Skip to main content

Pregnancy outcomes in patients receiving assisted reproductive therapy with systemic lupus erythematosus: a multi-center retrospective study

A Correction to this article was published on 07 February 2023

This article has been updated



To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and maternal and fetal outcomes of assisted reproductive therapy (ART) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).


Patients from three tertiary hospitals from Guangzhou, China followed-up from 2013 to 2022 were included retrospectively. Patients with planned or unplanned natural pregnancy were chosen as controls. ART procedure and pregnancy outcomes were recorded and compared.


A total of 322 ART cycles in 142 women were analyzed. Sixty-six intrauterine pregnancies out of 72 clinical pregnancies yielded 65 live infants, including 5 pairs of twins. The clinical pregnancy rate was 46.5% (66/142). The mean age at the first clinical pregnancy was 34.0 ± 3.8 years. The median (interquartile range, IQR) disease course was 42.5 (25, 84.8) months. Twenty-seven (40.9%) of them had a history of adverse pregnancy. Primary infertility occurred in 20 (30.3%) patients. Obstruction of fallopian tubes (17/66, 25.8%) and premature ovarian failure (9/66, 13.6%) were the leading causes for infertility. Ovulation induction therapy (OIT) were conducted in 60 (83.3%) pregnancies, and no ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) or thrombosis was observed. The leading maternal adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) included premature delivery (21/66, 31.8%), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) (15/66, 22.7%), and disease flares (10/66, 15.2%). Spontaneous premature delivery (9/21, 42.9%) and preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) (6/21, 28.6%) were the leading causes for premature delivery. Preeclampsia (19.0% vs 0%, P = 0.012) increased in premature delivery. Infants delivered prematurely were likely to be low-birth-weight (LBW)/very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) (81.0% vs 7.7%, P < 0.001). Disease flares were mild (4/10, 40.0%) or moderate (5/10, 50.0%), and developed during the second (3/10, 30.0%) or third (6/10, 60.0%) trimester with favorable outcomes. Fetal loss in ART (6/66, 9.1%) was primarily attributed to early spontaneous abortion (n = 5). The average delivery time was 36.8 ± 2.1 weeks of gestation. The average birth weight was 2653.5 ± 578.6 g. LBW infants accounted for 30.8% (20/65). No neonatal death or neonatal lupus occurred. The incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes did not increase in patients with ART compared with planned pregnancy and reduced significantly compared with an unplanned pregnancy.


The safety and efficacy of ART is assured in lupus patients with stable disease. Maternal and fetal APOs are comparable with planned pregnancy, with a relatively high incidence of premature delivery, GDM, and LBW infants.


Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease affecting multiple organs including the reproductive system. Most of the patients with SLE are at childbearing age. Benefit from the diagnostic and therapeutic advances, patients with SLE are no longer discouraged from pregnancy under certain circumstances. However, it has been estimated that more than 50% of the lupus patients have less children than desired [1]. Chronic inflammation in SLE causes dysfunction of the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis, auto-oophoritis, and abnormal uterine bleeding, resulting in menstrual irregularity and premature ovarian failure [2]. The presence of anti-phospholipid antibodies leads to microthrombosis and impairs the embryo implantation [3]. Toxicity secondary to immunosuppressants such as cyclophosphamide (CYC) represents a common driver of infertility across SLE. Besides, worries for disease flares contribute to the postponing of pregnancy.

Assisted reproductive therapy (ART) is a well-developed technique for infertility and is widely used in the general population. The application of ART in lupus patients remains to be a matter of ongoing debate. Worries lie in lupus flares and thrombotic events induced by ovulation induction therapy (OIT), and the uncertainty of pregnancy outcomes hinders the manipulation of ART. With the advances in our knowledge and treatment options, however, ART is carried out successfully in lupus patients. It is strongly recommended in women with uncomplicated rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases whose disease is stable/quiescent [4].

