Skip to main content

Enhanced BMP-2/BMP-4 ratio in patients with peripheral spondyloarthritis and in cytokine- and stretch-stimulated mouse chondrocytes

Abstract

Background

Excessive bone formation in the entheses is one of the features of peripheral spondyloarthritis (SpA). Complex pathological mechanisms connecting inflammation, mechanical stress, and ossification are probably involved. We focused on bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-2, -4, and -7 as possible mediators of this process.

Methods

BMP-2, -4, and -7 concentration was measured by ELISA in synovial fluids (SFs) of SpA (n = 56) and osteoarthritic (n = 21) patients. Mouse organotypic ankle cultures were challenged by a pro-inflammatory cocktail. Mouse primary chondrocytes, osteoblasts, or tenocytes were treated with TNF-α, interleukin (IL)-17, or IL-22 and/or subjected to cyclic stretch, or with recombinant BMP-2 or -4.

Results

In SpA SFs, if BMP-7 was barely detectable, BMP-2 concentration was higher and BMP-4 was lower than in osteoarthritic samples, so that BMP-2/BMP-4 ratio augmented 6.5 folds (p < 0.001). In SpA patients, TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-17 levels correlated this ratio (n = 21). Bmp-2/Bmp-4 ratio was similarly enhanced by cytokine treatment in explant and cell cultures, at mRNA level. In particular, simultaneous application of TNF-α and cyclical stretch induced a 30-fold increase of the Bmp-2/Bmp-4 ratio in chondrocytes (p = 0.027). Blockade of prostaglandin E2 and IL-6 production had almost no effect on the stretch-induced regulation of Bmp-2 or -4. Osteoinductive effects of BMP-4, and to a lesser extend BMP-2, were identified on cultured chondrocytes and tenocytes.

Conclusions

Our results first settle that BMP factors are locally deregulated in the SpA joint. An unexpected decrease in BMP-4 could be associated to an increase in BMP-2, possibly in response to mechanical and/or cytokine stimulations.

Background

Spondyloarthropathy is a common rheumatic disease, with a worldwide prevalence estimated at between 0.2 and 1.6% [1]. Patients whose symptoms are principally peripheral rather than axial are grouped under the term peripheral spondyloarthritis (SpA), which includes psoriatic arthritis, reactive arthritis, and enteropathic arthritis, among others. Frequently involved joints include the hands, wrists, elbows, shoulders, knees, ankles, and feet. Excessive bone formation is observed in the entheses, the bony insertions of the tendons and ligaments, which can lead in advanced stages to ankylosis. The pain is typically relieved by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), anti-TNF agents, or anti-interleukin (IL)-17 antibodies. All of these treatments have beneficial effects on inflammatory lesions, and long-term control of inflammation appears critical to limit ectopic ossification [2, 3]. The hierarchy between inflammation, mechanical stress, and ossification mechanisms in SpA pathophysiology seems complex.

The enthesis is structured as an organ, where the tendons attach to the bone through fibrocartilage connections. The mechanism of enthesophyte formation in SpA is still unclear. The bony spurs probably develop both by endochondral and by intramembranous ossification, i.e., both by cartilage-to-bone transition process and by direct deposition of osteoid on the underlying bone [4]. The process of endochondral ossification is however considered prevalent [3, 5, 6]. In this case, within an enthesis, ossification could be initiated by the metaplasia of tendon cells into fibro-chondrocytes and then chondrocytes [5].

The causes of the ectopic and excessive deposition of bone mineralized matrix still remain incompletely understood [3]. On the one hand, enthesitis is a characteristic feature of SpA. The inflammation process is relatively well deciphered: in addition to the pleotropic role of TNF-α, after activation by IL-23, T cells can promote local inflammation in the enthesis through IL-17 and IL-22, in particular. But in most pathological contexts, bone inflammation leads to enhanced resorption and suppressed formation [7]. On the other hand, biomechanical stress is proposed to occupy a central place in SpA pathophysiology, but the precise mechanisms leading to a pathological response of the enthesis are still largely unknown. Mechanical stretch may trigger ossification by entheseal cells. Numerous data have already shown that mechanical strain can enhance bone formation activity in osteoblasts [8]. In comparison, little is known regarding the effect of mechanical strain on chondrocytes and tendon cells in terms of mineralization. A particular cyclic tensile strain has been shown to upregulate expression of hypertrophic markers in primary chondrocytes [9]; and cyclic stretch may also favor osteogenic orientation of ligament cells [10,11,12]. Biomechanical stress and inflammation are certainly interconnected. In particular, microdamages induced by mechanical stress can participate in inflammation. But also, inflammation-induced bone loss can change the distribution of forces in the joint, in turn causing new bone formation to stabilize the structure [2]. Overall, further research on the relationship between inflammatory cytokines, mechanical stress, growth factors, and target entheseal cells are still needed.

Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are known to play an essential role in promoting bone formation. They not only regulate the chondro- and osteoblasto-genesis during skeletal development, so as to recap the endochondral ossification, but also play a role in the preservation of bone homeostasis afterward, and enhance the bone fracture healing. To date, more than 20 BMP members have been characterized, belonging to the transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) superfamily [13]. BMPs trigger cellular responses mainly through the Smad pathway, but also through the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. Activation of the canonical Smad pathway consists of R-Smads phosphorylation (including Smad1, 5, and 8) and dimerization with the common partner Smad4, before nuclear translocation to regulate gene transcription. Higher serum levels of BMP-2, -7 but also -4 were found in SpA patients, and BMP-2 and -4 levels had a significant correlation with spinal radiograph scores, and BMP-7 levels reflected radiographic damage [14, 15]. Recently, abnormal osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells from patients with axial SpA was shown to be the consequence of an imbalance between BMP-2 and Noggin, a BMP antagonist [16]. In addition, genetic polymorphisms in a BMP receptor have been identified as a predisposition to the ossification of a spine ligament [17]. In this pathology, with clinical features close to SpA symptoms, the expression of BMP receptors is particularly high [18]. Besides, the over-expression of Noggin reduced the incidence and severity of the spontaneous SpA-like arthritis of male DBA/1 mice [6]. In this context, we hypothesized that BMP family members may stimulate the first steps of enthesis ossification in SpA and therefore constitute promising targets.

