Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Expression of interferon-regulated genes in juvenile dermatomyositis versus Mendelian autoinflammatory interferonopathies

Arthritis Research & Therapy volume 22, Article number: 69 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) is a systemic autoimmune disease with a prominent interferon (IFN) signature, but the pathogenesis of JDM and the etiology of its IFN signature remain unknown. The Mendelian autoinflammatory interferonopathies, Chronic Atypical Neutrophilic Dermatosis with Lipodystrophy and Elevated temperature (CANDLE) and STING-Associated Vasculopathy with onset in Infancy (SAVI), are caused by genetic mutations and have extremely elevated IFN signatures thought to drive pathology. The phenotypic overlap of some clinical features of CANDLE and SAVI with JDM led to the comparison of a standardized interferon-regulated gene score (IRG-S) in JDM and myositis-specific autoantibody (MSA) JDM subgroups, with CANDLE and SAVI.

Methods

A peripheral 28-component IRG-S assessed by NanoString™ in 57 JDM patients subtyped by MSA was compared with IRG-S in healthy controls (HC) and CANDLE/SAVI patients. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed, and individual genes were evaluated for their contribution to the score. IRG-S were correlated with disease assessments and patient characteristics.

Results

IRG-S in JDM patients were significantly higher than in HC but lower than in CANDLE or SAVI. JDM IRG-S overlapped more with SAVI than CANDLE by PCA. Among MSA groups, anti-MDA5 autoantibody-positive patients’ IRG-S overlapped most with SAVI. The IFI27 proportion was significantly higher in SAVI and CANDLE than JDM, but IFIT1 contributed more to IRG-S in JDM. Overall, the contribution of individual interferon-regulated genes (IRG) in JDM was more similar to SAVI. IRG-S correlated moderately with JDM disease activity measures (rs = 0.33–0.47) and more strongly with skin activity (rs = 0.58–0.79) in anti-TIF1 autoantibody-positive patients. Weakness and joint disease activity (multinomial OR 0.91 and 3.3) were the best predictors of high IRG-S.

Conclusions

Our findings demonstrate peripheral IRG expression in JDM overlaps with monogenic interferonopathies, particularly SAVI, and correlates with disease activity. Anti-MDA5 autoantibody-positive JDM IRG-S were notably more similar to SAVI. This may reflect both a shared IFN signature, which is driven by IFN-β and STING pathways in SAVI, as well as the shared phenotype of vasculopathy in SAVI and JDM, particularly in anti-MDA5 autoantibody-positive JDM, and indicate potential therapeutic targets for JDM.

Background

Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) is a complex autoimmune disease characterized by weakness and rashes [1]. Myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSA) define phenotypic features and prognosis within JDM, with anti-TIF1, anti-NXP2, and anti-MDA5 autoantibodies being the most common MSA groups in JDM [1,2,3,4]. Although the etiology of JDM is presently unknown, multiple genetic and environmental factors contribute [1, 5]. Interferon (IFN)-regulated genes (IRG) are upregulated in the blood, muscle, and skin of patients with JDM and adult dermatomyositis (DM) and correlate with disease activity [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13], although the exact source, mechanism, and role of IFN remain unclear and detailed assessments by MSA group are lacking.

Mendelian autoinflammatory interferonopathies, which are associated with a strong IRG signature, include Chronic Atypical Neutrophilic Dermatosis with Lipodystrophy and Elevated temperature (CANDLE) caused by additive loss-of-function mutations in proteasome components [14,15,16] and STING-Associated Vasculopathy with onset during Infancy (SAVI), resulting from gain-of-function mutations in the Stimulator of IFN genes (STING) protein [16, 17]. These conditions have a very strong IRG signature and blocking IFN signaling with a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor correlates with clinical improvement and IRG-S decrease in the majority of 18 CANDLE and SAVI patients, with 50% of CANDLE patients achieving persistent clinical remission [16, 18,19,20]. A direct comparison of JDM to the monogenic interferonopathies may provide insight into the role of IFN in JDM, particularly as CANDLE and SAVI share some clinical features with JDM. For example, CANDLE is also associated with lipodystrophy, joint contractures, and myositis, while SAVI has frequent vasculopathy including distal ulcerations and interstitial lung disease [1, 16, 21].

Utilizing a 28 IRG score (IRG-S), which was developed and validated as a biomarker in CANDLE and SAVI [22], we evaluated peripheral blood IRG expression in JDM. Given prominent IRG signatures and overlapping clinical features of JDM with conditions with IFN-driven pathogenesis based on genetic mutations (CANDLE and SAVI), we aimed to better characterize and understand the role of IFN in JDM and its MSA subgroups through direct comparison to patients with CANDLE and SAVI.

Methods

Patient selection

Subjects were enrolled in National Institutes of Health institutional review board-approved natural history studies (Table 1). Active JDM patients (n = 57) met probable or definite Bohan and Peter criteria [23]. CANDLE (n = 11) and SAVI (n = 7) patients were genetically defined and used as positive interferonopathy controls [18]. Neonatal-onset multisystem inflammatory disease (NOMID) patients (n = 18) served as autoinflammatory controls (IL-1 mediated), in addition to 26 healthy controls (HC), both of which were IFN-negative [22]. HC were not age- or gender-matched to JDM patients, as we previously did not find significant differences in IRG-S based on these variables [22]. All JDM patients consented to a NIH/NIEHS IRB-approved protocol. All CANDLE, SAVI, NOMID, and HC patients consented to a NIH/NIAID IRB-approved protocol (NCT02974595). MSAs were identified by validated immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting methods [24]. MSAs with adequate numbers of JDM patients for analysis included anti-p155/140 (TIF1) (n = 21), anti-MJ (NXP2) (n = 11), anti-MDA5 (n = 11) autoantibodies, and MSA-negative (n = 9). Clinical data are available to characterize features for 56 JDM patients.

Table 1 Demographics of each condition
Full size table

Materials

From a single sample per patient of whole blood collected in PAXgene tubes (Qiagen, Germantown, MD), total RNA was extracted. NanoString Technologies™ (Seattle, WA) was used for gene expression analysis, with scores calculated as a sum of Z-scores for each of 28 IRGs [22]. Exploratory analysis (data not shown) of complete blood count parameters (white blood cell count as well as absolute neutrophil, lymphocyte, monocyte, eosinophil, and basophil counts) between JDM (n = 55) versus CANDLE (n = 10) and SAVI (n = 5) FDR corrected for multiple comparisons did not detect any significant differences, so no further normalization based on these counts was performed.