Until recently, most studies of ART procedures pay little attention to maternal diagnosis. Studies of ART with interest in SLE report very small numbers. Herein, we conducted a multi-center retrospective study to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and complications of ART in SLE.

Patients and methods

Patients and data collection

A multi-center, observational, retrospective study was performed. Consecutive patients with SLE followed up during one or more cycles of ART in three tertiary hospitals from Guangzhou (i.e., the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University) from January 2013 to October 2022 were included. Lupus patients with natural pregnancy during the same period were selected as controls and divided into planned pregnancy and unplanned pregnancy. SLE was diagnosed according to the 1997 ACR diagnostic criteria [5]. The data of clinical phenotype of lupus, obstetric history, outcome of pregnancies, obstetrical complications, perinatal complications of newborns, laboratory tests, and medical treatments before and during pregnancy were collected and reviewed by two rheumatologists (D.C and Z.Z).

ART procedure

Woman meeting the following criteria were eligible for ART: (1) incapacity to fulfill pregnancy after a reasonable time (> 1 year) of sexual intercourse with no contraceptive measures taken, (2) no moderate or severe SLE flares for at least a year, (3) absence of major organ dysfunction, (4) oral prednisone ≤ 10 mg per day, (5) discontinuation of immunosuppressants including CYC, methotrexate, and mycophenolate mofetil for at least 6 months, for those who were taking leflunomide, wash-out therapy was administered and leflunomide was withdrawn for at least 6 months. All the patients were transferred to the reproductive centers after disease evaluation by rheumatologists. Patients were re-evaluated by the obstetricians for indications for ART. Those who received ART were followed by a multi-disciplinary team afterwards according to Chinese recommendations for perinatal care in high-risk women [6].

ART included ovarian stimulation, oocyte retrieval, in vitro fertilization (IVF), and transfer of the fertilized embryo into the uterus. Intrauterine insemination (IUI) was performed by injecting the sperm directly into the uterus. IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was conducted by removing an oocyte from the ovaries, fertilizing it with semen outside the body, and then replacing it back to the womb. Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) encompasses preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) and preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). Briefly, embryos cultured in vitro were analyzed for a monogenic disease, and only disease-free embryos were transferred to the mother, to avoid the termination of pregnancy with an affected fetus. PGT was primarily applied to elderly pregnant women, women with recurrent miscarriage, women with recurrent transplant failure, parental chromosomal diseases, parental monogenic inherited diseases, and parental thalassemia. Clinical pregnancy, including intrauterine pregnancy and ectopic pregnancy, was confirmed with elevated serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) level 14 days after transplantation and gestational sacs identified 4–6 weeks after transplantation by ultrasonography. Clinical pregnancy rate was defined as patients detected with fetal heartbeat divided by the total patients.

Controlled OIT

Individualized OIT was performed by obstetricians, and the following protocols were used. Long protocol: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist was administered in the midluteal phase. Obstetric ultrasound examination was performed, and the sex hormone levels (i.e., follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), and estradiol) were detected 14 days after. Individualized injection with recombinant FSH was prescribed accordingly. Ultralong protocol: GnRH agonist was administered on day 2 of the menstrual period and repeated for 1–3 cycles. Ovarian stimulation was started by gonadotropin (Gn) 28 days after the last injection of GnRH. Antagonist protocol: Exogenous Gn was given on day 2 of the menstrual period, followed by antagonist four days later to prevent early ovulation. Other unconventional protocols: Modified natural cycle with a small amount of Gn. Mini-dose protocol with a small dose of Gn in a patient having low ovarian reserves.


Primary infertility was defined as a couple that has never been able to conceive a pregnancy after a minimum of one year of attempting to do so through unprotected intercourse. Secondary infertility was defined as the inability to conceive or carry a pregnancy to term after having already successfully given birth to one or more children.

Planned pregnancy was defined according to Chinese recommendations for perinatal management in women with SLE [7]. Unplanned pregnancy included patients who became pregnant in active disease, withdrew medication without doctors’ guidance, and new onset of SLE during pregnancy.

