Skip to main content
Download PDF

Role of DNA dioxygenase Ten-Eleven translocation 3 (TET3) in rheumatoid arthritis progression

Arthritis Research & Therapy volume 24, Article number: 222 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients present with abnormal methylation patterns in their fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLS). Given that DNA demethylation is critical for producing DNA methylation patterns, we hypothesized that DNA demethylation may facilitate RA progression. Therefore, we designed this study to examine the role of DNA dioxygenase family, Ten-Eleven translocation (TET1/2/3), in the pathological process of RA.

Methods

Synovial tissues and FLS were obtained from patients with RA and Osteoarthritis. K/BxN serum-induced arthritis was induced in Wild-type (WT) and TET3 heterozygous-deficient (TET3+/−) C57BL/6 mice.

Results

We found that both TET3 and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) were upregulated in synovitis tissues from RA patients and confirmed this upregulation in the cultured FLS derived from synovitis tissues. Tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) upregulated TET3 and 5hmC levels in cultured FLS, and the stimulated FLS exhibited high cell mobility with increased transcription of cellular migration-related factors such as C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 8 (CXCL8) and C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2) in a TET3-dependent manner. In addition, TET3 haploinsufficiency lowered RA progression in a mouse model of serum-induced arthritis.

Conclusions

Based on these findings, we can assume that TET3-mediated DNA demethylation acts as an epigenetic regulator of RA progression.

Background

In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), treatment with anti-rheumatic drugs targeting some molecules responsible for immunity and inflammation is often effective in improving symptoms depending on their pathological context. However, remission only occurs in around half of the patients receiving these treatments [1]. These facts suggest that persistent inflammation aggravates RA progression forcing the transition to the irreversible state and sending patients beyond the point of no return [2,3,4].

Fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLS) are key cells in pannus formation. FLS in RA synovial tissues appear to transition into partially transformed cells with a hypersensitive phenotype [5]. The chromatin state defines the phenotype and is regulated via DNA methylation and histone modification [6, 7]. DNA methylation is regulated via DNA demethylation and re-methylation [7]. In DNA re-methylation, DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) are responsible for de novo methylation and methylation maintenance. DNA demethylation includes passive demethylation and active demethylation [7]. Ten-eleven translocation (TET) proteins, active demethylation enzymes, first oxidize methylated cytosine (5-methylcytosine (5mC)) to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC), 5-formylcytosine (5fC), and 5-carboxylcytosine (5caC).

Genome-wide unbiased studies have revealed that activated FLS from RA patients present with abnormal patterns of DNA methylation [8,9,10,11,12,13], and it has been suggested that these abnormalities may be associated with more aggressive phenotypes [12]. Furthermore, we have shown that the expression levels of DNMT1 and DNMT3a were downregulated in FLS in the presence of tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) and interleukin-1β (IL-1β), which may lead to the abnormal patterns of DNA methylation in these cells [12]. However, little information is available on the link between DNA demethylation and the onset and progression of RA. Therefore, this study was designed to determine whether DNA demethylation is associated with the chronicity of RA and we focused on the role of the TET enzymes as active facilitators of DNA demethylation.

Materials and methods

Detailed materials and methods are described in supplement information (Supplementary Data S1).

Results

TET3 expression in synovial membranes and FLS of patients with RA

To understand the role of TET family proteins in RA progression, we first analyzed the expression profiles of the TET1/2/3 proteins, 5mC, and 5hmC in the synovial membranes of RA patients, and compared these with those of osteoarthritis (OA) patients. Immunohistochemical analysis confirmed the expression of TET2, TET3, and 5hmC in both the RA and OA synovial membranes. Among the TET proteins, TET3 exhibited the highest expression in the RA patients (Fig. 1A). In addition, quantitative analysis revealed that both TET3 and 5hmC expression were higher in the RA patients when compared with the OA patients, while the expression levels of TET2 were similar between the two patient groups (Fig. 1B).