Analysis methods

Analysis was performed using R version 3.5.0 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, ISBN 3-9000-51-07-0, http://www.r-project.org), GraphPad Prism7 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA), JMP13 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC), or SYSTAT13 (Systat Software, San Jose, CA).

Whole blood score comparisons

With JDM overall, IRG-S were compared to CANDLE, SAVI, NOMID, and HC, and FDR corrected for multiple comparisons using the Benjamini, Krieger, and Yekutieli method [25], with significant q values < 0.05. Exploratory analysis compared subgroups of JDM (highest quartile of JDM IRG-S (JDM-HQ), JDM IRG-S above HC, or a specific MSA group) to each other, autoinflammatory conditions and/or HC by Kruskal-Wallis tests, followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons tests (uncorrected), with p < 0.05 considered significant.

Principal component analysis

For principal component analysis (PCA) of JDM, JDM-HQ, and MSA subgroups with the autoinflammatory diseases and controls, all PCAs had adequate samples, as indicated by Kaiser-Meyer Olkin test (values ≥ 0.86) and Bartlett’s sphericity test (p values < 0.0001). Five unrotated PCAs were performed using normalized gene counts, each with autoinflammatory diseases and HC data, differentiated by whether they included all JDM patients or a MSA subgroup as follows: PCA-A (all JDM, CANDLE, SAVI, NOMID, HC), PCA-B (anti-MDA5 autoantibody-positive subgroup of JDM, CANDLE, SAVI, NOMID, HC), PCA-C (anti-NXP2 autoantibody-positive subgroup of JDM, CANDLE, SAVI, NOMID, HC), PCA-D (anti-TIF1 autoantibody-positive subgroup of JDM, CANDLE, SAVI, NOMID, HC), and PCA-E (MSA-negative subgroup of JDM, CANDLE, SAVI, NOMID, HC). One anti-TIF1 JDM patient with suspected viral bronchitis had outlying IRG expression (> 99th percentile) and principal component (PC) scores, and was removed from the analysis. The component loadings are the correlations of the individual gene normalized Z-scores with the given principal component. A stronger loading (e.g., greater than 0.40 or less than − 0.40) indicates a stronger relationship or contribution of that gene with that principal component. As with correlations, these can be negative or positive.

Gene proportion analysis

The contribution of each of the 28 individual IRGs was compared to the total IRG Z-score, which was normalized so that no gene component was negative. Each gene’s proportion of the total normalized IRG-S in JDM-HQ was compared to that in CANDLE and SAVI. The analysis was limited to JDM-HQ (n = 14); this subgroup of JDM has an IRG-S in the same range as CANDLE and SAVI for a more equitable comparison of individual gene proportions. As our goal was to assess whether the pattern of dysregulation in JDM IRG-S was the same as in CANDLE and SAVI, we assessed gene proportions from scores in the same IRG-S range in order to limit differences due simply to different levels of overall dysregulation.

Ratios related to NF-κB and IFN-γ

The expression level of the 3 IFN response genes (CXCL10, GPB1, SOCS1) that are regulated by STAT1 and have nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) binding sites are differentially regulated in some conditions with elevated IRG-S, distinguishing a subset of diseases from CANDLE and SAVI [26]. Also, as the contribution of different interferons can be variable, the expression level of 9 of the IFN response genes (CXCL10, EPSTI1, IFIT1, IFIT2, IFIT3, ISG15, LY6E, SOCS1, USP18) with a greater increase in expression when induced by IFN-γ than IFN-α, over all 28 genes, was assessed as this has also been described to be variable in other interferonopathies versus CANDLE and SAVI [26]. Both the ratio of 3 NF-κB-related genes compared to the other 25 IRGs (“NF-κB ratio”) and the latter ratio of 9 genes over 28 (“IFN-γ ratio”) [26] were calculated based on normalized counts with analysis as above in JDM patients with elevated scores or IRG-S above healthy control range [22] and described by MSA group versus CANDLE and SAVI.

IFN score correlations in JDM

IRG-S were correlated by Spearman’s rank (rs) with core set disease activity and damage assessments in JDM patients overall and in patients with anti-TIF1 autoantibodies [27] (Table 2). IRG-S were also correlated with corticosteroid doses. IRG-S was compared between JDM patients receiving specific medications or not by the Mann-Whitney test and analyzed by the number of steroid-sparing medications received via Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s (uncorrected) tests.

Table 2 Spearman’s rank correlations between selected myositis disease measures and interferon-regulated gene (IRG) scores
Full size table

Two published IRG-S from DM patients, IFIT1, IRF7, and ISG15 [6] and EPSTI1, HERC5, IFI27, IFI44, IFI44L, IFI6, IFIT1, IFIT3, ISG15, MX1, OAS1, OAS3, and RSAD2 [7], were calculated by summing the Z-score of relevant genes for correlation with JDM disease assessments.

JDM disease activity and damage core measures [27] (Additional file 1: Table S1) were compared among IRG-S above and below 48.9, the 95th percentile of HC [22], using Mann-Whitney or Fisher’s exact tests. Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT) cardiovascular and gastrointestinal visual analog scales (VAS) were excluded, as few patients had activity in these systems. Non-redundant measures (rs < 0.7) that differentiated high and low IRG-S were included in backward stepwise logistic regression to examine those associated (alpha < 0.15) with high IRG-S (> 48.9).

Interferon-related protein correlation

IP-10 (CXCL10) as part of a Luminex assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) was assessed in serum or plasma of JDM patients available, to compare the IRG-S with IFN-signaling at the protein level by Spearman’s correlation.

