Effects on muscle tissue remodeling and lipid metabolism in muscle tissue from adult patients with polymyositis or dermatomyositis treated with immunosuppressive agents
- Ingela Loell†1,
- Joan Raouf†1,
- Yi-Wen Chen2,
- Rongye Shi3,
- Inger Nennesmo4,
- Helene Alexanderson5,
- Maryam Dastmalchi1,
- Kanneboyina Nagaraju2,
- Marina Korotkova1 and
- Ingrid E. Lundberg1Email author
© The Author(s). 2016
Received: 8 October 2015
Accepted: 25 May 2016
Published: 10 June 2016
Polymyositis (PM) and dermatomyositis (DM) are autoimmune muscle diseases, conventionally treated with high doses of glucocorticoids in combination with immunosuppressive drugs. Treatment is often dissatisfying, with persisting muscle impairment. We aimed to investigate molecular mechanisms that might contribute to the persisting muscle impairment despite immunosuppressive treatment in adult patients with PM or DM using gene expression profiling of repeated muscle biopsies.
Paired skeletal muscle biopsies from six newly diagnosed adult patients with DM or PM taken before and after conventional immunosuppressive treatment were examined by gene expression microarray analysis. Selected genes that displayed changes in expression were analyzed by Western blot. Muscle biopsy sections were evaluated for inflammation, T lymphocytes (CD3), macrophages (CD68), major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I expression and fiber type composition.
After treatment, genes related to immune response and inflammation, including inflammasome pathways and interferon, were downregulated. This was confirmed at the protein level for AIM-2 and caspase-1 in the inflammasome pathway. Changes in genes involved in muscle tissue remodeling suggested a negative effect on muscle regeneration and growth. Gene markers for fast type II fibers were upregulated and fiber composition was switched towards type II fibers in response to treatment. The expression of genes involved in lipid metabolism was altered, suggesting a potential lipotoxic effect on muscles of the immunosuppressive treatment.
The anti-inflammatory effect of immunosuppressive treatment was combined with negative effects on genes involved in muscle tissue remodeling and lipid metabolism, suggesting a negative effect on recovery of muscle performance which may contribute to persisting muscle impairment in adult patients with DM and PM.
Polymyositis (PM) and dermatomyositis (DM) are chronic, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) characterized by proximal muscle weakness. Muscle biopsies reveal signs of inflammation including infiltrating T cells, macrophages, cytokines (interleukin (IL)-1) interferons (IFNs)) and upregulated major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I expression in the fibers as well as regenerating and degenerating fibers [1, 2]. Treatment is based on high doses of glucocorticoids (GC) often combined with additional immunosuppressive drugs. The effectiveness of GC in patients with PM or DM varies between individuals, but is often disappointing and few recover former muscle performance [3–5]. In addition, side effects such as osteoporosis, hypertension, insulin resistance and steroid myopathy are common .
GC interact with the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and form a complex that is translocated into the cell nucleus where it regulates target gene actions through transrepression or transactivation mechanisms [7–9]. It is assumed that the immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory effects of GC are mediated through transrepression, downregulating the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and IFNγ . On the other hand, transactivation through GC response elements (GREs) controls genes that mediate metabolic side effects of GC and enhances the expression of anti-inflammatory genes such as IL-10, IKB and annexin-1 . The limited effects of conventional immunosuppressive treatment, including high doses of GC, on muscle performance in patients with PM and DM is well recognized, but the underlying molecular mechanisms of the limited effects have not been completely elucidated. Persisting upregulation of certain inflammatory pathways such as infiltrating T cells, MHC-I, several pro-inflammatory cytokines [10–12], prostaglandin E2 (PGE2)  and leukotriene B4 (LTB4) pathways  in muscle tissue might partly explain the sustained weakness in patients despite treatment. Other molecular mechanisms affected by treatment may also influence muscle performance. This emphasizes the need for a better understanding of the molecular response in the target organ (muscle) in order to identify new therapeutic targets and abolish the persistent muscle weakness.
In this study, we aimed to investigate molecular events that might contribute to persisting compromised muscle function despite immunosuppressive treatment in adult patients with PM or DM. Thus, we investigated muscle biopsies taken before and after conventional immunosuppressive treatment using gene expression profiling combined with analysis of selected proteins at the protein level.