Fig. 1
figure 1

TET3 expression in the RA synovial tissues. A Representative patterns of staining for 5mC, 5hmC, TET1/2/3 (brown). RA (n = 3), OA (n = 3). Scale bar, 50 μm. B The percentage of area with positive staining for TET1/2/3. RA (n = 3), OA (n = 3). C Representative patterns of staining for TET1/2/3 (blue) and CD55/CD68 (brown). Synovial tissues (n = 2). Scale bar, 20 μm. D Relative mRNA expression levels of TET1/2/3. RA FLS (n = 6), OA FLS (n = 6). Data are mean ± standard error of the mean (B) and the box-and-whisker plots (D). Two-tailed P values by the t-test (B). One-tailed P values by the Mann-Whitney U-test (D)

Full size image

Next, we attempted to identify the cell types expressing TET proteins within the synovial tissues. The cell type markers for FLS (CD55) and monocytes/macrophages (CD68) were found to co-localize with TET2 and TET3, while TET1 expression levels were low in both of these cell types (Fig. 1C). TET3 was highly expressed in the superficial layer of the synovial membrane and clearly co-stained with CD55, but not with CD68 (Fig. 1C). Conversely, co-staining with TET2 and CD68 were co-stained, but not CD55 and TET2 (Fig. 1C). As TET3 expression in the synovial membrane was visible in the FLS, we went on to evaluate TET3 expression in a primary culture of FLS from RA patients. Immunohistochemical analysis of the cultured FLS showed higher expression levels of TET3 than TET1 and TET2 (data not shown). RA FLS presented with increased TET3 expression when compared to the FLS from OA patients (Fig. 1F). Collectively, these findings suggest that RA activation in FLS is associated with the expression of TET3 and not the other TET proteins.

Pro-Inflammatory cytokines induce TET3 expression in FLS samples

As TET3 is highly expressed in FLS samples from RA patients, we reasoned that the associated pro-inflammatory cytokines are likely to function as TET3 inducers. The cultured RA FLS were treated with pro-inflammatory cytokines, and then TET1/2/3 expression was assessed at the mRNA level. Among the TET members, only TET3 exhibited significant induction in responses to TNFα, IL-1, and IL-17 (Fig. 2A). In contrast, no increase in TET1 or TET2 expression was recorded for any of the nine cytokines used in this assay.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Stimulation with TNFα increased TET3 expression levels in RA FLS. A Relative mRNA expression levels of TET1/2/3. RA FLS (n = 4). B Immunoblotting analysis of TET3 expression in RA FLS unstimulated or stimulated with TNFα for 0, 48, and 96 h. RA FLS (n = 3). C (Left) Representative patterns in immunohistochemical staining of TET3 expression in RA FLS stimulated with TNFα for 0, 24, and 48 h. (Right) The nucleus/cytoplasm (N/C) intensity ratio of TET3 expression (20 cells each). RA FLS (n = 3). D (Left) Immunoblotting with 5hmC in gDNA from FLS unstimulated for 0 h and 96 h or stimulated with TNFα for 96 h. (Right) Relative expression levels of 5hmC. FLS (n = 3). Data are mean ± standard error of the mean (A and D) and the box-and-whisker plots (C). Two-tailed P values by the Mann-Whitney U-test (vs. no-stimulation control), *P < 0.05 (A) and the Tukey’s honestly significant difference test (C). One-tailed P values by the Mann-Whitney U-test (D)

Full size image

TNFα induces TET3 expression and the hydroxylation of methylated DNA

We then tested whether pro-inflammatory cytokines potentiate TET3 function in the putative DNA demethylation process. Given the clinical impact of increased TNFα during RA progression, we selected TNFα as the most likely to induce a response (Fig. 2A). First, we investigated the effect of TNFα on TET3 regulation at the protein level. Western blot confirmed that TNFα increased TET3 expression at the protein level, which was further supported by the quantitative image analysis using ImageJ software (Fig. 2B). In addition, the obtained results suggest that TNFα induced this response at the transcript level as there was no change in TET3 mRNA turnover (Supplementary Figure S1). These results were consistent with the significant accumulation of nuclear TET3 protein in cultured RA FLS at 48 h post-TNFα stimulation (Fig. 2C). This increase was also accompanied by an increase in 5hmC (Fig. 2D), suggesting that increases in pro-inflammatory cytokines during RA progression stimulate TET3 expression, leading to the hydroxylation of methylated DNA in RA FLS.

