Skip to main content

Circular RNAs in osteoarthritis: indispensable regulators and novel strategies in clinical implications


Over the past decades, circular RNAs (circRNAs) have emerged as a hot spot and sparked intensive interest. Initially considered as the transcriptional noises, further studies have indicated that circRNAs are crucial regulators in multiple cellular biological processes, and thus engage in the development and progression of many diseases including osteoarthritis (OA). OA is a prevalent disease that mainly affects those aging, obese and post-traumatic population, posing as a major source of socioeconomic burden. Recently, numerous circRNAs have been found aberrantly expressed in OA tissues compared with counterparts. More importantly, circRNAs have been demonstrated to interplay with components in OA microenvironments, such as chondrocytes, synoviocytes and macrophages, by regulation of their proliferation, apoptosis, autophagy, inflammation, or extracellular matrix reorganization. Herein, in this review, we extensively summarize the roles of circRNAs in OA microenvironment, progression, and putative treatment, as well as envision the future directions for circRNAs research in OA, with the aim to provide a novel insight into this field.


Being prevalent mainly in aging, obese and post-traumatic population [1, 2], OA is one of the major sources of chronic joint pain and disability. It is characterized by dysfunctions of cartilage that involve in the apoptosis of chondrocytes, degradation of extracellular matrix (ECM), inflammation, etc. [3,4,5] OA has been recognized as a principal origin of socioeconomic burden coming in two forms. One is the excessive requirement for health-care system, another is the increase in medical costs. As it was concluded, during 1996 to 2005 in the United States, annual expenditures charged to insurers for women with OA was $4833 higher than that of without OA while the costs for man with OA surpassed those of their non-OA counterparts by $4036 [6]. Currently, the therapeutic methods for OA include the physical activities [7], acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), intra-articular steroid injections, and surgery [8]. Besides, novel treatments for OA such as the mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are also on the way [9]. However, the outcomes of OA patients are not satisfactory due to its inevitable destruction to the joint [10], thereby early diagnosis and treatment are of great importance for favorable prognosis.

Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) have been ascertained as the central regulators for progression of multiple diseases [11, 12]. Recently, several reviews have addressed the critical roles of ncRNAs in the pathogenesis, development and therapeutic potential of OA [13,14,15]. CircRNA is a special subset of ncRNA, discriminated by a covalently closed-loop structure, while without neither 5′-3′ polyadenylated nor polarity tail [16]. They are derived from the known protein-coding genes, comprising with one or more exons. Notably, they are exceptionally stable due to the loop structure [17]. In 1976, H L Sanger et al. identified the first circRNA, namely the viroids [18]. For a long time, circRNAs were regarded as transcriptional noises produced during abnormal splicing. Currently, with the application of high-throughput RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) in biological study, thousands of circRNAs have been newly identified and even functionally annotated in multiple physiological and pathological processes of eukaryotes, such as the progression of carcinoma [19, 20], inflammation [21], aging [22], infection [23], etc.

Recently, the relationship between OA and circRNAs has been partially elucidated. Emerging studies suggested that circRNAs could participate in the development of OA through mechanisms such as interfering chondrocytes proliferation and apoptosis [24], regulating ECM degradation [25], and inflammation [26]. Herein, in this review, we have summarized the roles of circRNAs in OA microenvironment, development, and putative treatment, as well as discussed the future directions toward circRNAs in OA.

Biogenesis and mechanism of circRNAs

Derived from canonical splice sites of pre-mRNA [27], circRNAs are primarily produced by “back splicing”, a process which dependent on the cis-regulatory elements and trans-acting factors [28]. Based on the current evidences, three regulatory models are proposed underlying the biogenesis of circRNAs: (1) Spliceosome mediated back-splicing and ligation, which largely relies on the presence of canonical splice sites within the exons [29]. Spliceosome at the 5′ donor site attacking the 3′ acceptor site brings the downstream and upstream fragments into close proximity to form a circulation. The ligation, occurring on the same exon or between two exons, is also catalyzed by spliceosome [30]. A more recent study uncovered that the spliceosomes could assemble across the exon and take part in either the canonical linear splicing or back-splicing [31]. (2) Cis-elements involved circRNA biogenesis. Several circRNAs are processed from internal exons and flanking introns, in which the regulatory elements locating at introns flanking circularized exons are necessitated [32]. RNA paring formed in the introns flanking exons is deemed as a crucial regulator, which generates RNA duplexes that promotes the back-splicing [27]. The primary circulation produced by RNA paring finally forms into the circRNAs with intron included or excluded by back-splicing and alternative splicing [28]. Besides, RNA paring can happen in either the repetitive or the non-repetitive complementary sequences [33]. (3) RNA-binding protein (RBP) regulated circRNA formation. RBP can bind to the introns flanking exons to interfere with the normal splicing. A dimerization of RBPs is then formed and brings the downstream splice- donor site into close proximity with an upstream splice- acceptor site, which finally induces the formation of circRNA [34, 35].

As abovementioned, circRNAs are currently deemed as vital regulators in eukaryotes. Although the functions of overwhelming majority of circRNAs remain elusive, the present studies have showed that circRNAs regulate gene expression in multiple levels. Typically, circRNA can bind to miRNA as a sponge to perturb their expression, and thereby interfering the downstream mRNAs or proteins. For instance, ciRS-7 contains more than 60 miRNA-7 binding sites, and over 20,000 miRNA-7 molecules are bound by ciRS-7 per cell [36, 37]. Moreover, circRNAs engage in the regulation of gene transcription. Some circRNAs such as those derived from processed intron lariats (ciRNAs) [38] or from back-splicing containing the introns [39] are located in the nucleus. These circRNAs were reported to modulate the transcription of their parental genes in cis-regulatory way, which may be achieved by interacting with Pol II complex [39]. In addition, circRNAs can interplay with protein to produce specific circRNPs, which subsequently affecting functions of the associated proteins. It was proposed that there was a feedback loop between circRNAs and proteins from the same gene. Proteins could facilitate the biogenesis of circRNAs while circRNAs in turn control the expression of proteins [34]. Interestingly, circRNAs may also be translatable. However, due to the lack of 5′ end 7-methylguanosine (m7G) caps and 3′ poly(A) tails, circRNA translation is considered to happen in a novel way. It was suggested that some circRNA sequences could act as the internal ribosome entry sites (IRESs) to allow ribosomes binding to the translatable circRNAs [40]. For example, the translation of CircZNF609 in myogenesis [41], circMbL in fly [40], and circβ-catenin in liver cancer [42] are all happen in this manner. The detailed graphical description of these mechanisms is presented in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The biogenesis and general mechanisms of circRNAs. CircRNAs are generated through different ways: (1) Spliceosome mediated back-splicing and ligation; (2) Cis-elements involved circRNA biogenesis; (3) RNA-binding protein (RBP) regulated circRNA formation. Meanwhile, circRNAs may exert their functions through acting as miRNAs sponge, modulating the transcription, interplaying with protein directly, or translating into protein

CircRNAs in microenvironment of OA

The pathogenesis and development of OA involve in multiple cells and molecules that construct the OA microenvironment, as shown in Fig. 2. Dysfunctions of articular chondrocytes, the main cellular component of cartilage, such as apoptosis [43] and autophagy [44] are considered to play an indispensable role during OA. During initial stage, the molecular composition and organization of ECM are altered while the cartilage surface remains intact [45]. Meanwhile, under the stimulation of those factors, the chondrocytes begin to acquire active proliferation ability and induce matrix secretion to repair the ECM. Molecules such as the growth factors [46], hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) [47], and growth differentiation factor 5 (GDF5) [48] are found to participate in these processes. With the progression of OA, the articular microenvironment produces more factors to mitigate the deterioration. However, The proliferating cells may produce high amounts of catabolic enzymes/ pro-inflammatory mediators which finally lead to chondrocyte apoptosis and ECM degradation [49]. The cartilage is then disrupted and dysfunctional. Sequentially, the bone eburnation, osteophyte formation, muscle damage, and tendon destruction also appear [50]. Of note, inflammation also plays a role in the OA microenvironment, especially for the post-traumatic OA [51]. The products of tissue damage and stress recognized by the cell surface pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs) can trigger the inflammatory signal pathways such as the nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) [52]. Multiple inflammation related molecules were found to be elevated in OA [53], including the interleukin 1β (IL-1β), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), chemokines, etc. Meanwhile, OA is usually companied by synovitis [54], even though its initiator remains unclear. Investigation of the OA synovium immune cell indicated that the CD14+ monocytes/macrophages, T cells, and mast cells were the dominating cell types [55], which implicated a role of innate immune system in OA inflammation [56].