Patients and muscle biopsies
Clinical data on the patients at the time of biopsies
Disease duration (months)
Cumulative cortisone (mg)
Imuunosuppressive treatment at second biopsy
Support for diagnosis
MDA5, SSA, Ro60
MW, S, LD
MW, CK, MB
MW, CK, S, EMG
MW, CK, S, EMG
MW, CK, MB, S, EMG
MW, CK, MB
Clinical and laboratory assessment
Clinical and laboratory outcome measures were retrieved from the SweMyoNet quality of care register for myositis patients and from medical records. Muscle performance before and after treatment was assessed by the Manual Muscle Test (MMT-8) and the Functional Index-2 (FI-2); ≥15 % increase was defined as improved . The MMT-8 measures isometric muscle strength in eight muscle groups  and the FI-2 measures dynamic repetitive muscle performance; it includes seven muscle groups with a maximum of 60 or 120 repetitions for each muscle . Both the MMT-8 and the FI-2 are presented as % of maximal score (100 % = good muscle performance) in Table 1. Serum levels of creatine kinase (CK) and lactate dehydrogenase (LD) were analyzed as routine tests at the Department of Clinical Chemistry, Karolinska University Hospital. Myositis-associated and myositis-specific autoantibodies were tested by RNA immunoprecipitation (IP) and protein IP in Kyoto, Japan, and are presented in Table 1 [20, 21].
Histopathological and immunohistochemical analyses
Histopathological evaluation of muscle tissue sections was performed by an experienced muscle pathologist on coded sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Immunohistochemistry staining was used to identify the presence of inflammatory cells such as T lymphocytes (CD3), macrophages (CD68) and the expression of MHC class I according to a standard protocol  using mouse monoclonal anti-CD3 (BD Biosciences, CA, USA), anti-CD68 (Dako Cytomation, Denmark) and anti-MHC-I (My Bio Sourse, CA, USA) antibodies. Isotype-matched irrelevant antibodies were used as negative controls. Conventional microscopic evaluation of the staining was performed and the whole tissue sections were scored for CD3 and CD68 as follows: 0, no positive cells; 1, few positive scattered cells or one infiltrate of inflammatory cells; 2, clusters of positive cells or two infiltrates of inflammatory cells; and 3, several large cellular infiltrates. For MHC-I staining, the sections were scored as follows: 0, no positive fibers; 1, few positive scattered fibers; 2, clusters of positive fibers; and 3, several large areas with positive fibers.
Fiber-type composition was determined by mATPase staining to distinguish between slow-twitch type I and fast-twitch type II muscle fibers [23, 24]. In brief, muscle sections were pre-incubated at acidic or alkaline pH, respectively. Type I fibers emerge in a black color at pH 4.3 in contrast to type II fibers which appears in white; the opposite pattern is observed when pre-incubating at pH 10.3. Semi-quantitative analysis was applied on coded sections for analysis of fiber-type composition; the whole tissue section area was evaluated by counting fibers using a Leica microscope system (BX60; digital camera, Sony CDK-500, Tokyo, Japan). The results are presented as fiber type percentage of the total amount of fibers on the section.
RNA expression profiling
Expression profiling was performed using Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 microarrays. Total RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis, cRNA labeling, microarray hybridization, and image acquisition were performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol . The quality control criteria developed at the Children’s National Medical Center Microarray Center for each array were followed .
Hybridization signals of the microarrays were recorded using Microarray Suite 5.0 (MAS 5.0) (Affymetrix) and the data were analyzed using GeneSpring 7.0 (Agilent, CA, USA). Genes were filtered with the number of present calls across the 12 arrays analyzed. Genes with at least one present call were selected for statistical analysis using paired t test. All profiles have been made publicly accessible via NCBI GEO (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/).
Genes with a fold change ≥2 were selected, and a functional analysis of the molecular networks and pathways was performed using the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA; Ingenuity Systems®, www.ingenuity.com). The significance of the association between the genes in the dataset, biological functions, and pathways was determined by the right-tailed Fischer’s exact test.
Western blot was performed by using a tissue section protocol . The 10-μm muscle sections were lysed in Tissue Protein Extraction Reagent (T-PER; Thermo Scientifics, USA) supplemented with 1× complete protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) and incubated on ice for 30 min. The protein content was determined using a Bio-Rad protein assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories AB, Sweden). Gel electrophoresis was carried out on the NuPAGE® Novex® Bis-Tris gel system (Invitrogen AB, Sweden). Proteins were transferred on a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane using a Trans-Blot SD semi-dry transfer cell (Bio-Rad Laboratories). The membrane was blocked with 5 % milk in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 0.1 % Tween-20) and incubated with primary (rabbit polyclonal anti-caspase-1 (Millipore, MA, USA), rabbit polyclonal anti-FKBP5 (Millipore, MA, USA), mouse monoclonal anti-AIM-2 (LifeSpan Biosciences, WA, USA)) (overnight, 4 °C) and secondary (ECL anti-mouse IgG HRP linked (GE Healthcare, UK), ECL anti-rabbit IgG HRP linked (GE Healthcare, UK)) (1 h, room temperature) antibodies. The bands were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) and the band intensities were measured using the Gel Doc XR system (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Quantification was performed with normalization against GAPDH as a housekeeping protein.