Results

Description of clinical features

Clinical characteristics were also descriptively compared between disease groups based on medical record review. Our cohort of JDM patients demonstrates some clinical overlap with CANDLE and SAVI including the presence of myositis, certain cutaneous features, musculoskeletal and systemic features, and damage findings albeit with different frequencies (Additional file 1: Table S2). Cutaneous features have distinctive characteristics in each condition, specifically heliotrope, Gottron’s papules, photosensitivity, V-sign, and shawl sign rashes present in JDM, whereas panniculitis, nodular violaceous erythema, and annular plaques are present prominently in CANDLE, and cutaneous ulceration in SAVI. All of the JDM patients had proximal weakness while 8/10 (80%) of CANDLE and 1/4 (25%) of SAVI had myositis. All of the SAVI patients with available data (4/4, 100%) had interstitial lung disease versus 8/56 (14.3%) of JDM and none of the CANDLE patients. Of note, there is some variation within JDM by the MSA group as previously described [1,2,3,4]. The anti-TIF1 autoantibody JDM subgroup has more photosensitivity (18/20, 90.0%) and shawl sign rash (8/20, 55.0%) versus other groups in JDM. The anti-NXP2 autoantibody JDM subgroup has more notable myositis with MMT < 225/260 (2/5, 40%) and less photosensitivity (5/11, 45.5%), V-sign (1/11, 9.1%), and shawl sign (0/11, 0.0%). Both have less interstitial disease (0/20 and 0/11, 0.0%). The anti-MDA5 autoantibody JDM subgroup has less notable myositis with MMT <225/260 (0/8, 0.0%) and more cutaneous ulceration and interstitial lung disease (both 7/10, 70.0%) (Additional file 1: Table S2).

Whole blood IRG score analysis

JDM patients (median 40) had higher 28 IRG-S than patients with NOMID and HC and lower IRG-S than CANDLE and SAVI patients (median 534 and 501, respectively). IRG-S of JDM-HQ patients (median 473) did not differ from CANDLE and SAVI patients (Fig. 1). The IRG-S for each of the MSA groups were higher than in patients with NOMID and HC and did not differ from each other. IRG-S of JDM patients with anti-TIF1 and anti-NXP2 autoantibodies (median 42 and 25, respectively) were lower than those of patients with CANDLE and SAVI. Anti-MDA5 autoantibody-positive and MSA-negative patients (median 147 and 186, respectively) are lower but not statistically different from CANDLE and SAVI (Additional file 1: Figure S1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Peripheral blood interferon-regulated gene (IRG) scores in juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) compared to monogenic autoinflammatory disease patients and healthy controls. Median and interquartile ranges are shown. Dotted horizontal line represents 95th percentile of healthy controls [22]. CANDLE (n = 11), SAVI (n = 7), NOMID (n = 18), HC (n = 26). JDM overall (n = 57):*q < 0.05, **q < 0.01. JDM-HQ (n = 14): **p < 0.01. JDM overall and JDM-HQ are higher than NOMID and HC; JDM overall is lower than CANDLE and SAVI. Abbreviations: IRG, interferon-regulated gene; JDM, juvenile dermatomyositis; JDM-HQ, highest-quartile scores in JDM; CANDLE, Chronic Atypical Neutrophilic Dermatosis with Lipodystrophy and Elevated temperature; SAVI, STING-Associated Vasculopathy with onset during Infancy; NOMID, neonatal-onset multisystem inflammatory disease; HC, healthy controls; IQR, interquartile range

Full size image

Principal component analysis (PCA)

All 5 PCA analyses had three interpretable principal components (PCs) with eigenvalues > 1, accounting for 89.3–91.3% of the variance. All 5 PCAs produced a similar PC1 with high (> 0.8) component loadings for 23–25 out of 28 genes accounting for 80.4–82.8% of overall variance and did not distinguish CANDLE, SAVI, and JDM well (Additional file 1: Table S3). Thus, PC1 differentiates IFN disease groups (CANDLE, SAVI, JDM, and JDM MSA groups) from IFN-negative controls (NOMID and HC). PC2 and PC3 better demonstrated the differentiation among CANDLE, SAVI, and JDM overall (PCA-A, Fig. 2a), or the specific MSA groups within JDM from CANDLE and SAVI (PCA-B to PCA-D, Fig. 2b–d; PCA-E, Additional file 1: Figure S2). CANDLE, SAVI, and JDM or the specific MSA group separated from HC and NOMID in PC2 and PC3. JDM-HQ patients are further separated from HC and NOMID than the remaining JDM patients. In PC2 and PC3, JDM overlaps more with SAVI than CANDLE. Anti-MDA5 autoantibody-positive JDM patients show near-complete overlap with SAVI (PCA-B, Fig. 2b), in contrast to anti-NXP2 and anti-TIF1 autoantibody-positive JDM, and the MSA-negative groups, which overlap more with SAVI than CANDLE, but to a lesser degree (PCA-C, PCA-D, Fig. 2c, d; PCA-E, Additional file 1: Figure S2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Principal component 2 (PC2) and 3 (PC3) scores from principal component analysis (PCA) of interferon-regulated gene (IRG) scores from JDM patients with other conditions. a PCA-A with JDM (including JDM highest quartile IRG score, JDM-HQ), CANDLE, SAVI, NOMID, and HC. b PCA-B with anti-MDA5 autoantibody-positive subgroup of JDM, CANDLE, SAVI, NOMID, and HC. c PCA-C with anti-NXP2 autoantibody-positive subgroup of JDM, CANDLE, SAVI, NOMID, and HC. d PCA-D with anti-TIF1 autoantibody-positive subgroup of JDM, CANDLE, SAVI, NOMID, and HC. Large circles represent each group, including CANDLE (pink), SAVI (red), and JDM-HQ or JDM myositis-specific autoantibody (MSA) group (anti-TIF1, anti-NXP2, anti-MDA5) (blue). JDM, as opposed to JDM-HQ, in a represents the lower 3 quartiles of JDM IRG scores. Abbreviations: IRG, interferon-regulated gene; JDM, juvenile dermatomyositis; JDM-HQ, highest-quartile scores in JDM; TIF1, subgroup of JDM with anti-TIF1 myositis-specific autoantibodies; NXP2, subgroup of JDM with anti-NXP2 myositis-specific autoantibodies; MDA5, subgroup of JDM with anti-MDA5 myositis-specific autoantibodies; neg, subgroup of JDM that was negative on testing for myositis-specific autoantibodies; CANDLE, Chronic Atypical Neutrophilic Dermatosis with Lipodystrophy and Elevated temperature; SAVI, STING-Associated Vasculopathy with onset during Infancy; NOMID, neonatal-onset multisystem inflammatory disease; HC, healthy controls

Full size image

Across all five PCAs, we identified the genes with the largest component loadings in PC2 and PC3 (absolute value > 0.4). Briefly, component loadings are essentially weights representing the relative contributions of each gene to the principal component (linear combinations of individual gene scores). In 4 of the 5 PCAs (for JDM overall and all subgroups except anti-TIF1), PC2 had large loadings for GBP1 and SOCS1, and PC3 had large loadings for CXCL10 (Table 3). IFI27 was a large contributor to PC2 in PCAs that included JDM overall, as well as anti-TIF1 and anti-NXP2 autoantibody-positive patients, and a large PC3 contributor for PCAs that included anti-MDA5 autoantibody-positive and MSA-negative patients. LAMP3 had a large PC2 loading only for the PCA that included anti-MDA5 autoantibody-positive patients. The anti-TIF1 autoantibody-positive PCA had CXCL10 in PC2 and GBP1 and SOCS1 in PC3.

