Skip to main content

Advertisement

Kinetics of gene expression and bone remodelling in the clinical phase of collagen-induced arthritis

Arthritis Research & Therapy volume 17, Article number: 43 (2015) Cite this article

  • 2039 Accesses

  • 12 Citations

Abstract

Introduction

Pathological bone changes differ considerably between inflammatory arthritic diseases and most studies have focused on bone erosion. Collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) is a model for rheumatoid arthritis, which, in addition to bone erosion, demonstrates bone formation at the time of clinical manifestations. The objective of this study was to use this model to characterise the histological and molecular changes in bone remodelling, and relate these to the clinical disease development.

Methods

A histological and gene expression profiling time-course study on bone remodelling in CIA was linked to onset of clinical symptoms. Global gene expression was studied with a gene chip array system.

Results

The main histopathological changes in bone structure and inflammation occurred during the first two weeks following the onset of clinical symptoms in the joint. Hereafter, the inflammation declined and remodelling of formed bone dominated.

Global gene expression profiling showed simultaneous upregulation of genes related to bone changes and inflammation in week 0 to 2 after onset of clinical disease. Furthermore, we observed time-dependent expression of genes involved in early and late osteoblast differentiation and function, which mirrored the histopathological bone changes. The differentially expressed genes belong to the bone morphogenetic pathway (BMP) and, in addition, include the osteoblast markers integrin-binding sialoprotein (Ibsp), bone gamma-carboxyglutamate protein (Bglap1), and secreted phosphoprotein 1 (Spp1). Pregnancy-associated protein A (Pappa) and periostin (Postn), differentially expressed in the early disease phase, are proposed to participate in bone formation, and we suggest that they play a role in early bone formation in the CIA model. Comparison to human genome-wide association studies (GWAS) revealed differential expression of several genes associated with human arthritis.

Conclusions

In the CIA model, bone formation in the joint starts shortly after onset of clinical symptoms, which results in bony fusion within one to two weeks. This makes it a candidate model for investigating the relationship between inflammation and bone formation in inflammatory arthritis.

Introduction

Inflammatory arthritis is characterised by joint destruction, often resulting in severe distortion of the joint architecture, and leading to impaired function of the joints. The balance between anabolic and catabolic bone remodelling, however, differs between the inflammatory arthritic diseases rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). While RA primarily is an erosive disease, bone erosion and bone formation co-exist in patients with PsA and AS [1]. Why the bone responds differently to an inflammatory insult is not clarified, but may be important in directing future treatment strategies.

Collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) is a model for RA both due to its construct validity, including autoimmune reaction to collagen type II and MHC class II dependency, and due to its face validity, that is severe bone destruction. Moreover, disease development ends in bony fusion (ankylosis) of the destroyed joints, which could make it a relevant model for bone-forming inflammatory arthritic diseases.

Bone formation in CIA has been described as starting two to four weeks after onset of arthritis, but mainly playing a role in the healing state two to three months after onset [2]. However, in a kinetic study of new bone formation in CIA and adjuvant-induced arthritis (AIA) in rat, periosteal proliferation was reported as early as day 3 (CIA) and day 5 (AIA) after onset of arthritis, and new bone formation peaked at day 27 in both models [3].

Bone formation may occur directly within the mesenchyme (intramembranous) or via a cartilage scaffold (endochondral ossification). In both processes, the extracellular matrix (ECM) is mineralised. In particular two pathways have been implicated in osteoblast differentiation and bone formation: the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signalling pathway, of which several proteins induce ectopic bone formation [4], and the wingless-type (WNT) signalling pathway [5].

With the aim to understand the molecular mechanisms linking inflammation with new bone formation, the present study was initiated to histologically characterise bone remodelling in the CIA model throughout the disease course, and to relate this to gene expression. To minimise variation between the data and enable correlation to clinical duration of arthritis, we used tarsal joints with a clinical score of 3. By grouping the tarsal joints according to onset and duration of symptoms, we show that the process of bone formation runs in parallel with the local inflammatory process in the joint, with a concomitant differential expression of genes involved in bone remodelling.

Methods

Animal model

Arthritis was induced in male DBA/1JBom mice by intradermal injection of 100 μl chicken collagen type II (CII) (2 mg/ml) (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) in complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA) (0.5 mg/ml) (Sigma-Aldrich) on day 1 and boosted on day 21 with CII in incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (IFA) (Sigma-Aldrich). The control group received CFA and IFA without collagen, respectively. The mice were scored for onset, severity and duration of arthritis in the tarsal joints. Severity in this joint was scored from 0 (no erythema or swelling) to 3 (severe erythema and swelling). Tarsal joints were collected for histology and gene expression analysis. The mice were, in addition, assigned a total score for all four paws (with a theoretical maximum of 24 points for all paws). This additional scoring system was used to judge when the animals should be euthanized as required by Danish legislation (score exceeding 10 points). The mice were housed under standard conditions, and provided pellets and water ad libitum. The Danish Ethics Authorities ‘The Animal Experiments Inspectorate’ approved the studies (permit number: 2008/561 − 1532).

Histology

Fifty-two tarsal joints were collected for histology. The tarsal joints were divided into groups according to duration of arthritis in the joint: day 0 to 3, day 4 to 7, week 1 to 2, > 2 weeks, and > 2 weeks with declining inflammation (‘declined’). In the group ‘declined’ the joints previously had a clinical score of 3 for minimum two weeks, after which the clinical score had declined > 1 score at the time the joint was sampled. For all other joints, the clinical score was 3 at the sampling time. For number of joints per time-point, see Table S2A in Additional file 1. The joints were fixed in formalin and decalcified in 10% Na-EDTA for two to three weeks.

Haematoxylin and eosin-stained sections were assigned a score for bone erosion, bone formation, synovitis, tendinitis, and peritendinitis. Bone remodelling was judged by the degree of modulation of joint structure, presence of osteoclasts (OCs) and osteoblasts (OBs), and formation of cartilage and woven bone (Figure S1 in Additional file 2). Synovitis, tendinitis and peritendinitis were scored by the degree of infiltrating cells and fibrosis. All features were scored from 0 (no pathologic changes) to 4 (severe pathologic changes).