Pregnancy trimesters were defined as follows: first trimester: up to 13th weeks of gestation; second: from 14 to 26th weeks; third: after 27th week. SLE activity was measured by Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Pregnancy Disease Activity Index (SLEPDAI) during gestation. Mild disease activity was defined as SLEPDAI score 5 to 9, moderate disease activity as SLEPDAI score 10 to 14, and high disease activity as SLEPDAI score ≥ 15 [8]. The highest score was used in statistical analysis.

Adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs)

Maternal APOs: (1) Disease flare: worsening or new symptoms attributed to SLE. An SLE flare was established by an increase ≥ 3 in SLEPDAI [9]. (2) Pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH): hypertension during pregnancy, which included gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, and eclampsia. Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure > 140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure > 90 mmHg in sitting position in at least two consecutive measurements during pregnancy. (3) Preeclampsia: a new onset of hypertension with or without proteinuria after the 20th week of gestation in a previously normotensive woman [10]. (4) Eclampsia: the occurrence of one or more generalized, tonic–clonic convulsions unrelated to other medical conditions in women with hypertensive disorder of pregnancy [9]. (5) Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM): the onset or first recognition of diabetes occurred during pregnancy. Diabetes was confirmed by oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) fasting plasma glucose ≥ 92 mg/dl (5.1 mmol/dl), or 1‑hour glucose in venous plasma ≥ 180 mg/dl (10.0 mmol/l), or OGTT 2‑hour glucose in venous plasma ≥ 153 mg/dl (8.5 mmol/l) [11]. (6) Fetal loss included spontaneous abortion, therapeutic abortion (artificial termination of pregnancy due to the exacerbation of lupus or obstetric complications), intrauterine fetal death (IUFD, death of a fetus due to the reasons other than chromosomal abnormalities, anatomic malformation, or congenital infection after 20 weeks of gestation), and neonatal death (death of a live infant within 28 days after birth). (7) Premature delivery: birth under 37 weeks gestational age, with further classification into late (34 weeks and above) and early (under 34 weeks) preterm births. (8) Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM): the spontaneous rupture of membranes during pregnancy before the 37th week of gestation.

Fetal APOs: (1) Intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR): birth weight below the 10th percentile of the Chinese population according to gestational week at delivery and fetal gender. (2) Fetal distress: fetus hypoxia and acidosis which endangers the health of the fetus. (3) Low-birth-weight (LBW): infant with birth weight < 2500 g. (4) Very-low-birth-weight (VLBW): infant with birth weight < 1500 g.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 25.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). Normally distributed data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and non-normal variables were expressed as median (interquartile range, IQR). Categorical variables were presented as frequency and percentage. Comparison among groups was evaluated with chi-square test or Fisher exact test for categorical variables and one-way ANOVA for continuous variables with normal distribution. Between-group comparison was evaluated using Student’s t test for continuous variables with normal distribution, and Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables with non-normal distribution. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant in comparison among the three groups. A P value < 0.016 was considered statistically significant in comparison between any two groups.


Demographic data

A total of 322 ART cycles was performed in 142 consecutive patients. Finally, 66 patients ended in 72 clinical pregnancies, including 66 intrauterine pregnancies and 6 ectopic pregnancies. Clinical pregnancy rate was 46.5% (66/142). The mean age at the first clinical pregnancy was 34.0 ± 3.8 years. The median (IQR) disease course was 42.5 (25, 84.8) months.

Approximately 40.9% (27/66) of them had histories of adverse pregnancy, including spontaneous abortion (17/66, 25.8%), ectopic pregnancy (11/66, 16.7%), therapeutic abortion (7/66, 10.6%), and preeclampsia (1/66, 1.5%) (Table 1).