Table 3 Highest magnitude component loadings from PCA (PC2, PC3) for JDM/MSA subgroups versus other conditions
Full size table

Gene proportion analysis

The contribution of individual genes to the normalized total IRG-S was evaluated among CANDLE, SAVI, and JDM-HQ (n = 14). JDM-HQ was chosen for comparison as overall, it has IRG-S in the same range as CANDLE and SAVI in order to compare gene proportions more equitably. IFI27 constituted a significantly smaller proportion of the 28-gene IRG-S in the JDM-HQ (median 6.9%) than in CANDLE (median 32.4%) or SAVI (median 27.0%) (Fig. 3a). Because IFI27 dominated the IRG-S in CANDLE and SAVI and the proportion of total IRG-S was higher in JDM-HQ for many other IRGs, analysis comparing contribution of other genes to the overall score was done after removing IFI27. Without IFI27, only IFIT1 remained significantly greater in proportion in JDM-HQ versus SAVI and CANDLE. GBP1 continued to constitute a greater percentage of the IRG-S in CANDLE than JDM-HQ, while four IRGs (HERC5, MX1, OAS3, OASL) had significantly greater proportion in JDM-HQ than in CANDLE (Fig. 3b).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Proportion of individual genes from 28 normalized IRG-S for JDM highest quartile (JDM-HQ), CANDLE, SAVI. *JDM-HQ gene proportion significantly different from SAVI. †JDM-HQ gene proportion significantly different from CANDLE. ‡JDM-HQ gene proportion significantly different from CANDLE and SAVI. Heat map of median proportion of the respective gene by normalized Z-score with red for highest proportion and dark blue for lowest proportion. Bold indicates values in a diagnosis group(s) significantly higher compared to values in the italicized/underlined group(s). Italicized/underlined indicates values in a diagnosis group(s) significantly lower compared to values in bold group(s). a All 28 IRGs are included. b IFI27 has been removed. Individual gene percentages (%) of the total IRG score, by normalized Z-scores (see the “Methods” section) are shown in alphabetical order by gene as median and interquartile ranges for JDM highest-quartile, CANDLE, and SAVI patients. Medians percentages of each gene by diagnosis may not sum to 100 due to skewing in the group, but they do in individual patients. JDM-HQ (n = 14) included 4 with anti-TIF1 Ab, 4 with anti-MDA4 Ab, 3 with anti-NXP2 Ab, and 3 MSA-neg. The JDM Physician Global Activity (PGA) median is 4.1/10 with an interquartile range of 2.4 to 4.7. Abbreviations: IRG, interferon-regulated gene; JDM-HQ, juvenile dermatomyositis patients with the highest quartile of IRG scores; CANDLE, Chronic Atypical Neutrophilic Dermatosis with Lipodystrophy and Elevated temperature; SAVI, STING associated Vasculopathy with onset during Infancy; anti-TIF1 Ab, includes subgroup of JDM patients with anti-TIF1 autoantibodies; anti-NXP2 Ab, subgroup of JDM patients with anti-NXP2 autoantibodies; anti-MDA5 Ab, includes subgroup of JDM patients with anti-MDA5 autoantibodies; MSA-neg, includes subgroup of JDM that is negative for myositis-specific autoantibodies; PGA. Physician Global Activity on 0–10 visual analog scale

Full size image

Ratios related to NF-κB and IFN-γ

The NF-κB ratio in the JDM patients with elevated IRG-S (median 0.03) was significantly lower than NOMID (median 0.13) and HC (median 0.10). They were in the range of the CANDLE (median 0.06) and SAVI (median 0.02) patients, consistent with a smaller cohort of JDM patients previously assessed (Additional file 1: Figure S3A) [26]. When examining JDM patients by the MSA group, the anti-MDA5 group (median 0.02) has the lowest ratio (Additional file 1: Figure S3B). Regarding the IFN-γ ratio, the JDM patients with elevated IRG-S have a significantly higher ratio (median 0.44) versus CANDLE (median 0.38) and also have a higher ratio than SAVI (median 0.41, p = 0.06) (Additional file 1: Figure S4A). When examining JDM patients by MSA groups, the anti-MDA5 group (median 0.44) has the lowest ratio (Additional file 1: Figure S4B).

IRG score correlations in JDM

The standard IRG-S correlated moderately (rs = 0.33–0.47) with seven measures of disease activity in JDM, including physician global activity (PGA), manual muscle testing (MMT), extra-muscular global and skeletal activity, Disease Activity Score (DAS), and 2 serum muscle enzyme levels, with similar performance 2 published IRG-S (Table 2). In anti-TIF1 autoantibody-positive JDM patients, IRG-S more strongly correlated with cutaneous and extra-muscular activity, as well as DAS total and skin activity (rs = 0.58–0.76), with lower correlation with MMT. Other IRG-S performed similarly for the anti-TIF1 autoantibody-positive JDM group (data not shown). Limited patient assessments precluded correlation of IRG-S with disease measures in anti-NXP2 and anti-MDA5 autoantibody-positive patients, although there was no difference in PGA among MSA subgroups.

Forty-six percent (26/57) of JDM patients had high IRG-S (> 48.9). JDM patients with high IRG-S (> 48.9) differed in 11 disease activity measures from those with low scores (Additional file 1: Table S1). From the multivariable regression analysis, low muscle strength (odds ratio [OR] 0.91, p < 0.01) and high skeletal (joint) disease activity (OR 3.3, p = 0.03) were the best predictors of high IRG-S (Table 4). No significant differences in high versus low IRG-S were found by gender, race, disease duration, or ever having calcinosis, cutaneous ulceration, or interstitial lung disease (Additional file 1: Table S1). Unfortunately, small numbers within specific MSA groups precluded multivariable regression analysis within a MSA group.

