence NF, Sampat RM, Kopito RR: Impairment of the ubiquitin-proteasome system by protein aggregation. Science. 2001, 292: 1552-1555. 10.1126/science.292.5521.1552.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Travers KJ, Patil CK, Wodicka L, Lockhart DJ, Weissman JS, Walter P: Functional and genomic analyses reveal an essential coordination between the unfolded protein response and ER-associated degradation. Cell. 2000, 101: 249-258. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80835-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Friedlander R, Jarosch E, Urban J, Volkwein C, Sommer T: A regulatory link between ER-associated protein degradation and the unfolded-protein response. Nat Cell Biol. 2000, 2: 379-384. 10.1038/35017001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Brewer JW, Diehl JA: PERK mediates cell-cycle exit during the mammalian unfolded protein response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97: 12625-12630. 10.1073/pnas.220247197.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Schett G, Tohidast-Akrad M, Steiner G, Smolen J: The stressed synovium. Arthritis Res. 2001, 3: 80-86. 10.1186/ar144.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lee AS: The glucose-regulated proteins: stress induction and clinical applications. Trends Biochem Sci. 2001, 26: 504-510. 10.1016/S0968-0004(01)01908-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Little E, Tocco G, Baudry M, Lee AS, Schreiber SS: Induction of glucose-regulated protein (glucose-regulated protein 78/BiP and glucose-regulated protein 94) and heat shock protein 70 transcripts in the immature rat brain following status epilepticus. Neuroscience. 1996, 75: 209-219. 10.1016/0306-4522(96)00267-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. DeGracia DJ, Kumar R, Owen CR, Krause GS, White BC: Molecular pathways of protein synthesis inhibition during brain reperfusion: implications for neuronal survival or death. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2002, 22: 127-141. 10.1097/00004647-200202000-00001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Kumar R, Azam S, Sullivan JM, Owen C, Cavener DR, Zhang P, Ron D, Harding HP, Chen JJ, Han A, et al: Brain ischemia and reperfusion activates the eukaryotic initiation factor 2α kinase, PERK. J Neurochem. 2001, 77: 1418-1421. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00387.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Shuda M, Kondoh N, Imazeki N, Tanaka K, Okada T, Mori K, Hada A, Arai M, Wakatsuki T, Matsubara O, et al: Activation of the ATF6, XBP1 and grp78 genes in human hepatocellular carcinoma: a possible involvement of the ER stress pathway in hepatocarcinogenesis. J Hepatol. 2003, 38: 605-614. 10.1016/S0168-8278(03)00029-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Feldmann M, Brennan FM, Maini RN: Rheumatoid arthritis. Cell. 1996, 85: 307-310. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81109-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Arend WP: Physiology of cytokine pathways in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2001, 45: 101-106. 10.1002/1529-0131(200102)45:1<101::AID-ANR90>3.0.CO;2-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Clair EWS: Infliximab treatment for rheumatic disease: clinical and radiological efficacy. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002, 61 (Suppl II): ii67-ii69.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Green GS: Etanercept (Enbrel): update on therapeutic use. Ann Rheum Dis. 2000, 59 (Suppl I): i46-i49.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Tsuchimochi K, Yagishita N, Yamasaki S, Amano T, Kato Y, Kawahara K, Aratani S, Fujita H, Ji F, Sugiura A, et al: Identification of a crucial site for synoviolin expression. Mol Cell Biol. 2005, 25: 7344-7356. 10.1128/MCB.25.16.7344-7356.2005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© BioMed Central Ltd 2005