Skip to content


  • Research article
  • Open Access

Hydroxychloroquine is associated with impaired interferon-alpha and tumor necrosis factor-alpha production by plasmacytoid dendritic cells in systemic lupus erythematosus

Arthritis Research & Therapy201214:R155

  • Received: 23 March 2012
  • Accepted: 27 June 2012
  • Published:



Plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) constitutively express two members of the Toll-like receptor (TLR) family, TLR-9 and TLR-7, through which they can be stimulated to produce high levels of interferon (IFN)-α, a key mediator of the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Given the known efficacy of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in the treatment of SLE, we examined its ability to inhibit such pDC function in vivo.


Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from SLE subjects treated or not with HCQ and from healthy controls were stimulated with the TLR-9 agonist, CpG oligodeoxynucleotides (CpG-A ODN)-2216, and the TLR-7 agonist, imiquimod. The proportion of monocytes, B cells, myeloid dendritic cells, pDCs, and natural killer (NK) cells producing IFN-α and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) was then analyzed by multiparameter flow cytometry.


After TLR-9/7 stimulation in both SLE and healthy subjects, significant production of IFN-α and TNF-α was only observed in pDCs. TLR-7 and TLR-9 induced IFN-α and TNF-α production by pDCs from subjects with SLE was decreased relative to that found in controls (TLR-9/IFN-α, P < 0.0001; TLR-9/TNF-α P < 0.0001; TLR-7/TNF-α P = 0.01). TLR-9 and TLR-7 induced IFN-α and TNF-α production by pDCs was severely impaired in 36% (TLR-9) and 33% (TLR-7) of SLE subjects. In almost all cases, these subjects were being treated with HCQ (HCQ vs. no HCQ: impaired TLR-9/IFN-α, P = 0.0003; impaired TLR-7/IFN-α, P = 0.07; impaired TLR-9/TNF-α, P < 0.009; impaired TLR-7/TNF-α, P < 0.01).


Treatment with HCQ is associated with impaired ability of pDCs from subjects with SLE to produce IFN-α and TNF-α upon stimulation with TLR-9 and TLR-7 agonists.


  • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patient
  • Imiquimod
  • Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell
  • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index


A growing body of evidence indicates that type I interferons, such as interferon-α (IFN-α), play a pivotal role in the etiology and pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and single-nucleotide polymorphisms in several key molecules important for IFN-α production and action are associated with SLE [1, 2]. Moreover, some of these type I IFN pathway polymorphisms have been shown to impact IFN-α levels and responsiveness in SLE patients in vivo [3].

Plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) have been shown to be the major source of IFN-α production in the peripheral blood [4] and within lymph nodes [5], and these cells produce IFN-α after stimulation across TLR-7 and/or TLR-9 [68]. pDCs have also been implicated as key mediators of pathogenesis in SLE [9, 10]. However, a number of studies have shown that SLE patients have circulating pDCs that are reduced in number and/or are dysfunctional [1113]. Since different cell types are known to produce type I IFN in small quantities after microbial challenge [4], these observations raise the possibility that other circulating cells (for example, those involved in the innate immune system, such as monocytes or myeloid dendritic cells, and/or those expressing TLR-9 and/or TLR-7, such as B cells) are the source of IFN-α production in SLE.

Antimalarial agents, such as quinine, have long been used in the treatment of SLE, first (in 1894) in the context of cutaneous lupus and then, as hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), in the context of SLE [1417]. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, SLE patients treated with HCQ had fewer disease flares and severe disease exacerbations compared to those receiving a placebo [18]. Despite some uncertainty regarding the exact mechanism(s) underlying their various effects, the principal mechanism of action of agents such as HCQ relates to their ability to increase the intracytoplasmic pH and to thereby prevent acidification and maturation of endosomes [19, 20]. IFN-α in SLE patients can be produced by pDCs in response to continuous stimulation by circulating immune complexes [9] that are internalized by CD32 (FcγRIIA), with subsequent detection of DNA and RNA by endosomal TLR-9 and TLR-7 in pDCs [10, 21]. HCQ would predictably block TLR-9/7 stimulation [22, 23] and thus play a beneficial role in the treatment of SLE. Importantly, HCQ has been shown to inhibit the production of IFN-α in pDCs in vitro, either after induction by DNA-containing immune complexes [10] or upon stimulation with TLR-9 agonists [13]. It is not clear, however, whether the same effect occurs in vivo, that is, in the setting of SLE patients treated with HCQ.

In the current study, we have addressed the above questions directly in a cohort of patients with SLE, treated or not with HCQ, to determine the predominant circulating cell subpopulation capable of IFN-α production and the extent to which such production is inhibited by HCQ in vivo.