RNA extraction and microarray analysis

Three tarsal joints were sampled per group (twelve joints in total). For the group ‘More than two weeks, with declined inflammation’ the joints had had a clinical score of 3 for minimum two weeks, after which the clinical score had declined > 1 score at the time for sampling. For all other joints, the clinical score was 3 when sampled (Table S2B in Additional file 1). The twelve joints were compared to three joints from non-immunised control animals. The joints were processed and analysed separately (unpooled). Skin, visible muscle tissue and fur were removed and tarsal joints collected by transverse sectioning of the metatarsus bones and the tibia/fibula under the fur border. This procedure ensured that all joints in the tarsus were included in each sample. Except for the skin and visible muscle, all other soft tissues were included in the sample. The joints were subsequently snap-frozen in liquid N2 and stored at −80°C. RNA was extracted using the mirVana™ miRNA isolation kit (Ambion, Exiqon A/S, Vedbæk Denmark), amplified and labelled using the Pico amplification kit (Nugen Technologies, San Carlos, CA, USA), according to the manufacturers’ instructions, followed by hybridisation to Mouse Gene 1.0ST microarrays (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

The quality of the RNA was evaluated using the RNA integrity number (RIN), and only samples with RIN >8.3 were included for further analysis.

Arrays were normalized using RMA background correction and quantile normalisation in R v.2.15 (Additional file 3). Significance of differentially expressed genes was assessed by analysis of variance (ANOVA), and adjusted for multiple testing by estimating false discovery rates (FDR). Data visualisation was performed in Qlucore Omics Explorer v.2.2 (Qlucore AB, Lund, Sweden). The expression data are deposited in Gene Expression Omnibus [6]; accession number: Series record GSE61140).

Functional analysis and network representation of differentially expressed genes was performed in Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA, Ingenuity™ Systems). Gene expression levels are indicated in the IPA networks as red (upregulated) or green (downregulated) in comparison to non-induced controls.

The differentially regulated genes assigned to Bio Functions of bone and skeleton, were used to compile a comprehensive list of genes potentially involved in bone remodelling in the CIA model.

Quantitative PCR

For qPCR analysis of Bmp1, RNA (90 ng per reaction) was reverse transcribed to cDNA using the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kit (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA). qPCR was performed with TaqMan Universal PCR Mastermix (Applied Biosystems, USA) and primer-assays Bmp1 Mm00802225_m1 and Gapdh Mm99999915_g1 (Applied Biosystems, USA). PCR was initiated at 50°C for 2 minutes and 95°C for 10 minutes, and the cycling conditions were 95°C for 15 seconds and 60°C for 1 minute (40 cycles). For the remaining 14 genes (Table S4 in Additional file 4), qPCR analysis was performed by AROS Applied Biotechnology A/S (Aarhus, Denmark). cDNA was prepared from 100 ng RNA/sample using the High Capacity cRNA Reverse Transcription kit (Applied Biosystems, USA) and the qPCR reaction was performed with TaqMan™ Universal PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, USA). Assay IDs for the specific primer/probe sets (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) are listed in Table S4 in Additional file 4. Samples were analysed as triplicates and normalized by subtraction of the sample mean Ct value from that of the mean Ct value of the housekeeping gene Gapdh.

Statistics

Histological scoring results were assessed using Kruskall-Wallis test followed by a Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. qPCR results were analysed by ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test, and compared by linear regression to array results. The significance of the correlation coefficients was tested using Student's t-distribution. All statistical analyses were performed in GraphPad Prism v.5 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA), with the statistical unit being one joint from each animal included.

Results

Development of arthritis and histopathology of CIA from onset to decline of clinical symptoms

After immunization with chicken CII, mean onset of arthritis was observed on day 31 ± 8.8. Mean score of arthritis peaked six weeks after boost with a mean score of 4.6 ± 1.8. In order to study local arthritis development, onset and severity of arthritis in the tarsal joint was recorded in detail.

For the histological study, a total of 52 tarsal joints were used. Fourteen were sampled between day 0 and 4, ten between day 4 and 7, eleven between week 1 and 2, and seventeen after week 2 of clinical inflammation onset. After week 2, twelve samples showed declining clinical symptoms. Little variation in the appearance of synovitis, peritendinitis, and bone remodelling was noted within the groups. The data are in accordance with a previously published study showing occurrence of bony spur formation early after disease onset [3].

Day 0 to 4 after clinical disease onset: The infiltration of inflammatory cells was equally pronounced when comparing the synovium (mean score 3.8 +/−0.4) and the peritendon (mean score 3.9+/−0.3) (Figure 1A). In 10/14 joints, fibroblast activity and fibrosis indicated chronic inflammation, while 4/14 joints had no signs of chronicity. Bone pathology was dominated by erosion (11/14 joints), initiated where the peritendon and synovium are attached to, or in close proximity to the bone, while the articular cartilage remained intact. Bone erosion was severe as judged by the presence of multinucleated osteoclasts (OC) and the extent of structural damage of the cartilage and bone tissue (Figure 1B). However, both OB proliferation, and collagen deposition, was observed in the periosteum and seemed, from visible staining ability, to have progressed into secretion of osteoid-like matrix in 3/14 joints (Figure 1C).

Figure 1
figure1

Histopathology of tarsal joints day 0 to 7. A) Day 0 to 4: overview of inflammation in the tarsal joint showing equal severity of inflammation in peripheral tissues and synovium (arrows). (B-C) Day 0 to 4: bone erosion and OC activity (arrow in B, day 3) dominates. Proliferation and collagen deposition takes place (star in C, day 0) in the periosteum and results in osteoid deposition (arrows in C, day 3). (D) Day 4 to 7: the joint architecture is severely distorted (day 7). OC, osteoclast.

Full size image

Day 4 to 7 after clinical disease onset: Severe fibrosis and synovitis approaching the articular cartilage, and resulting in erosion of the articular cartilage, was observed (Figure 1D). In areas of less severe inflammation, pronounced OB activity and onset of endochondral ossification was noted as judged from the appearance of hypertrophic cartilage. Bone erosion (mean score of 3.1+/−1.3) and bone formation (2.2+/−1.1), was observed in 9/10 joints.

Week 1 to 2 after clinical disease onset: Bone erosion (score 2.6+/−1.4) and bone formation (score 2.9+/−1.1) was pronounced and observed in 10/11 joints. Endochondral ossification was dominating (Figure 2A). Ankylosis was noted from day 8 and consisted of an inner layer of remodelled bone, followed by a cartilage layer. The outer lining layer of the bone-forming lesion consisted of mesenchymal cells (Figure 2B). In most joints, inflammation was severe, but gradually disappearing and replaced by severe fibrosis with yet active fibroblast proliferation.

Figure 2
figure2

Histopathology of tarsal joints from day 8 and until decline of symptoms. (A) Appearance of cartilage (encircled) marks the onset of endochondral ossification (day 8). (B) Ankylosis has progressed from being fibrous to consist of cartilage and osteoid (day 10), with osteoid closest to the original bone (arrow). (C) Declining disease phase: bone formation is remodelled with OC activity observed in some animals (arrow). (D) Histological scores of bone erosion (black bars) and bone formation (grey bars) over time (mean +/− standard deviation (SD)). Statistics from the comparisons of individual groups is indicated by lines above the bars (Dunn’s multiple comparison test, *P <0.05, **P <0.01, ***P <0.001). OC, osteoclast.