Table 1 Basic characteristics of patients with ART. Pa, comparisons among three groups. Pb, comparison between ART and planned pregnancy. Pc, comparison between ART and unplanned pregnancy. Pd, comparison between planned and unplanned pregnancy

The positive of aCL-IgG was 3.0% (2/66). The positive of β2-GPI-IgG and β2-GPI-IgM were 3.0% (2/66) and 4.5% (3/66), respectively. The positive of lupus anticoagulants (LA) was 1.5% (1/66). Pre-pregnant treatment included glucocorticoids (26/66, 39.4%), cyclosporin A (CsA) (4/66, 6.1%), hydroxychloroquine (57/66, 86.4%), low-dose aspirin (LDA) (10/66, 15.2%), and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (7/66, 10.6%).

Manipulation of ART

Primary infertility occurred in 20 (30.3%) patients, while secondary infertility in 46 (69.7%) patients. Underlying causes were shown in Table 2. Obstruction of fallopian tubes (17/66, 25.8%) and premature ovarian failure (9/66, 13.6%) were the leading. Two patients (3.0%) had anti-phospholipid syndrome (APS).

Table 2 Causes for ART

OIT was conducted in 60 (83.3%) pregnancies, including long protocol (27/72, 37.5%), mini-dose protocol (12/72, 16.7%), modified natural cycle (12/72, 16.7%), antagonist protocol (7/72, 9.7%), and ultralong protocol (2/72, 2.8%). IVF was performed in 58 (80.6%) pregnancies, ICSI in 7 (9.7%), IUI in 2 (2.8%), and PGT in 5 (6.9%). Neither ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) nor thrombotic event was observed.

Maternal outcomes

Sixty (83.3%) pregnancies ended in successful delivery. Cesarean section was conducted in 42 pregnancies (42/66, 63/6%). Maternal APOs were shown in Table 3. Premature delivery was a complication with the highest incidence (21/66, 31.8%). The causes for premature delivery included spontaneous premature delivery (9/21, 42.9%), PPROM (6/21, 28.6%), obstetric problems (4/21, 19.0%), and mixed (2/21, 9.5%). The average delivery time of premature delivery was 36.8 ± 2.2 weeks of gestation, including 4 patients (19.0%) with early premature delivery and 17 patients (81.0%) with late premature delivery.

Table 3 Maternal outcomes in ART. Pa, comparisons among three groups. Pb, comparison between ART and planned pregnancy. Pc, comparison between ART and unplanned pregnancy. Pd, comparison between planned and unplanned pregnancy

The incidence of GDM ranked second (15/66, 22.7%). Among 15 patients with GDM, the mean age was 37.0 ± 4.5 years. The mean pre-pregnant body mass index (BMI) was 22.1 ± 2.1 kg/m2. Fetal loss occurred in two pregnancies (13.3%). Fourteen infants were born, including a pair of twins and three LBW infants.

Ten patients (15.2%) experienced disease flares. Most of the severity was mild (4/10, 40.0%) or moderate (5/10, 50.0%). Active disease tended to develop during the second (3/10, 30.0%) or third (6/10, 60.0%) trimester. Lupus nephritis (8/10, 80.0%) was the main manifestation, followed by thrombocytopenia (5/10, 50.0%). Nine out of ten (90.0%) delivered live infants (Table 4).

Table 4 Manifestation of disease flares. Pa, comparisons among three groups. Pb, comparison between ART and planned pregnancy. Pc, comparison between ART and unplanned pregnancy. Pd, comparison between planned and unplanned pregnancy

Fetal outcomes

Sixty-five live infants, including 5 pairs of twins, were born from 60 intrauterine pregnancies. The live birth rate was 83.3% (60/72). The average delivery time was 36.8 ± 2.1 weeks of gestation. The average birth weight was 2653.5 ± 578.6 g. The incidence of fetal APOs were shown in Table 5. Ten infants (15.4%) were transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU) after delivery. No neonatal lupus or fetal atrioventricular block was observed.