Clinical and experimental data were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed rank test. The level of significance was set at a p value ≤0.05.
Effects of treatment on clinical parameters
Clinical data are summarized in Table 1. All untreated patients had a median of 7.5 months (range 0.5–16 months) duration of clinical symptoms to the first biopsy, which was taken as part of the diagnostic work-up. At the time of the second biopsy, after a median of 9 months (range 8–15 months) with immunosuppressive treatment, two out of six adult patients fulfilled the definition of improvement for MMT-8, and four patients improved for FI-2. One out of the six patients achieved the maximum score of 100 % but still had a low test on endurance FI-2, and only one reached the maximum test of FI-2 at the second biopsy, indicating persisting muscle impartment in almost all patients (Table 1). All patients had normal CK values at the second biopsy (Table 1).
Histopathological and immunohistochemical changes in pre- and post- treatment muscle biopsies
In the pre-treatment biopsy, four patients had detectable inflammatory cells: two had large inflammatory infiltrates, and two had scattered T lymphocytes or macrophages. Five out of the six patients had detectable positive staining for MHC-I expression in muscle fiber membranes, ranging from small areas with discrete staining to large areas with whole fibers expressing MHC-I. In the follow-up biopsy after immunosuppressive treatment, a few scattered T lymphocytes and macrophages were present in one patient, and scattered T lymphocytes were found in another patient. MHC class I expression was expressed in muscle fibers in one of five available follow-up biopsies. In addition, two pre-treatment biopsies showed signs of degenerating or regenerating fibers, but none of the follow-up biopsies showed this.
Effects of treatment on the overall gene expression
After treatment, the expression of 369 genes was significantly affected (>2.0 fold change) in the muscle tissue of patients, including 126 upregulated and 243 downregulated genes. Gene Ontology analysis demonstrated that the top Upstream Regulators statistically relevant for our gene dataset were Interferon Gamma (IFNG), interferon regulatory factor 7 (IRF7), Interferon type I (IFNα), signal transducer and activator of transcription 2 (STAT2) and Interferon Alfa 2 (IFNA2), which were predicted to be inhibited based on the gene expression changes in the dataset.
Effects on genes associated with immune response and inflammation
Changes in expression (cutoff 2-fold) of the genes involved in immune responses and inflammation in patients with polymyositis or dermatomyositis after a median of 8.5 months of immunosuppressive treatment
Immune response and antigen presentation
chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2
chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 5
chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 2
chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 5
CDW52 antigen (CAMPATH-1 antigen)
CD80 antigen (CD28 ag ligand 1, B7-1 ag)
CD86 antigen (CD28 ag ligand 2, B7-2 ag)
cholinergic receptor, nicotinic, αpolypeptide 1
trinucleotide repeat containing 5
MHC class II, DQβ2
major histocompatibility complex, class I, A
HLA-G histocompatibility antigen, class I, G
MHC class I, C
MHC class I, B
MHC class I, F
MHC class II, DQα1
MHC class II, DQβ1
MHC class II, DPα1
Interleukin 23, subunit alpha
Interleukin 12 receptor, beta 1
Matrix metalloproteinase 3
signal transducer & activator of transcription 1, 91 kDa
chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 10
chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 11
28kD interferon responsive protein
IFN consensus sequence binding protein 1
IFN stimulated gene 20 kDa
IFNγ-inducible protein 30
IFN -induced protein 35
IFN -induced protein w tetratricopeptide repeats 4
IFN -stimulated transcription factor 3, γ
guanylate binding protein 1, IFN-inducible
guanylate binding protein 1, IFN-inducible
guanylate binding protein 5
absent in melanoma 2
caspase 1, (interleukin 1β convertase)
interleukin 18 (IFNg-inducing factor)
prostaglandin E receptor 3 (subtype EP3)
prostaglandin E receptor 4 (subtype EP4)
cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 1
Effects on genes involved in muscle tissue remodeling
Changes in expression (cutoff 2-fold) of genes involved in ubiquitin proteasome pathway, skeletal muscle structure, and remodeling in patients with polymyositis or dermatomyositis after immunosuppressive treatment
Ubiquitin proteasome pathway
proteasome subunit,β type, 8 (large multifunctional protease 7)
ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2L 6