Full size image

Two weeks after clinical disease onset: The clinical severity of inflammation was declining in most joints, although 5/17 joints still showed severe clinical signs. In the joints with severe clinical arthritis, accumulation of cartilage was still apparent, while in joints with declining clinical symptoms, an increase in what was observed as mineralisation of cartilage and newly formed bone took place, in addition to modification of the newly formed bone by OCs (Figure 2C).

By comparing the development in scores for bone erosion and bone formation, respectively, a significant difference over time was observed with the greatest development in scores of bone formation (P = 0.0186 vs. P <0.0001) (Figure 2D).

Gene expression in joints from mice with CIA normalises after two weeks of inflammation

Having examined the bone remodelling after clinical onset of arthritis histologically, we aimed at describing the time course of bone remodelling by global gene expression profiling (Figure 3A and B).

Figure 3
figure3

Cluster analysis and validation of gene expression profile. (A) Separation of samples by unsupervised hierarchical clustering. The groups are: day 0 to 3, week 1 to 2 and week 3 to 4 after onset of arthritis, and joints with declining clinical disease activity. Colours and colour intensity indicate upregulation (red) or downregulation (green) regulation of genes. (B) Venn diagram of the gene expression study showing the number of genes differentially expressed at the time points: day 0 to 3, week 1 to 2, week 3 to 4, and in the declining disease phase in comparison to control. (C) The results from the microarray study were validated with qPCR. Bmp1 was normalised to Gapdh expression and compared to a control sample from non-immunised mice. Statistically significant differences between group means (δ-ct-values) are indicated with lines above the bars (Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test, *P <0.05, **P <0.01). (D) The gene expression level of Bmp1 assessed by qPCR correlated significantly (r2 = 0.7, P <0.0002) with the corresponding microarray data (linear regression test).

Full size image

Unsupervised hierarchical clustering grouped the samples into a phase of high transcriptional activity between week 0 and 2, and, subsequently, a period of declining transcriptional activity. One sample from the declining disease phase (decline 10) clustered together with the controls, showing that the gene expression pattern normalised in the late disease phase (Figure 3A). In the first three days, 908 genes displayed a +2-fold change in the transcriptional level, while 749 genes were differentially expressed in week 1 to 2 (>2 fold change, P <0.05). The IPA showed that the top biological functions, canonical pathways, and upregulated genes were dominated by genes involved in arthritis and the immune system in general, in connective and skeletal tissue disorders and remodelling, as well as tissue development and function (Table S5A and B in Additional file 5).

Several potentially disease-relevant genes (Saa3, Timp1, Postn, Ctsk, Mmp3 and Mmp13) demonstrated very high fold changes (between 10.6 and 45.3) (Table 1). Moreover, pregnancy–associated plasma protein A (Pappa) was strongly upregulated when comparing day 0 to 3 with week 1 to 2 (fold change +2.3) (Table 2). A muscle- and epidermis-specific gene expression signature was found among the most downregulated genes when comparing day 0 to 3 and control samples (Table 1).

Table 1 Highly differentially expressed genes grouped according to function
Full size table
Table 2 Groups of genes showing a time-dependent expression pattern
Full size table

In week 3 to 4 after onset of disease, the number of two-fold differentially expressed genes had decreased to 353 (Figure 3B). The pathway profile changed accordingly, and was dominated by tissue remodelling and developmental pathways, although an inflammatory gene expression signature was still present (Table S5C and D in Additional file 5).

A comparison of gene expression between week 0 to 2 and week 3 to 4 revealed considerable up-regulation of several epidermal genes (fold changes between 3.8 and 13.9) in the samples collected three to four weeks after onset of arthritis (Table 1).

The expression pattern of 15 differentially expressed genes was verified by qPCR. Of these, 12 genes correlated significantly with the gene expression pattern obtained from the microarray profile, while three genes showed the same expression pattern, but the correlation was not significant. The expression of Bmp1 is shown in Figure 3C and D (r2 = 0.7, p < 0.0002), and the remaining validation data are shown in Figure S6 in Additional file 6 and Figure S7 in Additional file 7 and with the corresponding r2 and P-values in Table S8 in Additional file 8.

To identify genes associated with the observed bone pathology, we focused on genes, differentially expressed at the different time-points, which were related to bone and skeleton in the IPA Bio Functions. The genes and associated Bio Functions reflected the bone remodelling process (Table S9 in Additional file 9), and their number and effect size declined over time. The genes and their expression profiles are shown individually in Table S10 in Additional file 10.

Distinctive expression profiles of genes involved in osteoblast and osteoclast functions

The differentially expressed genes, related to bone, from Table S10 in Additional file 10, were divided into profiles and are shown separately in Table 2. Profile one encompassed genes with the highest expression on day 0 to 3 with a subsequently declining profile. These were in particular genes encoding proteins involved in OC differentiation and function (Ccl9, Tyrobp, Atp6v0d2, Lif; fold changes between 2.0 and 9.2), in addition to ECM formation and collagen type 1 assembly (Bmp1, Crtap, Tnc, Lox; fold changes between 1.9 and 10.6) [9-14] (Table 2, Figure 4A, and Table S10 in Additional file 10). In profile two, genes with the highest expression in week 1 to 2, followed by a declining expression pattern, were included. These were in particular genes encoding proteins involved in mineralisation and osteoblast function (Sp7, Spp1, Mgp, Sparc, Enpp1, Bglap1, Ifitm5; fold changes between 1.5 and 4.5) [15-21] (Table 2, Figure 4B and Table S10 in Additional file 10). Integrin-binding sialoprotein (Ibsp; fold change +3.0) also belongs to this group [20], but showed the highest expression in week 3 to 4. Moreover, a large group of genes showed a sustained differential expression pattern at day 0 to 3 and week 1 to 2. These included genes involved in osteoblast functions and ECM formation (Col1a1, Col1a2, Ogn, Bgn, Col12a1, Ppib, Lum, Hapln1, Cthrc1, Postn; fold changes between 2.2 and 10.3) [13,14,22-27] (Table 2). Finally, tissue destruction was reflected by up-regulation of the genes for four metalloproteinases (MMPs): the MMP inhibitor Timp1; acid phosphatase 5 (Acp5); cathepsin K [28]; cathepsin S [29], and additional cathepsins. These genes were among the most highly expressed, throughout disease development (Table 1, Table 2 and Table S10 in Additional file 10).