Materials and methods

Patients studied

SLE subjects were recruited from the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Lupus Genetics Project collection [1, 24]. From this cohort, we recruited 39 individuals of European ancestry who fulfilled at least four of the American College of Rheumatology criteria for SLE [25]. Disease activity was assessed using the Systemic Lupus Activity Questionnaire (SLAQ) [26]. Subjects with the following criteria were excluded: acute infection or vaccination within the prior eight weeks, ongoing treatment with chemotherapy (including cyclophosphamide) or radiotherapy, or active viral hepatitis. Ten healthy gender-matched blood donors served as controls. The University of California, San Francisco Committee on Human Research approved the study and all subjects provided written informed consent.

Preparation of PBMCs

Blood samples obtained from SLE and healthy control subjects were collected into ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were prepared using a ficoll hypaque gradient. Cells were washed in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and suspended in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with penicillin, streptomycin, and L-glutamine.

TLR stimulation

PBMCs (106) from SLE and control subjects were cultured with the TLR-7 agonist, imiquimod, (5 μg/ml; InvivoGen, San Diego, CA, USA), the TLR-9 agonist, CpG-A ODN 2216 (5 μM; InvivoGen), the TLR-4 agonist, lipopolysaccharide (0.05 μg/ml; InvivoGen), and media for five hours at 37°C in 5% CO2. Brefeldin A (GolgiPlug, BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA, USA) was added during the final three hours of stimulation to block cytokine secretion.

Flow cytometry

The panels of antibodies used for phenotypic and intracellular cytokine detection are described in Additional file 1, Table S1. Cytokine detection and phenotyping were performed by sequential cell surface and intracellular staining, following the manufacturer's instructions. Potential Fc receptors were blocked by incubating PBMCs with mouse serum prior to the addition of specific mouse anti-human antibodies. Fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis was performed on a four-laser BD LSR-II flow cytometer, and data were analyzed using FlowJo software v9-3 (Treestar, Ashland, OR, USA) and transferred into analysis and graphic software including Excel (Windows, Seattle, WA, USA) and/or GraphPad Prism5 (La Jolla, CA, USA). All analyses were carried out without knowledge of the subject's clinical status, including treatment. The strategy used to gate the different subsets of PBMCs is shown in Additional file 1, Figure S1.

Statistical analyses

Exact nonparametric two-tailed tests were used. The Kruskal-Wallis One-Way Analysis of Variance on Ranks (ANOVA) or the Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare continuous variables. The Dunn's multiple comparison test was used for statistical correction of multiple comparisons. The Fisher's exact test was used to compare dichotomous variables. The Spearman rank correlation test was used to determine correlations between variables, with r being the Spearman correlation coefficient. Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism 5.01 software. P-values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.


Characteristics of subjects studied

Table 1 outlines the characteristics of the 39 SLE subjects and 10 healthy controls analyzed in this study. SLE subjects were classified into two groups according to treatment regimen: one group of 25 subjects received hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and another group of 14 subjects did not. Among the 25 subjects treated with HCQ, 18 received 400 mg/day, 1 received 300 mg/day, and 6 received 200 mg/day. The mean age of the SLE subjects was 53 years and 36 (92%) were female. All subjects were of self-described European descent. The mean SLAQ score, defining lupus disease activity, was 10.4 (± 8.4). Twelve of the SLE subjects (30.8%) were receiving prednisone at a daily dose that was less that 10 mg/day. Eight (20.5%) were also treated with immunosuppressive medication, for example, cyclosporine (n = 2), mycophenolate mofetil (n = 3), methotrexate (n = 2), or azathioprine (n = 1). Compared to controls, SLE subjects were older (53 ± 12.5 vs. 30 ± 4.3 years old, P < 0.0001). Compared to SLE subjects being treated with HCQ, SLE subjects not receiving HCQ were similar in terms of age, gender, disease activity and other current treatment.
Table 1

Characteristics of SLE patients and healthy controls studied



SLE subjects


(n= 10)

All (n= 39)


(n= 25)


(n= 14)

Age, years (SD)

30 (4.3)1

53 (12.5)1

50.4 (12.7)

57.6 (11.2)

Female, n (%)

8 (80%)

36 (92%)

22 (88%)

14 (100%)

European ancestry, n (%)

10 (100%)

39 (100%)

25 (100%)

14 (100%)

Years since SLE diagnosis (SD)


19.2 (9.7)

17.2 (9.4)

22.7 (9.6)

SLE activity (SLAQ)


10.4 (8.4)

11.8 (8.9)

8.1 (7.3)



prednisone, n (%)


12 (30.8%)

9 (36%)

3 (21.4%)

immunosuppressant, n (%)


8 (20.5)

5 (20%)

3 (21.4%)