Table 5 Fetal outcomes in ART. Pa, comparisons among three groups. Pb, comparison between ART and planned pregnancy. Pc, comparison between ART and unplanned pregnancy. Pd, comparison between planned and unplanned pregnancy

Infants of LBW accounted for 30.8% (20/65), and infants of VLBW accounted for 3.1% (2/65). Approximately 63.6% (14/22) of the LBW/VLBW infants were born prematurely. Six VLBW and 2 LBW infants were from twin gestation (8/22, 36.4%). The incidence of fetal APOs such as neonatal pathological jaundice (45.5% vs 2.3%, P < 0.001), neonatal pneumonia (13.6% vs 0%, P = 0.035), and neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS) (13.6% vs 0%, P = 0.035) increased significantly in LBW/VLBW infants. Nearly half of the LBW/VLBW infants (10/22, 45.5%) were transferred to ICU, compared to 7.0% (3/43) in term infants (P = 0.001).

Comparison of pregnancy outcomes between patients with or without premature delivery

Considering premature delivery was the most common APO, we further compared premature delivery with term delivery. As shown in Table 6, preeclampsia (19.0% vs 0%, P = 0.012) occurred more frequently in premature delivery. Besides, the incidence of LBW infants increased significantly in premature delivery (81.0% vs 7.7%, P < 0.001).

Table 6 Comparison between premature and term delivery

Comparison of pregnancy outcomes in ART, planned pregnancy, and unplanned pregnancy

In the comparison with planned pregnancies (n = 214) and unplanned pregnancies (n = 66), patients receiving ART were older (34.0 vs 31.1 vs 28.4 years, P < 0.001), and more likely to complicated with history of adverse pregnancy (40.9% vs 31.8% vs 15.2%, P = 0.004). Patients receiving ART were likely to develop GDM (22.7% vs 7.5% vs 1.5%, P < 0.001). Disease flares (15.2% vs 10.7% vs 78.8%, P < 0.001) and fetal loss (9.1% vs 7.5% vs 65.2%, P < 0.001) decreased significantly in ART. As for disease flares, patients receiving ART or with planned pregnancy usually had mild-to-moderate activity, while patients with unplanned pregnancy usually had severe activity (10.0% vs 0% vs 53.8%, P < 0.001). Disease flares were likely to occur during the second or third trimester in ART and planned pregnancy, and it occurred during the first or second trimester in unplanned pregnancy. The manifestation of active disease was similar in the three groups. However, organ involvement except for lupus nephritis and thrombocytopenia seemed to increase in unplanned pregnancy.

Reasons for fetal loss in ART included early spontaneous abortion (n = 5), and disease flare complicated with severe preeclampsia (n = 1). Reasons for fetal loss in planned pregnancy including stillbirth (n = 6), disease flares (n = 5), serious deformity (n = 2), early spontaneous abortion (n = 2), and uterine rupture (n = 1). Reasons for fetal loss in unplanned pregnancy included disease flare (n = 39), therapeutic abortion due to drug toxicity (n = 2), stillbirth (n = 1), and early spontaneous abortion (n = 1).

Time of delivery was earlier in unplanned pregnancy (36.8 vs 37.1 vs 34.8 weeks, P < 0.001), although premature delivery did not differ. The average birth weight was the lightest in unplanned pregnancy (2653.5 g vs 2703.3 g vs 2298.3 g, P = 0.003). Other fetal complications and the presence of auto-antibodies did not differ among groups.


We report the safety and pregnancy outcomes of ART in lupus patients with stable disease. Nearly half of the women (46.5%) receiving ART ended in clinical pregnancy, and 83.3% of the pregnancies ended in successful delivery. No OHSS or thrombotic event was reported. Only a few patients experienced disease flares. No neonatal lupus, fetal atrioventricular block or neonatal death occurred. Pregnant outcomes in lupus patients undergoing ART are favorable, although premature delivery, GDM, and LBW infants remain to be important issues.