Figure 4
figure4

Gene expression networks during osteoblast activity in early and late phases of joint inflammation. A) A network of genes related to osteoblast activity, in particular collagen type I assembly and cross-linking, during the early phase of clinical disease. Colours and colour intensity indicate upregulation (red) or downregulation (green) regulation of genes at day 0 to 3, where most of the genes showed the greatest fold change in comparison to non-induced controls. One exception is Dmp1, which became upregulated at week 3 to 4. B) A network of genes related to osteoblast activity, in particular mineralisation, during the late phase of clinical disease. Colours and colour intensity indicate upregulation (red) or downregulation (green) regulation of genes at week 1 to 2, where most of the genes showed the greatest fold change in comparison to non-induced controls. One exception is Ibsp, which was most highly upregulated in week 3 to 4.

Full size image

Differential expression of genes belonging to the BMP pathway

Differentially expressed genes related to the BMP pathway included the genes encoding the BMP type I and type II receptors (Bmpr1a and Bmpr2, fold change +2 at week 1 to 2 and day 0 to 3, respectively), and proteins downstream of the BMP signalling pathway (Smad2 and Smad6, fold change +2.1 at week 1 to 2 and −1.8 at day 0 to 3, respectively) (Table 2, Figure 5 and Table S10 in Additional file 10). The BMP ligand Bmp2 (fold change +1.7 at day 0 to 3) together with Smad4 (fold change +1.3 at day 0 to 3) and Smad5 (fold change +1.4 at day 0 to 3) showed the same marginal change in expression pattern. The BMP ligands Bmp4, Bmp6, and Bmp7 were slightly downregulated (fold change between −1.7 to −1.3 at day 0 to 3).

Figure 5
figure5

Differentially expressed genes related to BMP signalling at day 0 to 3 of arthritis in comparison to non-induced controls. Regulation of genes is indicated by colour and colour intensity (red = upregulated, green = downregulated). (A) Network of BMP related genes in general. (B) Functional pathway of BMP signalling. BMP, bone morphogenetic protein.

Full size image

High upregulation of the gene for Inhibin beta A (Inhba; fold change +5.6 at day 0 to 3) was found, in addition to minor expression changes in the genes of some of the transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) receptors (Acvr2a and Acvr2b) bound by this protein (Table 2 and Figure 5A).

Differential expression of genes belonging to the WNT pathway

Within the group of genes related to the WNT pathway, the genes for the receptor FZD1 (fold change +1.7 at day 0 to 3) and transcription factor TCF4 (fold change +1.7 at week 1 to 2) were differentially expressed, in addition to a number of WNT inhibitors. These included the hypoxia-induced Hif1a, which showed more than 4-fold up-regulation and Sost and Ndrg2, which were between 2 and 5.6-fold downregulated. The well-described WNT inhibitor Dkk1 was slightly downregulated (Table 2 and Table S10 in Additional file 10).

Comparison to genome-wide association studies in human arthritis

Some of the genes differentially expressed in the herein presented study have been linked to human arthritis in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) (Table 2). Of those genes, several are involved in cartilage- and bone remodelling (underlined in Table 3).

Table 3 Differential expression of genes associated with human arthritis in GWAS studies
Full size table

Discussion

In this study, we have shown that in CIA, major histopathological changes, comprising inflammation as well as bone formation and ankylosis, occur within the first two weeks after the inflammatory symptoms become clinically apparent in a joint. Moreover, we have shown that the histopathology is reflected at the gene expression level, where a number of genes, coding for proteins important in inflammation and bone remodelling, are differentially expressed within the same time period after disease onset. This suggests that the CIA model is relevant for the osteoproliferative inflammatory arthritis in PsA and AS.

Bone formation in the murine CIA model has been described as starting in the subacute inflammatory disease phase, two to four weeks after onset of arthritis, but mainly playing a role in the healing state two to three months after onset [2]. However, no studies disclose any molecular details regarding bone formation throughout the arthritis disease course. Recently, Schett et al. [3] performed a histological study of new bone formation in the rat CIA and AIA models. In their study, periosteal proliferation was noted on day 3 (CIA) and day 5 (AIA) after onset of arthritis and new bone formation peaked at day 27 after onset of arthritis in both models.

The link between joint inflammation and bone remodelling is not clear. In human arthritis, areas with inflammation were shown to be predictive of bone formation [42], but bone formation does not seem to be blocked by anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) treatment [43]. In the present study, we have shown that in the murine CIA model, bone formation is (1) initiated during active inflammation, (2) develops in parallel with the inflammation, and (3) that the bone mineralises and remodels when clinical inflammatory signs are declining.

The molecular events underlying inflammation and bone remodelling were investigated using gene expression profiling. The results are based on a first kinetic mapping of global gene expression in the joint during clinical onset and development of arthritis. Expression of specific genes might differ depending on the microanatomical site within the joint and future studies of proteins important in the interplay between inflammation and bone formation should address this. We found that the bone pathology observed histologically was reflected in the Bio Functions, significantly associated with differentially expressed genes, from onset to decline of clinical arthritis in the joint. Moreover, genes involved in inflammation and bone remodelling were co-expressed during the first two weeks after onset of clinical arthritis and, hereafter, the gene expression gradually normalized to control levels, while the clinical inflammation was declining. A muscle-specific signature was observed among the most downregulated genes during the first two weeks after onset of arthritis. This may reflect muscle inactivity and atrophy observed in the model [44] and may translate to the impaired muscle function observed in arthritis patients. However, since animals in the acute disease phase also lose weight, this may partly explain some of the gene expression changes observed in muscle-specific genes.

Several metalloproteinases and cathepsins associated with human arthritis showed sustained, high expression during the entire disease course (Table 1, and Table S10 in Additional file 10). These reflect tissue destruction, in addition to being a link between bone erosion and bone formation. MMP9 and MMP13 have been shown to play a crucial role in endochondral bone formation, as well as in matrix degradation and in OC and osteoprogenitor differentiation [45,46].