Fig. 2

The OA microenvironment. Risk factors enter into the joint microenvironment and induce abnormities of cartilage. Firstly, the molecular composition and organization of ECM are changed to activate the proliferation and secretion of chondrocytes. The proliferating cells may produce high amounts of catabolic enzymes/ pro-inflammatory mediators which lead to chondrocyte apoptosis and ECM degradation. Innate immune cells such as the macrophages are motivated and the inflammatory responses then appear under the impact of various molecules. ECM: extracellular matrix, GDF5: growth differentiation factor 5, HIF: hypoxia-inducible factor

As the indispensable component of OA microenvironment, ncRNAs have been demonstrated to participate in a multitude of OA related processes [57, 58]. Firstly, circRNAs constitute a large-scale subset of ncRNAs that exist in the OA microenvironment, which construct a regulatory network in OA progression. For instance, the proliferation, apoptosis, and degradation of articular chondrocytes are closely associated with abnormally expressed circRNAs [59, 60]. Zhu H et al. found that circGCN1L1 could promote the synoviocyte proliferation and chondrocyte apoptosis by sponging miR-330-3p [26]. However, the relationship between circRNAs and other cells in OA microenvironment such as the macrophage and fibroblast remain largely unknown.

Secondly, circRNAs are clarified as the vital regulators of cellular autophagy. Liang et al. have demonstrated that circCDYL could enhance the autophagic level in breast cancer cell by targeting miR-1275-ATG7, subsequently aggravating the tumor progression [61]. Meanwhile, circPAN3 was reported as a key mediator of drug resistance in acute myeloid leukemia by regulating autophagy and the AMP-activated protein kinase/ mammalian target of rapamycin (AMPK/mTOR) signaling pathway [62]. In addition, autophagy is also considered underlying the scenario of OA. Conclusive evidences were obtained from multiple studies that autophagy was increased in OA under the induction of catabolic and nutritional stresses, and that autophagy in turn regulated the expression of OA-like genes [63]. Moreover, the close interaction between autophagy and inflammation has been determined [64]. Notably, autophagy can perturb the inflammation of OA [65]. Therefore, circRNAs may act as critical mediators of autophagy in OA.

Besides, circRNAs also contribute to the innate immunity in OA [66]. Zhang and colleagues proposed that differential expression of 189 circRNAs were found between M1 and M2 macrophages [67]. Meanwhile, circ-RasGEF1B significantly affected the activation of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) exposed macrophages [68]. In addition, circ-ZC3H4 was proved as a crucial mediator of pulmonary macrophages activation induced by Silicon dioxide (SiO2) [69]. Further, the innate immunity related cells including monocytes/ macrophages and mast cell were disclosed to enrich in the OA microenvironment [55]. And it was noticed that innate immune response was in line with the development of OA [70]. Inhibition of macrophage activation could substantially reduce the inflammatory response and block the OA advancement in rat model [71]. Given these evidences, we envision that circRNAs are capable of interfering the progression of OA by affecting the innate immune system, which may pave a novel pathway to discover the underlying mechanism of OA.

Multifaceted role of circRNAs in OA

CircRNA profiles in OA

Currently, it has been recognized that cartilage abnormality is significantly associated with the status of chondrocytes, including its differentiation [72], hypertrophy [73], apoptosis [43], regeneration [74], etc. In the past several years, there have been substantial studies toward these processes, in which the circRNAs took a big place. The aberrant changes of multiple circRNAs have been demonstrated in OA. A whole-transcriptome sequencing revealed that the expression of 42 circRNAs were altered in OA cartilage tissue compared with the normal cartilage [75]. Meanwhile, differential expressions of 1380 circRNAs were observed between OA chondrocytes and the counterparts [76]. Later, Xiao and colleagues unrevealed 197 differentially expressed circRNAs in OA knee condyle [77]. Furthermore, in OA mouse model induced by IL-1β, 119 upregulated and 136 downregulated circRNAs were also identified by the RNA-seq [78]. Additionally, expression level of 58 circRNAs were found to be altered in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) OA tissue [79]. Collectively, the changing patterns of circRNAs indicate their potential functions in OA. Based on these genomic profiles, researches have been further performed toward these upregulated or downregulated circRNAs as follows. The detailed mechanisms are also displayed in Table 1 and Fig. 3.

Table 1 regulatory roles of circRNAs in OA
Fig. 3

Detailed mechanism of circRNAs in OA. CircRNAs are either upregulated or downregulated in OA. The aberrant expressed circRNAs participate in the OA progression through binding to the miRNAs or proteins to interfere the downstream genes. Regulation of circRNAs on OA development involves in the chondrocytes proliferation and apoptosis, ECM metabolism, inflammation, etc. ECM: extracellular matrix, ERG: E26 transformation-specific (ETS)-related gene, HIF-1a: hypoxia-inducible factor-1a, IGF-1R: insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor, MMP-13: matrix metalloproteinase 13, NAMPT: nicotinamide phosphoribosyl transferase

Upregulated circRNA in OA


A newly published study uncovered that the dysregulated circRNA-UBE2G1 accelerated OA progression [80]. By using Quantitative real-time reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR), the investigators found that circRNA-UBE2G1 level was considerably elevated in LPS-treated chondrocytes (C28/I2 cell line). Functional assays indicated that circRNA-UBE2G1 suppression could restore the viability of LPS-treated chondrocytes and decrease the level of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Mechanistically, circRNA-UBE2G1 acted as a competing endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs) and bound to miR-373, hereby increasing the expression of HIF-1α, a vital regulatory molecule in cell proliferation, survival [89], and synovial fibrosis under hypoxic conditions [90]. Thus, circRNA-UBE2G1 is an important regulator of OA advancement.


The expression of circ_0136474 in OA tissue was markedly increased compared with the normal counterpart according to the microarray analysis conducted by Li et al. [24]. Furthermore, cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assay, flow cytometry, and dual-luciferase reporter assay illustrated that overexpression of circ_0136474 in OA could inhibit the proliferation and promote the apoptosis of chondrocytes by competitive binding to miR-127-5p [24]. The immune-localization between circ_0136474 and matrix metalloproteinase 13 (MMP-13), a central regulator in cartilage degradation [89], has been confirmed by RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assy. Further exploration has ascertained that the suppression of miR-127-5p negatively regulated the MMP-13 expression. Taken together, enhancement of circ_0136474 in OA is a risk factor for cartilage damage and OA progress.


CircRNA-CER, also known as circRNA 100,876, has been explored in OA and other human diseases. Previous studies demonstrated that aberrant circRNA-CER expression contributed to the proliferation and metastasis of gastric cancer [91], colorectal cancer [92], breast cancer [93], etc. Generally, circRNA-CER were reported to serve as ceRNA that bound to the corresponding miRNA.

In OA, the expression level of circRNA-CER was upregulated. Bioinformatics predicting the interaction between circRNA and miRNA suggested that circRNA-CER was closely correlated with miR-136 [81]. Their relationship was then validated by luciferase assay. Further, circRNA-CER inhibition reduced the expression of MMP-13 mRNA, and the co-transfection of miR-136 inhibitor and si-CER could reverse this effect [81]. Thus, it has been concluded that circRNA-CER could compete for miR-136 with MMP-13, consequently facilitating the process of chondrocyte ECM degradation.


CircVCAN, locating at the chr5:83519349–83,522,309, has been partially studied in several human diseases. For instance, the expression level of CircVCAN in monocytes was considerably changed in sepsis, and its dysregulation was related to the condition of immunity [94].

Recently, circVCAN has been found to be highly expressed in OA violated cartilage tissue compared with that without OA destruction from meniscus injury patients [60]. Western blot and qRT-PCR showed that knockdown of circVCAN by siRNA could downregulate the mRNA and protein level of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), and vice versa. Since PCNA is an important node in the cell proliferation regulatory network [95], the crosstalk between circVCAN and PCNA may suggest a role of circVCAN in proliferation as well. Besides, the flow cytometry connoted that chondrocytes tended to maintain at G0/G1 phase in the cell cycle and induce apoptosis when treated with si-CircVCAN. Moreover, NF-κB pathway was notably downregulated during circVCAN silencing. Additionally, when transfected with the NF-κB inhibitor, the effect of LV-CircVCAN (increasing circVCAN level) on chondrocytes proliferation and apoptosis was reversed. Therefore, CircVCAN could participate in the chondrocyte proliferation and apoptosis, partially via regulating the NF-κB pathway in OA.


As validated by qRT-PCR, circPSM3 was upregulated in OA chondrocytes [59]. By contrast, miR-296-5p was found downregulated in OA, and luciferase reporter assay indicated that miR-296-5p was the target of circPSM3. MiR-296-5p could effectively enhance the cell proliferation [59]. Meanwhile, miR-296-5p inhibitor restored the cell proliferation and differentiation that was suppressed by si-circPSM3. Therefore, circPSM3 expedited chondrocytes proliferation and differentiation in OA via binding to miRNA-296-5p, whereby circPSM3 may serve as a potential therapeutic target for OA.