The efficacy of ART in terms of clinical pregnancy rate in our study (46.5%) is comparable with that in the general population from the same center (57.1%) [12]. In previous studies, nearly 41.4% of patients with connective tissue diseases (CTD) became clinically pregnant via ART [13]. Previous and current findings suggest that ART is an effective method for infertility in patients with SLE. Timing to start ART is crucial. The optimal time-point for ART in SLE is not determined. In the current study, the disease was stable in all patients for more than 1 year. In other centers, patients were considered suitable for ART until the disease is stable for at least half a year [14]. Balancing the risk of disease flares and obstetrical complications, we consider patients with disease remission for at least one year as potential candidates for ART. However, the comparison of pregnancy outcomes in patients with different stable courses remains to be elucidated.

OHSS induced by OIT is one of the major concerns that hinder the implementation of ART in SLE. The incidence, however, does not increase in CTD (~ 3% of cycles) compared with the general population (3–8% of cycles) [15, 16]. Individualized stimulation therapy is essential in taking the causes for infertility and the level of sex hormones into consideration. It’s suggested OIT should only be used in true infertility [17]. GnRH antagonist program is relatively safe since it avoids the use of hCG which may induce high estradiol concentrations [16, 18]. In our study, no case of OHSS was observed. It further assured OIT does not confer additional risk in SLE.

A few of the patients experienced maternal or fetal APOs, despite that disease activity was well controlled before ART. Premature delivery, GDM, and disease flares were common. Among 72 pregnancies, 31.8% of them had premature infants. It exceeds that in the general Chinese population (6.2–7.2%) [19]. The incidence of premature delivery varies from 20 to 50% in other studies [17, 18, 21]. The reasons, however, were not well-presented. Nearly half of the pregnancies (42.9%) in our study were spontaneous preterm, and one fifth (28.6%) were attributed to PPROM. Of note, 19.0% of the women with premature delivery experienced preeclampsia. The incidence of LBW infants was also increased in premature delivery. Our results suggest that efforts to ensure full-term birth is of clinical significance.

The incidence of GDM in the ART group increased significantly (22.7%), compared with planned pregnancy (7.5%) and unplanned pregnancy (1.5%). In a European study recruiting 60 women with rheumatic disease undergoing ART, GDM occurred in 8.7% of the pregnancies. GDM occurs in 3.0–21.2% of the Asian pregnant women [20]. Traditional risk factors include high pre-pregnant BMI, advanced maternal age, personal or family history of diabetes, twin pregnancy, and genetic susceptibility [11]. ART emerges as another predisposing factor for GDM. In ART pregnancy, the increasing level of estrogen is associated with the incidence of GDM [21]. The average age of patients with GDM in our series was relatively old (37.0 ± 4.5), while pre-pregnant BMI was normal. The incidence of fetal loss in women complicating with GDM was high (13.3%). These results suggest that blood glucose needs to be supervised closely and early recognition of GDM might reduce fetal loss.

Disease flares (15.2%) in ART are as frequent as previously published (13–14.8%) [17, 18]. The incidence is in line with planned pregnancy (10.7%), and lower than that in unplanned pregnancy (78.8%). Maternal and fetal outcomes were comparable between patients with or without disease flares. One of the reasons could be that disease flares were usually mild-to-moderate and occurred during the second or third trimester. Nephritis (80.0%) was the major manifestation, followed by thrombocytopenia (50.0%). Generally, the pattern of disease flares did not differ between ART and planned pregnancy, while that in unplanned pregnancy involved various systems. Although a few patients experience the risk of disease flare during ART, the outcomes are usually satisfactory.

The occurrence of fetal loss did not increase in ART (9.1% in ART vs 7.5% in planned pregnancy vs 65.2% in unplanned pregnancy), and early spontaneous abortion is the leading cause. Only one fetal loss was attributed to disease flares. Early spontaneous abortion appears to be the most common cause and the rate ranges from 22 to 63% in the general patients after ART [22]. Many factors are attributable, such as advancing maternal age and genetic defects. Our results suggest a fetal loss is probably determined by obstetrical factors rather than disease flares in ART in SLE.