proteasome (prosome, macropain) subunit, beta type, 9
proteasome) activator subunit 1 (PA28 α)
proteasome activator subunit 2 (PA28β)
ubiquitin-activating enzyme E1C (UBA3 homolog, yeast)
Structure proteins and tissue remodeling
myosin binding protein H
Ras-related associated with diabetes
bone morphogenetic protein 1
Nuclear receptor co-activator
calcium channel, voltage-dependent, L type, alpha 1D subunit
carbohydrate (chondroitin 4) sulfotransferase 11
myosin, heavy polypeptide 4, skeletal muscle
forkhead box O1A
growth differentiation factor 8
tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 4
FK506 binding protein 5
actinin, alpha 3
Effects on genes involved in lipid metabolism
Changes in expression of the genes involved in lipid metabolism in patients with polymyositis or dermatomyositis after immunosuppressive treatment
Lipid transport and uptake
fatty acid binding protein 7, brain
ATP-binding cassette, sub-family D member 2
apolipoprotein L, 6
Lipid accumulation and lipolysis
stearoyl-CoA desaturase (delta-9)
cell death-inducing DFFA-like effector c
ceramide synthase 3
Human CB1 cannabinoid receptor
fatty-acid-Coenzyme A ligase, long-chain 3
Lipid Storage Droplet Protein 5
sphingosine kinase 1
Confirmation of changes at the protein level
Effects on fiber type composition
In the present study, in which adult patients improved but none had recovered muscle strength at the follow-up biopsy, we found that immunosuppressive treatment of newly diagnosed PM and DM patients had suppressive effects on gene expression of immune and inflammatory pathways, including type 1 IFN and inflammasome pathways, in skeletal muscle. However, we also observed changed expression of genes involved in skeletal muscle tissue remodeling indicating protein breakdown and reduced muscle regeneration, which may negatively affect muscle regeneration and growth. Furthermore, we found altered expression of genes associated with lipid uptake, lipolysis, and lipid accumulation in response to treatment, indicating complex effects on intramuscular lipid metabolism that may also have a negative effect on muscle performance. Among the immune and inflammatory pathways suppressed by treatment, the downregulation of type I IFN pathways in muscle tissue was most striking. It is well recognized that the type I IFN pathway is activated in patients with autoimmune diseases including IIM [28, 29]. A significant upregulation of IFN-inducible genes in muscle biopsies from PM and DM patients was detected compared to age-/sex-matched controls [30, 31]. The high overexpression of interferon-inducible genes was also demonstrated in whole blood from both PM and DM patients . Moreover, a recent study of peripheral blood gene expression has revealed that IIM patients displayed a predominant IFNα-mediated response program . The expression of type I IFN-inducible genes in whole blood correlated with disease activity in PM and DM patients and was reduced after immunomodulatory therapies [32, 33]. Our novel finding that immunosuppressive treatment suppressed the IFN pathway in muscle tissue from PM and DM patients is in agreement with these previous reports. Our results provide additional evidence supporting the beneficial effects of conventional immunosuppressive treatment in myositis, through inhibition of the IFN pathway and reduced formation of pro-inflammatory mediators in muscle tissue.
Another finding was downregulation of genes involved in inflammasome activity in response to treatment, which was confirmed at the protein level for AIM-2 and Caspase-1. Our findings have added insights into the favorable effects of conventional immunosuppressive treatment, which includes inhibition of the inflammasome pathway in muscle tissue in patients with PM or DM, as well as several other pathways associated with immune response and inflammation, which was validated by immunohistochemistry confirming a low degree of inflammation in the post-treatment biopsies as assessed by CD3, CD68, and MHC-I expression.
However, our group has previously demonstrated an insufficient effect of immunosuppressive treatment on PGE2 and LTB4 pathways associated with the persistent expression of mPGES-1, COX-1, and 5-LO proteins in myositis muscle despite treatment [13, 14]. In line with these observations, we did not detect any alterations in the gene expression of these enzymes or changes at the protein level for the eicosanoid receptors EP3, EP4, and CysLTR1. The receptors were expressed at the protein level in muscle from patients with myositis before and after treatment, suggesting that PGE2 and LT might contribute to chronic inflammation and muscle wasting and these pathways could be potential targets for new therapies.