Hsa_circ_0005105 is a novel circRNA that located at chr5:134022479–134,023,989. Wu et al. reported that the expression level of hsa_circ_0005105 was markedly increased in IL-1β treated chondrocytes [25]. Western blot detection suggested that overexpression of hsa_circ_0005105 suppressed the expression of type II collagen (Col II) and aggrecan (AGG), the major components of hyaline (or intraarticular) cartilage [25]. Furthermore, miR-26a, the target gene of hsa_circ_0005105, was confirmed by dual-luciferase reporter assay. MiR-26a was found to inhibit the expression of nicotinamide phosphoribosyl transferase (NAMPT), an indispensable catabolic regulator in inflammatory pathway [95, 96]. However, the inhibition could be reversed by hsa_circ_0005105 upregulation [96, 97]. Hence, hsa_circ_0005105 modulated the progression of OA via a hsa_circ_0005105-miR-26a-NAMPT axis.


Locating at chrX:139865339–139,866,824, circRNA-CDR1as has a genomic length of 1485 nt. Based on the current studies, dysregulation of circRNA-CDR1 has been identified in a variety of physio-pathologic processes, such as the growth and chemo-sensitivity of carcinomas [98, 99], myogenic and osteoblastic differentiation [100, 101], and particularly, the progression of OA [82].

QRT-PCR examination illustrated that circRNA-CDR1as expression level in chondrocytes derived from OA cartilage was remarkably higher than that of the normal chondrocytes, and the deactivation of circRNA-CDR1as by siRNA boosted the expression of Col II, but reduced MMP-13 [82]. Additionally, down-regulation of circRNA-CDR1as minimized the level of inflammatory factor IL-6. Pull down assay further confirmed that circRNA-CDR1as could bind to miR-641. Fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF-2) was then determined as the target of miR-641 by TargetScan website and dual luciferase reporter assay [82]. Further investigation discovered that by activating the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase/extracellular regulated kinase (MEK/ERK) signaling pathway, circRNA-CDR1as/miR-641/FGF-2 axis facilitated the ECM degradation and inflammation of chondrocytes [82].


A study by Zhou et al. inferred a higher expression of circRNA_Atp9b in mouse OA chondrocytes [83]. Western blotting and qRT-PCR elucidated that knockdown of circRNA_Atp9b dramatically forced the synthesis of Col II, but diminished MMP-13 expression, inflammatory factors, IL-6 and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) in chondrocytes [83]. Bioinformatics analysis and luciferase activity assay disclosed that circRNA_Atp9b functioned as a miR-138-5p sponge [83]. Meanwhile, transfection of miR-138-5p inhibitor could reverse the protective effect of circRNA_Atp9b suppression. Summarily, these findings manifested that circRNA_Atp9b was capable of modulating IL-1β-induced ECM synthesis by sponging miR-138-5p in OA chondrocytes [83]. Besides, circRNA_Atp9b was also proposed to regulate the inflammatory response in LPS induced MRC-5 cells by blocking the NF-κB and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) pathway [102].


CircRNA.33186, derived from the Umad1 gene on chr6:8373906–8,427,185, was found to be expressed 4.83-fold higher in OA chondrocytes than the normal control [84]. In vivo study of OA mice models also disclosed the up-regulation of circRNA.33186 [84]. Moreover, the expression level of MMP-13 was significantly reduced while the Col II was up-expressed when the chondrocyte was transfected with si-circRNA.33186 [84]. CCK8 and 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU) assay illuminated that circRNA.33186 ablation could restore the proliferation of chondrocytes that was deactivated by IL-1β [84]. It was then figured out that miR-127-5p had a binding site for circRNA6.3318 and their relationship was further validated by luciferase screening assay [84]. Furthermore, miR-127-5p was clarified to target MMP-13. In particular, after co-transfecting with miR-127-5p inhibitor, the effects caused by silencing of circRNA6.3318 were significantly resumed [84]. In conclusion, the pathogenesis promotion effect of circRNA.33186 relied heavily on binding to miR-127-5p and acting as a sponge.


Zhu et al. have investigated the role of a circGCN1L1 splicing variant that had an upregulated fold change of 153.3, the hsa_circ_0000448, in the progression of TMJ OA [26]. Mechanistic studies uncovered that circGCN1L1 in TMJ OA synovial cells and tissues could promote the chondrocytes apoptosis and synoviocytes proliferation. MiR-330-3p was found as the only miRNA that was predicted to have a binding site for circGCN1L1 in all of the three online databases (circular RNA interactome, StarBase, and RegRNA2.0) [26]. In vitro study displayed that expression level of miR-330-3p was negatively correlated with the circGCN1L1 expression. Further exploration ascertained that circGCN1L1 could target miR-330-3p as a sponge [26]. Moreover, miR-330-3p directly bound to TNF-α and restrained the secretion of matrix-degrading enzymes, including MMP3, MMP13 and a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs-4 (ADAMTS4) [26]. From these data, it can be summarized that circGCN1L1-miR-330-3p-TNF axis exerted crucial function in TMJ OA modulation.

Downregulated circRNA in OA


As shown by qRT-PCR, the expression level of circ9119 was significantly downregulated in OA tissue and IL-1β induced chondrocytes compared with the normal counterpart [85]. 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay demonstrated that the suppression of chondrocytes proliferative activity was reversed after circ9119 overexpression treatment. Using bioinformatics analysis, miR-26a was found to be a target for circ9119, and the phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) was targeted by miR-26a [85], which was further verified by luciferase reporter assay. The expression level of miR-26a was increased and PTEN was reduced in IL-1β induced chondrocytes, while their expression was restored after circ9119 overexpression [85]. Thus, these findings suggested that circ9119 accelerated the proliferation of IL-1β induced chondrocytes via binding to miR-26a, subsequently increasing the PTEN [103].


Hsa_circ_0045714, locating at chr17:73808192–73,809,959, was considerably down-regulated in OA tissue and TNF-a treated chondrocytes [86]. As revealed by luciferase reporter assay, miR-193b was targeted by hsa_circ_0045714, and their expression level was negatively correlated. Further investigations demonstrated that miR-193b could target insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R) and suppress its expression, while overexpression of hsa_circ_0045714 antagonized this repressive effect [86]. Moreover, IGF-1R could increase the secretion of Col II and AGG in chondrocytes while miR-193b restrained their expression. Similarly, the inhibition effect of miR-193b could be reversed by hsa_circ_0045714 overexpression [86]. Besides, IGF-1R and hsa_circ_0045714 could accelerate the proliferation of chondrocytes, while miR-193b enhanced cell apoptosis [86]. Collectively, these results indicated that hsa_circ_0045714 regulated the ECM synthesis and proliferation of chondrocytes by abolishing miR-193b expression, whereby promoting the IGF-1R gene.


CircSERPINE2 is located at chr2:224856519–224,866,639 in human genome. Detection in 10 human OA cartilages and 10 controls from different donors illustrated that circSERPINE2 expression was down-expressed in OA sample [87]. Knockdown of circSERPINE2 was found to accelerate the apoptosis and motivate the expression of MMP3, MMP13 and ADAMTS4 in human chondrocytes and SW1353 cells (chondrosarcoma cell lines). Luciferase assay has verified that miR-1271 was a target for circSERPINE2. Meanwhile, chondrocytes apoptosis was significantly restored when the si-circSERPINE2 was co-transfected with miR-1271 inhibitor. Moreover, the E26 transformation-specific (ETS)-related gene (ERG) was validated as the target gene of miR-1271 [87]. The in vivo study using ACLT rabbit model further implied that circSERPINE2 could alleviate the progression of OA [87]. In summary, overexpression of circSERPINE2 protected chondrocytes from apoptosis and ECM degradation via miR-1271-ERG pathway.


CiRS-7, also termed as CDR1as, is originated from the antisense orientation transcription of CDR1 gene [104]. It is a circular miR-7 inhibitor with more than 70 binding sites [104], and the ciRS-7/miR-7 axis has been identified to play a regulatory role in many diseases. It was reported that the ciRS-7/miR-7/NF-kβ axis could significantly interfere the invasion, proliferation, and migration of non-small cell lung cancer cells [105]. Further, it could impact the insulin secretion by targeting Myrip and Pax6 [106].

In the plasma of OA patients, ciRS-7 expression was downregulated while miR-7 expression was upregulated compared with the healthy subjects [88]. Further investigation has revealed that knockdown of ciRS-7 could promote the secretion of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 and IL-8 [88]. Flow cytometry unraveled that ciRS-7 inhibition and miR-7 activation induced the pro-apoptotic effects in OA cells. In conclusion, these findings indicated that ciRS-7/miR-7 axis exerted important function in the regulation of OA.

Potential clinical utilizations of circRNAs in OA

Considering the pivotal roles of circRNAs in the progression and development of OA, it has been speculated that circRNAs are of great importance in clinical application like other ncRNAs [5, 107]. Particularly, there has been increasingly more attention on changes of circRNAs in body fluid such as the peripheral blood and synovial fluid since they are easy to acquire and detect. Wang et al. have uncovered that hsa_circ_0032131 level in peripheral blood of OA patients was differentially expressed and could serve as a biomarker for diagnosis [108]. The value of area under curve (AUC) for hsa_circ_0032131 was 0.8455. In parallel to this, peripheral blood hsa_circ_0020014 was also illuminated to be a potential biomarker for OA diagnosis with an AUC of 0.6415 [109]. Similarly, in blood sample of OA patients, ciRS-7 expression level was notably decreased, which indicated the potential of ciRS-7 to be a diagnostic biomarker [88]. Likewise, circRNA expression profiles in synovial fluid of OA patients have also been carried out by microarray analysis [110]. Results showed that the expression level of three circRNAs (hsa_circ_0104595, hsa_circ_0104873, and hsa_circ_0101251) could distinctly distinguish OA patients from their normal counterpart, with the AUC value of 0.708, 0.683, and 0.754, respectively. Therefore, circRNAs may act as promising biomarkers for the prediction of OA (Table 2).