LBW/VLBW infants are common fetal complications, accounting for 33.9% in total. More than two-thirds (63.6%) of them were born prematurely. ART-conceived pregnancies have a higher incidence of LBW compared with all births (25.5% vs 8.1%), mainly due to multiple gestation [23]. We notice the proportion of LBW was slightly higher in ART than planned pregnancy, although no statistical significance was reached. VLBW infants counted for a very small number (3.1%). However, VLBW was frequent in unplanned pregnancy (21.7%). A higher proportion of LBW/VLBW infants were transferred to ICU. Efforts must be devoted to reducing the incidence of LBW/VLBW in order to minimize subsequent adverse outcomes.

Our study had a certain weakness. Few patients in our study were positive for aPL or LA. These patients were probably not considered for ART initially. The low positive of aPL hinders further analysis on the relation between aPL and APOs. However, previous studies showed that ART is safe even in patients with APS, and aPL does not increase the risk of thrombotic events and has no impact on pregnancy outcomes in ART [18]. In addition, the efficacy in different ART procedures or OIT was not analyzed due to the limited number of patients included.

ART is safe and yields satisfactory outcomes in lupus patients with stable disease for more than one year under close surveillance by a multidisciplinary team. Maternal and fetal APOs are comparable with planned pregnancy and reduced significantly compared with unplanned pregnancy. The incidences of premature delivery, GDM, and LBW infants, however, are still high.

Availability of data and materials

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Change history



Adverse pregnancy outcome


Anti-phospholipid syndrome


Assisted reproductive therapy


Atrial septal defect




Body mass index


Cyclosporin A


Connective tissue diseases




Follicle-stimulating hormone


Gestational diabetes mellitus




Gonadotropin-releasing hormone


Human chorionic gonadotropin




Intracytoplasmic sperm injection


Intensive care unit


Interquartile range


Intrauterine fetal death


Intrauterine growth retardation


Intrauterine insemination


In vitro fertilization


Lupus anticoagulants




Low-dose aspirin


Luteinizing hormone


Low molecular weight heparin


Neuropsychiatric-systemic lupus erythematosus


Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome


Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome


Oral glucose tolerance test


Ovulation induction therapy


Patent ductus arteriosus


Patent foramen ovale


Pregnancy-induced hypertension


Preimplantation genetic diagnosis


Preimplantation genetic screening


Preimplantation genetic testing


Preterm premature rupture of membranes


Standard deviation


Systemic lupus erythematosus


Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Pregnancy Disease Activity Index






  1. Clowse M, Chakravarty E, Costenbader K, Chambers C, Michaud K. Effects of infertility, pregnancy loss, and patient concerns on family size of women with rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012;64(5):668–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Oktem O, Yagmur H, Bengisu H, Urman B. Reproductive aspects of systemic lupus erythematosus. J Reprod Immunol. 2016;117:57–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hunt BJ, Khamashta MA. Antiphospholipid antibodies and the endothelium. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2000;2(3):252–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sammaritano LR, Bermas BL, Chakravarty EE, Chambers C, Clowse MEB, Lockshin MD, et al. 2020 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Management of Reproductive Health in Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020;72(4):529–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hochberg MC. Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1997;40(9):1725.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Obstetrics and Gynecology Group of Chinese Medical Association. Chinese recommendations for perinatal care in high-risk women (1st edition). Chin J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;46(2):150–3. Chinese.

  7. The SLE study group of China. Chinese recommendations for perinatal management in women with SLE. Natl Med J China. 2015;95(14):1056–60. Chinese.