Table 4 Multivariable logistic regression predicting high IFN score in JDM patients
Full size table

Regarding therapy (Additional file 1: Table S4), neither oral nor intravenous corticosteroid doses correlated with IRG-S (rs = 0.04–0.08). No differences in IRG-S were evident among patients grouped by total steroid-sparing medications received. Patients receiving hydroxychloroquine (n = 21/56), methotrexate (n = 40/56), or intravenous immunoglobulin (n = 18/56) had no difference in IRG-S compared to those not receiving these therapies. Patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (n = 8/56) had lower IRG-S than those not receiving MMF (median − 4.29 vs. 85.2, p = 0.004), although they also had significantly lower PGA (median 1.7 vs. 2.3, p = 0.03).

Given the increased overlap of the anti-MDA5 subgroup of the JDM cohort (n = 10 with clinical information), we assessed the clinical characteristics of this group in particular versus the rest of JDM, CANDLE, and SAVI (Additional file 1: Table S2). The anti-MDA5 subgroup of JDM versus the rest of JDM was characterized by increased cutaneous ulceration (7/10, 70% vs. 8/46, 17%) and interstitial lung disease (ILD) (7/10, 70% vs. 1/46, 2%) with less weakness defined as a MMT score of < 225/260 (0/8, 0.0% vs. 8/28, 29%). In our SAVI cohort, distal ulcerations (4/4, 100.0%) and ILD (5/5, 100.0%) are common, while both are not features commonly observed in our CANDLE cohort (none reported and 3/9, 33.3%, respectively). Myositis is not a frequently observed or assessed feature in our SAVI patients (1/4, 25.0%) and more common in our CANDLE cohort (8/10, 80.0%) though MMT was not performed. Overall, there are multiple features overlapping between JDM, CANDLE, and SAVI with the highest overlap between anti-MDA5 autoantibody-positive JDM patients with SAVI.

To compare the interferon-regulated gene expression to protein expression, the IRG-S was compared to IP-10 in JDM (n = 19). A significant correlation was found (rs = 0.49, p = 0.03), similar to that observed in CANDLE and SAVI patients [20].

Discussion

This study analyzed an IRG-S in JDM and MSA groups within JDM versus Mendelian interferonopathies (CANDLE and SAVI), an IL-1 mediated, non-IFN autoinflammatory disease control (NOMID), and healthy controls. PCA and gene proportion analysis suggested similarities of the IRG pattern elevation in JDM and anti-MDA5 autoantibody-positive patients to SAVI and a moderate correlation of IRG-S with clinical measures.

Blood IRG-S in JDM patients ranged from the levels in HC to as high as CANDLE, and SAVI, but were primarily between HC/NOMID and CANDLE/SAVI. We confirmed that some JDM patients’ IRG-S overlap with HC (54% in our cohort) [7, 28]. IFI27 was found to be most dynamically upregulated [22], contributing a higher proportion when the IRG-S is higher (data not shown). We found that although IFI27 contributed the most to the total IRG-S in JDM-HQ, SAVI, and CANDLE with similarly high overall scores, the proportion of IFI27 to the total IRG-S was lower in JDM-HQ. After excluding IFI27, four genes (HERC5, MX1, OAS3, OASL) contributed a higher proportion to the total IRG-S in JDM-HQ versus CANDLE, whereas one gene, IFIT1, had an increased proportion in JDM-HQ compared to both CANDLE and SAVI. IFIT1 is a negative regulator of STING, which is an adaptor protein essential for IFN-β induction. IFIT1 disrupts the STING interaction with mitochondrial anti-viral signaling protein (MAVS) and TANK-binding kinase (TBK1), which decreases IFN-β expression [29], and may present a counter-regulatory mechanism to “dampen” STING and IFN-β signaling in JDM. Interestingly, SAVI, caused by gain-of-function mutations in STING leading to constitutive activation of IFN-β through the STING-TBK1-IRF3 pathway [16], has a more complete overlap of IRG-S with JDM than CANDLE suggesting that STING and IFN-β may be preferentially activated in JDM. In DM, the higher correlation of serum IFN-β with disease activity and peripheral blood IRG signature versus IFN-α [10] could be consistent with a pathogenic role of STING in JDM. JDM patients with elevated IRG-S had lower NF-κB ratios, similar to canonical interferonopathies CANDLE and SAVI, indicating it is unlikely JDM has much concomitant NF-kB signaling seen in other conditions with an elevated IRG-S [26]. Overall, JDM with elevated IRG-S had higher IFN-γ ratios than CANDLE and SAVI, which is consistent with previous reports of IFN-γ co-localizes with CD3+ T cells in untreated JDM muscle biopsies and increase in both type I and type I interferon-regulated genes in JDM muscle [8], which may differentiate JDM from autoinflammatory CANDLE and SAVI. Differences in these ratios by MSA groups merit evaluation in larger groups.

SAVI is a vasculopathy characterized by violaceous plaques and/or nodules, often with features of vascular damage with gangrene and infarcts in acral areas such as at the tips of the fingers and/or toes [16, 17]. JDM is also a small-vessel vasculopathy with dilated and tortuous periungual capillaries, endarteropathy, and capillary loss noted on muscle biopsy, and patients may develop vasomotor instability in acral areas [3, 30, 31]. Both JDM and SAVI share features of vasculopathy leading to thrombosis, tissue ischemia, and infarction, consistent with both phenotypic overlap and potentially shared role of IFN in vasculopathy pathogenesis [16, 17, 30, 31]. Although Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor therapy does not specifically or fully block IFN-β or constitutively activated STING, it does inhibit type I and II IFN signaling [32] and several reports have noted clinical improvement in SAVI with decreased skin vasculopathy and stabilization of lung disease on JAK inhibitor therapy [20, 33]. Similarly, a limited number of cases in refractory JDM patients have noted improvement of skin and muscle symptoms with JAK inhibitor therapy [34, 35, 38].

MSA groups continue to evolve as an important predictor of subgroups within JDM both regarding phenotype and prognosis. Among the IRG-S of MSA group patients, the anti-MDA5 autoantibody-positive IRG-S overlapped most closely with SAVI by PCA. The anti-MDA5 autoantibody subgroup of JDM is characterized by increased cutaneous ulceration and interstitial lung disease (ILD) with less muscle disease [1,2,3], also observed in our cohort, with more overlap with these vasculopathic features seen in SAVI than CANDLE in general [15,16,17], also specifically observed in our cohort. JAK inhibitor therapy has been noted to show improved outcomes in refractory anti-MDA5 autoantibody adult and juvenile dermatomyositis, including with rapidly progressive ILD [36,37,38].