1, P < 0.0001. HCQ, hydroxycholoroquine; SD, standard deviation; SLAQ, Systemic Lupus Activity Questionnaire; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus

Plasmacytoid dendritic cells are responsible for IFN-α and TNF-α production upon TLR-9/7 stimulation in both SLE and healthy subjects

We first investigated the production of IFN-α and TNF-α by PBMCs upon TLR-9 or TLR-7 stimulation in SLE and healthy subjects. PBMCs from subjects with SLE and healthy controls were stimulated in vitro for five hours using the TLR-9 ligand, CpG-A ODN 2216, and the TLR-7 ligand, imiquimod R837. IFN-α and TNF-α production in monocytes (HLA-DR+CD14+), B cells (HLA-DR+CD14-CD16-CD20+), myeloid dendritic cells (mDCs, HLA-DR+CD14-CD16-CD20-CD11c+), pDCs (HLA-DR+CD14-CD16-CD20-CD123+), and natural killer cells (NK cells, HLA-DR-CD16+) was determined using multiparameter flow cytometry (see Additional file 1, Figure S1). In SLE and healthy subjects overall, TLR-9 stimulation induced the production of IFN-α and TNF-α in 0.3% (SD ± 0.3) and 0.8% (± 1.2) of monocytes, 1.3% (± 1.8) and 0.2% (0.2) of B cells, 1.2% (± 1.3) and 0.5% (0.6) of mDCs, and 7.5% (± 8.7) and 10.3% (± 13.5) of pDCS (Figure 1A). After stimulation of TLR-7, a similar analysis of SLE and healthy subjects showed induction of IFN-α and TNF-α in 0.4% (± 0.6) and 0.9% (± 1.1) of monocytes, 1% (± 1.6) and 0.1% (± 0.1) of B cells, 0.8% (± 1.3) and 0.4% (± 0.5) of mDCs, and 4.8% (± 5) and 5.5% (± 4.2) of pDCs (Figure 1B). Of these levels of induction, those observed in pDCs from SLE patients and controls were significantly higher than those observed in the other cell subpopulations. No production of IFN-α or TNF-α was noted in NK cells in either group or with either stimulation. Therefore, among various subpopulations of PBMCs, pDCs represent the major source of IFN-α and TNF-α after TLR-9/7 stimulation in both SLE and healthy subjects (see, for example, Figure 1C).
Figure 1
Figure 1

Plasmacytoid dendritic cells are responsible for IFN-α and TNF-α production upon TLR-9/7 stimulation. Flow cytometric analysis of IFN-α (left) and TNF-α (right) production after TLR-9 (A) or TLR-7 (B) stimulation of monocytes (CD14+), B cells (CD20+), mDCs (CD11c+), pDCs (CD123+), and NK cells (CD16+) found in the PBMCs of SLE patients (n = 39, white circles) and healthy (n = 10, black circles) (see supplementary Figure S1 for details on phenotypic analysis). The lines represent the median IFN-α/TNF-α production by subsets of PBMCs. (C) Flow cytometric analysis of IFN-α and TNF-α production after media (No Stim, top), TLR-9 (middle) and TLR-7 (bottom) stimulation of plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs), (HLA-DR+CD14-CD16-CD20-) CD123+ in one representative subject. *, refers to P < 0.05, ** refers to P < 0.005, *** refers to P < 0.0001.

pDCs from SLE patients show impaired production of IFN-α and TNF-α after TLR-9/7 stimulation

Upon TLR-9 stimulation with CpG, 19.2% (± 3.5) and 29% (± 4) of pDCs from healthy subjects produced IFN-α and TNF-α, respectively. By contrast, only 4.4% (± 0.7) and 8.1% (± 2.1) of pDCs from SLE subjects produced IFN-α (P < 0.0001), as compared to healthy controls) and TNF-α (P < 0.0001, as compared to healthy controls) (Figure 2A). Likewise, the production of IFN-α and TNF-α by pDCs upon TLR-7 stimulation with imiquimod was decreased in SLE subjects (4% ± 0.6 and 4.4% ± 0.6, respectively) compared to healthy controls (7.2% ± 2.5 and 8.6% ± 1.4, respectively). However, only the difference in the TNF-α production between these two groups was statistically significant (P = 0.01) (Figure 2B).
Figure 2
Figure 2

pDCs from SLE patients show impaired production of IFN-α and TNF-α after TLR-9/7 stimulation. Comparison of the frequency of circulating pDCs (CD123+ cells) producing IFN-α (left) and TNF-α (right) after TLR-9 (A) or TLR-7 (B) stimulation between SLE subjects (n = 39, white circles) and healthy controls (n = 10, black circles). In each case, the lines represent the mean value and the error bars show the standard deviation.