Genes regulated by both TET3 and TNFα are relevant to RA

Persistent exposure to pro-inflammatory cytokines has been reported to transform FLS into cells that produce a variety of arthritogenic molecules [14]. We then went on to use a gene microarray analysis (21,448 genes) to profile the global gene regulation in cultured RA FLS (n = 3) treated with TNFα in the presence or absence of anti-TET3 small interfering RNA (siRNA) [i.e., TET3- knockdown (KD)] in an effort to determine whether TET3 mediates this TNFα induced transformation. The KD efficiency of TET3 by siRNA was confirmed using qPCR and Western blotting (Supplementary Figure S2A and B). The gene expression array analysis was conducted using four groups [control siRNA (siCTL)/TNFα(–), siCTL/TNFα(+), TET3-KD (siTET3)/TNFα(–), or siTET3/TNFα(+)], and the genes with significant expression differences (ANOVA F-test, P < 0.05) were used in the hierarchical analysis (Supplementary Figure S3). When we compared the siCTL/TNFα(+) and the siCTL/TNFα(–) groups, the number of genes regulated by TNFα stimulation at the cutoff point [|log fold change (FC)| >0.58, false discovery rate (FDR)-corrected F-test, P < 0.3)] is shown in Fig. 3A, with 280 upregulated genes and 185 downregulated genes, respectively. When we compared the siTET3/ TNFα(+) and the siCTL/TNFα(+) group, the number of genes affected by TET3-KD under TNFα treatment was 180, with 93 genes upregulated and 87 downregulated, respectively. There were an estimated 95 genes that are likely to be regulated by both TNFα and TET3, with 52 of these being upregulated and 43 downregulated, respectively (Fig. 3A, Supplementary Table S1 and S2). The 52 upregulated genes encode several factors associated with RA progression, including those associated with neutrophil migration [such as C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 8 (CXCL8) and CXCL5], cell migration [such as Myocardin (MYOCD), Calponin 1 (CNN1), and Integrin Subunit Beta 3 (ITGB3)], amplifying inflammation [such as Leukemia Inhibitory Factor (LIF) and Interleukin 1 Beta (IL1B)], proto-oncogenes [KIT Proto-Oncogene, Receptor Tyrosine Kinase (KIT), RELB Proto-Oncogene, nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) Subunit (RELB)], Interferon (IFN)-inducible genes [Interferon Induced Protein 44 Like (IFI44L), 2′-5′-Oligoadenylate Synthetase 1 (OAS1), and Radical S-Adenosyl Methionine Domain Containing 2 (RSAD2)]. Those genes with variations known to increase RA risk are also listed in this figure [TNF alpha-induced protein 3 (TNFAIP3) and fatty acid desaturase 2 (FADS2)].

Fig. 3
figure 3

Identification of TNFα-TET3-dependent genes, pathways, and RA-like phenotypes in RA FLS. A The Venn diagram of induced and downregulated genes. B Representative enriched KEGG pathways. C Heat map of chemokine genes expression. Red corresponds to gene upregulation and blue to gene down-regulation. D Relative mRNA expression levels in RA FLS with or without TNFα stimulation and TET3-knockdown. CXCL8 (n = 3), CCL2 (n = 3), RANKL (n = 3), OPG (n = 3), MMP1 (n = 3), MMP13 (n = 3). E Concentrations in the supernatant of FLS with or without TNFα stimulation and TET3-knockdown. RA FLS (n = 4). F (Left) Representative images of scratch assays of RA FLS with or without TNFα stimulation and TET3-knockdown. (Right) Count of cells per field filling the original scratch area. RA FLS (n = 3). Data are mean ± standard error of the mean (D, E, and F). One-tailed P values by the Mann-Whitney U-test (D, E, and F)

Full size image

Next, we went on to complete functional ontology and KEGG pathway analyses on these genes (Fig. 3B, Supplementary Table S3 and S4), and confirmed the expected enrichment of the “TNF signaling” pathway [16.1-fold (P = 2.79E−06, FDR = 0.003)]. Significant enrichments were detected in the known signaling pathways associated with RA progression, including “NOD-like receptor signaling,” “NF-kappa B signaling,” “Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction” and “Chemokine signaling” pathways (Fig. 3B). As the CXC-chemokines are well-recognized facilitators of RA progression, we went on to perform a cluster analysis and showed that several C-C motif chemokines are likely regulated by both TET3 and TNFα (Fig. 3C).