Importantly we found signs in the gene expression profiles after treatment indicating an effect on muscle remodeling. We observed downregulation of several genes in the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway and also increased expression of structural proteins such as α-actinin and vinculin, indicating an increase in muscle mass. Reversely, we detected increased expression of myostatin, suggesting inhibition of myogenesis and a negative effect on muscle growth. Furthermore, downregulation of RRAD and MYBPH could also be a sign of reduced muscle regeneration. RRAD expression was elevated during skeletal muscle development as well as in adult muscle post-injury . FKBP5 is an essential functional regulator of the GR complex and is associated with muscle tissue alteration; it plays an important role in basic cellular processes and in immunoregulation involving protein folding and trafficking . We observed an increased protein expression of FKBP5, implicating a negative effect on muscle tissue remodeling. Overall, these data point to negative effects of conventional immunosuppressive treatment on muscle regeneration and growth. Furthermore, the enhanced gene expression of specific markers for fast type II fibers, MYH4 and ACTN3, suggest a fiber-type switching towards the type II fibers in response to treatment, which was confirmed by analysis of fiber-type composition. This observation is in agreement with the clinical problem of low muscle endurance as measured by FI-2 and with previous data reporting a shift towards fast twitch type II fibers in patients with chronic PM or DM which interestingly could be reversed by exercise [36, 37].
A third pathway that we found to be altered in muscle tissue after immunosuppressive treatment relates to lipid metabolism. The balance between lipid production and oxidation is essential for normal cell functions; thus, an excess of FFA is converted to triacylglycerol for intracellular lipid storage. The dysregulation of this process leads to the production of lipotoxic lipid intermediates (ceramides, diacylglycerol, fatty acyl CoA) that might cause cell dysfunction or death . A novel observation from our study is that immunosuppressive treatment including GC might affect lipid storage in skeletal muscle. In addition, upregulated CERS3 suggests an enhanced accumulation of ceramide which has previously been linked to insulin resistance . Moreover, ceramide has been implicated in skeletal muscle dysfunction and fatigue in chronic diseases and in mouse muscle fibers in vitro [40, 41]. Additional detailed studies are needed to define lipid profiles in muscle tissue from myositis patients in comparison with healthy individuals and in relation to immunosuppressive treatment. Notably, patients with juvenile DM are at risk of developing lipodystrophy, associated with loss or redistribution of subcutaneous fat . The lipodystrophy is accompanied by metabolic abnormalities such as insulin resistance, diabetes and dyslipidemia, and may occur as a result of inflammation. Our study included adult patients, although there is very little known about lipodystrophy in adult patients with PM or DM. There is a case study from 2007 describing a woman suffering from a typical DM which developed lipodystrophy and insulin resistance . Although worth mentioning, there is no evidence that standard therapies for DM causes lipodystrophy.
A strength of our study is the paired muscle biopsy samples, with two biopsies taken from the same individuals and the repeated biopsy that was taken regardless of clinical signs of a flare. A paired sample study design reduces the problem of inter-individual variations. Nevertheless, our current study has several limitations: one of them is the low number of patients included and the heterogeneity in diagnoses of PM and DM and in the degree of histopathological changes before treatment. Also, no magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed before the biopsies were taken which could have enhanced the detection of inflammation in the muscle. Differences in typical histopathological features in muscle biopsies seen in PM and DM suggest that different mechanisms may contribute to the muscle inflammation. However, several studies on cytokine and chemokine expression have not revealed significant differences between PM and DM, suggesting that inflammatory molecular pathways may be shared. One patient with typical DM features and muscle weakness had no signs of MHC class expression on muscle fibers, which could be explained by the sometimes patchy distribution of MHC class I expression. Another limitation is the inconsistency in the immunosuppressive treatment used in combination with GC, as it was given based on the decision of the treating physician, although all patients were treated with high doses of GC. Furthermore, the total expected duration of immunosuppressive treatment in patients with PM or DM is often 2–3 years. Here, we chose to take a repeated biopsy after approximately 9 months, which is not likely to show the final repaired muscle but rather an effect of the immunosuppressive treatment on molecular pathways (which was the aim of our study). Despite the heterogeneity in diagnosis and treatment and the low degree of inflammatory cell infiltrates in two patients before treatment, we could still see significant downregulation of genes involved in inflammation, supporting the beneficial effect of the immunosuppressive treatment on the inflammatory pathway. One patient developed type 2 diabetes after the start of immunosuppressive treatment. None of the other patients had medications or conditions that could impact muscle metabolism. Furthermore, details on diet were not included. In recent years, our group has shown that intensive exercise can have a positive influence on muscle health . Four out of the six patients in the present study did exercise regularly, which might have counteracted some of the damage induced by the oral corticosteroid treatment. Moreover, it is not possible to distinguish between the relative contribution of the disease progress and the immunosuppressive treatment on the outcome in this study. To address this question an experimental model should be considered. Due to the limited number of patients the results need to be interpreted with some caution and need to be replicated in a larger cohort of patients.