To determine if the proportion of pDCs in subjects with SLE was also low (as has been reported [12]), we examined the proportion of pDCs (as defined by the percentage of HLA-DR+, CD123+ cells, relative to all singlet, live cells). At least in this study, the mean percentage of pDCs in SLE subjects (0.46% ± 0.3) did not differ significantly from that observed in healthy controls (0.37% ± 0.1; P = 0.98) (Figure 3A). Moreover, the percentage of pDCs did not significantly differ between SLE subjects receiving (0.42% ± 0.33) or not receiving (0.48% ± 0.28) HCQ (P = 0.50) (Additional file 1, Figure S2A).
Figure 3
Figure 3

Frequency of circulating pDCs, pDCs IFN-α+/TNF-α+ after TLR-9/7 stimulation and lupus disease activity. (A) Flow cytometric analysis of pDCs (HLA-DR+CD123+ cells) found in the PBMCs in one representative subject (left). Comparison of the frequency of circulating pDCs found in SLE subjects (white circles) and healthy controls (black circles) (right). (B) Absence of statistical correlation between the frequency of CD123+ pDCs IFN-α+ (white triangles) or TNF-α+ (black triangles) after TLR-9 (left) or TLR-7 (right) stimulation and disease activity assessed by using the Systemic Lupus Activity Questionnaire (SLAQ) in SLE patients (TLR-9 stimulation: IFN-α/SLAQ, r = -0.20, P = 0.23; TNF-α/SLAQ, r = -0.08, P = 0.62) (TLR-7 stimulation: IFN-α/SLAQ, r = -0.18, P = 0.28; TNF-α/SLAQ, r = -0.01, P = 0.96). In each case, the lines represent the mean value and the error bars show the standard deviation.

We then examined the relationship between the level of pro-inflammatory cytokines (that is, IFN-α and TNF-α) produced by pDCs and the clinical activity of SLE (as defined using the Systemic Lupus Activity Questionnaire, or SLAQ). No statistical correlation was found between the production of IFN-α and TNF-α upon TLR-9/7 stimulation and the SLAQ scores (Figure 3B). The ability of pDCs to produce IFN-α/TNF-α upon TLR-9/7 stimulation was also not associated with age (age and TLR-9/IFN-α, r = 0.20, P = 0.21) (age and TLR-9/TNF-α, r = 0.20, P = 0.24) (age and TLR-7/IFN-α, r = 0.12, P = 0.45) (age and TLR-7/TNF-α, r = 0.01, P = 0.95) (Additional file 1, Figure S2B).

pDC production of IFN-α and TNF-α upon TLR-9/7 stimulation is dramatically reduced in SLE subjects treated with HCQ

IFN-α and TNF-α production by pDCs upon TLR-9 and TLR-7 stimulation was severely impaired (< 1% of CD123+ IFN-α+/TNF-α+) in 36% (14 subjects) and 33% (13 subjects) of SLE subjects, respectively. Interestingly, all of the 14 SLE subjects with impaired TLR-9 induced IFN-α production and 11 of 13 with impaired TLR-7 induced IFN-α production were being treated with HCQ (impaired TLR-9/IFN-α; HCQ vs no HCQ; P = 0.0003) (impaired TLR-7/IFN-α; HCQ vs no HCQ; P = 0.07). Likewise, 13 of the 14 SLE subjects with impaired TNF-α production upon TLR-9 stimulation (HCQ vs no HCQ; P < 0.009) and 12 of the 13 subjects with impaired TNF-α production upon TLR-7 stimulation (HCQ vs no HCQ; P < 0.01) were being treated with HCQ.

Overall, pDC production of IFN-α and TNF-α upon TLR-9 and TLR-7 stimulation was lower in SLE subjects treated with HCQ (TLR-9: 2% ± 2.2 CD123+IFN-α+; 1.4% ± 2.9 CD123+TNF-α+) (TLR-7: 3.3% ± 3.8 CD123+IFN-α+; 3.7% ± 3.7 CD123+TNF-α+) compared to SLE subjects who were not receiving HCQ (TLR-9: 8.6% ± 4.3 CD123+IFN-α+, P < 0.0001; 11.8% ± 9.1 CD123+TNF-α+, P < 0.0001) (TLR-7: 5.3% ± 3.9 CD123+IFN-α+, P = 0.058; 7.4% ± 7.4 CD123+TNF-α+, P = 0.054) (Figure 4). This difference was highly significant (P < 0.0001) in the case of TLR-9 stimulation and trended towards significance (P < 0.06) in the case of TLR7 stimulation. We did not observe any significant differences in IFN-α/TNF-α production by TLR-9/7-stimulated pDCs between subjects receiving 400 mg/day and 200 mg/day (TLR-9/IFN-α, P = 0.35) (TLR-9/TNF-α, P = 0.27) (TLR-7/IFN-α, P = 0.42) (TLR-7/TNF-α, P = 0.13) (Additional file 1, Figure S3). Interestingly, HCQ treatment did not have any effect on the production of TNF-α by monocytes (CD14+) and mDCs (CD11c+) upon TLR-4 stimulation. Indeed, among SLE patients receiving HCQ or not, 22.2% (± 14.7) and 16% (± 10.4) of monocytes, respectively, produced TNF-α after five hours of in vitro lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation (P = 0.20). In addition, 8.7% (± 13.2) and 6.9% (± 8.6) of mDCs produced TNF-α upon LPS stimulation among SLE patients receiving HCQ or not (P = 0.74) (Figure 5).
Figure 4
Figure 4