TET3 facilitates the mobility of activated FLS

To verify gene regulation of the candidate chemokines by these factors, real-time qPCR was performed using cultured RA FLS to assess the mRNA expression levels of CXCL8, CCL2, receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL), osteoprotegerin (OPG), matrix metalloproteinase 1 (MMP1), and MMP13 (Fig. 3D). Although the expression of RANKL, MMP1, and MMP13 (up-regulated) as well as OPG (down-regulated) were shown to be TNFα-dependent, they appeared to be TET3 independent (Fig. 3D). As TNFα is well known to induce the production of inflammatory mediators [5], the production of the other mediators during RA FLS culture were also evaluated for TET3 dependence (Fig. 3E). Although IL-1, IL-17A, and TNFα were below the detection level in this study, presumably due to the detection limits of the culture media, induction of CXCL8 and CCL2 by TNFα were both confirmed to be linked to TET3 expression (Fig. 3E). Increases in IL-6 and VEGF in response to TNFα were observed, but were shown to be TET3 independent (Fig. 3E). One of the most distinct features of RA progression is cell migration and invasion of activated FLS under persistent stimulation by pro-inflammatory cytokines [5]. Given this, we then investigated whether TET3 is indeed involved in increasing the cellular mobility of FLS following TNFα stimulation using cultured RA FLS. The scratch assay was used to assess cell migration and invasion [15], and TET3-KD abrogated the effect of TNFα stimulation on FLS cell mobility (Fig. 3F). Thus, TET3 seems to mediate the action of a subset of TNFα target genes responsible for pannus formation in progressed RA joints.

Haploinsufficiency of TET3 (TET3 +/−) attenuates RA progression in an RA mouse model induced by K/BxN serum

Given the findings in both the clinical samples and cultured FLS, we hypothesize that TET3 expression in FLS facilitates RA progression in the joints. To further address this point, we attempted to illustrate TET3 function in the intact joints of an RA mouse model. The development of a typical RA-like phenotype was achieved following murine treatment with K/BxN serum [16] (Fig.4), and a TET3 gene-depleted CL57BL/6 line was used as no overt abnormality with normal reproductive ability has been observed in mice with TET3 haploinsufficiency [17, 18]. TET2/3 and methylated DNAs were clearly stained in the synovial tissues of the joints in wild-type (WT) mice. K/BxN serum transfer was found to upregulate the expression levels of TET2, TET3, and 5hmC (Fig. 4A), consistent with the findings from the human RA clinical samples (Fig. 1). In TET3+/− mice, K/BxN serum transfer was unable to induce significant expression of TET3 and did not affect TET2 expression levels (Fig. 4A). Acute arthritis was induced following K/BxN serum transfer in WT and TET3+/− mice (Fig. 4B, C). However, the progression of arthritis was clearly aborted in TET3+/−-K/BxN mice (Fig. 4B). Histological analysis suggested that TET3 haploinsufficiency attenuates the hallmarks of arthritis progression, including reducing synovial inflammation and FLS proliferation following bone destruction (Fig. 4C). Marked bone erosion was obvious in the arthritic WT-K/BxN mice, but not in the TET3+/−-K/BxN mice when evaluated using micro-computed tomography (Fig. 4D). Furthermore, K/BxN serum transfer potently induced the spread of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP)-positive mature osteoclasts in the border area between the inflamed synovial membrane and bone, but this effect was much less obvious in the TET3+/−-K/BxN mice (Fig. 4E). In contrast, TET3 silencing by transfection of FLS with siRNAs significantly suppressed the cell proliferation of FLS than those transfected with control siRNA (Supplementary Fig S4). These findings support the in vivo significance of TET3 function in facilitating the progression of arthritis and pannus formation.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Arthritis attenuated by TET3+/− in an RA mouse model. A Representative patterns of staining for 5mC, 5hmC, TET1/2/3 (brown) in the ankle synovial tissue. B Serial changes in the arthritis score. WT-K/BxN (n = 8), TET3+/−-K/BxN (n = 9). C (Left) Representative sections of synovial tissues stained with hematoxylin (HE) and eosin and Safranin O (S-O). (Right) histological scores of inflammation/hyperplasia, bone erosion, and cartilage damage. WT-K/BxN (n = 4), TET3+/−-K/BxN (n = 5). D Images of micro-computed tomography. Red arrows correspond to bone erosion. WT-K/BxN (n = 1), TET3+/−-K/BxN (n = 1). E Sections of mouse synovial tissues stained with tartrate-resistant acidic phosphatase. WT-K/BxN (n = 2), TET3+/−-K/BxN (n = 2). Scale bar, 300 μm (A), 100 μm (left D), 50 μm (middle D), 200 μm (right D). Data are mean ± standard error of the mean (B and C). Two-tailed P values by the t-test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, vs. WT-K/BxN (B and C)