  8. Buyon J, Kalunian K, Ramsey-Goldman R, Petri M, Lockshin M, Ruiz-Irastorza G. Assessing disease activity in SLE patients during pregnancy. Lupus. 1999;8(8):677–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ruperto N, Hanrahan LM, Alarcón GS, Belmont HM, Brey RL, Brunetta P, et al. International consensus for a definition of disease flare in lupus. Lupus. 2011;20(5):453–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Brown M, Lindheimer M, Swiet M, Assche A, Moutquin J. The classification and diagnosis of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: statement from the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP). Hypertens Pregnancy. 2001; 20(1): IX-XIV.

  11. Chiefari E, Arcidiacono B, Foti D, Brunetti A. Gestational diabetes mellitus: an updated overview. J Endocrinol Invest. 2017;40(9):899–909.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fan J, Zhong Y, Chen C. Impacts of Anti-dsDNA Antibody on In Vitro Fertilization-Embryo Transfer and Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer. J Immunol Res. 2017;2017:8596181.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Reggia R, Andreoli L, Sebbar H, Canti V, Ceccarelli F, Favaro M, et al. An observational multicentre study on the efficacy and safety of assisted reproductive technologies in women with rheumatic diseases. Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2019;3(1):rkz005.

  14. Wechsler B, Le Thi Huong D, Vauthier-Brouzes D, Lefebvre G, Gompel A, Piette JC. Can we advise ovulation induction in patients with SLE? Scand J Rheumatol Suppl. 1998;107:53–9.

  15. Nastri CO, Teixeira DM, Moroni RM, Leitao VM, Martins WP. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: pathophysiology, staging, prediction and prevention. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45:377–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Guballa N, Sammaritano L, Schwartzman S, Buyon J, Lockshin M. Ovulation induction and in vitro fertilization in systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid syndrome. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43(3):550–6.;2-Y.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Huong D, Wechsler B, Vauthier-Brouzes D, Duhaut P, Costedoat N, Lefebvre G, et al. Importance of planning ovulation induction therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid syndrome: a single center retrospective study of 21 cases and 114 cycles. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2002;32(3):174–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Delvigne A, Rozenberg S. Epidemiology and prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): a review. Hum Reprod Update. 2002;8:559–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Blencowe H, Cousens S, Oestergaard M, Chou D, Moller A, Narwal R, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications. Lancet. 2012;379(9832):2162–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yuen L, Wong VW. Gestational diabetes mellitus: challenges for diferent ethnic groups. World J Diabetes. World J Diabetes. 2015;25;6(8):1024–32:

  21. Shiqiao H, Bei X, Yini Z, Lei J. Risk factors of gestational diabetes mellitus during assisted reproductive technology procedures. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2020;36(4):318–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Farr SL, Schieve LA, Jamieson DJ. Pregnancy loss among pregnancies conceived through assisted reproductive technology, United States, 1999–2002. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165:1380–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Reig A, Seli E. The association between assisted reproductive technologies and low birth weight. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2019;31(3):183–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable


This project was supported by grants from the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2022A1515010911), and Guangzhou Science and Technology Program Project (202,201,011,824).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



ML performed a clinical evaluation of all the patients and data analysis and wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. PD collected all the data, searched for the references, and participated in the clinical evaluation of all the patients. GL prepared the tables and conducted data analysis. XY performed data collection and data interpretation, and MP and YC participated in data collection. YZ participated in data collection and data interpretation. ZZ formulated the research idea, and critically reviewed the submission of the manuscript. DC formulated the research idea, critically reviewed the manuscript, and approved the submission. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhongping Zhan or Dongying Chen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics committee of the above three centers approved the research. Informed consents were obtained from the participants. This work was conducted according to the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lao, M., Dai, P., Luo, G. et al. Pregnancy outcomes in patients receiving assisted reproductive therapy with systemic lupus erythematosus: a multi-center retrospective study. Arthritis Res Ther 25, 13 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Assisted reproductive therapy
  • Systemic lupus erythematosus
  • Pregnancy
  • Anti-phospholipid antibody
  • Ooutcome