In conclusion, a majority of genes involved in immune response were downregulated in muscle tissue from patients with PM or DM after conventional immunosuppressive treatment. In addition, genes involved in protein degradation and muscle regeneration were altered, indicating insufficient muscle tissue remodeling, and, finally, the expression of genes related to lipid metabolism was affected by treatment, suggesting intramuscular lipid accumulation leading to skeletal muscle dysfunction. These findings provide new plausible explanations for the persistent muscle weakness and fatigue observed in patients despite treatment, and diminished tissue inflammation, and at least some of these may be affected in a beneficial way by combining immunosuppressive treatment with physical exercise.
ABCD2, ATP-binding cassette, sub-family D member 2; ACTN3, sarcomeric muscle protein α-actinin 3; AIM2, Absent In melanoma 2; BMP1, Bone morphologic protein 1; CASP1, Caspase-1; CD3, T lymphocytes; CD68, macrophages; CERS3, ceramide synthase 3; CES1, Carboxylesterase 1; CIDEC, cell death-inducing DFFA-like effector c; CK, creatine kinase; CYSLTR1, Cysteinyl Leukotriene Receptor 1; DM, dermatomyositis; ECL, enhanced chemiluminescence; FA, fatty acid; FABP7, fatty acid binding protein 7; FI-2, Functional Index-2; FKBP5, FK506 binding protein 5; GC, glucocorticoids; GR, glucocorticoid receptor; GRE, glucocorticoid response element; HAQ, Health Assessment Questionnaire; IFNA2, interferon alfa 2; IFNG, interferon gamma; IFN, interferon; IFNα, interferon type I; IIM, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies; IL, interleukin; IPA, Ingenuity Pathway Analysis; IRF7, interferon regulatory factor 7; LIPE, Hormone-sensitive lipase; LPL, Lipoprotein Lipase; LSDP5, Lipid Storage Droplet Protein; LTB4, leukotriene B4; MHC, major histocompatibility complex; MMT-8, Manual Muscle Test; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MSTN, Myostatin; MYBPH, Myosin binding protein H; MYH4, myosin heavy chain 4; NCOA6, nuclear receptor co-activator 6; PGE2, prostaglandin E2; PM, polymyositis; PTGER4, prostaglandin E Receptor 4; RRAD, Ras associated with diabetes; SCD, stearoyl-CoA desaturase; SPHK1, sphingosine kinase 1; STAT2, signal transducer and activator of transcription 2; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; VCL, vinculin
The authors would like to thank Eva Lindroos for exceptional handling and provision of muscle biopsy samples. Many thanks are also given to Nurse Christina Ottosson for excellent patient care and for providing clinical data from patients. We want to thank Professor Tsuneyo Mimori, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan, for providing us with results for myositis-associated and -specific autoantibodies.
This study was supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council, the Swedish Rheumatism Association, King Gustaf V 80 Year Foundation, Funds at the Karolinska Institutet and through the regional agreement on medical training and clinical research (ALF) between Stockholm County Council and Karolinska Institutet. KN was supported by National Institutes of Health grantss K26OD011171, R24HD050846-02, and P50AR060836, and United States Department of Defense grants W81XWH-05-1-0659, W81XWH-11-1-0782, W81XWH-11-1-0330, and W81XWH 10-1-0767.
IL carried out the immunohistochemistry staining, and participated in drafting and revising the manuscript. JR carried out the immunoblots, contributed to analysis and interpretation of data, and participated in drafting, revising, and finalized the manuscript. YWC carried out the gene expression profiling and participated in revising the manuscript. RS carried out the gene expression profiling and helped to revise the manuscript. IN contributed to analysis and interpretations of histopathology and immunohistochemistry staining, and participated in revising the manuscript. HA participated in the design of the study and participated in revising the manuscript. MD participated in the design of the study and helped to revise the manuscript. KN participated in the design of the study and revising the manuscript. MK contributed to the interpretation of data, and participated in the design of the study and revising the manuscript. IEL participated in the design of the study and revising the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Nagaraju K, Casciola-Rosen L, Lundberg I, Rawat R, Cutting S, Thapliyal R, et al. Activation of the endoplasmic reticulum stress response in autoimmune myositis: potential role in muscle fiber damage and dysfunction. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(6):1824–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lundberg I, Ulfgren AK, Nyberg P, Andersson U, Klareskog L. Cytokine production in muscle tissue of patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Arthritis Rheum. 1997;40(5):865–874.Google Scholar
- Zong M, Lundberg IE. Pathogenesis, classification and treatment of inflammatory myopathies. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2011;7(5):297–306.Google Scholar
- Hengstman G, Van Den Hoogen F, Van Engelen B. Treatment of dermatomyositis and polymyositis with anti-tumor necrosis factor-α: long-term follow-up. Eur Neurol. 2004;52(1):61–63.Google Scholar