Table 2 Potential clinical applications of circRNAs in OA

Moreover, circRNAs can also act as the therapeutic targets for drugs as outlined above, yet there is currently no such drug in OA. Some manipulation strategies have been developed to inhibit or enhance the expression level of circRNAs. The initial method to suppress circRNAs expression is siRNA which complements to the back-splice site to interfere with the circRNAs production [111]. Genome-editing tools such as CRISPR/Cas9 also have been used in removal of functional circRNAs [112], although their application in human body is still in fierce controversy.

Further, several newly established strategies for diseases treatment may expand the therapeutic application of circRNAs in OA. For instance, circRNAs are found in extracellular vesicles (EVs) that can modulate the progress of diseases by transporting their cargo (ncRNA, protein, mRNA, lipid, etc.) [5, 113]. Since EVs are also the important regulators in cartilage homeostasis and osteoarthritis [114], circRNAs may partially exert their function via the EVs transportation system. In fact, some exosomal ncRNAs such as miRNAs have been illustrated to take part in the regulation of OA. As an example, exosomal miR-95-5p can protect cartilage from harassment of OA through directly targeting histone deacetylase 2/8 (HDAC2/8) [115]. Moreover, the emerging role of other exosomal ncRNAs including the lncRNAs has been illustrated in musculoskeletal disorders [5, 116]. In addition, EVs have shown great potential as the vehicle to selectively deliver drugs into specific site of tissue [117]. By delivering the engineered RVG-circSCMH1-EVs to the brain of stroke mice and monkeys, Li et al. have validated that exogenous circRNAs delivery by EVs could improve the outcome of stroke [118]. Accordingly, delivering effective exogenous circRNAs into OA site by EVs is a novel direction for OA treatment.

Moreover, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are another potential treatment option for OA that have sparked intensive research interest in recent years [119]. Derived from human organs such as the bone marrow and adipose, MSCs are multipotent progenitor cells that are capable of differentiating into different lineages including chondrocytes to repair tissue damage [120, 121]. Combining with scaffolds, MSCs can promote the regeneration of articular cartilage [122]. Additionally, the MSCs derived exosome can promote the proliferation and suppress the apoptosis of chondrocytes [123], as well as alleviate the inflammation response in OA [124]. Of note, the expression level of a large diversity of circRNAs have been changed during chondrogenic differentiation of MSCs [125]. Among them, CircRNA-CDR1as has been validated to maintain the differentiation and proliferation of human umbilical cord MSCs [126]. Thus, circRNAs may be utilized as the regulator to determine the differentiation trend and speed during the MSCs therapy, which pave the way for customized treatment.

Methods for circRNA research

Over the past decades, emerging technologies have been developed and adopted to explore the presences and functional implications of circRNAs even though the current methods are still of limitations. Here we have summarized and discussed the existing approaches as well as their deficiencies in circRNA research.

Genome-wide circRNA profiling

Conventional genome-wide sequencing is not suitable for circRNAs because of their specific circular structure. To figure out this limitation, several circRNA collection and purification methods such as circRNA enrichment using RNase R have been invented [127] to remove linear RNAs ahead of sequencing. Moreover, the identification of specific circRNAs relies on recognition of their back-spliced junction (BSJ) reads, so multiple annotation-dependent approaches (such as MapSplice [128], CIRCexplorer [129], KNIFE [130], etc.) and algorithms (such as fnd-circ, segemehl [131], CIRI [132], etc.) for globally detection of circRNAs based on RNA-seq data also have been created. However, using different algorithms for circRNA prediction may lead to discrepant results, therefore it was suggested that several algorithms should be combined together to ensure the reliability [133].

Experimental detection and validation of circRNAs

Several options are available for experimental validation of circRNAs, containing PCR, gel electrophoresis, Sanger sequencing, FISH, and Northern Blot. PCR is currently one of the most widely used method for fast detection of circRNAs. Firstly, primers that spanning the splice site are designed in a convergent direction. Then, the semiquantitative or quantitative PCR is conducted accordingly. However, PCR results of circRNAs are easy to be influenced by the linear RNAs that have the same sequences with the circRNAs reverse transcriptional fragments. Thus, subsequent gel electrophoresis and Sanger sequencing are recommended to further validate the PCR product [134]. Another experimental validation approach of circRNAs is Northern Blot, which represents as the golden standard [135]. CircRNAs detection can be achieved by either short probes spanning the BSJ or longer probes overlapping as much as an entire circularized exon [135]. This method is of high specificity and great versatility, even though it is laborious and time-consuming.

Meanwhile, the subcellular location of circRNAs is usually explored by FISH, a technique using probe to detect specific site in RNAs [136]. A fluorescently labeled junction specific probe is designed to discover and visualize circRNAs in cells. However, the expression level of a majority of circRNAs are relatively low in cells, which makes it difficult to be detected by fluorescence. Moreover, circRNAs fluorescent signal can be disturbed by the linear trans-spliced RNA isoforms. To overcome this limitation, pre-treating RNAs with RNase R has been applied [39].

Expression interference of circRNAs

To explore functions of circRNAs, the loss and gain of function by manipulating its expression are necessary. Similar to the linear RNAs, suppression of circRNAs can be accomplished by RNAi technology. Nevertheless, the specific siRNA or shRNA must target the BSJ sites of circRNAs to avert silence of its cognate linear RNAs. This yields a limitation that we cannot design manifold RNAi fragments to overcome the off-target effect [127]. In addition, CRISPR/Cas9 is a potential method to achieve circRNA knockdown, which is fulfilled by large fragments deletion. Piwecka et al. have generated a circRNA CDR1as KO animal model by removing the entire CDR1as producing region [112]. However, CRISPR/Cas9 is still an unmatured tool for circRNAs suppression, and it inevitably impacts the expression of linear RNAs. Meanwhile, the entire genomic removal of gene locus may have enigmatic effects on cells.

Overexpression of circRNAs remains challenging. Complementary sequence-mediated RNA circularization is a classical manner for circRNA upregulation, which is implemented by a constructed plasmid compromising the circRNA-producing exons, flanking intronic sequences and intrinsic complementary sequences. With well-designed vector, the expression efficiency is high; however, the presence of non-specific linear RNA isoforms is common. Thomas et al. have designed a vector consisting of the upstream intron, downstream intron fragment (reverse complement with upstream intron), and the sequence for circRNA circularization that can be cloned between upstream and downstream sequences [36]. Compared with traditional cloning, this vector is of higher efficiency for circRNA amplification. Another way for circRNAs overexpression is to modulate the Quaking level or insert Quaking binding motifs into introns [35]. Since Quaking is a dimer that can bind to two separated regions of a single RNA molecule, it is possible that Quaking promotes the biogenesis of circRNAs. However, this technology has not been well developed currently.

Synthesis of circRNAs in vitro

CircRNAs production in vitro is indispensable for the structural and functional studies. To acquire a circRNA, the linear RNAs generated from chemical synthesis or enzymatic transcription are ligated using various protocols [137] (such as chemical, enzymatic, or DNAzyme-supported protocols). The chemical synthesis is capable of producing RNAs with different backbone, linkages, and base modifications, which allows a wide range of customization. As another choice, the enzymatic protocols represent advantages in producing long RNAs that may exceed 1000 bp in length. However, it lacks of the possibility for site-specific modification [138].

In summary, technologies for circRNAs research have been partially developed. Multiple aspects of circRNAs (such as the presence validation, structure, loss and gain of function, and artificial synthesis) have been explored using these strategies, which has deepened our understand toward the role of circRNAs in diseases. Nevertheless, some methods remain unmatured in circRNAs study such as the CRISPR/Cas9. Advances of scientific study largely relies on the evolution of technology; therefore, novel insight of circRNAs may continuously uncovered with employment of new experimental assay.

Conclusions and perspectives

CircRNAs have emerged as the novel and key modulators in OA with great potential serving as the diagnostic biomarkers or therapeutic regulators. The contributions of circRNAs in cartilage homeostasis, microenvironment, progression, and putative therapy for OA have been discussed in this review. Moreover, it has been highlighted that circRNAs may be combined with some novel therapeutic strategies such as the EVs drug delivery system and MSCs treatment to extend their therapeutic applications.

Nevertheless, the current studies toward circRNAs and OA are still of limitations. On the one hand, as outlined above, almost all of the researches focus on the “sponge” function of circRNAs in OA while other mechanisms such as the transcriptional regulation and interaction with RBP remain elusive. On the other hand, studies concerning the clinical applications of circRNAs in OA are limited to the diagnostic biomarker and possible therapeutic target, many novel directions are not explored yet.