In this study, we investigated the possible deregulation in BMP factors in the joint of SpA patients. We focused on BMP-2, -4, and -7 which have already been found deregulated in SpA patients. To determine if levels of BMP were locally impaired in the entheseal environment, BMP contents were assessed in SpA patients’ synovial fluids. Using organotypic and cellular models, we then aimed to determine which cells in the enthesis might produce BMPs, and whether stretch and/or cytokines might be responsible for a local imbalance in BMP content.

Methods

Human synovial fluids

Synovial fluids (SFs) were obtained from 21 patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and 56 patients with peripheral spondyloarthritis (SpA). SFs were sampled during an arthrocentesis. Cells were removed by centrifugation before storage at − 80 °C. The study was approved by the local ethics committee and by the French Research Ministry (N°2008–402). All enrolled patients have given their formal consent. OA was diagnosed according to the EULAR criteria [19]. Patients with OA included 12 males (57%) and 9 females, with a mean age of 63 ± 15 years old (mean ± SD). All OA SFs were typically non-inflammatory, with less than 500 elements per mm3. SpA patients satisfied the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria for peripheral SpA [20]. SpA patients’ characteristics are detailed in Table 1. C-reactive protein (CRP) serum concentration was measured for 34 patients with SpA as previously described [21].

Table 1 Characteristics of SpA patients

Organotypic culture

An organotypic model of mouse ankle was used to study the enthesis of Achilles tendon insertion into the calcaneus bone, as previously described [22]. Samples were retrieved from 12-week-old DBA/2 male mice. After 1 day of rest in serum-free Dulbecco’s Modification of Eagle Medium (DMEM), the ankles were treated for 3 days with a cocktail of pro-inflammatory cytokines: TNF-α, IL-22, IL-17, IL-6, and IL-1β (each at 10 ng/mL). While one leg was cytokine-stimulated, the contralateral one served as the untreated control.

Immunohistochemistry

Mouse ankles were isolated from 12-week-old DBA/2 male animals and fixed in acidified formal alcohol (AFA) for 24 h at room temperature. Tissue samples were paraffin-embedded after decalcification and dehydration and sliced with a microtome. The tissue sections were incubated overnight with anti-phospho-Smad5 primary antibody (ABcam ab92698). Sections were revealed by the use of the HRP Envision™ anti-rabbit kit and tetrahydrochloridediaminobenzidine (DAB) staining (Dako). Sections were slightly counter-stained with Mayer’s hematoxylin staining.

Entheseal cell primary culture

Primary osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and tenocytes were isolated from newborn (4–6 days) SWISS mice by successive enzymatic digestion of calvaria, knee, and femoral head cartilage and tail tendon, respectively [23]. Tenocytes and chondrocytes were grown 1 week in DMEM supplemented with 10% of serum, penicillin (10 U/mg), and streptomycin (0.1 mg/mL). Tenocytes were passed once but not chondrocytes. Osteoblasts were grown for 3 weeks in the same medium, but ascorbic acid (50 μg/mL) was added from day 3 after seeding and β-glycerophosphate (10 mM) from day 10. Convenient osteoblast maturation in these conditions has already been validated [23].

Stretch and cytokine challenges of cultured cells

Chondrocytes and osteoblasts were placed in serum-free conditions for 24 h, with 0.1% bovine serum albumin, before any mechanical or cytokine stimulation. For tenocyte cultures, serum content was reduced to 1%. Cells were subjected to equibiaxial stretching using Flexcell® Tension Plus FX-3000 (Flexcell® International) for 2 or 6 h (0.5% Hz, 4.5% elongation). Inflammatory stress was induced by addition of recombinant mouse cytokines (Immunotools) for 6 or 24 h: 10 ng/mL of TNF-α and 100 ng/mL of IL-17 (also known as IL-17A) or IL-22.

Cell treatments with BMP-2, -4, and Noggin

Chondrocytes and tenocytes were grown for 1 week as described before. They were then treated for the next 10 days in DMEM containing serum (10%) and ascorbic acid (50 μg/mL), with or without recombinant human BMP-2 or -4 (20, 100, or 250 ng/mL) or 100 ng/mL of recombinant mouse Noggin (Immunotools).

ELISA analysis

All ELISA experiments were performed according to the manufacturers’ instructions. ELISA kits for BMP-2, -4, and -7 and osteoprotegerin (OPG) were purchased from R&D Systems, and kits for prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and IL-6 from Cayman, Invitrogen.

Alkaline phosphatase (AP) specific activity

AP activity was measured using p-nitrophenyl phosphate as a substrate as described before [22]. For standardization, proteins were quantified by BCA assay kit (Pierce).

Gene expression analysis

Total RNA extraction, reverse transcription, and real-time QPCR were realized as previously described [22]. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Gapdh) was used as a reference gene in cultured cells. For normalization of tissue samples, the geometric average of three housekeeping genes was calculated: β-actin (Actb), hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (Hprt), and ribosomal Protein L13a (Rpl13a).

Statistical analysis

For the analysis of human samples, data from OA patients were compared to SpA patients by the use of unpaired T test Welch corrected. Linear correlations were established with Pearson’s test. For the analysis of mouse samples, at least 4 independent experiments were performed. Data were analyzed by the use of two-sided Mann-Whitney tests. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05 (*).

Results

In synovial fluid of SpA patients, BMP-2 content is higher and BMP-4 is lower than in OA samples

BMP-2, -4, and -7 concentrations were measured by ELISA in the synovial fluid (SF) of 56 SpA patients (Fig. 1a). BMP levels were independent of age and sex of the patients (data not shown). Compared to OA patients (n = 21), BMP-2 content was particularly elevated in SpA SF (165 ± 19 versus 100 ± 21 pg/mL; mean ± SEM, p = 0.025). In opposition, BMP-4 concentration was lower in SpA SF than in OA samples (1.6 ± 0.4 versus 4.1 ± 0.7 pg/mL, p = 0.004). In consequence, the balance between BMP-2 and -4 was drastically impaired in the SF of SpA patients, as clarified by the calculation of BMP-2/BMP-4 ratio, which is increased by 6.5 folds (Fig. 1b, p < 0.001). BMP-7 was detected in only 16 SpA SF (28%) and in only 4 OA SF (19%) (Fig. 1a). Neither BMP-2 nor BMP-4 content seemed significantly affected by HLAB27 status of the SpA patients (Suppl. figure 1). Nevertheless, BMP-2/BMP-4 ratio tended to be higher in HLAB27-negative patients (660 ± 203 versus 237 ± 80 for HLAB27-positive patients, p = 0.069, Fig. 1c). However, these results should be confirmed on a larger cohort, as only 39 patients were included. In addition, multiple comparison tests revealed no effect of treatments as regards the following groups: ± therapeutic treatment (data not shown), ± NSAID, ± corticosteroid, ± DMARD, and ± anti-TNF-α (Fig. 1d). But again, these results should be completed on a larger cohort.