Genes with the highest fold change at day 0 to 3 after onset of clinical arthritis reflected osteoclast function and differentiation, in addition to ECM formation and collagen type 1 assembly, while genes showing the highest fold change at week 1 to 2 or week 3 to 4 encompassed a well-known group of OB markers and genes involved in mineralisation (Table 2, Figure 4A and B). These variations in gene expression pattern mirror the development in OB differentiation and function, as gene expression is specific for the differential stages of the OB [47]. The gene expression profiles followed the histological observations: bone erosion, periosteal proliferation and osteoid secretion, was observed in the initial phase followed by onset of endochondral bone formation and mineralisation in weeks 1 to 2. The data support a model for bone remodelling during arthritis, where bone erosion is mainly taking place during the very early phase of clinical arthritis, with the onset of tissue remodelling and bone formation following shortly after, developing in parallel with the inflammation. When the inflammatory response ceases, the addition of new bone decreases, and the hitherto created bone is remodelled and mineralised. As suggested by the histological results, the newly formed bone may be created in different processes depending on the microanatomical site. Thus, addition of bone in the periosteum takes place first, without preceding cartilage formation, while osteophytes at the joint margin are created in a process resembling endochondral ossification (Figure 6). A comparison of the present data to the proteoglycan-induced arthritis (PGIA) model reveals a high degree of similarity concerning the mixed anabolic and catabolic bone remodelling profile [8]. In contrast, the TNFα-transgenic arthritis mouse model showed a primarily catabolic bone remodelling profile, while genes representing the osteoproliferative response showed no or marginally differential expression [7]. This is in line with a general comprehension of the TNFα-transgenic mouse as a mainly erosive model, while the PGIA and CIA models demonstrate osteoproliferative arthritis. All three models showed a strong up-regulation of Mmps and Timp1. Data are compared in Table S10 Additional file 10.

Figure 6
figure6

Bone remodelling in the CIA model. Model of bone remodelling during the course of clinical arthritis. The proposed dominating process in the bone is shown in the top part of the figure. Differentially expressed genes, encoding proteins with a function in bone remodelling, are divided into groups according to function and time point of highest differential expression in comparison to the control. All genes are upregulated in comparison to the control at the indicated time-point. Group 1: genes encoding proteins involved in osteoclast function and differentiation; Group 2: genes encoding proteins with a function in extracellular matrix formation and collagen type I assembly (highest differential expression at day 0 to 4); Group 3: genes encoding proteins with a function in extracellular matrix formation and collagen type I assembly (sustained high differential expression on day 0 to 4 and week 1 to 2); Group 4: genes with a function in mineralisation of bone (highest differential expression in week 1 to 2); Group 5: genes with a function in mineralisation of bone (highest differential expression during week 3 to 4). CIA, collagen-induced arthritis; ECM, extracellular matrix.

Full size image

Highly differentially expressed genes encoding proteins involved in bone formation between day 0 to 3 of clinical arthritis are potential links between inflammation and bone formation. Two of these genes are the insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-dependent proteinase pregnancy-associated plasma protein A gene (Pappa) and periostin (Postn). In addition, genes particularly involved in early ECM formation, preceding bone formation, are potential candidates. The PAPP-A protein is an anabolic growth factor in bone in vivo and in vitro [48,49] and regulates bioavailability of Insulin-like growth factor (IGF) involved in bone formation [50], and also differentially expressed. Expression of Pappa is stimulated by inflammatory cytokines in several cell types, including OBs, and macrophages isolated from artherosclerotic lesions [51,52]. It has recently been identified as a marker of inflammation in acute coronary syndrome [53]. Furthermore, Pappa knockout mice display disturbed bone formation [54,55], while mice overexpressing Pappa have increased bone formation [48,49]. Thus, Pappa expression might be induced in the early inflammatory environment and the protein could be involved in initiating bone formation in the CIA model.

The Postn gene is one of the highly differentially expressed genes with a proposed role in bone remodelling. It is preferentially located in the periostium and is re-expressed during fracture repair, mechanical stress, and in RA [14]. The expression is regulated by BMP2 and TGFβ. Overexpression of periostin increases bone formation possibly by promoting cell survival of preosteoblasts and OBs [56]. By binding fibronectin, tenascin and BMP1, it increases the activation of pro-lysyl oxidase, which in turn cross-links collagen [14]. Moreover, BMP1 has been linked to arthritis and bone formation [57,58] and may increase bone formation in several ways.

In weeks 1 to 2 after clinical onset, many genes reflecting the mineralisation of osteoid showed the highest differential expression over time in comparison to control (Table 2 and Figure 4B). Integrin-binding sialoprotein (Ibsp) is involved in the formation of crystals, as well as cell attachment to hydroxyapatite [20]. Osteonectin (Sparc) binds and connects hydroxyapatite to collagen type I [21], while osteonectin (Spp1) binds hydroxyapatite crystals, inhibiting their formation [21]. Moreover, these genes also reflect the complexity of interactions between ECM, OCs and OBs, as many of them have dual functions in bone remodelling.

In summary, the network of regulated genes involved in collagen type I assembly represented in Figure 4A, might play an important role in arthritis-associated ECM formation, leading to fibrosis and osteophyte formation.

Of particular interest in arthritis-associated bone remodelling are molecules belonging to the BMP and WNT signalling pathways. In human arthritis, the BMP ligands 2 and 6 [59] and their receptors BMPR1a and BMPR2 [60] were upregulated, while BMP ligands 4 and 5 were downregulated in RA and osteoarthritis (OA) synovium in comparison to normal control samples. Our results showed a similar up-regulation of the genes for the receptors BMPR1a and BMPR2, but down-regulation of Bmp4, Bmp6 and Bmp7 (Figure 5).

One of the strongly upregulated genes in this study is Inhba (Inhibin beta A), which may stimulate the TGFβ signalling pathway through binding to receptors Acv1b, Avr2a and Avr2b. This non-steroidal hormone regulating follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) secretion is reported to increase bone formation in a knock-in transgenic mouse [61], and has been associated with human arthritis [62].

A profile of WNT signalling is not distinct in our gene expression data, since most of the genes belonging to this pathway were marginally differentially expressed compared to the control samples. However, a number of WNT inhibitors were differentially expressed. These included the upregulated Hif1a. The encoded protein is a hypoxia inducible factor that plays a role in angiogenesis during endochondral bone formation. Together with Sp7, it inhibits the WNT signalling pathway [63]. Moreover, WNT inhibitors Sost and Ndgr2 were both downregulated and Dkk1, the master regulator of WNT signalling, was slightly downregulated. This could be expected during anabolic bone conditions. Sost and Dkk1 downregulation has been associated with proteoglycan-induced arthritis in mice, and DKK1 with human AS [8].

In Table 3, several genes identified in GWAS of human arthritis are listed together with the expression data from the CIA model found in the present study. The five underlined genes encode proteins with a function in cartilage or bone remodelling, and are potential therapeutic candidate genes. The expression of those genes highlights the importance of the CIA model for studies of osteoproliferative inflammatory arthritic diseases.

Conclusions

Bone remodelling in the CIA model results in ankylosis within one to two weeks after clinical disease onset and occurs simultaneously with the local inflammatory process in the joint. Furthermore, in this study, we have identified networks of genes involved in early and late bone formation, as well as genes associated with human arthritis, which may provide potential targets for modulating bone formation in arthritis.