Furthermore, the peripheral blood IRG-S correlates moderately with disease activity measures, including muscle and extra-muscular components [6, 7, 10]. Multivariable regression analysis identified weakness (MMT-26) and increased skeletal features (skeletal VAS) as the most important factors associated with high IRG-S in JDM overall. MSA-negative patients having elevated IRG-S differs from previous reports of lower IFN chemokine scores in MSA-negative patients, although this was a different type of score and the methodology to determine MSAs also differed [39]. In anti-TIF1 autoantibody-positive patients, who characteristically tend to have more photosensitive rashes, the IRG-S correlated more strongly with skin disease-activity measures although anti-TIF1 patients did not have significantly higher skin activity in our cohort. Unfortunately, small numbers of patients precluded multivariable regression analysis within the anti-TIF1 MSA group.

Though type I IFN itself is in extremely low concentrations in the blood or serum, IRGs are readily quantifiable and have been associated with elevation of serum IFN-α and IFN-β in DM [7, 10]. Notably, our gene expression assessment on NanoString™, which does not require amplification, has low inter-assay and inter-observer variability and excellent reproducibility [22] and may hold value as a potential biomarker in the clinical setting compared to a traditional polymerase chain reaction or PCR-based methods used in other studies [6, 7, 28] that are more difficult to standardize particularly across centers. Additionally, the IRG-S correlated significantly with peripheral protein IP-10. The “gold standard” to validate the peripheral IFN score would be a comparison to the affected skin and/or muscle, in which elevated IRG expression has been previously reported [8, 9]. Although correlations between skin/muscle and blood IRG expression have not been performed, the correlation of the blood IRG expression with muscle and skin disease activity in our Nanostring™ assay and other reports using PCR analyses [6, 7, 10] holds promise as a valuable disease activity marker, though further validation is needed.

Limitations of this study include the evaluation of referred JDM patients at a single time point who have received multiple immunosuppressive therapies. We generally did not find that the IRG-S correlated with any specific medications. However, muscle IRG expression in DM and adult polymyositis and peripheral interferon-regulated chemokine score in refractory adult and pediatric myositis was reported to be reduced with rituximab therapy [40, 41]. The number of patients with Mendelian autoinflammatory diseases and within MSA subgroups was small, but the uniform elevation of the IRG signature and disease-specific differences still allowed for meaningful analysis. Lastly, we evaluated whole blood; thus, the differential contributions of various cell types to the IRG elevation could not be assessed. Though we could not normalize for specific different cell populations within whole blood, it is reassuring that exploratory analysis of white blood cells and differential cell counts between JDM versus CANDLE and SAVI did not find any significant differences (data not shown).

Conclusions

In conclusion, the IRG-S correlates with disease measures in JDM, with a higher correlation for cutaneous features in the anti-TIF1 autoantibody group. IRG-S in JDM has similarities to that of Mendelian interferonopathies, particularly IRG-S for the JDM-HQ and anti-MDA5 autoantibody subgroups. Further evaluation by the MSA group in larger cohorts is important to examine. Specific IRGs have a differential contribution in JDM patients, with a pattern more similar to SAVI than CANDLE, pointing to a potentially larger role of STING activation and IFN-β in JDM and a potential treatment target.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to their containing information that could compromise research participant privacy. The data are available and de-identified from the corresponding author (HK) on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

JDM:

Juvenile dermatomyositis

IFN:

Interferon

CANDLE:

Chronic Atypical Neutrophilic Dermatosis with Lipodystrophy and Elevated temperature

SAVI:

STING-Associated Vasculopathy with onset in Infancy

IRG-S:

Interferon-regulated gene score

MSA:

Myositis-specific autoantibodies

HC:

Healthy controls

PCA:

Principal component analysis

IRG:

Interferon-regulated genes

DM:

Dermatomyositis

STING:

STimulator of INterferon Genes

JAK:

Janus kinase

NOMID:

Neonatal-onset multisystem inflammatory disease

NIH:

National Institutes of Health

NIEHS:

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

IRB:

Institutional Review Board

NIAID:

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases

JDM-HQ:

Highest quartile of juvenile dermatomyositis interferon-regulated gene scores

MDAAT:

Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool

VAS:

Visual analog scale

PC:

Principal component

PGA:

Physician global activity assessment by visual analog scale

MMT:

Manual muscle testing

DAS:

Disease Activity Score

MMF:

Mycophenolate mofetil

ILD:

Interstitial lung disease

MAVS:

Mitochondrial anti-viral-signaling protein

TBK1:

TANK-binding kinase

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

IP-10:

Interferon gamma-inducible protein 10

NF-κB:

Nuclear factor kappa B

References

  1. Pachman LM, Khojah AM. Advances in juvenile dermatomyositis: myositis specific antibodies aid in understanding disease heterogeneity. J Pediatr. 2018;195:16–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tansley SL, Simou S, Shaddick G, Betteridge ZE, Almeida B, Gunawardena H, Thomson W, Beresford MW, Midgley A, Muntoni F, et al. Autoantibodies in juvenile-onset myositis: their diagnostic value and associated clinical phenotype in a large UK cohort. J Autoimmun. 2017;84:55–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rider LG, Nistala K. The juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: pathogenesis, clinical and autoantibody phenotypes, and outcomes. J Intern Med. 2016;280(1):24–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Habers GE, Huber AM, Mamyrova G, Targoff IN, O'Hanlon TP, Adams S, Pandey JP, Boonacker C, van Brussel M, Miller FW, et al. Brief report: association of myositis autoantibodies, clinical features, and environmental exposures at illness onset with disease course in juvenile myositis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68(3):761–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Miller FW, Lamb JA, Schmidt J, Nagaraju K. Risk factors and disease mechanisms in myositis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2018;14(5):255–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bilgic H, Ytterberg SR, Amin S, McNallan KT, Wilson JC, Koeuth T, Ellingson S, Newman B, Bauer JW, Peterson EJ, et al. Interleukin-6 and type I interferon-regulated genes and chemokines mark disease activity in dermatomyositis. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60(11):3436–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Greenberg SA, Higgs BW, Morehouse C, Walsh RJ, Kong SW, Brohawn P, Zhu W, Amato A, Salajegheh M, White B, et al. Relationship between disease activity and type 1 interferon- and other cytokine-inducible gene expression in blood in dermatomyositis and polymyositis. Genes Immun. 2012;13(3):207–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Moneta GM, Pires Marafon D, Marasco E, Rosina S, Verardo M, Fiorillo C, Minetti C, Bracci-Laudiero L, Ravelli A, De Benedetti F, et al. Muscle expression of type I and type II interferons is increased in juvenile dermatomyositis and related to clinical and histological features. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71(6):1011–21.