- Pandya JM, Loell I, Hossain MS, Zong M, Alexanderson H, Raghavan S, et al. Effects of conventional immunosuppressive treatment on CD244+ (CD28null) and FOXP3+ T cells in the inflamed muscle of patients with polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2016;18(1):1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schäcke H, Döcke W-D, Asadullah K. Mechanisms involved in the side effects of glucocorticoids. Pharmacol Ther. 2002;96(1):23–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Necela BM, Cidlowski JA. Mechanisms of glucocorticoid receptor action in noninflammatory and inflammatory cells. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2004;1(3):239–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hayashi R, Wada H, Ito K, Adcock IM. Effects of glucocorticoids on gene transcription. Eur J Pharmacol. 2004;500(1):51–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Newton R, Holden NS. Separating transrepression and transactivation: a distressing divorce for the glucocorticoid receptor? Mol Pharmacol. 2007;72(4):799–809.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nyberg P, Wikman AL, Nennesmo I, Lundberg I. Increased expression of interleukin 1alpha and MHC class I in muscle tissue of patients with chronic, inactive polymyositis and dermatomyositis. J Rheumatol. 2000;27(4):940–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zong M, Loell I, Lindroos E, Nader GA, Alexanderson H, Hallengren CS, Borg K, Arnardottir S, McInnes IB, Lundberg IE. Effects of immunosuppressive treatment on interleukin-15 and interleukin-15 receptor α expression in muscle tissue of patients with polymyositis or dermatomyositis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012. annrheumdis-2011–200495.Google Scholar
- Ulfgren AK, Grundtman C, Borg K, Alexanderson H, Andersson U, Harris HE, et al. Down-regulation of the aberrant expression of the inflammation mediator high mobility group box chromosomal protein 1 in muscle tissue of patients with polymyositis and dermatomyositis treated with corticosteroids. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50(5):1586–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Korotkova M, Helmers SB, Loell I, Alexanderson H, Grundtman C, Dorph C, et al. Effects of immunosuppressive treatment on microsomal prostaglandin E synthase 1 and cyclooxygenases expression in muscle tissue of patients with polymyositis or dermatomyositis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67(11):1596–602.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Loell I, Munters LA, Pandya J, Zong M, Alexanderson H, Fasth AE, Hallengren CS, Rådmark O, Lundberg IE, Jakobsson P-J. Activated LTB4 pathway in muscle tissue of patients with polymyositis or dermatomyositis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(2):293–299.Google Scholar
- Bohan A, Peter JB, Bowman RL, Pearson CM. A computer-assisted analysis of 153 patients with polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Medicine. 1977;56(4):255–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dorph C, Nennesmo I, Lundberg IE. Percutaneous conchotome muscle biopsy. A useful diagnostic and assessment tool. J Rheumatol. 2001;28(7):1591–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mendell JR, Florence J. Manual muscle testing. Muscle Nerve. 1990;13(S1):S16–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rider LG, Koziol D, Giannini EH, Jain MS, Smith MR, Whitney‐Mahoney K, et al. Validation of manual muscle testing and a subset of eight muscles for adult and juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Arthritis Care Res. 2010;62(4):465–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Alexanderson H, Broman L, Tollback A, Josefson A, Lundberg IE, Stenstrom CH. Functional index-2: validity and reliability of a disease-specific measure of impairment in patients with polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;55(1):114–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Forman MS, Nakamura M, Mimori T, Gelpi C, Hardin JA. Detection of antibodies to small nuclear ribonucleoproteins and small cytoplasmic ribonucleoproteins using unlabeled cell extracts. Arthritis Rheum. 1985;28(12):1356–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nakashima R, Imura Y, Kobayashi S, Yukawa N, Yoshifuji H, Nojima T, et al. The RIG-I-like receptor IFIH1/MDA5 is a dermatomyositis-specific autoantigen identified by the anti-CADM-140 antibody. Rheumatology. 2010;49(3):433–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Frostegard J, Ulfgren AK, Nyberg P, Hedin U, Swedenborg J, Andersson U, et al. Cytokine expression in advanced human atherosclerotic plaques: dominance of pro-inflammatory (Th1) and macrophage-stimulating cytokines. Atherosclerosis. 1999;145(1):33–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brooke MH, Kaiser KK. Three “myosin adenosine triphosphatase” systems: the nature of their pH lability and sulfhydryl dependence. J Histochem Cytochem. 1970;18(9):670–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Scott W, Stevens J. Binder–Macleod SA. Human skeletal muscle fiber type classifications. Phys Ther. 2001;81(11):1810–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen Y-W, Zhao P, Borup R, Hoffman EP. Expression profiling in the muscular dystrophies identification of novel aspects of molecular pathophysiology. J Cell Biol. 2000;151(6):1321–36.