Taken together, this suggests that the CIA model is an important tool in investigations of the relationship between inflammation and bone formation in the search for therapeutic targets to prevent ankylosis in inflammatory arthritis.

Abbreviations

AIA:

antibody-induced arthritis

AS:

ankylosing spondylitis

BMP:

bone morphogenetic protein

CFA:

complete Freund’s adjuvant

CIA:

collagen-induced arthritis

CII:

collagen type II

ECM:

extracellular matrix

ERK:

extracellular signal-regulated kinases

FSH:

follicle-stimulating hormone

GWAS:

genome-wide association studies

IFA:

incomplete Freund’s adjuvant

IGF:

insulin-like growth factor

IPA:

Ingenuity Pathway Analysis

MMP:

matrix metallopeptidase

OA:

osteoarthritis

OB:

osteoblast

OC:

osteoclast

PGIA:

proteoglycan-induced arthritis

PsA:

psoriatic arthritis

RA:

rheumatoid arthritis

TGFβ:

transforming growth factor beta

TNFα:

tumor necrosis factor alpha

WNT:

wingless-type

References

  1. 1.

    Finzel S, Englbrecht M, Engelke K, Stach C, Schett G. A comparative study of periarticular bone lesions in rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:122–7.

  2. 2.

    Holmdahl R, Andersson EC, Andersen CB, Svejgaard A, Fugger L. Transgenic mouse models of rheumatoid arthritis. Immunol Rev. 1999;169:161–73.

  3. 3.

    Schett G, Stolina M, Dwyer D, Zack D, Uderhardt S, Kronke G, et al. Tumor necrosis factor alpha and RANKL blockade cannot halt bony spur formation in experimental inflammatory arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60:2644–54.

  4. 4.

    Wozney JM, Rosen V. Bone morphogenetic protein and bone morphogenetic protein gene family in bone formation and repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;346:26–37.

  5. 5.

    Schett G, Zwerina J, David JP. The role of Wnt proteins in arthritis. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2008;4:473–80.

  6. 6.

    Edgar R, Domrachev M, Lash AE. Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:207–10.

  7. 7.

    Aidinis V, Carninci P, Armaka M, Witke W, Harokopos V, Pavelka N, et al. Cytoskeletal rearrangements in synovial fibroblasts as a novel pathophysiological determinant of modeled rheumatoid arthritis. PLoS Genet. 2005;1:e48.

  8. 8.

    Haynes KR, Pettit AR, Duan R, Tseng HW, Glant TT, Brown MA, et al. Excessive bone formation in a mouse model of ankylosing spondylitis is associated with decreases in Wnt pathway inhibitors. Arthritis Res Ther. 2012;14:R253.

  9. 9.

    Lean JM, Murphy C, Fuller K, Chambers TJ. CCL9/MIP-1gamma and its receptor CCR1 are the major chemokine ligand/receptor species expressed by osteoclasts. J Cell Biochem. 2002;87:386–93.

  10. 10.

    Ota K, Quint P, Weivoda MM, Ruan M, Pederson L, Westendorf JJ, et al. Transforming growth factor beta 1 induces CXCL16 and leukemia inhibitory factor expression in osteoclasts to modulate migration of osteoblast progenitors. Bone. 2013;57:68–75.

  11. 11.

    Wu H, Xu G, Li YP. Atp6v0d2 is an essential component of the osteoclast-specific proton pump that mediates extracellular acidification in bone resorption. J Bone Miner Res. 2009;24:871–85.

  12. 12.

    Zou W, Reeve JL, Liu Y, Teitelbaum SL, Ross FP. DAP12 couples c-Fms activation to the osteoclast cytoskeleton by recruitment of Syk. Mol Cell. 2008;31:422–31.

  13. 13.

    Eyre DR, Weis MA. Bone collagen: new clues to its mineralization mechanism from recessive osteogenesis imperfecta. Calcif Tissue Int. 2013;93:338–47.

  14. 14.

    Merle B, Garnero P. The multiple facets of periostin in bone metabolism. Osteoporos Int. 2012;23:1199–212.

  15. 15.

    Boskey AL, Christensen B, Taleb H, Sorensen ES. Post-translational modification of osteopontin: effects on in vitro hydroxyapatite formation and growth. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2012;419:333–8.

  16. 16.

    Gopalakrishnan R, Ouyang H, Somerman MJ, McCauley LK, Franceschi RT. Matrix gamma-carboxyglutamic acid protein is a key regulator of PTH-mediated inhibition of mineralization in MC3T3-E1 osteoblast-like cells. Endocrinology. 2001;142:4379–88.

  17. 17.

    Kaback LA, Soung DY, Naik A, Smith N, Schwarz EM, O’Keefe RJ, et al. Osterix/Sp7 regulates mesenchymal stem cell mediated endochondral ossification. J Cell Physiol. 2008;214:173–82.

  18. 18.

    Mackenzie NC, Zhu D, Milne EM, Van ’t Hof R, Martin A, Darryl QL, et al. Altered bone development and an increase in FGF-23 expression in Enpp1(−/−) mice. PLoS One. 2012;7:e32177.

  19. 19.

    Moffatt P, Gaumond MH, Salois P, Sellin K, Bessette MC, Godin E, et al. Bril: a novel bone-specific modulator of mineralization. J Bone Miner Res. 2008;23:1497–508.

  20. 20.

    Nahar NN, Missana LR, Garimella R, Tague SE, Anderson HC. Matrix vesicles are carriers of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and noncollagenous matrix proteins. J Bone Miner Metab. 2008;26:514–9.

  21. 21.

    Delany AM, Hankenson KD. Thrombospondin-2 and SPARC/osteonectin are critical regulators of bone remodeling. J Cell Commun Signal. 2009;3:227–38.

  22. 22.

    Chen XD, Shi S, Xu T, Robey PG, Young MF. Age-related osteoporosis in biglycan-deficient mice is related to defects in bone marrow stromal cells. J Bone Miner Res. 2002;17:331–40.

  23. 23.

    Ge G, Seo NS, Liang X, Hopkins DR, Hook M, Greenspan DS. Bone morphogenetic protein-1/tolloid-related metalloproteinases process osteoglycin and enhance its ability to regulate collagen fibrillogenesis. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:41626–33.

  24. 24.

    Izu Y, Sun M, Zwolanek D, Veit G, Williams V, Cha B, et al. Type XII collagen regulates osteoblast polarity and communication during bone formation. J Cell Biol. 2011;193:1115–30.

  25. 25.

    Kimura H, Kwan KM, Zhang Z, Deng JM, Darnay BG, Behringer RR, et al. Cthrc1 is a positive regulator of osteoblastic bone formation. PLoS One. 2008;3:e3174.