Fig. 1
figure1

Levels of BMP-2, -4, and -7 in synovial fluids from patients with peripheral spondyloarthritis (SpA), compared to osteoarthritic (OA) patients. a BMP-2, BMP-4, and BMP-7 contents were measured by ELISA. b BMP-2/BMP-4 ratio was calculated to illustrate the equilibrium between the two growth factors. *Statistical difference between the n = 56 SpA and n = 21 OA samples. Among SpA patients, BMP-2/BMP-4 ratio was compared between HLAB27-positive and -negative status (c), and patients treated (+) or not (−) with NSAIDs, corticosteroids (Cort), DMARDs, or anti-TNF-α biotherapies (d). Symbols represent individual data points; the stick band represents the mean of each group

BMP levels in SF of SpA patients correlate OPG and inflammatory markers

Because of the osteogenic potential of BMPs, a correlation between BMP-2 and -4 contents in the SF of SpA patients and its level of osteoprotegerin (OPG), which is a bone anti-resorptive marker, was expected. BMP-2 concentration indeed correlated OPG levels. Interestingly, an even stronger correlation was observed between OPG and the BMP-2/BMP-4 ratio (Table 2, Fig. 2a, b). Besides, we were also concerned by any connection between BMP levels and the inflammatory status of the patients (Table 2, Fig. 2c–f). C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration is the most widespread serum inflammatory marker used in the clinical management of SpA. Again, a correlation was observed between BMP-2 and CRP levels (Fig. 2c). However, CRP content did not correlate neither BMP-4 concentration directly (data not shown), nor BMP-2/BMP-4 ratio (Table 2). In the same vein, correlations were investigated between the SF’s pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-17 and BMP levels (Table 2). TNF-α and IL-6 content correlated the BMP2/BMP-4 ratio (Fig. 2d, e) but not BMP-2 level. IL-17 was detected in only 8 SpA SF over 21 (38%), yet a positive correlation was identified with BMP-2/BMP-4 ratio (Fig. 2f).

Table 2 Correlation analysis between inflammatory markers and BMP-2 levels and BMP-2/BMP-4 ratios in SF of SpA patients
Fig. 2
figure2

Correlations between BMP-2 levels or BMP-2/BMP-4 ratios and inflammatory markers for SpA patients. CRP concentration (c) was determined in n = 34 SpA patients and OPG, TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-17 in n = 21 patients (a, b, d–f). Correlations were examined relative to BMP-2 levels (a, c) or to the BMP-2/BMP-4 ratios (b, d–f). Symbols represent individual data points; the plain line represents the linear regression

Cytokines regulate BMP expression in entheseal cells

Our organotypic model of mouse ankle was used to investigate whether BMP expression was sensitive to cytokines within the enthesis of Achilles tendon (Fig. 3a). Addition of an inflammatory cocktail containing TNF-α, IL-22, IL-17, IL-6, and IL-1β increased Bmp-2 gene expression (4 folds), tended to augment Bmp-4, and did not modify Bmp-7 (data not shown). Thus, a little imbalance of the Bmp-2/Bmp-4 ratio in favor of Bmp-2 was also observed in this model (1.5 folds, Fig. 3a). To determine which cells in the enthesis might produce BMPs, mouse primary chondrocytes, mature osteoblasts, or tenocytes were treated with the cytokines that are typically suggested to be involved in SpA pathogenesis [24, 25]: TNF-α, IL-17, and IL-22, separately. The more noticeable effects were observed in response to TNF-α: Bmp-2 gene expression was increased in chondrocytes and decreased in tenocytes, Bmp-4 was diminished in all three cell types (Fig. 3b, c), and Bmp-7 was decreased in chondrocytes (data not shown). IL-17 had a similar effect as TNF-α on Bmp-4 mRNA, but to a lesser extent, and it induced a slight reduction of Bmp-2 mRNA in chondrocytes. IL-22 had no visible effects (Fig. 3b, c). It appears that wherever Bmp-2 and/or Bmp-4 expression was regulated, the balance always tilted in favor of Bmp-2 (Fig. 3d). A discrepancy could be noted in the regulation of Bmp-4 gene expression between the organotypic model and the cell culture, even if the Bmp-2/Bmp-4 ratio was in favor of Bmp-2 in both cases.

Fig. 3
figure3

Regulation of Bmp-2 and -4 gene expression in response to cytokine stimulation. a Total RNA was extracted from mouse ankle enthesis after organotypic culture, for real-time PCR analysis. The explants were stimulated 72 h by a cocktail of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-22, IL-17, IL-6 and IL-1β, 10 ng/mL each). Gene expression of Bmp-2 and -4 and the Bmp-2/Bmp-4 ratio were compared to the contralateral non-treated samples. b–d Cultured chondrocytes (black bars), osteoblasts (white bars), and tenocytes (gray bars) were treated 24 h by either TNF-α (10 ng/mL), IL-17 (100 ng/mL), or IL-22 (100 ng/mL). Gene expression of Bmp-2 (b) and -4 (c) and the Bmp-2/Bmp-4 ratio (d) were compared to non-treated control cells