Full size image

Discussion

Here, we assessed the role of the TET proteins, as the primary enzymes facilitating DNA demethylation, in RA progression in both human RA tissues and an RA mouse model, with a view to evaluating how epigenetic regulation might facilitate RA progression. The expression of all three TET proteins and hyper-hydroxylation of methylated DNA (5hmc), was evaluated in these assays and our results show that there was a significant increase in TET3 and 5hmc in the synovial tissues of RA patients (Fig. 1A). A combination of immunohistochemical analysis and cell culture of FLS from the RA synovial membranes clearly demonstrated the increased expression of TET3 in these FLS (Fig.1C, D). These findings are consistent with previous reports of altered epigenetic markers, such as methylated DNA [12] and histone modifications [19, 20] in the FLS of RA patients. In addition, evaluation of the clinical samples revealed that increases in pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNFα, IL-1, and IL-17) produced during RA progression clearly induced the upregulation of TET3 expression, but not the other TETs, in the cultured FLS (Fig. 2A). TET1 expression levels were lower than that of TET3 in the RA synovial tissues (Fig. 1A), and when semi-quantitatively compared in RA and OA patients (Fig. 1B). Moreover, given the lack of overlapping staining between TET1 and CD55/CD68 (Fig. 1C), we can assume that TET1 is likely to engage in chondrogenesis in the joint [21]. TET2 is strongly expressed in monocytes/macrophages (CD68), but not in FLS (CD55), from RA tissues (Fig. 1C) or cultured FLS (Fig. 1D). However, the difference in its expression between RA and OA patients was negligible (Fig.1B). Given the global role and cellular distribution of macrophages in pro-inflammatory responses, TET2 may modify epigenetic events in the residential macrophages of RA synovial tissues [22]. To verify the role of TET3 in RA progression in intact animals, we used a mouse model of RA induced by K/BxN serum transfer [16], in which the expected progression of RA-like arthritis was observed (Fig. 4A). The onset of arthritis was initiated, but its progression was clearly aborted by TET3 haploinsufficiency [17, 18] under these conditions (Fig. 4B, C). Moreover, less bone destruction was observed in the TET3+/−-K/BxN mice (Fig. 4D). Given the pivotal role of FLS in RA progression, we presume that TET3 facilitates inflammatory responses in FLS and adjacent cells during RA progression, presumably through epigenetic modification by initiating DNA demethylation. Notably, TET3 could be useful as an inflammatory indicator during RA progression, since there are no other suitable inflammatory FLS markers in the literature.

Given the upregulated expression of TET3 in the RA synovium (Fig. 1A, C), we were not surprised to find that the expression levels of TET3 were found clearly upregulated in response to several pro-inflammatory cytokines associated with RA progression in the cultured FLS [2] (Fig. 2A). Moreover, we showed that TNFα treatment for 96 h in cultured FLS was also effective in upregulating the levels of TET3 protein and 5hmC (Fig. 2B, D). The molecular basis underlying the upregulation of TET3 by these cytokines remains unknown, but may be associated with the cell-autonomous responses in FLS associated with these cytokines. This suggests that future studies should focus on the molecular mechanism facilitating the cytokine-mediated regulation of TET3 expression. This regulatory mechanism is supported by the fact that gene expression analysis under TET3-KD (Fig.3A), demonstrated that TET3 facilitates TNFα-mediated induction of the other inflammatory factors associated with RA progression. Therefore, we presume that the actions of the inflammatory factors produced during RA progression, at least in part, facilitate TET3-mediated DNA demethylation.

We searched for the downstream target genes of TET3 that might account for RA progression and successfully found that TET3 was required for the TNFα-mediated induction of 52 downstream genes including inflammatory factors and CXC-chemokines such as CCL2, CXCL5, and CXCL8 (Fig. 3A–C). CXCL5 and CXCL8 are potent neutrophil recruiters, while CCL2 activates monocytes and peripheral helper T (Tph) cell mobility [23], as well as the maturation of monocytes into mature osteoclasts [24]. The role of TET3 in activated cell mobility (Fig. 3F) and osteoclastgenesis (Fig. 4D, E) by TNFα was experimentally verified. In addition, these chemokines are known to potentiate the proliferation and angiogenic properties of FLS during RA progression [25]. Like these chemokines, the interleukins (IL-1β and LIF) identified in this gene screening have already been shown to promote inflammation during RA progression [26, 27]. IL-1β maintains persistent inflammation in the RA synovium and thereby drives bone destruction, and its induction by TNFα in the RA synovium is well documented [26]. LIF induction by TNFα may lead to IL-6 induction through the LIF signaling pathway via the activator of transcription 4 (STAT4) and TNFα signaling pathway via NF-κB and C/EBPβ in the RA synovium [28, 29]. The upregulation of receptor tyrosine kinase, c-kit (encoded by KIT), in FLS may contribute to increased cellular mobility in the presence of its ligand stem cell factor (SCF) during RA progression.