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Cooper ST, Lo HP, North KN. Single section Western blot: improving the molecular diagnosis of the muscular dystrophies. Neurology. 2003;61(1):93–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bruce CR, Risis S, Babb JR, Yang C, Kowalski GM, Selathurai A, et al. Overexpression of sphingosine kinase 1 prevents ceramide accumulation and ameliorates muscle insulin resistance in high-fat diet-fed mice. Diabetes. 2012;61(12):3148–55.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Higgs BW, Liu Z, White B, Zhu W, White WI, Morehouse C, et al. Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, myositis, rheumatoid arthritis and scleroderma share activation of a common type I interferon pathway. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(11):2029–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- de Jong TD, Vosslamber S, Mantel E, de Ridder S, Wesseling JG, van der Pouw Kraan TC, et al. Physiological evidence for diversification of IFNα-and IFNβ-mediated response programs in different autoimmune diseases. Arthritis Res Ther. 2016;18(1):1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cappelletti C, Baggi F, Zolezzi F, Biancolini D, Beretta O, Severa M, et al. Type I interferon and Toll-like receptor expression characterizes inflammatory myopathies. Neurology. 2011;76(24):2079–88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhou X, Dimachkie MM, Xiong M, Tan FK, Arnett FC. cDNA microarrays reveal distinct gene expression clusters in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Med Sci Monit. 2004;10(7):BR191–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Walsh RJ, Kong SW, Yao Y, Jallal B, Kiener PA, Pinkus JL, et al. Type I interferon-inducible gene expression in blood is present and reflects disease activity in dermatomyositis and polymyositis. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56(11):3784–92.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Greenberg S, Higgs B, Morehouse C, Walsh R, Kong SW, Brohawn P, Zhu W, Amato A, Salajegheh M, White B. Relationship between disease activity and type 1 interferon-and other cytokine-inducible gene expression in blood in dermatomyositis and polymyositis. Genes Immun. 2012;13(3):207–213.Google Scholar
- Hawke TJ, Kanatous SB, Martin CM, Goetsch SC, Garry DJ. Rad is temporally regulated within myogenic progenitor cells during skeletal muscle regeneration. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2006;290(2):C379–87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Binder EB. The role of FKBP5, a co-chaperone of the glucocorticoid receptor in the pathogenesis and therapy of affective and anxiety disorders. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2009;34:S186–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Loell I, Helmers S, Dastmalchi M, Alexanderson H, Munters L, Nennesmo I, et al. Higher proportion of fast‐twitch (type II) muscle fibres in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies—evident in chronic but not in untreated newly diagnosed patients. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2011;31(1):18–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dastmalchi M, Alexanderson H, Loell I, Stahlberg M, Borg K, Lundberg IE, et al. Effect of physical training on the proportion of slow-twitch type I muscle fibers, a novel nonimmune-mediated mechanism for muscle impairment in polymyositis or dermatomyositis. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57(7):1303–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schaffer JE. Lipotoxicity: when tissues overeat. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2003;14(3):281–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schmitz-Peiffer C. Targeting ceramide synthesis to reverse insulin resistance. Diabetes. 2010;59(10):2351–3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Nikolova-Karakashian MN, Reid MB. Sphingolipid metabolism, oxidant signaling, and contractile function of skeletal muscle. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2011;15(9):2501–17.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ferreira LF, Moylan JS, Stasko S, Smith JD, Campbell KS, Reid MB. Sphingomyelinase depresses force and calcium sensitivity of the contractile apparatus in mouse diaphragm muscle fibers. J Appl Physiol. 2012;112(9):1538–45.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bingham A, Mamyrova G, Rother KI, Oral E, Cochran E, Premkumar A, et al. Predictors of acquired lipodystrophy in juvenile-onset dermatomyositis and a gradient of severity. Medicine. 2008;87(2):70.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Lee LA, Hobbs KF. Lipodystrophy and metabolic abnormalities in a case of adult dermatomyositis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;57(5):S85–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Munters LA, Loell I, Ossipova E, Raouf J, Dastmalchi M, Lindroos E, Chen YW, Esbjörnsson M, Korotkova M, Alexanderson H. Endurance Exercise Improves Molecular Pathways of Aerobic Metabolism in Patients with Myositis. Arthritis and Rheumatology; 2016. doi:10.1002/art.39624.