Stretch also regulates BMP expression in entheseal cells

Chondrocytes, osteoblasts, or tenocytes in monolayer culture were subjected to 2 h or 6 h of a cyclic stretch to assess the effects of mechanical stimulation on BMP expression (Fig. 4a-c). Concerning Bmp-2 gene expression, the strongest result was a stretch-induced upregulation in chondrocytes (Fig. 4a). Bmp-4 mRNA was decreased in all three cell types by 6 h of mechanical stress (Fig. 4b). Bmp-2/Bmp-4 ratio was thus upregulated, especially in chondrocytes (Fig. 4c). Bmp-7 gene expression was not detected in tenocytes and almost not regulated in osteoblasts and chondrocytes (data not shown). Because chondrocytes were the more responsive to cytokines (Fig. 3) and stretch (Fig. 4a–c), we focused on this cell type to evaluate the effect of the combination of 6-h long dynamic stretch and TNF-α. The stretch- and TNF-α-induced upregulation of Bmp-2 and downregulation of Bmp-4 expression were additive (Fig. 4d, e). Bmp-2/Bmp-4 ratio was calculated, in order to provide an overview of the equilibrium regulation. Stretch and TNF-α alone induced a 3-fold and a 10-fold increase, respectively. The combination of both stimulations led to a rise of around 30 folds in the expression of Bmp-2 relative to Bmp-4 (Fig. 4f). By the use of a similar experiment, the response to the combination of stretch and IL-17 was assessed: addition of IL-17 did not amplify the effect of the stretch alone (data not shown).

Fig. 4
figure4

Regulation of Bmp-2 and -4 gene expression and phospho-smad5 in response to mechanical stimulation. a–c Dynamic stretch was applied for 2 h or 6 h to cultured chondrocytes (black bars), osteoblasts (white bars), and tenocytes (gray bars). Gene expression of Bmp-2 (a) and -4 (b) and the Bmp-2/Bmp-4 ratio (c) were compared to non-stretched control cells. d–f Cultured chondrocytes were stimulated 6 h by stretch (white bars), or 10 ng/mL of TNF-α (gray bars) separately or simultaneously (black bars). Gene expression of Bmp-2 (d) and -4 (e) and the Bmp-2/Bmp-4 ratio (f) were compared to non-stretched untreated control cells. g Immunostaining of phospho-smad5 in sane mouse ankle sections. The section comprises the enthesis -E- of the Achilles tendon -T- insertion into the calcaneus bone -B-. Some chondrocytes of the sesamoid cartilage zone were positive, as revealed by an intracellular brown staining. Sections were slightly counter-stained with Mayer’s hematoxylin staining. *p < 0.05 in comparison to the control resting condition; p values are indicated for the differences between the other conditions, ns: not significant (p > 0.1)

Mechanical stress may activate BMP pathway in situ

Activation of the BMP canonical pathway was revealed by the immunostaining of a phosphorylated form of Smad5 (phospho S463 and S465) on mouse ankle sections (Fig. 4g). Some chondrocytes were positive, but no tenocytes of the Achilles tendon or osteocytes of the underlying bone. Interestingly, phospho-Smad5 was selectively detected in chondrocytes of the sesamoid cartilage zone, which is a location of high mechanical stress [26]. This cell-specificity suggests that the steady-state activation of BMP signaling is already high in mechanically stimulated cartilage cells nearby the enthesis.

The response to 6 h of mechanical stress is independent of IL-6 and PGE2

Overproduction of pro-inflammatory mediators has already been shown in cultured chondrocytes and osteoblasts in response to mechanical stress, hence we investigated IL-6 and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) production in our stretching model [27, 28]. The stretch did induce an inflammatory response in osteoblasts and chondrocytes (Fig. 5a, b). Il-6 gene expression was markedly induced by 6 h of stretch in both cell types, but not in tenocytes (Fig. 5a), and IL-6 secretion by osteoblasts rapidly increased in accordance (Fig. 5b). In addition, in chondrocytes and osteoblasts, cyclooxygenase-2 (Cox-2) expression was upregulated and an increased release of its enzymatic product PGE2 was observed. Like IL-6, levels of released PGE2 were neatly higher in osteoblast cultures than in chondrocytes (Fig. 5b). By the way, very little TNF-α gene expression was detected in all the three cell types and it was not induced in response to mechanical stress (data not shown).

Fig. 5
figure5

Connection between IL-6 and PGE2 inflammation pathways and the mechanical stimulation. a Dynamic stretch was applied for 6 h to cultured chondrocytes (black bars), osteoblasts (white bars), and tenocytes (gray bars). Gene expression of Il-6 and Cox-2 were compared to non-stretched control cells. b IL-6 and PGE2 secretion was analyzed in the culture medium of chondrocytes and osteoblasts either in control (rest) or stretched conditions. c, d Piroxicam was added to chondrocytes to inhibit PGE2 synthesis. c The piroxicam-induced reduction in PGE2 content of the culture medium was validated in TNF-α-treated chondrocytes. d The effect of piroxicam on gene expression of Bmp-2 and -4 was analyzed in control or stretched conditions. e, f IL-6 blocking antibodies (Ab) were added to chondrocytes to inhibit IL-6 pathway. The effect of this treatment was compared to non-specific IgG1 antibodies (ctrl Ab). e Mmp-13 gene expression was analyzed in control or IL-6-treated chondrocytes and (f) Bmp-2 and -4 gene expression in control (rest) or stretched chondrocytes. *p < 0.05 in comparison to the control condition, p values are indicated for the differences between the other conditions, ns: not significant (p > 0.1)

Next, we wondered if, in cultured chondrocytes, the stretch-induced Bmp-2/Bmp-4 mRNA deregulation was mediated by the inflammation. Piroxicam was used as NSAID to inhibit Cox activity, which was validated by a dramatic decrease in TNF-α-induced PGE2 production (Fig. 5c). Piroxicam addition had no effect on Bmp-2 or -4 mRNA in control conditions and it did not alter the stretch-induced Bmp-2 or -4 regulations (Fig. 5d). On the other hand, IL-6 blocking antibodies were used to assess the possible role of autocrine IL-6 in the stretch-mediated regulations. IL-6-induced Mmp-13 stimulation was used to check the efficiency of the blockage of IL-6 action (inhibition by 95%, Fig. 5e). Similarly, addition of IL-6 blocking antibodies had no detectable consequences on Bmp-2 or -4 gene expression (Fig. 5f). Of note, Il-6 mRNA was logically induced by TNF-α in chondrocytes (7-fold change), but IL-6 blockage had no effect on TNF-α-induced BMP regulation (Suppl. figure 2).