Both the in vivo and in vitro observations clearly demonstrate that TET3 facilitates gene induction of C-C motif chemokines (CCL2 and CXCL8) by TNFα, as well as other pro-inflammatory cytokines. However, the detailed molecular mechanism underlying the interactions between gene regulation and DNA demethylation remains unknown [30]. However, when taken together with our previous findings on the altered DNA methylation patterns of RA FLS [8], we can assume that the changes noted in the DNA array are at least partially due to DNA demethylation events in the FLS during RA progression. The induction of CCL2 and CXCL8 by TNFα stimulation appears to be achieved via potentiation of their gene promoters which are activated via TET3-mediated DNA demethylation. Given that it is generally accepted that passive DNA demethylation occurs during DNA duplication, the changes in gene expression associated with TNFα and DNA demethylation may also be partially mediated through the increased DNA duplication of RA FLS. This idea is not inconsistent with the fact that cell proliferation is promoted by pro-inflammatory cytokines other than TNFα during RA progression.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our findings suggest that TET3 serves as an epigenetic gatekeeper for the point-of-no-return in both the progression and chronicity of RA-mediated joint destruction. Early and effective therapeutic intervention to prevent this progression to the point-of-no-return could be a key to finding a cure for deteriorating RA. When this is taken together with our observations, it is clear that our data suggests that TET3 may be a promising target for therapeutic intervention.

Availability of data and materials

The data used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

RA:

Rheumatoid arthritis

FLS:

Fibroblast-like synoviocytes

TET1/2/3:

Ten-Eleven translocation 1/2/3

WT:

Wild-type

TET3 +/− :

TET3 heterozygous-deficient

5hmC:

5-hydroxymethylcytosine

TNFα:

Tumor necrosis factor α

CXCL:

C-X-C motif chemokine ligand

CCL:

C-C motif chemokine ligand

DNMTs:

DNA methyltransferases

5mC:

5-methylcytosine

5hmC:

5-hydroxymethylcytosine

5fC:

5-formylcytosine

5caC:

5-carboxylcytosine

IL:

Interleukin

siRNA:

Small interfering RNA

KD:

Knockdown

RANKL:

Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand

OPG:

Osteoprotegerin

MMP:

Matrix metalloproteinase

References

  1. Schett G, Tanaka Y, Isaacs JD. Why remission is not enough: underlying disease mechanisms in RA that prevent cure. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2020;17(3):135–44.

  2. Smolen JS, Aletaha D, Barton A, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Rev. 2018;4:18001 Disease primers.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ospelt C, Gay S, Klein K. Epigenetics in the pathogenesis of RA. Sem Immunopathol. 2017;39(4):409–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Firestein GS, McInnes IB. Immunopathogenesis of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Immunity. 2017;46(2):183–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bottini N, Firestein GS. Duality of fibroblast-like synoviocytes in RA: passive responders and imprinted aggressors. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2013;9(1):24–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stylianou E. Epigenetics of chronic inflammatory diseases. J Inflammation Res. 2019;12:1–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zeng Y, Chen T. DNA methylation reprogramming during mammalian development. Genes. 2019;10(4):257.

  8. Nakano K, Whitaker JW, Boyle DL, Wang W, Firestein GS. DNA methylome signature in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(1):110–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Glossop JR, Haworth KE, Emes RD, et al. DNA methylation profiling of synovial fluid FLS in rheumatoid arthritis reveals changes common with tissue-derived FLS. Epigenomics. 2015;7(4):539–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. de la Rica L, Urquiza JM, Gomez-Cabrero D, et al. Identification of novel markers in rheumatoid arthritis through integrated analysis of DNA methylation and microRNA expression. J Autoimmunity. 2013;41:6–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ai R, Laragione T, Hammaker D, et al. Comprehensive epigenetic landscape of rheumatoid arthritis fibroblast-like synoviocytes. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nakano K, Boyle DL, Firestein GS. Regulation of DNA methylation in rheumatoid arthritis synoviocytes. J Immunol (Baltimore, Md. : 1950). 2013;190(3):1297–303.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Karouzakis E, Gay RE, Michel BA, Gay S, Neidhart M. DNA hypomethylation in rheumatoid arthritis synovial fibroblasts. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60(12):3613–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kalliolias GD, Ivashkiv LB. TNF biology, pathogenic mechanisms and emerging therapeutic strategies. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2016;12(1):49–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Choe JY, Hun Kim J, Park KY, Choi CH, Kim SK. Activation of dickkopf-1 and focal adhesion kinase pathway by tumour necrosis factor alpha induces enhanced migration of fibroblast-like synoviocytes in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford, England). 2016;55(5):928–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Korganow AS, Ji H, Mangialaio S, et al. From systemic T cell self-reactivity to organ-specific autoimmune disease via immunoglobulins. Immunity. 1999;10(4):451–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tsukada Y, Akiyama T, Nakayama KI. Maternal TET3 is dispensable for embryonic development but is required for neonatal growth. Sci Rep. 2015;5:15876.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tan L, Shi YG. Tet family proteins and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in development and disease. Development (Cambridge, England). 2012;139(11):1895–902.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Loh C, Park SH, Lee A, Yuan R, Ivashkiv LB, Kalliolias GD. TNF-induced inflammatory genes escape repression in fibroblast-like synoviocytes: transcriptomic and epigenomic analysis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78(9):1205–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tsuchiya H, Ota M, Sumitomo S, et al. Parsing multiomics landscape of activated synovial fibroblasts highlights drug targets linked to genetic risk of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80(4):440–50.