  9. Wong D, Kea B, Pesich R, Higgs BW, Zhu W, Brown P, Yao Y, Fiorentino D. Interferon and biologic signatures in dermatomyositis skin: specificity and heterogeneity across diseases. PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e29161.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Huard C, Gulla SV, Bennett DV, Coyle AJ, Vleugels RA, Greenberg SA. Correlation of cutaneous disease activity with type 1 interferon gene signature and interferon beta in dermatomyositis. Br J Dermatol. 2017;176(5):1224–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Baechler EC, Bauer JW, Slattery CA, Ortmann WA, Espe KJ, Novitzke J, Ytterberg SR, Gregersen PK, Behrens TW, Reed AM. An interferon signature in the peripheral blood of dermatomyositis patients is associated with disease activity. Mol Med. 2007;13(1–2):59–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Greenberg SA, Pinkus JL, Pinkus GS, Burleson T, Sanoudou D, Tawil R, Barohn RJ, Saperstein DS, Briemberg HR, Ericsson M, et al. Interferon-alpha/beta-mediated innate immune mechanisms in dermatomyositis. Ann Neurol. 2005;57(5):664–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fall N, Bove KE, Stringer K, Lovell DJ, Brunner HI, Weiss J, Higgins GC, Bowyer SL, Graham TB, Thornton S, et al. Association between lack of angiogenic response in muscle tissue and high expression of angiostatic ELR-negative CXC chemokines in patients with juvenile dermatomyositis: possible link to vasculopathy. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(10):3175–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Brehm A, Liu Y, Sheikh A, Marrero B, Omoyinmi E, Zhou Q, Montealegre G, Biancotto A, Reinhardt A, Almeida de Jesus A, et al. Additive loss-of-function proteasome subunit mutations in CANDLE/PRAAS patients promote type I IFN production. J Clin Invest. 2015;125(11):4196–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu Y, Ramot Y, Torrelo A, Paller AS, Si N, Babay S, Kim PW, Sheikh A, Lee CC, Chen Y, et al. Mutations in proteasome subunit beta type 8 cause chronic atypical neutrophilic dermatosis with lipodystrophy and elevated temperature with evidence of genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64(3):895–907.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim H, Sanchez GA, Goldbach-Mansky R. Insights from Mendelian interferonopathies: comparison of CANDLE, SAVI with AGS, monogenic lupus. J Mol Med (Berl). 2016;94(10):1111–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu Y, Jesus AA, Marrero B, Yang D, Ramsey SE, Montealegre Sanchez GA, Tenbrock K, Wittkowski H, Jones OY, Kuehn HS, et al. Activated STING in a vascular and pulmonary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(6):507–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rodero MP, Crow YJ. Type I interferon-mediated monogenic autoinflammation: the type I interferonopathies, a conceptual overview. J Exp Med. 2016;213(12):2527–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. de Jesus AA, Canna SW, Liu Y, Goldbach-Mansky R. Molecular mechanisms in genetically defined autoinflammatory diseases: disorders of amplified danger signaling. Annu Rev Immunol. 2015;33:823–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sanchez GAM, Reinhardt A, Ramsey S, Wittkowski H, Hashkes PJ, Berkun Y, Schalm S, Murias S, Dare JA, Brown D, et al. JAK1/2 inhibition with baricitinib in the treatment of autoinflammatory interferonopathies. J Clin Invest. 2018;128(7):3041–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Torrelo A. CANDLE syndrome as a paradigm of proteasome-related autoinflammation. Front Immunol. 2017;8:927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim H, de Jesus AA, Brooks SR, Liu Y, Huang Y, VanTries R, Montealegre Sanchez GA, Rotman Y, Gadina M, Goldbach-Mansky R. Development of a validated interferon score using NanoString technology. J Interf Cytokine Res. 2018;38(4):171–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bohan A, Peter JB. Polymyositis and dermatomyositis (first of two parts). N Engl J Med. 1975;292(7):344–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Trieu EP, Targoff IN. Immunoprecipitation: Western blot for proteins of low abundance. Methods Mol Biol. 2015;1312:327–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Benjamini Y, Krieger AM, Yekutieli D. Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate. Biometrika. 2006;93(3):491–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. de Jesus AA, Hou Y, Brooks S, Malle L, Biancotto A, Huang Y, Calvo KR, Marrero B, Moir S, Oler AJ, et al. Distinct interferon signatures and cytokine patterns define additional systemic autoinflammatory diseases. J Clin Invest. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI129301.

  27. Rider LG, Aggarwal R, Machado PM, Hogrel JY, Reed AM, Christopher-Stine L, Ruperto N. Update on outcome assessment in myositis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2018;14(5):303–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rice GI, Melki I, Fremond ML, Briggs TA, Rodero MP, Kitabayashi N, Oojageer A, Bader-Meunier B, Belot A, Bodemer C, et al. Assessment of type I interferon signaling in pediatric inflammatory disease. J Clin Immunol. 2017;37(2):123–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Li Y, Li C, Xue P, Zhong B, Mao AP, Ran Y, Chen H, Wang YY, Yang F, Shu HB. ISG56 is a negative-feedback regulator of virus-triggered signaling and cellular antiviral response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(19):7945–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Crowe WE, Bove KE, Levinson JE, Hilton PK. Clinical and pathogenetic implications of histopathology in childhood polydermatomyositis. Arthritis Rheum. 1982;25(2):126–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Gitiaux C, De Antonio M, Aouizerate J, Gherardi RK, Guilbert T, Barnerias C, Bodemer C, Brochard-Payet K, Quartier P, Musset L, et al. Vasculopathy-related clinical and pathological features are associated with severe juvenile dermatomyositis. Rheumatology. 2016;55(3):470–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gadina M, Johnson C, Schwartz D, Bonelli M, Hasni S, Kanno Y, Changelian P, Laurence A, O’Shea JJ. Translational and clinical advances in JAK-STAT biology: the present and future of jakinibs. J Leukoc Biol. 2018;104(3):499–514.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Fremond ML, Rodero MP, Jeremiah N, Belot A, Jeziorski E, Duffy D, Bessis D, Cros G, Rice GI, Charbit B, et al. Efficacy of the Janus kinase 1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib in the treatment of vasculopathy associated with TMEM173-activating mutations in 3 children. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;138(6):1752–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Aeschlimann FA, Fremond ML, Duffy D, Rice GI, Charuel JL, Bondet V, Saire E, Neven B, Bodemer C, Balu L, et al. A child with severe juvenile dermatomyositis treated with ruxolitinib. Brain. 2018;141(11):e80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Papadopoulou C, Hong Y, Omoyinmi E, Brogan PA, Eleftheriou D. Janus kinase 1/2 inhibition with baricitinib in the treatment of juvenile dermatomyositis. Brain. 2019;142(3):e8.