Osteogenic effects of BMP-2 and BMP-4 on chondrocytes and tenocytes

First, the steady-state level of some osteoblast and chondrocyte markers was used to characterize our different cell cultures: osteocalcin (or bone γ-carboxyglutamate protein 2, Bglap2) and tissue-nonspecific alkaline phosphatase (Alpl) gene expression, the ratio of type II to type I collagen (Col2a1/Col1a1) mRNA, and alkaline phosphatase (AP) specific activity. The latter was 5 folds higher in chondrocytes than in tenocytes, and again 50 folds higher in mature osteoblasts than in chondrocytes (Suppl. figure 3). In cultured chondrocytes, BMP-4 slightly enhanced AP specific activity and gene expression (Fig. 6a). The BMP antagonist Noggin was able to reduce AP activity (Fig. 6a); however, its effect was very faint, probably because the basic level of BMPs in the culture medium was low. Additional genes were investigated to better characterize the BMP-induced maturation of chondrocytes as those cells may hypertrophy and/or trans-differentiate into osteoblasts [29]. Matrix metalloproteinase 13 (Mmp-13) and type X collagen (Col10a1) were used as hypertrophy and early trans-differentiation markers, and Bglap2 and Osteopontin (Opn) as later markers. The BMP-4-induced upregulation of Alpl was associated with an increase in Mmp13, Bglap2, and Opn mRNAs, at the highest dose (Fig. 6b). In parallel, BMP-2, and more neatly BMP-4, enhanced AP-specific activity and gene expression in cultured tenocytes (Fig. 6c). Again, Noggin was able to faintly reduce AP activity (Fig. 6c). Because tendon cells are prone to trans-differentiate either into the chondrocyte or the osteoblast lineage [30], both chondrocyte (Sox9 and Col2a1) and osteoblast markers (Osterix, Osx) were further explored (Fig. 6d). Sox9 and Col2a1 mRNA were not modulated, neither in the presence of BMP-2 nor of BMP-4. On the contrary, Osx was strongly increased by BMP-4, indicating that tenocytes rather trans-differentiated in osteoblast-like than in chondrocyte-like cells (Fig. 6d). Globally, in our models, BMP-4 seemed to be more potent than BMP-2. Indeed, BMP-4 treatment augmented AP in cultured chondrocytes and in tenocytes, and AP induction was higher in response to BMP-4, as compared to the same doses of BMP-2.

Fig. 6
figure6

Osteoinductive effects of BMP-2 and -4 on cultured chondrocytes and tenocytes. BMP-2 or 4 (20, 100 or 250 ng/mL) or Noggin (100 ng/mL) were added during 10 days to cultured chondrocytes (a, b) and tenocytes (c, d). Alkaline phosphatase gene expression (Alpl) and specific activity were compared to untreated control cells (a, c). Additional differentiation marker genes were analyzed in cultured cells treated at the highest dose (b, d): matrix metalloproteinase 13 (Mmp13), type II and X collagen (Col2a1, Col10a1), bone γ-carboxyglutamate protein 2 (Bglap2, coding osteocalcin), osteopontin (Opn), SRY-box transcription factor 9 (Sox9), and osterix (Osx)

Discussion

Primarily, we measured an enhanced BMP-2/BMP-4 ratio in SF from patients with SpA. BMP deregulation has already been observed in SpA patients’ serum; however, to our knowledge, this is the first study assessing BMP levels in SpA patients’ SF. The consistency of our results was validated with respect to previous studies that assessed BMP contents in SF from OA patients [31,32,33,34]. Three independent studies have demonstrated that BMP-2 serum concentration was in the range of 100 pg/mL and neatly higher in ankylosing spondylitis patients than in healthy controls [14, 15, 35]. Our result showing that BMP-2 content is particularly elevated in SpA SF seems thus coherent, especially because a correlation between serum and SF BMP-2 levels was expected [31]. In accordance, an increase in BMP-2 protein expression has already been detected in the inflamed synovial tissue of SpA patients [36]. Of note, BMP-2 seems almost absent from the healthy synovium, tendon, or articular cartilage [36,37,38], but its expression drastically increases in fibroblasts, chondrocytes, and osteoblasts during OA osteophyte formation [37, 39], as well as in fibroblasts and chondrocytes during ossification of various ligaments [38]. In addition to the previously observed correlation of BMP-2 levels with the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Indexes [14, 15], we noticed a correlation with OPG and CRP markers. Altogether, these data support the clinical relevance of BMP-2 assessment. In contrast, the drop of BMP-4 levels in SpA SF was a particularly striking result. Indeed, BMP-4 serum content has been shown to be either equal or superior in SpA patients than in healthy donors [14, 15, 35]. However, a decrease in BMP-4 expression has already been observed in synovial tissue of patients with OA and rheumatoid arthritis [40]. Our results settle that BMP factors are deregulated locally in the SpA joint. Yet, one of the limitations of this study is that it did not determine whether such deregulation was also systemic. Nevertheless, our data suggest an unsuspected role of BMP-4 modulation in SpA.

In addition, the absence of HLAB27 seemed to emphasize the unbalance of BMP-2/BMP-4 ratio in the SF of SpA patients (n = 39). This trend might have a clinical relevance as among ankylosing spondylitis patients, HLAB27-negative ones present a higher prevalence of peripheral arthritis [41]. Besides, it has recently been revealed that HLAB27 most likely crosstalks with BMP signaling in immune cells from SpA patients [42]. The mechanism for HLAB27 involvement in BMP production has not been addressed in this study. On the other hand, the participation of BMP pathway in the development of some of the characteristic features of SpA has also been stated in the absence of HLAB27 [6]. More generally, the molecular action of HLAB27 in the pathophysiology of SpA remains unclear.