  21. Taylor SE, Li YH, Smeriglio P, Rath M, Wong WH, Bhutani N. Stable 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) Acquisition Marks Gene Activation During Chondrogenic Differentiation. J Bone Min Res. 2016;31(3):524–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Shen Q, Zhang Q, Shi Y, et al. Tet2 promotes pathogen infection-induced myelopoiesis through mRNA oxidation. Nature. 2018;554(7690):123–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rao DA, Gurish MF, Marshall JL, et al. Pathologically expanded peripheral T helper cell subset drives B cells in rheumatoid arthritis. Nature. 2017;542(7639):110–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Khan UA, Hashimi SM, Bakr MM, Forwood MR, Morrison NA. CCL2 and CCR2 are Essential for the Formation of Osteoclasts and Foreign Body Giant Cells. J Cell Biochem. 2016;117(2):382–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Koch AE. Chemokines and their receptors in rheumatoid arthritis: future targets? Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(3):710–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dayer JM. The pivotal role of interleukin-1 in the clinical manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford, England). 2003;42(Suppl 2):ii3–10.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang F, Wei K, Slowikowski K, et al. Defining inflammatory cell states in rheumatoid arthritis joint synovial tissues by integrating single-cell transcriptomics and mass cytometry. Nat Immunol. 2019;20(7):928–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lennartsson J, Ronnstrand L. Stem cell factor receptor/c-Kit: from basic science to clinical implications. Physiol Rev. 2012;92(4):1619–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Nguyen HN, Noss EH, Mizoguchi F, et al. Autocrine Loop Involving IL-6 Family Member LIF, LIF Receptor, and STAT4 Drives Sustained Fibroblast Production of Inflammatory Mediators. Immunity. 2017;46(2):220–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Nygaard G, Firestein GS. Restoring synovial homeostasis in rheumatoid arthritis by targeting fibroblast-like synoviocytes. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2020;16(6):316–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Drs. Diane Mathis and Christophe Benoist (Harvard Medical School) for providing K/BxN mice, Drs. Ken Sabanai and Yukichi Zenke (Department of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan) for providing synovial tissue samples, and Megumi Hirahara and Kahoru Noda for the excellent technical assistant. Prof. Gary S. Firestein (University of California San Diego) kindly provided insightful comments and suggestions. This research project was supported in part by a Research Grant-In-Aid for Scientific Research by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan, the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan, UOEH Research Grant for Promotion of Occupational Health, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, MSD, and Eisai.

Funding

This research project was supported in part by a Research Grant-In-Aid for Scientific Research by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan, the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (17K09992), Boehringer Ingelheim (RS2020A000673916), Eisai (HHCS20200929029) and Mitsubishi-Tanabe.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Yahatanishi, Kitakyushu, 807-8555, Japan

    Akio Kawabe, Kaoru Yamagata, Kazuhisa Nakano, Kei Sakata, Shingo Nakayamada & Yoshiya Tanaka

  2. Health Sciences Research Center, Iryo Sosei University, 5-5-1 Chuodai-iino, Iwaki, Fukushima, 970-8551, Japan

    Shigeaki Kato

  3. Research Institute of Innovative Medicine, Tokiwa Foundation, 57 Kaminodai, Jyoban Kamiyunagayamachi, Iwaki, Fukushima, 972-8322, Japan