pDC production of IFN-α/TNF-α upon TLR-9/7 stimulation in SLE subjects treated with HCQ. Comparison of the frequency of pDCs (CD123+ cells) producing IFN-α (left) and TNF-α (right) after TLR-9 (A) or TLR-7 (B) stimulation between SLE subjects that were treated (n = 25, white squares) or not (n = 14, black triangles) with HCQ. In each case, the lines represent the mean value and the error bars show the standard deviation.

Figure 5
Figure 5

Monocytes and mDCs production of IFN-α/TNF-α upon TLR-4 stimulation in SLE subjects treated with HCQ. Flow cytometric analysis (left) of IFN-α and TNF-α production after TLR-4 (lipopolysaccharide, LPS) stimulation of monocytes (CD14+) (top, left) and mDCs, (CD11c+) (bottom) in a representative subject. Comparison of the frequency of monocytes (CD14+) (right top) and mDCs (CD11c+) (right bottom) cells producing TNF-α after TLR-4 stimulation between SLE subjects that were treated (white squares) or not (black triangles) with HCQ. In each case, lines represented the mean value and error bars the standard deviation.


Ongoing IFN-α production in SLE patients appears to play an important pathogenic role in the autoimmune process and pDCs have a pivotal role as the main producers of IFN-α in vivo [9, 27]. For this reason, different regimens directed against IFN-α are of high therapeutic benefit in SLE. In this study, we found that pDC production of IFN-α and TNF-α upon TLR-9 or TLR-7 stimulation was markedly reduced in SLE patients treated with HCQ. Although HCQ has been shown to act as a TLR-9 and TLR-7 antagonist in vitro, these data demonstrate that it also inhibits TLR-9 and TLR-7 stimulation in vivo. Such inhibition is also specific, in that HCQ treatment has little effect on TLR-4-induced production of TNF-α by monocytes and mDCs. Thus, our data provide new insights regarding the mechanism of action of HCQ in SLE. The reduction of TNF-α TLR-9/7-induced pDC production observed with HCQ is interesting from a therapeutic point of view, even if the involvement of TNF-α in the pathogenesis of SLE remains controversial [28]. Interestingly, a recent paper has shown that circulating TNF-α and type I IFN levels are correlated in a large cohort of SLE patients [29]. Finally, similar observations have been made in HCQ-treated HIV-infected "immunologic non-responders" [28], a condition in which chronic exposure to IFN-α may also lead to immune dysfunction [30].

One puzzling and previously reported result is the overall diminished IFN-α production by pDCs in SLE patients compared to controls [1113]. It has been hypothesized that the reduced ability of pDCs to produce IFN-α may be a consequence of the redistribution of the efficient pDCs into tissues [31] or of the exhaustion of circulating pDCs as a consequence of a high level of stimulation by persistent endogenous IFN-α inducing factors [13]. Although pDCs are probably migrating to tissues and producing IFN- α there, we did not observe any difference in the percentage of circulating pDCs between SLE patients and healthy controls. We did not either observe any association with IFN-α production by in vitro stimulated pDCs and SLE disease activity. Kwok et al. [13] previously showed that repeated stimulation of pDC with TLR-9 ligand decreased levels of IFN-α production. These authors concluded that the persistent presence of endogenous IFN-α-inducing factors induced TLR tolerance in pDCs of SLE patients. We have now demonstrated that, at least in some patients, such "tolerance" is strongly correlated with the exogenous administration of HCQ. In fact, most of the SLE patients in previous studies who showed decreased IFN-α production were receiving HCQ [1113]. Our comprehensive study of all subsets of PBMCs potentially targeted by TLR-9/7 ligand also excludes the possibility that other circulating mononuclear cells (besides pDCs) may produce IFN-α. It would have been of interest to determine IFN-α levels and the absolute number of pDCs in the circulation, but such measurements are themselves only uncertain surrogates of the IFN-α and pDC levels in tissues, where most of the pathology of SLE plays out. Although conflicting data may result from the use of different methods to isolate and culture the pDCs between studies, our results support a key role for HCQ treatment in explaining the impaired functional ability of pDCs in SLE.