Our data in cultured entheseal cells nicely paralleled our results in patients, since any stimuli mimicking local mechanical stress and inflammation steadily unbalanced the BMP-2/BMP-4 equilibrium, in favor of BMP-2. The imbalance was especially obvious when the combination of TNF-α and cyclical stretch was applied to chondrocytes. In these cells, the molecular mechanisms of BMP-2 induction by TNF-α have already been characterized, involving both transcriptional upregulation and mRNA stabilization [43]. Yet, inflammatory cytokines and BMP-2 have opposing effects regarding osteogenic differentiation, so the consequences of their concurrent presence in the enthesis regarding bone formation are uncertain [44,45,46]. In addition, the importance of the cross-talk between BMPs and inflammatory pathways should not be overlooked [47]. Not only pro-inflammatory cytokines can modulate the production of BMPs but also the BMPs can interfere with their effects. For instance, blockade of BMP pathway potentiates IL-17 and TNF-α effects in rheumatoid synoviocytes [48]. As the various BMP members have been suggested to exert both pro- and anti-inflammatory actions (see [49] for review), any unbalance in BMP signaling may disturb the inflammation process. However, one can speculate that once the inflammation is resolved, the osteogenic properties of BMPs could take the lead. Our results also suggest that mechanical stress might contribute to local inflammation. The production of pro-inflammatory factors, including IL-6 and PGE2, by mechanosensitive cells may participate in the enthesitis process. Especially, the osteoblasts and osteocytes of the underlying bone may be a source of soluble factors that could act through the entire enthesis structure.

Our more unexpected result is the decrease in BMP-4 that conversely corresponds to the increase in BMP-2. Phylogenetic analysis reveals that among the 20 members, BMP-2 and -4 are so analogous that they form alone a subgroup [50, 51]. BMPs mainly trigger cellular responses through six different type I and type II receptors activating the canonical Smad pathway [50, 51]. Nonetheless, single receptor knock-down experiment suggests very similar signaling mechanisms for BMP-2- and BMP-4-induced osteogenic effect [52]. Further increasing the complexity of BMP pathway, mature ligands are secreted as disulfide-linked dimers, offering numerous possible combinations that include BMP-2 or -4 [53]. Both BMP-2 and -4 promoters share common regulatory elements, including binding sites for the master bone and cartilage transcription factors Runx-2 and Sox-9, respectively [54, 55]. Interestingly, two putative NF-κB response elements were found in the BMP-2 gene, whereas BMP-4 one contains none [56]. In agreement, NF-κB has been shown to mediate the TNF-α-induced augmentation of BMP-2 gene expression in chondrocytes [43, 57].

As members of the large BMP family, both BMP-2 and -4 have osteoinductive properties [52, 58, 59]. The quality and magnitude of BMP-2 and -4 effects on human mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) appear comparable [52]. During arthritis, MSCs coming from the bone marrow can invade the soft tissues of the enthesis, in addition to local progenitor cells [60]. Such a set of multipotent cells could not only be involved in the immunoregulation process, but also be a major source of osteoblasts, contributing to the SpA ossification process [60]. Of interest, MSCs from SpA patients have enhanced osteogenic differentiation ability as compared with MSCs of healthy donors, and this greater osteogenic potential is especially due to BMP-2 overexpression [61]. In our study, both BMP-2 and BMP-4 ligands were able to induce osteoblastic-like differentiation in chondrocytes and tenocytes, indicating that BMPs are not only effective on progenitors, but also on already differentiated skeletal cells. Surprisingly, we observed a stronger osteoinductive effects with BMP-4 than with BMP-2. Indeed, such a differential does not match with the shift in favor of BMP-2 that we surmise to be involved in SpA ossification. More refined investigations are required, in particular using different combinations of BMP-2/BMP-4 dimers, to clarify that point. The expression of bone formation markers in chondrocytes was expected, but was more startling in tenocytes. Yet, the capacity of BMP-2 to favor osteogenic differentiation in tendon cells has already been suggested [12, 62, 63]. In agreement with our results, in one of these studies, BMP-2 was increased by mechanical stimulation, and in another one, by PGE2-mediated inflammation [12, 62]. Stretch-induced BMP-4, alike BMP-2, was also observed in tendon cells [64]; however, to our knowledge, no study has demonstrated its osteogenic potential in these cells. Altogether, a local increase in BMPs might modify the mineralizing capacity of entheseal cells to favor ossification in SpA joint.

Although all BMPs are extremely similar, they are rarely redundant. We believe that the switch of BMP-2/BMP-4 equilibrium that we observed is of particular importance. Deficiency in BMP-2, as well as in BMP-4, both potent bone anabolic factors, is embryonically lethal. However, conditional gene targeting suggests slight functional differences between one and the other (see [50] for review). Focusing on the enthesis structure, BMP-4 has been identified as a key component for bone ridge formation [65, 66]. Actually, the transcription factor scleraxis regulates BMP-4 in tendon cells to induce cartilage formation at the tendon-skeleton junction [65]. In these bony structures, the progenitors are not chondrocytes but rather a distinct pool of tenocyte-like cells [66]. Adding to our results, the involvement of BMP-4 in bone formation during enthesis development further justifies the exploration of its role in pathologic ossification in the context of SpA.

Conclusions

More investigations are needed to decipher how an increased BMP-2 and a decreased BMP-4 level could interfere with the abnormal ossification of the enthesis in SpA. Exploring experimental SpA models would certainly supply more information on the impact of BMP-2/BMP-4 imbalance in this specific ankylosis. Identification of the BMP members that may stimulate the first steps of enthesis ossification in SpA could provide promising therapeutic targets. Disease and tissue context probably regulate very finely BMP signaling so that increasing both specificity and effectiveness of BMP-targeting strategies could be mandatory [67]. Nevertheless, our results settled the interest of investigating BMP pathways in SpA patients.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

BMP:

Bone morphogenetic protein

CRP:

C-reactive protein

DMARDs:

Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs

IL:

Interleukin

NSAIDs:

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

OA:

Osteoarthritis

PGE2 :

Prostaglandin E2

SF:

Synovial fluid

SpA:

Peripheral spondyloarthritis

References

  1. 1.