Nevertheless, studies have uncovered novel interactions between circRNAs and multiple biological and pathological processes. For example, N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification [139], the most abundant post-transcriptional RNA modification in mammals [140], has been demonstrated to regulate circRNA translation, degradation, export, etc. [141]. Chen and colleagues have found that m6A modification of circNSUN2 could enhance the liver metastasis of colorectal cancer by interfering the export of circNSUN2 [142]. Based on this, m6A modification of circRNAs may underlie the progression of OA. Interestingly, m6A modification of circRNAs also participates in the regulation of innate immunity that plays a crucial role in OA microenvironment. The innate immunity can be activated by endogenous and exogenous RNAs [143]. In contrast, m6A modification has also shown to suppress the innate immunity through YTH domain family member 2 (YTHDF2) that sequestered and blocked endogenous m6A-circRNA from activating the RIG-I antiviral pathway [144]. These findings indicate that m6A modified circRNAs may play a major part in OA progression.

Besides, the controlled generation of circRNAs is another hotspot, although there has been no study exploring it in OA. The artificial circulation can be formed in vivo or in vitro through different strategies such as the chemical ligation method, tornado method, and tRNA splicing machinery [145]. For instance, in vitro, the desired circRNAs were constructed by cloning the target sequence into an artificial exon that is flanked by repeated complementary intron, followed by transfection of plasmid into cells [146]. The artificial produced circRNAs may be useful tool in the targeted therapy of diseases. Jost and colleagues have designed a circRNA molecule containing the binding sites for miRNA-122, which was effective in inhibiting the secretion of hepatitis C viral proteins [147]. Since circRNAs are the key regulators of OA, this technology may provide new possibility for the treatment of OA.

Collectively, circRNAs are multifaceted regulators in OA progression, and it is beyond doubt that these circRNAs play important roles in exploring novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for OA. However, evidences about what properties make them improved over other biomarkers and the efficacy of them are scarce. Future studies are supposed to address these issues.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



circular RNAs




extracellular matrix


nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs


mesenchymal stem cells


Non-coding RNAs


RNA-binding protein




internal ribosome entry sites


hypoxia-inducible factor-1α


growth differentiation factor 5


nuclear factor-Κb


interleukin 1β




autophagy and the AMP-activated protein kinase


mammalian target of rapamycin


mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase


extracellular regulated kinase


c-Jun N-terminal kinase




tumor necrosis factor-α


cell counting kit-8




temporomandibular joint


competing endogenous RNAs


matrix metalloproteinase 13


RNA- fluorescence in situ hybridization

Col II:

type II collagen


nicotinamide phosphoribosyl transferase


fibroblast growth factor 2


3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide


phosphatase and tensin homolog


a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs-4


insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor


area under curve


extracellular vesicles


histone deacetylase


mesenchymal stem cells




YTH domain family member 2


  1. 1.

    Martel-Pelletier J, Barr AJ, Cicuttini FM, Conaghan PG, Cooper C, Goldring MB, Goldring SR, Jones G, Teichtahl AJ, Pelletier JP. Osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16072.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Rahmati M, Nalesso G, Mobasheri A, Mozafari M. Aging and osteoarthritis: central role of the extracellular matrix. Ageing Res Rev. 2017;40:20–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Goldring MB, Goldring SR. Osteoarthritis. J Cell Physiol. 2007;213(3):626–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Tu C, He J, Wu B, Wang W, Li Z. An extensive review regarding the adipokines in the pathogenesis and progression of osteoarthritis. Cytokine. 2019;113:1–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Tu C, He J, Chen R, Li Z. The emerging role of Exosomal non-coding RNAs in musculoskeletal diseases. Curr Pharm Des. 2019;25(42):4523–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Hunter DJ, Schofield D, Callander E. The individual and socioeconomic impact of osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2014;10(7):437–41.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Skou ST, Roos EM: Physical therapy for patients with knee and hip osteoarthritis: supervised, active treatment is current best practice. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2019, 37 Suppl 120(5):112–117.

  8. 8.