Low serum HCQ levels have been reported to be a marker for and a predictor of SLE exacerbations [32], leading to the question of a possible relationship between blood HCQ concentrations and efficacy. We did not observe any significant differences in IFN-α/TNF-α production by TLR-7/9-stimulated pDCs between subjects receiving 400 mg/day and 200 mg/day. We do not know, however, the extent to which each patient was compliant with treatment and serum HCQ levels were not routinely measured.

Lupus activity is commonly measured by valid and reliable disease activity physician-rated scores, such as the Systemic Lupus Activity Measure (SLAM) [33], the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) [34], or the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) [35]. All assess cumulative disease activity, including not only parameters that are immunological (for example, the level of antibodies against dsDNA and complement) but also clinical and biological. Practical considerations limited our ability to obtain all of the biological and immunological parameters required to calculate the SLEDAI or BILAG scores.

The SLAQ is a patient-reported assessment of subjective disease activity in SLE that has been shown to correlate strongly (r = 0.62) with the SLAM-omitting laboratory items [26] and is considered to be the best measure of self-reported disease activity in the field. It also has the advantage of being the most cost effective way to track disease activity. Using a cutoff score of 13 points on the SLAQ results in a negative predictive value of 74% for clinically important disease activity [26] defined by a SLAM-omitting laboratory items score ≥3 points. In our study, 30 (77%) subjects had a SLAQ score that was less than 13 and the mean SLAQ score was 10.4. We did not observe an association between TLR-9/7 induced IFN-α production by pDCs and SLE disease activity. However, most of the patients studied here had low levels of disease activity and, because of the number of subjects included, our study may have lacked power to fully address this question.


Despite evidence supporting beneficial effects of HCQ treatment in SLE, few clinical studies have been performed to elucidate the specific mechanisms of action. Our data suggest that HCQ is of therapeutic benefit in SLE because its use is associated with impairment of the in vivo production of IFN-α and TNF-α by circulating pDCs upon stimulation of TLR-9 and TLR-7. Possibly its efficacy is limited because it more effectively inhibits TLR9 than TLR7 responses. If so, this would provide impetus for the development of additional TLR-7 and TLR-9 antagonists to use as possible treatment options for SLE.



British Isles Lupus Assessment Group


fluorescence-activated cell sorting








myeloid dendritic cells


natural killer


peripheral blood mononuclear cells


plasmacytoid dendritic cells


Systemic Lupus Activity Measure


Systemic Lupus Activity Questionnaire


systemic lupus erythematosus


Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index


toll like receptor


tumor necrosis factor.



We would like to thank Ms. Ruby Harrison for organizing the recruitment of study patients.

This research was supported by Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris and Monahan Foundation (KS); and by a Mary Kirkland Scholar Award, the Alliance for Lupus Research, the Harvey V. Berneking Living Trust, and the following NIH grants: P60-AR-053308 and R01 AR052300 (LAC), and OD000329 and R01AI40312 (to JMM, a recipient of the NIH Director's Pioneer Award Program, part of the NIH Roadmap for Medical Research, through grant DPI OD00329).

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Medicine, Division of Experimental Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California San Francisco, 1001 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA
Department of Medicine, Division of Internal Medicine, APHP, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Paris Diderot University, 46 rue Henri Huchard, Paris, 75018, France
Department of Medicine, Rosalind Russell Medical Research Center for Arthritis, University of California San Francisco, 374 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94117, USA