    Stolwijk C, et al. Global prevalence of spondyloarthritis: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016;68(9):1320–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Neerinckx B, Lories RJ. Structural disease progression in axial spondyloarthritis: still a cause for concern? Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2017;19(3):14.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Neve A, et al. Pathogenesis of ligaments ossification in spondyloarthritis: insights and doubts. Ann Med. 2017;49(3):196–205.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Benjamin M, et al. Evidence for a distinctive pattern of bone formation in enthesophytes. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(6):1003–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Benjamin M, Rufai A, Ralphs JR. The mechanism of formation of bony spurs (enthesophytes) in the achilles tendon. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43(3):576–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Lories RJ, Derese I, Luyten FP. Modulation of bone morphogenetic protein signaling inhibits the onset and progression of ankylosing enthesitis. J Clin Invest. 2005;115(6):1571–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Loi F, et al. Inflammation, fracture and bone repair. Bone. 2016;86:119–30.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Yu HS, et al. Impact of mechanical stretch on the cell behaviors of bone and surrounding tissues. J Tissue Eng. 2016;7:2041731415618342.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Wong M, Siegrist M, Goodwin K. Cyclic tensile strain and cyclic hydrostatic pressure differentially regulate expression of hypertrophic markers in primary chondrocytes. Bone. 2003;33(4):685–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Tanno M, et al. Uniaxial cyclic stretch induces osteogenic differentiation and synthesis of bone morphogenetic proteins of spinal ligament cells derived from patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligaments. Bone. 2003;33(4):475–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Wescott DC, et al. Osteogenic gene expression by human periodontal ligament cells under cyclic tension. J Dent Res. 2007;86(12):1212–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Rui YF, et al. Mechanical loading increased BMP-2 expression which promoted osteogenic differentiation of tendon-derived stem cells. J Orthop Res. 2011;29(3):390–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Gazzerro E, Canalis E. Bone morphogenetic proteins and their antagonists. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2006;7(1–2):51–65.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Park MC, Park YB, Lee SK. Relationship of bone morphogenetic proteins to disease activity and radiographic damage in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Scand J Rheumatol. 2008;37(3):200–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Chen HA, et al. Association of bone morphogenetic proteins with spinal fusion in ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol. 2010;37(10):2126–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Xie Z, et al. Imbalance between bone morphogenetic protein 2 and Noggin induces abnormal osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in Ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68(2):430–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Wang H, Jin W, Li H. Genetic polymorphisms in bone morphogenetic protein receptor type IA gene predisposes individuals to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine via the smad signaling pathway. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018;19(1):61.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Yonemori K, et al. Bone morphogenetic protein receptors and activin receptors are highly expressed in ossified ligament tissues of patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Am J Pathol. 1997;150(4):1335–47.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Zhang W, et al. EULAR evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(3):483–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Rudwaleit M, et al. The assessment of spondyloarthritis international society classification criteria for peripheral spondyloarthritis and for spondyloarthritis in general. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(1):25–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Bougault C, et al. Involvement of sphingosine kinase/sphingosine 1-phosphate metabolic pathway in spondyloarthritis. Bone. 2017;103:150–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    El Jamal A, et al. Cytokine-induced and stretch-induced sphingosine 1-phosphate production by enthesis cells could favor abnormal ossification in spondyloarthritis. J Bone Miner Res. 2019;34(12):2264–76.

  23. 23.

    Bougault C, et al. Wnt5a is expressed in spondyloarthritis and exerts opposite effects on enthesis and bone in murine organ and cell cultures. Transl Res. 2015;166(6):627–38.

  24. 24.

    Lories RJ, McInnes IB. Primed for inflammation: enthesis-resident T cells. Nat Med. 2012;18(7):1018–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Ronneberger M, Schett G. Pathophysiology of spondyloarthritis. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2011;13(5):416–20.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Benjamin M, Ralphs JR. Fibrocartilage in tendons and ligaments--an adaptation to compressive load. J Anat. 1998;193(Pt 4):481–94.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Sanchez C, et al. Mechanical loading highly increases IL-6 production and decreases OPG expression by osteoblasts. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2009;17(4):473–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Huang J, Ballou LR, Hasty KA. Cyclic equibiaxial tensile strain induces both anabolic and catabolic responses in articular chondrocytes. Gene. 2007;404(1–2):101–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Aghajanian P, Mohan S. The art of building bone: emerging role of chondrocyte-to-osteoblast transdifferentiation in endochondral ossification. Bone Res. 2018;6:19.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Magne D, Bougault C. What understanding tendon cell differentiation can teach us about pathological tendon ossification. Histol Histopathol. 2015;30(8):901–10.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Liu Y, et al. Correlation of bone morphogenetic protein-2 levels in serum and synovial fluid with disease severity of knee osteoarthritis. Med Sci Monit. 2015;21:363–70.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Schmal H, et al. Synovial cytokine expression in ankle osteoarthritis depends on age and stage. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(5):1359–67.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Honsawek S, et al. Relationship of plasma and synovial fluid BMP-7 with disease severity in knee osteoarthritis patients: a pilot study. Int Orthop. 2009;33(4):1171–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    de Sousa EB, et al. Osteoarthritic synovial fluid modulates cell phenotype and metabolic behavior. Stem Cells Int. 2019;2019:8169172.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Liao HT, et al. Bone morphogenetic proteins and Dickkopf-1 in ankylosing spondylitis. Scand J Rheumatol. 2018;47(1):56–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Lories RJ, et al. Bone morphogenetic proteins 2 and 6, expressed in arthritic synovium, are regulated by proinflammatory cytokines and differentially modulate fibroblast-like synoviocyte apoptosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48(10):2807–18.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Nakase T, et al. Localization of bone morphogenetic protein-2 in human osteoarthritic cartilage and osteophyte. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2003;11(4):278–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Rui YF, et al. Expression of chondro-osteogenic BMPs in clinical samples of patellar tendinopathy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(7):1409–17.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Zoricic S, et al. Expression of bone morphogenetic proteins and cartilage-derived morphogenetic proteins during osteophyte formation in humans. J Anat. 2003;202(Pt 3):269–77.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Bramlage CP, et al. Decrease in expression of bone morphogenetic proteins 4 and 5 in synovial tissue of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2006;8(3):R58.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Arévalo M, et al. Influence of HLA-B27 on the ankylosing spondylitis phenotype: results from the REGISPONSER database. Arthritis Res Ther. 2018;20(1):221.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Grandon B, et al. HLA-B27 alters BMP/TGFβ signalling in. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78(12):1653–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Fukui N, et al. Pro-inflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor-alpha induces bone morphogenetic protein-2 in chondrocytes via mRNA stabilization and transcriptional up-regulation. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(37):27229–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Wang Y, et al. Regulatory effects of bone morphogenetic protein-4 on tumour necrosis factor-α-suppressed Runx2 and osteoprotegerin expression in cementoblasts. Cell Prolif. 2017;50(4):e12344.

  45. 45.