  36. Kato M, Ikeda K, Kageyama T, Kasuya T, Kumagai T, Furuya H, Furuta S, Tamachi T, Suto A, Suzuki K, et al. Successful treatment for refractory interstitial lung disease and pneumomediastinum with multidisciplinary therapy including tofacitinib in a patient with anti-MDA5 antibody-positive dermatomyositis. J Clin Rheumatol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1097/RHU.0000000000000984.

  37. Kurasawa K, Arai S, Namiki Y, Tanaka A, Takamura Y, Owada T, Arima M, Maezawa R. Tofacitinib for refractory interstitial lung diseases in anti-melanoma differentiation-associated 5 gene antibody-positive dermatomyositis. Rheumatology. 2018;57(12):2114–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Sabbagh S, Almeida de Jesus A, Hwang S, Kuehn HS, Kim H, Jung L, Carrasco R, Rosenzweig S, Goldbach-Mansky R, Rider LG. Treatment of anti-MDA5 autoantibody-positive juvenile dermatomyositis using tofacitinib. Brain. 2019;142(11):e59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Reed AM, Crowson CS, Hein M, de Padilla CL, Olazagasti JM, Aggarwal R, Ascherman DP, Levesque MC, Oddis CV, Group RIMS. Biologic predictors of clinical improvement in rituximab-treated refractory myositis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16:257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Nagaraju K, Ghimbovschi S, Rayavarapu S, Phadke A, Rider LG, Hoffman EP, Miller FW. Muscle myeloid type I interferon gene expression may predict therapeutic responses to rituximab in myositis patients. Rheumatology. 2016;55(9):1673–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Lopez De Padilla CM, Crowson CS, Hein MS, Strausbauch MA, Aggarwal R, Levesque MC, Ascherman DP, Oddis CV, Reed AM. Interferon-regulated chemokine score associated with improvement in disease activity in refractory myositis patients treated with rituximab. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2015;33(5):655–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Drs. Sarthak Gupta and Robert Colbert for their critical reading of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases including the Office of Science and Technology and the Translational Immunology Section, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and NIH Clinical Center. Dr. Kim’s work was supported in part by the Cure JM Foundation. Social & Scientific Systems was supported under a contract with NIEHS (HHSN273201600002I).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Raphaela Goldbach-Mansky and Lisa G. Rider contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pediatric Translational Research Branch, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA

    Hanna Kim

  2. Environmental Autoimmunity Group, Clinical Research Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA

    Fatima Gunter-Rahman, Esther Lee, Terrance P. O’Hanlon, Frederick W. Miller & Lisa G. Rider

  3. Social & Scientific Systems, Inc., Durham, NC, USA

    John A. McGrath

  4. Translational Autoinflammatory Diseases Section, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA

    Adriana A. de Jesus, Yan Huang & Raphaela Goldbach-Mansky

  5. VA Medical Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, and Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, USA

    Ira N. Targoff

  6. Translational Immunology Section, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA

    Wanxia L. Tsai & Massimo Gadina

Authors
  1. Hanna Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fatima Gunter-Rahman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. John A. McGrath
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Esther Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Adriana A. de Jesus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ira N. Targoff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yan Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Terrance P. O’Hanlon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Wanxia L. Tsai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Massimo Gadina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Frederick W. Miller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Raphaela Goldbach-Mansky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Lisa G. Rider
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Study concept and design was by HK, RGM, and LR. HK, FGR, JM, MG, EL, LR, and RGM analyzed and interpreted the data. HK and WT performed the experiments. IT, YH, TO, and ADJ acquired the data. LR, FM, and RGM provided clinical samples and clinical data. HK, JM, ADJ, LR, and RGM made critical revisions to the paper. The the authors have read and approved of the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

Raphaela Goldbach-Mansky and Lisa G. Rider share last authorship.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanna Kim.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was carried out in accordance with the institutional review board (IRB) of the National Institutes of Health. All JDM patients consented to a NIEHS IRB-approved protocol. All CANDLE, SAVI, NOMID, and HC patients consented to a NIAID IRB-approved protocol (NCT02974595).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Univariate Comparison of Parameters in JDM patients with High versus Low Interferon-Regulated Gene Score. Table S2. Clinical Features of JDM and myositis-specific autoantibody (MSA) groups, CANDLE, and SAVI. Table S3. Component loadings for Principal Component (PC) Analysis for PC1, PC2 and PC3 for JDM or myositis-specific autoantibody (MSA) subgroups of JDM, with autoinflammatory conditions and controls. Table S4. Treatment information. Figure S1. Peripheral blood interferon-regulated gene (IRG) scores in juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) myositis-specific autoantibody (MSA) groups compared to monogenic autoinflammatory disease patients and healthy controls. Figure S2. PCA graph of Principal Component 2 and 3 scores with MSA-negative JDM group with other conditions. Figure S3. NF-κB ratio in JDM with elevated IRG-S and by MSA groups versus other conditions. Figure S4. IFNγ ratio in JDM with elevated IRG-S and by MSA groups versus other conditions.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, H., Gunter-Rahman, F., McGrath, J.A. et al. Expression of interferon-regulated genes in juvenile dermatomyositis versus Mendelian autoinflammatory interferonopathies. Arthritis Res Ther 22, 69 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-020-02160-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-020-02160-9

Keywords

Arthritis Research & Therapy

ISSN: 1478-6362

Contact us