    Taruc-Uy RL, Lynch SA. Diagnosis and treatment of osteoarthritis. Prim Care. 2013;40(4):821–36 vii.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Wang Z, Zhu H, Dai S, Liu K, Ge C. Alleviation of medial meniscal transection-induced osteoarthritis pain in rats by human adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell Investig. 2020;7:10.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Calders P, Van Ginckel A. Presence of comorbidities and prognosis of clinical symptoms in knee and/or hip osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018;47(6):805–13.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Duan ZX, Huang P, Tu C, Liu Q, Li SQ, Long ZL, Li ZH. MicroRNA-15a-5p regulates the development of osteoarthritis by targeting PTHrP in chondrocytes. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:3904923.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Zhang Y, Wang F, Chen G, He R, Yang L. LncRNA MALAT1 promotes osteoarthritis by modulating miR-150-5p/AKT3 axis. Cell Biosci. 2019;9:54.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Abbasifard M, Kamiab Z, Bagheri-Hosseinabadi Z, Sadeghi I. The role and function of long non-coding RNAs in osteoarthritis. Exp Mol Pathol. 2020;114:104407.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Wu Y, Lu X, Shen B, Zeng Y. The therapeutic potential and role of miRNA, lncRNA, and circRNA in osteoarthritis. Curr Gene Ther. 2019;19(4):255–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Huynh NP, Anderson BA, Guilak F, McAlinden A. Emerging roles for long noncoding RNAs in skeletal biology and disease. Connect Tissue Res. 2017;58(1):116–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Soghli N, Qujeq D, Yousefi T, Soghli N. The regulatory functions of circular RNAs in osteosarcoma. Genomics. 2020;112(4):2845–56.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Kristensen LS, Andersen MS, Stagsted LVW, Ebbesen KK, Hansen TB, Kjems J. The biogenesis, biology and characterization of circular RNAs. Nat Rev Genet. 2019;20(11):675–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Sanger HL, Klotz G, Riesner D, Gross HJ, Kleinschmidt AK. Viroids are single-stranded covalently closed circular RNA molecules existing as highly base-paired rod-like structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976;73(11):3852–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Meng S, Zhou H, Feng Z, Xu Z, Tang Y, Li P, Wu M. CircRNA: functions and properties of a novel potential biomarker for cancer. Mol Cancer. 2017;16(1):94.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Tu C, He J, Qi L, Ren X, Zhang C, Duan Z, Yang K, Wang W, Lu Q, Li Z. Emerging landscape of circular RNAs as biomarkers and pivotal regulators in osteosarcoma. J Cell Physiol. 2020;235(12):9037–58.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Lin T, Zhang X, Lu Y, Gong L. Identification of circular RNA related to inflammation-induced Lymphangiogenesis by microarray analysis. DNA Cell Biol. 2019;38(8):887–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Cai H, Li Y, Niringiyumukiza JD, Su P, Xiang W. Circular RNA involvement in aging: an emerging player with great potential. Mech Ageing Dev. 2019;178:16–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Li X, Liu CX, Xue W, Zhang Y, Jiang S, Yin QF, Wei J, Yao RW, Yang L, Chen LL. Coordinated circRNA Biogenesis and Function with NF90/NF110 in Viral Infection. Mol Cell. 2017;67(2):214–227.e217.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Li Z, Yuan B, Pei Z, Zhang K, Ding Z, Zhu S, Wang Y, Guan Z, Cao Y. Circ_0136474 and MMP-13 suppressed cell proliferation by competitive binding to miR-127-5p in osteoarthritis. J Cell Mol Med. 2019;23(10):6554–64.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Wu Y, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Wang JJ. CircRNA hsa_circ_0005105 upregulates NAMPT expression and promotes chondrocyte extracellular matrix degradation by sponging miR-26a. Cell Biol Int. 2017;41(12):1283–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Zhu H, Hu Y, Wang C, Zhang X, He D. CircGCN1L1 promotes synoviocyte proliferation and chondrocyte apoptosis by targeting miR-330-3p and TNF-α in TMJ osteoarthritis. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11(4):284.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Jeck WR, Sorrentino JA, Wang K, Slevin MK, Burd CE, Liu J, Marzluff WF, Sharpless NE. Circular RNAs are abundant, conserved, and associated with ALU repeats. Rna. 2013;19(2):141–57.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Chen LL. The biogenesis and emerging roles of circular RNAs. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2016;17(4):205–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Starke S, Jost I, Rossbach O, Schneider T, Schreiner S, Hung LH, Bindereif A. Exon circularization requires canonical splice signals. Cell Rep. 2015;10(1):103–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Wang Y, Wang Z. Efficient backsplicing produces translatable circular mRNAs. Rna. 2015;21(2):172–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Li X, Liu S, Zhang L, Issaian A, Hill RC, Espinosa S, Shi S, Cui Y, Kappel K, Das R, et al. A unified mechanism for intron and exon definition and back-splicing. Nature. 2019;573(7774):375–80.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Zhang Y, Xue W, Li X, Zhang J, Chen S, Zhang JL, Yang L, Chen LL. The biogenesis of nascent circular RNAs. Cell Rep. 2016;15(3):611–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Zhang XO, Wang HB, Zhang Y, Lu X, Chen LL, Yang L. Complementary sequence-mediated exon circularization. Cell. 2014;159(1):134–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Ashwal-Fluss R, Meyer M, Pamudurti NR, Ivanov A, Bartok O, Hanan M, Evantal N, Memczak S, Rajewsky N, Kadener S. circRNA biogenesis competes with pre-mRNA splicing. Mol Cell. 2014;56(1):55–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Conn SJ, Pillman KA, Toubia J, Conn VM, Salmanidis M, Phillips CA, Roslan S, Schreiber AW, Gregory PA, Goodall GJ. The RNA binding protein quaking regulates formation of circRNAs. Cell. 2015;160(6):1125–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Hansen TB, Jensen TI, Clausen BH, Bramsen JB, Finsen B, Damgaard CK, Kjems J. Natural RNA circles function as efficient microRNA sponges. Nature. 2013;495(7441):384–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Memczak S, Jens M, Elefsinioti A, Torti F, Krueger J, Rybak A, Maier L, Mackowiak SD, Gregersen LH, Munschauer M, et al. Circular RNAs are a large class of animal RNAs with regulatory potency. Nature. 2013;495(7441):333–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Zhang Y, Zhang XO, Chen T, Xiang JF, Yin QF, Xing YH, Zhu S, Yang L, Chen LL. Circular intronic long noncoding RNAs. Mol Cell. 2013;51(6):792–806.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Li Z, Huang C, Bao C, Chen L, Lin M, Wang X, Zhong G, Yu B, Hu W, Dai L, et al. Exon-intron circular RNAs regulate transcription in the nucleus. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2015;22(3):256–64.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Pamudurti NR, Bartok O, Jens M, Ashwal-Fluss R, Stottmeister C, Ruhe L, Hanan M, Wyler E, Perez-Hernandez D, Ramberger E, et al. Translation of CircRNAs. Mol Cell. 2017;66(1):9–21.e27.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Legnini I, Di Timoteo G, Rossi F, Morlando M, Briganti F, Sthandier O, Fatica A, Santini T, Andronache A, Wade M, et al. Circ-ZNF609 Is a Circular RNA that Can Be Translated and Functions in Myogenesis. Mol Cell. 2017;66(1):22–37.e29.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Liang WC, Wong CW, Liang PP, Shi M, Cao Y, Rao ST, Tsui SK, Waye MM, Zhang Q, Fu WM, et al. Translation of the circular RNA circβ-catenin promotes liver cancer cell growth through activation of the Wnt pathway. Genome Biol. 2019;20(1):84.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Hwang HS, Kim HA. Chondrocyte apoptosis in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16(11):26035–54.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Luo P, Gao F, Niu D, Sun X, Song Q, Guo C, Liang Y, Sun W. The role of autophagy in chondrocyte metabolism and osteoarthritis: a comprehensive research review. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:5171602.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Goldring MB, Goldring SR. Articular cartilage and subchondral bone in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010;1192:230–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Huang J, Zhao L, Chen D. Growth factor signalling in osteoarthritis. Growth Factors. 2018;36(5–6):187–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Fernández-Torres J, Zamudio-Cuevas Y, Martínez-Nava GA, López-Reyes AG. Hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) in the articular cartilage: a systematic review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2017;21(12):2800–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Miyamoto Y, Mabuchi A, Shi D, Kubo T, Takatori Y, Saito S, Fujioka M, Sudo A, Uchida A, Yamamoto S, et al. A functional polymorphism in the 5′ UTR of GDF5 is associated with susceptibility to osteoarthritis. Nat Genet. 2007;39(4):529–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Xia B, Di C, Zhang J, Hu S, Jin H, Tong P. Osteoarthritis pathogenesis: a review of molecular mechanisms. Calcif Tissue Int. 2014;95(6):495–505.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Loeser RF, Goldring SR, Scanzello CR, Goldring MB. Osteoarthritis: a disease of the joint as an organ. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64(6):1697–707.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Scanzello CR. Chemokines and inflammation in osteoarthritis: insights from patients and animal models. J Orthop Res. 2017;35(4):735–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Scanzello CR. Role of low-grade inflammation in osteoarthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2017;29(1):79–85.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Wojdasiewicz P, Poniatowski ŁA, Szukiewicz D. The role of inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis. Mediat Inflamm. 2014;2014:561459.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Ayral X, Pickering EH, Woodworth TG, Mackillop N, Dougados M. Synovitis: a potential predictive factor of structural progression of medial tibiofemoral knee osteoarthritis -- results of a 1 year longitudinal arthroscopic study in 422 patients. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2005;13(5):361–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Klein-Wieringa IR, de Lange-Brokaar BJ, Yusuf E, Andersen SN, Kwekkeboom JC, Kroon HM, van Osch GJ, Zuurmond AM, Stojanovic-Susulic V, Nelissen RG, et al. Inflammatory cells in patients with Endstage knee osteoarthritis: a comparison between the Synovium and the Infrapatellar fat pad. J Rheumatol. 2016;43(4):771–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Griffin TM, Scanzello CR: Innate inflammation and synovial macrophages in osteoarthritis pathophysiology. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2019, 37 Suppl 120(5):57–63.

  57. 57.

    Hu J, Wang Z, Shan Y, Pan Y, Ma J, Jia L. Long non-coding RNA HOTAIR promotes osteoarthritis progression via miR-17-5p/FUT2/β-catenin axis. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9(7):711.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Swingler TE, Niu L, Smith P, Paddy P, Le L, Barter MJ, Young DA, Clark IM: The function of microRNAs in cartilage and osteoarthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2019, 37 Suppl 120(5):40–47.

  59. 59.