    Huang RL, et al. Opposing TNF-α/IL-1β- and BMP-2-activated MAPK signaling pathways converge on Runx2 to regulate BMP-2-induced osteoblastic differentiation. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5:e1187.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Zhang JR, et al. Different modulatory effects of IL-17, IL-22, and IL-23 on osteoblast differentiation. Mediat Inflamm. 2017;2017:5950395.

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    van der Kraan PM, Davidson EN. Cross-talk between bone morphogenetic proteins and inflammatory pathways. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015;17:326.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Varas A, et al. Blockade of bone morphogenetic protein signaling potentiates the pro-inflammatory phenotype induced by interleukin-17 and tumor necrosis factor-α combination in rheumatoid synoviocytes. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015;17:192.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Hanna A, Frangogiannis NG. The role of the TGF-β superfamily in myocardial infarction. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2019;6:140.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Salazar VS, Gamer LW, Rosen V. BMP signalling in skeletal development, disease and repair. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2016;12(4):203–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Rider CC, Mulloy B. Bone morphogenetic protein and growth differentiation factor cytokine families and their protein antagonists. Biochem J. 2010;429(1):1–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Lavery K, et al. BMP-2/4 and BMP-6/7 differentially utilize cell surface receptors to induce osteoblastic differentiation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(30):20948–58.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Guo J, Wu G. The signaling and functions of heterodimeric bone morphogenetic proteins. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2012;23(1–2):61–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Helvering LM, et al. Regulation of the promoters for the human bone morphogenetic protein 2 and 4 genes. Gene. 2000;256(1–2):123–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Rogers MB, Shah TA, Shaikh NN. Turning bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2) on and off in mesenchymal cells. J Cell Biochem. 2015;116(10):2127–38.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Graham TR, et al. PI3K/Akt-dependent transcriptional regulation and activation of BMP-2-Smad signaling by NF-kappaB in metastatic prostate cancer cells. Prostate. 2009;69(2):168–80.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Feng JQ, et al. NF-kappaB specifically activates BMP-2 gene expression in growth plate chondrocytes in vivo and in a chondrocyte cell line in vitro. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(31):29130–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Jane JA, et al. Ectopic osteogenesis using adenoviral bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-4 and BMP-6 gene transfer. Mol Ther. 2002;6(4):464–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Beederman M, et al. BMP signaling in mesenchymal stem cell differentiation and bone formation. J Biomed Sci Eng. 2013;6(8A):32–52.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Berthelot JM, Le Goff B, Maugars Y. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis: problems rather than solutions? Arthritis Res Ther. 2019;21(1):239.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Zheng G, et al. Enhanced osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in ankylosing spondylitis: a study based on a three-dimensional biomimetic environment. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10(5):350.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Zhang J, Wang JH. BMP-2 mediates PGE (2) -induced reduction of proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of human tendon stem cells. J Orthop Res. 2012;30(1):47–52.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Kang W, et al. Sequential application of bFGF and BMP-2 facilitates osteogenic differentiation of human periodontal ligament stem cells. J Periodontal Res. 2019;54(4):424–34.

  64. 64.

    Enokiya Y, et al. Effect of stretching stress on gene transcription related to early-phase differentiation in rat periodontal ligament cells. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2010;51(3):129–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Blitz E, et al. Bone ridge patterning during musculoskeletal assembly is mediated through SCX regulation of Bmp4 at the tendon-skeleton junction. Dev Cell. 2009;17(6):861–73.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Blitz E, et al. Tendon-bone attachment unit is formed modularly by a distinct pool of Scx- and Sox9-positive progenitors. Development. 2013;140(13):2680–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Calpe S, et al. Comparison of newly developed anti-bone morphogenetic protein 4 llama-derived antibodies with commercially available BMP4 inhibitors. MAbs. 2016;8(4):678–88.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank A. Félizard, L. Audigier, and R. Tisserand for helping in cellular experiments. Also, the authors wish to thank M. Melin and A. Pagnon (Novotec) for their expertise in preparing the histological sections. The authors sincerely acknowledge the Sainbiose lab (Inserm U1059, Université de Lyon, France) for providing the Flexcell® Tension Plus FX-3000 system.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Arthritis Fondation Courtin (2015 and 2018), the University of Lyon (2013), and the Rhône-Alpes Academic Research Community (2013).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AB conducted experiments and interpreted the data. AEJ conducted experiments on explant and cell culture models. PA conducted experiments on human SF. BLG, FB, and DM analyzed data and proofread the manuscript. CB conceived the project, planned the experimental design, participated in experiments, interpreted the data, and wrote the manuscript. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carole Bougault.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the local ethics committee and by the French Research Ministry (N°2008-402). All enrolled patients have given their formal consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Supplementary figure 1.

Levels of BMP-2 (A) and -4 (B) in synovial fluids from patients with peripheral spondyloarthritis (SpA). 23 HLAB27-positive SpA patients were compared to 16 HLAB27-negative ones.

Additional file 2: Supplementary figure 2.

Connection between IL-6 and PGE2 inflammation pathways and the TNF-α stimulation. TNF-α-treated cultured chondrocytes (10 ng/mL, 24 h) were compared to control cells. (A) Gene expression of Il-6 and Cox-2 were analyzed. (B) IL-6 blocking antibodies (Ab) were added to inhibit IL-6 pathway. The effect of this treatment was compared to non-specific IgG1 antibodies (ctrl Ab). Bmp-2 and -4 gene expression were analyzed. ns: not significant (p>0.1).

Additional file 3: Supplementary figure 3.

Comparison of the steady-state level of some osteogenic and chondrogenic markers between cultured osteoblasts, chondrocytes and tenocytes. (A) Bglap2, Alpl, Col1a1 and Col2a1 relative gene expressions and (B) alkaline phosphatase (AP) specific activity were analyzed in cultured chondrocytes (black bars), osteoblasts (white bars) and tenocytes (grey bars). Data from osteoblasts and tenocytes were compared to chondrocytes (*) and data from chondrocytes and tenocytes were compared to osteoblasts (#).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Briolay, A., El Jamal, A., Arnolfo, P. et al. Enhanced BMP-2/BMP-4 ratio in patients with peripheral spondyloarthritis and in cytokine- and stretch-stimulated mouse chondrocytes. Arthritis Res Ther 22, 234 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-020-02330-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Spondyloarthritis
  • BMPs
  • Ossification
  • Stretch
  • Cytokine
  • Enthesis