  1. Remmers EF, Plenge RM, Lee AT, Graham RR, Hom G, Behrens TW, de Bakker PI, Le JM, Lee HS, Batliwalla F, Li W, Masters SL, Booty MG, Carulli JP, Padyukov L, Alfredsson L, Klareskog L, Chen WV, Amos CI, Criswell LA, Seldin MF, Kastner DL, Gregersen PK: STAT4 and the risk of rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med. 2007, 357: 977-986. 10.1056/NEJMoa073003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Sigurdsson S, Nordmark G, Goring HH, Lindroos K, Wiman AC, Sturfelt G, Jonsen A, Rantapaa-Dahlqvist S, Moller B, Kere J, Koskenmies S, Widén E, Eloranta ML, Julkunen H, Kristjansdottir H, Steinsson K, Alm G, Rönnblom L, Syvänen AC: Polymorphisms in the tyrosine kinase 2 and interferon regulatory factor 5 genes are associated with systemic lupus erythematosus. Am J Hum Genet. 2005, 76: 528-537. 10.1086/428480.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kariuki SN, Niewold TB: Genetic regulation of serum cytokines in systemic lupus erythematosus. Transl Res. 2010, 155: 109-117. 10.1016/j.trsl.2009.08.012.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Siegal FP, Kadowaki N, Shodell M, Fitzgerald-Bocarsly PA, Shah K, Ho S, Antonenko S, Liu YJ: The nature of the principal type 1 interferon-producing cells in human blood. Science. 1999, 284: 1835-1837. 10.1126/science.284.5421.1835.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cella M, Jarrossay D, Facchetti F, Alebardi O, Nakajima H, Lanzavecchia A, Colonna M: Plasmacytoid monocytes migrate to inflamed lymph nodes and produce large amounts of type I interferon. Nat Med. 1999, 5: 919-923. 10.1038/11360.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kadowaki N, Ho S, Antonenko S, Malefyt RW, Kastelein RA, Bazan F, Liu YJ: Subsets of human dendritic cell precursors express different toll-like receptors and respond to different microbial antigens. J Exp Med. 2001, 194: 863-869. 10.1084/jem.194.6.863.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ito T, Amakawa R, Kaisho T, Hemmi H, Tajima K, Uehira K, Ozaki Y, Tomizawa H, Akira S, Fukuhara S: Interferon-alpha and interleukin-12 are induced differentially by Toll-like receptor 7 ligands in human blood dendritic cell subsets. J Exp Med. 2002, 195: 1507-1512. 10.1084/jem.20020207.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hoshino K, Sugiyama T, Matsumoto M, Tanaka T, Saito M, Hemmi H, Ohara O, Akira S, Kaisho T: IkappaB kinase-alpha is critical for interferon-alpha production induced by Toll-like receptors 7 and 9. Nature. 2006, 440: 949-953. 10.1038/nature04641.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ronnblom L, Alm GV: A pivotal role for the natural interferon alpha-producing cells (plasmacytoid dendritic cells) in the pathogenesis of lupus. J Exp Med. 2001, 194: F59-63. 10.1084/jem.194.12.f59.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Means TK, Latz E, Hayashi F, Murali MR, Golenbock DT, Luster AD: Human lupus autoantibody-DNA complexes activate DCs through cooperation of CD32 and TLR9. J Clin Invest. 2005, 115: 407-417.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Scheinecker C, Zwolfer B, Koller M, Manner G, Smolen JS: Alterations of dendritic cells in systemic lupus erythematosus: phenotypic and functional deficiencies. Arthritis Rheum. 2001, 44: 856-865. 10.1002/1529-0131(200104)44:4<856::AID-ANR142>3.0.CO;2-A.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Blomberg S, Eloranta ML, Magnusson M, Alm GV, Ronnblom L: Expression of the markers BDCA-2 and BDCA-4 and production of interferon-alpha by plasmacytoid dendritic cells in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2003, 48: 2524-2532. 10.1002/art.11225.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kwok SK, Lee JY, Park SH, Cho ML, Min SY, Kim HY, Cho YG: Dysfunctional interferon-alpha production by peripheral plasmacytoid dendritic cells upon Toll-like receptor-9 stimulation in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Res Ther. 2008, 10: R29-10.1186/ar2382.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. James JA, Kim-Howard XR, Bruner BF, Jonsson MK, McClain MT, Arbuckle MR, Walker C, Dennis GJ, Merrill JT, Harley JB: Hydroxychloroquine sulfate treatment is associated with later onset of systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2007, 16: 401-409. 10.1177/0961203307078579.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ruiz-Irastorza G, Egurbide MV, Pijoan JI, Garmendia M, Villar I, Martinez-Berriotxoa A, Erdozain JG, Aguirre C: Effect of antimalarials on thrombosis and survival in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2006, 15: 577-583. 10.1177/0961203306071872.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Costedoat-Chalumeau N, Amoura Z, Hulot JS, Lechat P, Piette JC: Hydroxychloroquine in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lancet. 2007, 369: 1257-1258.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Mullins JF, Watts FL, Wilson CJ: Plaquenil in the treatment of lupus erythematosus. JAMA. 1956, 161: 879-881. 10.1001/jama.1956.62970090020017k.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. A randomized study of the effect of withdrawing hydroxychloroquine sulfate in systemic lupus erythematosus. The Canadian Hydroxychloroquine Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1991, 324: 150-154.Google Scholar