  26. 26.

    Raouf A, Ganss B, McMahon C, Vary C, Roughley PJ, Seth A. Lumican is a major proteoglycan component of the bone matrix. Matrix Biol. 2002;21:361–7.

  27. 27.

    Urano T, Narusawa K, Shiraki M, Sasaki N, Hosoi T, Ouchi Y, et al. Single-nucleotide polymorphism in the hyaluronan and proteoglycan link protein 1 (HAPLN1) gene is associated with spinal osteophyte formation and disc degeneration in Japanese women. Eur Spine J. 2011;20:572–7.

  28. 28.

    Gowen M, Lazner F, Dodds R, Kapadia R, Feild J, Tavaria M, et al. Cathepsin K knockout mice develop osteopetrosis due to a deficit in matrix degradation but not demineralization. J Bone Miner Res. 1999;14:1654–63.

  29. 29.

    Baumgrass R, Williamson MK, Price PA. Identification of peptide fragments generated by digestion of bovine and human osteocalcin with the lysosomal proteinases cathepsin B, D, L, H, and S. J Bone Miner Res. 1997;12:447–55.

  30. 30.

    Lin Z, Bei JX, Shen M, Li Q, Liao Z, Zhang Y, et al. A genome-wide association study in Han Chinese identifies new susceptibility loci for ankylosing spondylitis. Nat Genet. 2012;44:73–7.

  31. 31.

    Ehlen HW, Chinenkova M, Moser M, Munter HM, Krause Y, Gross S, et al. Inactivation of anoctamin-6/Tmem16f, a regulator of phosphatidylserine scrambling in osteoblasts, leads to decreased mineral deposition in skeletal tissues. J Bone Miner Res. 2013;28:246–59.

  32. 32.

    Reveille JD, Sims AM, Danoy P, Evans DM, Leo P, Pointon JJ, et al. Genome-wide association study of ankylosing spondylitis identifies non-MHC susceptibility loci. Nat Genet. 2010;42:123–7.

  33. 33.

    The Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium. Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls. Nature. 2007;447:661–78.

  34. 34.

    Manchado E, Eguren M, Malumbres M. The anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C): cell-cycle-dependent and -independent functions. Biochem Soc Trans. 2010;38:65–71.

  35. 35.

    Cui J, Stahl EA, Saevarsdottir S, Miceli C, Diogo D, Trynka G, et al. Genome-wide association study and gene expression analysis identifies CD84 as a predictor of response to etanercept therapy in rheumatoid arthritis. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003394.

  36. 36.

    Itoh S, Udagawa N, Takahashi N, Yoshitake F, Narita H, Ebisu S, et al. A critical role for interleukin-6 family-mediated Stat3 activation in osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Bone. 2006;39:505–12.

  37. 37.

    Cobb JE, Plant D, Flynn E, Tadjeddine M, Dieude P, Cornelis F, et al. Identification of the tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 2 as a rheumatoid arthritis susceptibility locus in Europeans. PLoS One. 2013;8:e66456.

  38. 38.

    Okada Y, Terao C, Ikari K, Kochi Y, Ohmura K, Suzuki A, et al. Meta-analysis identifies nine new loci associated with rheumatoid arthritis in the Japanese population. Nat Genet. 2012;44:511–6.

  39. 39.

    Raychaudhuri S, Remmers EF, Lee AT, Hackett R, Guiducci C, Burtt NP, et al. Common variants at CD40 and other loci confer risk of rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Genet. 2008;40:1216–23.

  40. 40.

    Zeggini E, Panoutsopoulou K, Southam L, Rayner NW, Day-Williams AG, Lopes MC, et al. Identification of new susceptibility loci for osteoarthritis (arcOGEN): a genome-wide association study. Lancet. 2012;380:815–23.

  41. 41.

    Valdes AM, Loughlin J, Timms KM, van Meurs JJ, Southam L, Wilson SG, et al. Genome-wide association scan identifies a prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 variant involved in risk of knee osteoarthritis. Am J Hum Genet. 2008;82:1231–40.

  42. 42.

    Baraliakos X, Listing J, Rudwaleit M, Sieper J, Braun J. The relationship between inflammation and new bone formation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis 2. Arthritis Res Ther. 2008;10:R104.

  43. 43.

    van der Heijde D, Landewe R, Einstein S, Ory P, Vosse D, Ni L, et al. Radiographic progression of ankylosing spondylitis after up to two years of treatment with etanercept. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:1324–31.

  44. 44.

    Filippin LI, Teixeira VN, Viacava PR, Lora PS, Xavier LL, Xavier RM. Temporal development of muscle atrophy in murine model of arthritis is related to disease severity. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2013;4:231–8.

  45. 45.

    Ortega N, Behonick D, Stickens D, Werb Z. How proteases regulate bone morphogenesis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003;995:109–16.

  46. 46.

    Stickens D, Behonick DJ, Ortega N, Heyer B, Hartenstein B, Yu Y, et al. Altered endochondral bone development in matrix metalloproteinase 13-deficient mice. Development. 2004;131:5883–95.

  47. 47.

    Neve A, Corrado A, Cantatore FP. Osteoblast physiology in normal and pathological conditions. Cell Tissue Res. 2011;343:289–302.

  48. 48.

    Phang D, Rehage M, Bonafede B, Hou D, Xing W, Mohan S, et al. Inactivation of insulin-like-growth factors diminished the anabolic effects of pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) on bone in mice. Growth Horm IGF Res. 2010;20:192–200.

  49. 49.

    Qin X, Wergedal JE, Rehage M, Tran K, Newton J, Lam P, et al. Pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A increases osteoblast proliferation in vitro and bone formation in vivo. Endocrinology. 2006;147:5653–61.

  50. 50.

    Boldt HB, Conover CA. Pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A): a local regulator of IGF bioavailability through cleavage of IGFBPs. Growth Horm IGF Res. 2007;17:10–8.

  51. 51.

    Conover CA, Chen BK, Resch ZT. Regulation of pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A expression in cultured human osteoblasts. Bone. 2004;34:297–302.

  52. 52.

    Sangiorgi G, Mauriello A, Bonanno E, Oxvig C, Conover CA, Christiansen M, et al. Pregnancy-associated plasma protein-a is markedly expressed by monocyte-macrophage cells in vulnerable and ruptured carotid atherosclerotic plaques: a link between inflammation and cerebrovascular events. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:2201–11.

  53. 53.

    Li W, Li H, Gu F. CRP and TNF-alpha induce PAPP-A expression in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Mediators Inflamm. 2012;2012:697832.

  54. 54.