    Ni JL, Dang XQ, Shi ZB. CircPSM3 inhibits the proliferation and differentiation of OA chondrocytes by targeting miRNA-296-5p. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020;24(7):3467–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Ma HR, Mu WB, Zhang KY, Zhou HK, Jiang RD, Cao L. CircVCAN regulates the proliferation and apoptosis of osteoarthritis chondrocyte through NF-κB signaling pathway. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020;24(12):6517–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Liang G, Ling Y, Mehrpour M, Saw PE, Liu Z, Tan W, Tian Z, Zhong W, Lin W, Luo Q, et al. Autophagy-associated circRNA circCDYL augments autophagy and promotes breast cancer progression. Mol Cancer. 2020;19(1):65.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Shang J, Chen WM, Liu S, Wang ZH, Wei TN, Chen ZZ, Wu WB. CircPAN3 contributes to drug resistance in acute myeloid leukemia through regulation of autophagy. Leuk Res. 2019;85:106198.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Sasaki H, Takayama K, Matsushita T, Ishida K, Kubo S, Matsumoto T, Fujita N, Oka S, Kurosaka M, Kuroda R. Autophagy modulates osteoarthritis-related gene expression in human chondrocytes. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64(6):1920–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Matsuzawa-Ishimoto Y, Hwang S, Cadwell K. Autophagy and inflammation. Annu Rev Immunol. 2018;36:73–101.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Li YS, Zhang FJ, Zeng C, Luo W, Xiao WF, Gao SG, Lei GH. Autophagy in osteoarthritis. Joint Bone Spine. 2016;83(2):143–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Liu CX, Li X, Nan F, Jiang S, Gao X, Guo SK, Xue W, Cui Y, Dong K, Ding H, et al. Structure and Degradation of Circular RNAs Regulate PKR Activation in Innate Immunity. Cell. 2019;177(4):865–880.e821.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Li X, Zhang M, Lv K. Microarray analysis of circular RNA expression patterns in polarized macrophages. Int J Mol Med. 2017;39(2):373–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Ng WL, Marinov GK, Chin YM, Lim YY, Ea CK. Transcriptomic analysis of the role of RasGEF1B circular RNA in the TLR4/LPS pathway. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):12227.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Yang X, Wang J, Zhou Z, Jiang R, Huang J, Chen L, Cao Z, Chu H, Han B, Cheng Y, et al. Silica-induced initiation of circular ZC3H4 RNA/ZC3H4 pathway promotes the pulmonary macrophage activation. FASEB J. 2018;32(6):3264–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Kalaitzoglou E, Griffin TM, Humphrey MB. Innate immune responses and osteoarthritis. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2017;19(8):45.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Pei Y, Cui F, Du X, Shang G, Xiao W, Yang X, Cui Q. Antioxidative nanofullerol inhibits macrophage activation and development of osteoarthritis in rats. Int J Nanomedicine. 2019;14:4145–55.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Charlier E, Deroyer C, Ciregia F, Malaise O, Neuville S, Plener Z, Malaise M, de Seny D. Chondrocyte dedifferentiation and osteoarthritis (OA). Biochem Pharmacol. 2019;165:49–65.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Singh P, Marcu KB, Goldring MB, Otero M. Phenotypic instability of chondrocytes in osteoarthritis: on a path to hypertrophy. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2019;1442(1):17–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Kalamegam G, Memic A, Budd E, Abbas M, Mobasheri A. A comprehensive review of stem cells for cartilage regeneration in osteoarthritis. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1089:23–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Li H, Yang HH, Sun ZG, Tang HB, Min JK. Whole-transcriptome sequencing of knee joint cartilage from osteoarthritis patients. Bone Joint Res. 2019;8(7):290–303.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Wang Y, Wu C, Zhang F, Zhang Y, Ren Z, Lammi MJ, Guo X. Screening for differentially expressed circular RNAs in the cartilage of osteoarthritis patients for their diagnostic value. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2019;23(10):706–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Xiao K, Xia Z, Feng B, Bian Y, Fan Y, Li Z, Wu Z, Qiu G, Weng X. Circular RNA expression profile of knee condyle in osteoarthritis by illumina HiSeq platform. J Cell Biochem. 2019;120(10):17500–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Zhou Z, Du D, Chen A, Zhu L. Circular RNA expression profile of articular chondrocytes in an IL-1β-induced mouse model of osteoarthritis. Gene. 2018;644:20–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Hu Y, Zhu H, Bu L, He D. Expression profile of circular RNA s in TMJ osteoarthritis synovial tissues and potential functions of hsa_circ_0000448 with specific back-spliced junction. Am J Transl Res. 2019;11(9):5357–74.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Chen G, Liu T, Yu B, Wang B, Peng Q. CircRNA-UBE2G1 regulates LPS-induced osteoarthritis through miR-373/HIF-1a axis. Cell Cycle. 2020;19(13):1696–705.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Liu Q, Zhang X, Hu X, Dai L, Fu X, Zhang J, Ao Y. Circular RNA related to the chondrocyte ECM regulates MMP13 expression by functioning as a MiR-136 ‘Sponge’ in human cartilage degradation. Sci Rep. 2016;6:22572.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Zhang W, Zhang C, Hu C, Luo C, Zhong B, Yu X. Circular RNA-CDR1as acts as the sponge of microRNA-641 to promote osteoarthritis progression. J Inflamm (Lond). 2020;17:8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Zhou ZB, Du D, Huang GX, Chen A, Zhu L. Circular RNA Atp9b, a competing endogenous RNA, regulates the progression of osteoarthritis by targeting miR-138-5p. Gene. 2018;646:203–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Zhou ZB, Huang GX, Fu Q, Han B, Lu JJ, Chen AM, Zhu L. circRNA.33186 contributes to the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis by sponging miR-127-5p. Mol Ther. 2019;27(3):531–41.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Chen C, Yin P, Hu S, Sun X, Li B. Circular RNA-9119 protects IL-1β-treated chondrocytes from apoptosis in an osteoarthritis cell model by intercepting the microRNA-26a/PTEN axis. Life Sci. 2020;256:117924.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Li BF, Zhang Y, Xiao J, Wang F, Li M, Guo XZ, Xie HB, Xia H, Chen B. Hsa_circ_0045714 regulates chondrocyte proliferation, apoptosis and extracellular matrix synthesis by promoting the expression of miR-193b target gene IGF1R. Hum Cell. 2017;30(4):311–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Shen S, Wu Y, Chen J, Xie Z, Huang K, Wang G, Yang Y, Ni W, Chen Z, Shi P, et al. CircSERPINE2 protects against osteoarthritis by targeting miR-1271 and ETS-related gene. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78(6):826–36.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Zhou X, Jiang L, Fan G, Yang H, Wu L, Huang Y, Xu N, Li J. Role of the ciRS-7/miR-7 axis in the regulation of proliferation, apoptosis and inflammation of chondrocytes induced by IL-1β. Int Immunopharmacol. 2019;71:233–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Lee JW, Bae SH, Jeong JW, Kim SH, Kim KW. Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF-1) alpha: its protein stability and biological functions. Exp Mol Med. 2004;36(1):1–12.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Zhang L, Zhang L, Huang Z, Xing R, Li X, Yin S, Mao J, Zhang N, Mei W, Ding L, et al. Increased HIF-1α in knee osteoarthritis aggravate synovial fibrosis via fibroblast-like Synoviocyte Pyroptosis. Oxidative Med Cell Longev. 2019;2019:6326517.

    Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Yu X, Xiao W, Song H, Jin Y, Xu J, Liu X. CircRNA_100876 sponges miR-136 to promote proliferation and metastasis of gastric cancer by upregulating MIEN1 expression. Gene. 2020;748:144678.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Zhang J, Wang H, Wu K, Zhan F, Zeng H. Dysregulated circRNA_100876 contributes to proliferation and metastasis of colorectal cancer by targeting microRNA-516b (miR-516b). Cancer Biol Ther. 2020;21(8):733–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Yang CY, Zhang FX, He JN, Wang SQ. CircRNA_100876 promote proliferation and metastasis of breast cancer cells through adsorbing microRNA-361-3p in a sponge form. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019;23(16):6962–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Khan HN, Brands X, Aufiero S, Hoogendijk AJ, Klarenbeek AM, van Engelen TSR, Haak BW, van Vught LA, Horn J, Schultz MJ, et al. The circular RNA landscape in specific peripheral blood mononuclear cells of critically ill patients with sepsis. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):423.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Boehm EM, Gildenberg MS, Washington MT. The many roles of PCNA in eukaryotic DNA replication. Enzymes. 2016;39:231–54.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Yang S, Ryu JH, Oh H, Jeon J, Kwak JS, Kim JH, Kim HA, Chun CH, Chun JS. NAMPT (visfatin), a direct target of hypoxia-inducible factor-2α, is an essential catabolic regulator of osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(3):595–602.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Laiguillon MC, Houard X, Bougault C, Gosset M, Nourissat G, Sautet A, Jacques C, Berenbaum F, Sellam J. Expression and function of visfatin (Nampt), an adipokine-enzyme involved in inflammatory pathways of osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2014;16(1):R38.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Yu L, Gong X, Sun L, Zhou Q, Lu B, Zhu L. The circular RNA Cdr1as act as an oncogene in hepatocellular carcinoma through targeting miR-7 expression. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):e0158347.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Yang W, Gu J, Wang X, Wang Y, Feng M, Zhou D, Guo J, Zhou M. Inhibition of circular RNA CDR1as increases chemosensitivity of 5-FU-resistant BC cells through up-regulating miR-7. J Cell Mol Med. 2019;23(5):3166–77.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Li L, Chen Y, Nie L, Ding X, Zhang X, Zhao W, Xu X, Kyei B, Dai D, Zhan S, et al. MyoD-induced circular RNA CDR1as promotes myogenic differentiation of skeletal muscle satellite cells. Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech. 2019;1862(8):807–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Li X, Zheng Y, Zheng Y, Huang Y, Zhang Y, Jia L, Li W. Circular RNA CDR1as regulates osteoblastic differentiation of periodontal ligament stem cells via the miR-7/GDF5/SMAD and p38 MAPK signaling pathway. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018;9(1):232.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Sun J, Wang X, Wang D, Zhao Z, Zhang L. Zhang J: circAtp9b knockdown alleviates LPS-caused inflammation provided that microRNA-27a is upregulated. Int Immunopharmacol. 2020;78:105925.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Zhang Z, Zhang X, Zhang Y, Li J, Xing Z, Zhang Y. Spinal circRNA-9119 suppresses nociception by mediating the miR-26a-TLR3 Axis in a bone Cancer pain mouse model. J Mol Neurosci. 2020;70(1):9–18.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Hansen TB, Kjems J, Damgaard CK. Circular RNA and miR-7 in cancer. Cancer Res. 2013;73(18):5609–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Su C, Han Y, Zhang H, Li Y, Yi L, Wang X, Zhou S, Yu D, Song X, Xiao N, et al. CiRS-7 targeting miR-7 modulates the progression of non-small cell lung cancer in a manner dependent on NF-κB signalling. J Cell Mol Med. 2018;22(6):3097–107.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Xu H, Guo S, Li W, Yu P. The circular RNA Cdr1as, via miR-7 and its targets, regulates insulin transcription and secretion in islet cells. Sci Rep. 2015;5:12453.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Li Z, Dou P, Liu T, He S. Application of Long noncoding RNAs in osteosarcoma: biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2017;42(4):1407–19.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Wang Y, Wu C, Yang Y, Ren Z, Lammi MJ, Guo X. Preliminary exploration of hsa_circ_0032131 levels in peripheral blood as a potential diagnostic biomarker of osteoarthritis. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2019;23(10):717–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Wang Y, Wu C, Zhang Y, Yang Y, Ren Z, Lammi MJ, Guo X. Screening for differentially expressed circRNA between Kashin-Beck disease and osteoarthritis patients based on circRNA chips. Clin Chim Acta. 2020;501:92–101.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Yu F, Xie C, Sun J, Feng H, Huang X. Circular RNA expression profiles in synovial fluid: a promising new class of diagnostic biomarkers for osteoarthritis. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2018;11(3):1338–46.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Santer L, Bär C, Thum T. Circular RNAs: a novel class of functional RNA molecules with a therapeutic perspective. Mol Ther. 2019;27(8):1350–63.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Piwecka M, Glažar P, Hernandez-Miranda LR, Memczak S, Wolf SA, Rybak-Wolf A, Filipchyk A, Klironomos F, Cerda Jara CA, Fenske P et al. Loss of a mammalian circular RNA locus causes miRNA deregulation and affects brain function. Science. 2017;357(6357):eaam8526.