  19. Macfarlane DE, Manzel L: Antagonism of immunostimulatory CpG-oligodeoxynucleotides by quinacrine, chloroquine, and structurally related compounds. J Immunol. 1998, 160: 1122-1131.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hacker H, Mischak H, Miethke T, Liptay S, Schmid R, Sparwasser T, Heeg K, Lipford GB, Wagner H: CpG-DNA-specific activation of antigen-presenting cells requires stress kinase activity and is preceded by non-specific endocytosis and endosomal maturation. Embo J. 1998, 17: 6230-6240. 10.1093/emboj/17.21.6230.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Leadbetter EA, Rifkin IR, Hohlbaum AM, Beaudette BC, Shlomchik MJ, Marshak-Rothstein A: Chromatin-IgG complexes activate B cells by dual engagement of IgM and Toll-like receptors. Nature. 2002, 416: 603-607. 10.1038/416603a.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Boule MW, Broughton C, Mackay F, Akira S, Marshak-Rothstein A, Rifkin IR: Toll-like receptor 9-dependent and -independent dendritic cell activation by chromatin-immunoglobulin G complexes. J Exp Med. 2004, 199: 1631-1640. 10.1084/jem.20031942.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lovgren T, Eloranta ML, Kastner B, Wahren-Herlenius M, Alm GV, Ronnblom L: Induction of interferon-alpha by immune complexes or liposomes containing systemic lupus erythematosus autoantigen- and Sjogren's syndrome autoantigen-associated RNA. Arthritis Rheum. 2006, 54: 1917-1927. 10.1002/art.21893.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Seligman VA, Suarez C, Lum R, Inda SE, Lin D, Li H, Olson JL, Seldin MF, Criswell LA: The Fcgamma receptor IIIA-158F allele is a major risk factor for the development of lupus nephritis among Caucasians but not non-Caucasians. Arthritis Rheum. 2001, 44: 618-625. 10.1002/1529-0131(200103)44:3<618::AID-ANR110>3.0.CO;2-R.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Tan EM, Cohen AS, Fries JF, Masi AT, McShane DJ, Rothfield NF, Schaller JG, Talal N, Winchester RJ: The 1982 revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1982, 25: 1271-1277. 10.1002/art.1780251101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Karlson EW, Daltroy LH, Rivest C, Ramsey-Goldman R, Wright EA, Partridge AJ, Liang MH, Fortin PR: Validation of a Systemic Lupus Activity Questionnaire (SLAQ) for population studies. Lupus. 2003, 12: 280-286. 10.1191/0961203303lu332oa.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Marshak-Rothstein A: Toll-like receptors in systemic autoimmune disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006, 6: 823-835. 10.1038/nri1957.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Postal M, Appenzeller S: The role of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus. Cytokine. 2011, 56: 537-543. 10.1016/j.cyto.2011.08.026.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Weckerle CE, Imbuka D, Franek BS, Kelly JA, Kumabe M, James JA, Moser KL, Harley JB, Niewold TB: Large scale analysis of tumor necrosis factor alpha levels in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2012.Google Scholar
  30. Piconi S, Parisotto S, Rizzardini G, Passerini S, Terzi R, Argenteri B, Meraviglia P, Capetti A, Biasin M, Trabattoni D, Clerici M: Hydroxychloroquine drastically reduces immune activation in HIV-infected, antiretroviral therapy-treated immunologic nonresponders. Blood. 2011, 118: 3263-3272. 10.1182/blood-2011-01-329060.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Farkas L, Beiske K, Lund-Johansen F, Brandtzaeg P, Jahnsen FL: Plasmacytoid dendritic cells (natural interferon- alpha/beta-producing cells) accumulate in cutaneous lupus erythematosus lesions. Am J Pathol. 2001, 159: 237-243. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)61689-6.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Costedoat-Chalumeau N, Amoura Z, Hulot JS, Hammoud HA, Aymard G, Cacoub P, Frances C, Wechsler B, Huong du LT, Ghillani P, Musset L, Lechat P, Piette JC: Low blood concentration of hydroxychloroquine is a marker for and predictor of disease exacerbations in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2006, 54: 3284-3290. 10.1002/art.22156.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Bae SC, Koh HK, Chang DK, Kim MH, Park JK, Kim SY: Reliability and validity of systemic lupus activity measure-revised (SLAM-R) for measuring clinical disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2001, 10: 405-409. 10.1191/096120301678646146.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Bombardier C, Gladman DD, Urowitz MB, Caron D, Chang CH: Derivation of the SLEDAI. A disease activity index for lupus patients. The Committee on Prognosis Studies in SLE. Arthritis Rheum. 1992, 35: 630-640. 10.1002/art.1780350606.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Hay EM, Bacon PA, Gordon C, Isenberg DA, Maddison P, Snaith ML, Symmons DP, Viner N, Zoma A: The BILAG index: a reliable and valid instrument for measuring clinical disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus. Q J Med. 1993, 86: 447-458.PubMedGoogle Scholar


© Sacre et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.