    Miller BS, Bronk JT, Nishiyama T, Yamagiwa H, Srivastava A, Bolander ME, et al. Pregnancy associated plasma protein-A is necessary for expeditious fracture healing in mice. J Endocrinol. 2007;192:505–13.

  55. 55.

    Tanner SJ, Hefferan TE, Rosen CJ, Conover CA. Impact of pregnancy-associated plasma protein-a deletion on the adult murine skeleton. J Bone Miner Res. 2008;23:655–62.

  56. 56.

    Zhu S, Barbe MF, Liu C, Hadjiargyrou M, Popoff SN, Rani S, et al. Periostin-like-factor in osteogenesis. J Cell Physiol. 2009;218:584–92.

  57. 57.

    Sanchez-Sabate E, Alvarez L, Gil-Garay E, Munuera L, Vilaboa N. Identification of differentially expressed genes in trabecular bone from the iliac crest of osteoarthritic patients. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009;17:1106–14.

  58. 58.

    Grgurevic L, Macek B, Mercep M, Jelic M, Smoljanovic T, Erjavec I, et al. Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)1-3 enhances bone repair. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011;408:25–31.

  59. 59.

    Lories RJ, Derese I, Ceuppens JL, Luyten FP. Bone morphogenetic proteins 2 and 6, expressed in arthritic synovium, are regulated by proinflammatory cytokines and differentially modulate fibroblast-like synoviocyte apoptosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48:2807–18.

  60. 60.

    Marinova-Mutafchieva L, Taylor P, Funa K, Maini RN, Zvaifler NJ. Mesenchymal cells expressing bone morphogenetic protein receptors are present in the rheumatoid arthritis joint. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43:2046–55.

  61. 61.

    Perrien DS, Nicks KM, Liu L, Akel NS, Bacon AW, Skinner RA, et al. Inhibin A enhances bone formation during distraction osteogenesis. J Orthop Res. 2012;30:288–95.

  62. 62.

    El-Gendi SS, Moniem AE, Tawfik NM, Ashmawy MM, Mohammed OA, Mostafa AK, et al. Value of serum and synovial fluid activin A and inhibin A in some rheumatic diseases. Int J Rheum Dis. 2010;13:273–9.

  63. 63.

    Chen D, Li Y, Zhou Z, Xing Y, Zhong Y, Zou X, et al. Synergistic inhibition of Wnt pathway by HIF-1alpha and osteoblast-specific transcription factor osterix (Osx) in osteoblasts. PLoS One. 2012;7:e52948.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Rikke Bøgebo and Mikala Skydsgaard for assistance with data analysis, Marianne Løvendorf for technical assistance, John Zibert and Gunnar Olsen for contributing to the design of the study.

The study was supported by: The Danish Association for Rheumatism, The Graduate Program for In vivo Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen and LEO Pharma.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 2, Copenhagen, Ø DK-2100, Denmark
    • Katja CM Denninger
    •  & Åsa Andersson
  2. Disease Pharmacology/Molecular Biomedicine, LEO Pharma A/S, Industriparken 55, Ballerup, DK-2750, Denmark
    • Katja CM Denninger
    • , Thomas Litman
    • , Troels Marstrand
    • , Kristian Moller
    • , Lars Svensson
    •  & Tord Labuda
Authors
  1. Search for Katja CM Denninger in:
  2. Search for Thomas Litman in:
  3. Search for Troels Marstrand in:
  4. Search for Kristian Moller in:
  5. Search for Lars Svensson in:
  6. Search for Tord Labuda in:
  7. Search for Åsa Andersson in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katja CM Denninger.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

KD conceived, designed and conducted the study, carried out the microscopic analysis with KM and further analysis of the array data with TLi, and drafted the manuscript. TLi analysed and interpreted the microarray data, the IPA, and assisted in drafting the manuscript. TM carried out the first-line analysis and interpretation of the microarray data, and revised the manuscript critically. KM analysed and interpreted the microscopic data, and revised the manuscript critically. LS conceived and participated in design of the study, and revised the manuscript critically. TLa conceived and participated in design of the study, and revised the manuscript critically. ÅA conceived and participated in design of the study, and assisted substantially in drafting the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript, and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Additional files

Additional file 1: Table S2.

A and B: Overview of samples used for histology and global gene expression study.

Additional file 2: Figure S1.

Illustration of histological bone scores. (A) Bone erosion and formation score 0: no pathological changes. (B) Bone erosion score 2. (C) Bone formation score 2. (D) Bone erosion score 4. (E) Bone formation score 4.

Additional file 3:

RMA gene default summary of array data for review.

Additional file 4: Table S4.

Table of assay IDs for specific primer/probe sets (Life Techologies) used for validation of gene expression at AROS Applied Biotechnology A/S.

Additional file 5: Table S5.

(A) Comparison of samples from day 0 to 3 versus control. (B) Comparison of samples from week 1 to 2 versus control. C) Comparison of samples from week 3 to 4 versus control. (D) Comparison of samples from the declining disease phase versus control.

Additional file 6: Figure S6.

Validation of selected genes by qPCR showing correlation between the microarray data (X-axis, log2-transformed values) and the qPCR data (Y-axis, δCt values). δCt,gene is calculated as Ct,Gapdh-Ct,gene. Color coding, Red: day 0 to 3; Yellow: week 1 to 2; Green: week 3 to 4; Blue: declining disease phase; Black: control.

Additional file 7: Figure S7.

Validation of selected genes by qPCR showing a non-significant correlation between the microarray data (X-axis, log2 transformed values) and the qPCR data (Y-axis, δCt values). δCt,gene is calculated as Ct,Gapdh-Ct,gene. Color coding, Red: day 0 to 3; Yellow: week 1 to 2; Green: week 3 to 4; Blue: declining disease phase; Black: control.

Additional file 8: Table S8.

Correlation data and P-values for correlation between microarray and qPCR data.

Additional file 9: Table S9.

Selected Bio Functions related to bone. The Bio Functions that form the basis of the list of genes encoding proteins with a function in bone remodelling.

Additional file 10: Table S10.

List of genes encoding proteins with a suggested function in bone remodelling. The list was created from data in the selected Bio Functions and supplemented with genes based on literature search. The data are also compared to data from other gene expression studies. A list of references is available (please contact the corresponding author).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Denninger, K.C., Litman, T., Marstrand, T. et al. Kinetics of gene expression and bone remodelling in the clinical phase of collagen-induced arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 17, 43 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-015-0531-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Bone Formation
  • Bone Remodelling
  • Bone Erosion
  • Endochondral Ossification
  • Endochondral Bone Formation

Arthritis Research & Therapy

ISSN: 1478-6362

Contact us