  113. 113.

    Zhang W, Jiang X, Bao J, Wang Y, Liu H, Tang L. Exosomes in pathogen infections: a bridge to deliver molecules and link functions. Front Immunol. 2018;9:90.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Miyaki S, Lotz MK. Extracellular vesicles in cartilage homeostasis and osteoarthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2018;30(1):129–35.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Mao G, Hu S, Zhang Z, Wu P, Zhao X, Lin R, Liao W, Kang Y. Exosomal miR-95-5p regulates chondrogenesis and cartilage degradation via histone deacetylase 2/8. J Cell Mol Med. 2018;22(11):5354–66.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Tu C, Yang K, Wan L, He J, Qi L, Wang W, Lu Q, Li Z. The crosstalk between lncRNAs and the Hippo signalling pathway in cancer progression. Cell Prolif. 2020;53(9):e12887.

  117. 117.

    Vader P, Mol EA, Pasterkamp G, Schiffelers RM. Extracellular vesicles for drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016;106(Pt A):148–56.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Yang L, Han B, Zhang Z, Wang S, Bai Y, Zhang Y, Tang Y, Du L, Xu L, Wu F, et al. Extracellular vesicle-mediated delivery of CircSCMH1 promotes functional recovery in rodent and nonhuman primate ischemic stroke models. Circulation. 2020;142(6):556–74.

  119. 119.

    De Bari C, Roelofs AJ. Stem cell-based therapeutic strategies for cartilage defects and osteoarthritis. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2018;40:74–80.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, Jaiswal RK, Douglas R, Mosca JD, Moorman MA, Simonetti DW, Craig S, Marshak DR. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science. 1999;284(5411):143–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Demoor M, Ollitrault D, Gomez-Leduc T, Bouyoucef M, Hervieu M, Fabre H, Lafont J, Denoix JM, Audigié F, Mallein-Gerin F, et al. Cartilage tissue engineering: molecular control of chondrocyte differentiation for proper cartilage matrix reconstruction. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1840(8):2414–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Sakata R, Iwakura T, Reddi AH. Regeneration of articular cartilage surface: Morphogens, cells, and extracellular matrix scaffolds. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2015;21(5):461–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Liu Y, Lin L, Zou R, Wen C, Wang Z, Lin F. MSC-derived exosomes promote proliferation and inhibit apoptosis of chondrocytes via lncRNA-KLF3-AS1/miR-206/GIT1 axis in osteoarthritis. Cell Cycle. 2018;17(21–22):2411–22.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Zhang S, Teo KYW, Chuah SJ, Lai RC, Lim SK, Toh WS. MSC exosomes alleviate temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis by attenuating inflammation and restoring matrix homeostasis. Biomaterials. 2019;200:35–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Della Bella E, Menzel U, Basoli V, Tourbier C, Alini M, Stoddart MJ. Differential Regulation of circRNA, miRNA, and piRNA during Early Osteogenic and Chondrogenic Differentiation of Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cells. Cells. 2020;9(2):398.

  126. 126.

    Yang L, Bin Z, Hui S, Rong L, You B, Wu P, Han X, Qian H, Xu W. The role of CDR1as in proliferation and differentiation of human umbilical cord-derived Mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells Int. 2019;2019:2316834.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Li X, Yang L, Chen LL. The biogenesis, functions, and challenges of circular RNAs. Mol Cell. 2018;71(3):428–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  128. 128.

    Wang K, Singh D, Zeng Z, Coleman SJ, Huang Y, Savich GL, He X, Mieczkowski P, Grimm SA, Perou CM, et al. MapSplice: accurate mapping of RNA-seq reads for splice junction discovery. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(18):e178.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    Dong R, Ma XK, Chen LL, Yang L. Genome-wide annotation of circRNAs and their alternative Back-splicing/splicing with CIRCexplorer pipeline. Methods Mol Biol. 1870;2019:137–49.

    Google Scholar 

  130. 130.

    Zeng X, Lin W, Guo M, Zou Q. A comprehensive overview and evaluation of circular RNA detection tools. PLoS Comput Biol. 2017;13(6):e1005420.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    Hoffmann S, Otto C, Doose G, Tanzer A, Langenberger D, Christ S, Kunz M, Holdt LM, Teupser D, Hackermüller J, et al. A multi-split mapping algorithm for circular RNA, splicing, trans-splicing and fusion detection. Genome Biol. 2014;15(2):R34.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  132. 132.

    Gao Y, Wang J, Zhao F. CIRI: an efficient and unbiased algorithm for de novo circular RNA identification. Genome Biol. 2015;16(1):4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  133. 133.

    Hansen TB, Venø MT, Damgaard CK, Kjems J. Comparison of circular RNA prediction tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(6):e58.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  134. 134.

    Shan K, Liu C, Liu BH, Chen X, Dong R, Liu X, Zhang YY, Liu B, Zhang SJ, Wang JJ, et al. Circular noncoding RNA HIPK3 mediates retinal vascular dysfunction in diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 2017;136(17):1629–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  135. 135.

    Schneider T, Schreiner S, Preußer C, Bindereif A, Rossbach O. Northern blot analysis of circular RNAs. Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1724:119–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  136. 136.

    Querido E, Dekakra-Bellili L, Chartrand P. RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization for high-content screening. Methods. 2017;126:149–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  137. 137.

    Petkovic S, Müller S. RNA circularization strategies in vivo and in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(4):2454–65.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  138. 138.

    Petkovic S, Müller S. Synthesis and engineering of circular RNAs. Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1724:167–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  139. 139.

    Zhang W, He L, Liu Z, Ren X, Qi L, Wan. L, Wang W, Tu C, Li Z. Multifaceted Functions and Novel Insight into the Regulatory Role of RNA N6-methyladenosine Modification in Musculoskeletal Disorders. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:870.

  140. 140.

    Roundtree IA, Evans ME, Pan T, He C. Dynamic RNA modifications in gene expression regulation. Cell. 2017;169(7):1187–200.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  141. 141.

    Zhang L, Hou C, Chen C, Guo Y, Yuan W, Yin D, Liu J, Sun Z. The role of N (6)-methyladenosine (m (6) a) modification in the regulation of circRNAs. Mol Cancer. 2020;19(1):105.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  142. 142.

    Chen RX, Chen X, Xia LP, Zhang JX, Pan ZZ, Ma XD, Han K, Chen JW, Judde JG, Deas O, et al. N (6)-methyladenosine modification of circNSUN2 facilitates cytoplasmic export and stabilizes HMGA2 to promote colorectal liver metastasis. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):4695.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  143. 143.

    Streicher F, Jouvenet N. Stimulation of innate immunity by host and viral RNAs. Trends Immunol. 2019;40(12):1134–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  144. 144.

    Chen YG, Chen R, Ahmad S, Verma R, Kasturi SP, Amaya L, Broughton JP, Kim J, Cadena C, Pulendran B, et al. N6-Methyladenosine Modification Controls Circular RNA Immunity. Mol Cell. 2019;76(1):96–109.e109.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  145. 145.

    Ebermann C, Schnarr T, Müller S. Recent advances in understanding circular RNAs. F1000Res. 2020;9.

  146. 146.

    Tatomer DC, Liang D, Wilusz JE. Inducible expression of eukaryotic circular RNAs from plasmids. Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1648:143–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  147. 147.

    Jost I, Shalamova LA, Gerresheim GK, Niepmann M, Bindereif A, Rossbach O. Functional sequestration of microRNA-122 from hepatitis C virus by circular RNA sponges. RNA Biol. 2018;15(8):1032–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references




This work was supported by the [National Natural Science Foundation of China] under Grant [number 81902745], and [Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China] under Grant [number 2018JJ3716].

Author information




WCZ and CT conceived and designed the work. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by WCZ, LQ, RQC, JYH, ZYL and WCW. The first draft of the manuscript was written by WCZ, CT, LQ, and RQC. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. CT revised the manuscript. ZHL contributed to article drafting, critical revision and final approval of the version to be published. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chao Tu or Zhihong Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Figures of this review were created with the aid of Servier Medical Art (, reproduced under Creative Commons License attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, W., Qi, L., Chen, R. et al. Circular RNAs in osteoarthritis: indispensable regulators and novel strategies in clinical implications. Arthritis Res Ther 23, 23 (2021).

Download citation


  • Circular RNAs
  • Osteoarthritis
  • Microenvironment
  • Chondrocytes
  • Extracellular matrix