    Shigeaki Kato

  4. Pharmacology Research Laboratories I, Research Division, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, 1000 Kamoshida, Aoba, Yokohama, 227-0033, Japan

    Kei Sakata

  5. Advanced Biological Information Research Division, AMORI Frontier Research Center, Kyushu University, 744 Motooka, Nishi, Fukuoka, 819-0395, Japan

    Yu-ichi Tsukada

  6. Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin-kawara, Sakyo, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan

    Koichiro Ohmura

Authors
  1. Akio Kawabe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kaoru Yamagata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shigeaki Kato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kazuhisa Nakano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kei Sakata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yu-ichi Tsukada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Koichiro Ohmura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Shingo Nakayamada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yoshiya Tanaka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.K., K.N., K.S., K.Y., S.N., S.K., and Y.T. designed the methods and experiments, analyzed the data, and interpreted the results. A.K., K.N., K.S., and K.Y. carried out the laboratory experiments. Y.T. prepared TET3+/− mice. K.O. prepared K/BxN sera. A.K., K.N., S.K., and Y.T. wrote the manuscript. All authors have contributed to, read, and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshiya Tanaka.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of the University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants at the time of sample collection (H24-30). All animal experiments were approved by the Ethics Committee of Animal Care and Experimentation of the University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, in accordance with the Guiding of Principle for Animal Care Experimentation (AE 14-025).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation provided support in the form of salaries for K. Sakata. K. Nakano has received speaking fees from Astellas, UCB, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Eisai and has received research grants from Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Eisai, and Eli Lilly. K. Ohmura has received speaking fees and/or honoraria from Abbvie, Actelion, Astellas, Ayumi, Asahikasei-Pharma, Bristol-Myers, Eisai, Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Novartis, Sanofi and has received research grants from Bristol-Myers, Eisai, Eli Lilly, GSK, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Nippon-Kayaku. S. Nakayamada has received speaking fees from Bristol-Myers, Sanofi, Abbvie, Eisai, Chugai, Pfizer, Takeda, Asahi-kasei and has received research grants from Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Novartis and MSD. Y. Tanaka has received speaking fees and/or honoraria from Daiichi-Sankyo, Astellas, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Abbvie, YL Biologics, Bristol-Myers, Takeda, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Novartis, Eisai, Janssen, Teijin and has received research grants from Asahi-kasei, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Chugai, Takeda, Sanofi, Bristol-Myers, UCB, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai and Ono. All other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Supplementary Figure S1.

Degeneration of TET3 mRNA induced by TNFα stimulation. Relative mRNA expression levels of TET3 in RA FLS (n = 3) treated with actinomycin D (Wako, 10 μg/mL), followed by stimulation with TNFα for 0, 0.5, 1, 2, and 6 hrs. Supplementary Figure S2. Relative mRNA expression levels of TET1/2/3 with or without TET3-knockdown. (A) RA FLS (n = 2) samples were used to study TET3 mRNA levels by qPCR. Data are mean ± SEM. (B) RA FLS (n = 3) samples were used to study TET3 protein levels by Western blotting. Supplementary Figure S3. Heat map of differentially expressed genes in all RA FLS with or without TNFα stimulation and TET3-knockdown. 2013 of all 21,448 genes were differentially expressed genes in 4 RA FLS groups (ANOVA F-test, P < 0.05) and analyzed. Red corresponds to gene upregulation and blue to gene downregulation. Supplementary Figure S4. Cell proliferation of FLS by TET3 expression. RA FLS (n=3) were transfected with control or TET3 siRNAs. Cell numbers of FLS were counted with Hemocytometer at day 1, 3, and 7. P value by the t-test.

Additional file 2: Supplementary Table S1.

TET3-mediated upregulated genes. Supplementary Table S2. TET3-mediated downregulated genes. Supplementary Table S3. Results of functional enrichment analysis. Supplementary Table S4. KEGG pathway analysis. Supplementary Table S5. Demographic, clinical, and biochemical features of RA and OA patients whose synovial tissues were used in the experiments.

Additional file 3.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kawabe, A., Yamagata, K., Kato, S. et al. Role of DNA dioxygenase Ten-Eleven translocation 3 (TET3) in rheumatoid arthritis progression. Arthritis Res Ther 24, 222 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-022-02908-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-022-02908-5

Keywords

  • Ten-Eleven translocation 3
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Fibroblast-like synoviocytes
  • Tumor necrosis factor α

Arthritis Research & Therapy

ISSN: 1478-6362

Contact us