Skip to main content

Differential clinical efficacy of anti-CD4 monoclonal antibodies in rat adjuvant arthritis is paralleled by differential influence on NF-κB binding activity and TNF-α secretion of T cells


The aim of this study was to analyze the differential effects of three anti-CD4 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) (with distinct epitope specifities) in the treatment of rat adjuvant arthritis (AA) and on T-cell function and signal transduction. Rat AA was preventively treated by intraperitoneal injection of the anti-CD4 mAbs W3/25, OX35, and RIB5/2 (on days -1, 0, 3, and 6, i.e. 1 day before AA induction, on the day of induction [day 0], and thereafter). The effects on T-cell reactivity in vivo (delayed-type hypersensitivity), ex vivo (ConA-induced proliferation), and in vitro (mixed lymphocyte culture) were assessed. The in vitro effects of anti-CD4 preincubation on T-cell receptor (TCR)/CD3-induced cytokine production and signal transduction were also analyzed. While preventive treatment with OX35 and W3/25 significantly ameliorated AA from the onset, treatment with RIB5/2 even accelerated the onset of AA by approximately 2 days (day 10), and ameliorated the arthritis only in the late phase (day 27). Differential clinical effects at the onset of AA were paralleled by a differential influence of the mAbs on T-cell functions, i.e. in comparison with OX35 and W3/25, the 'accelerating' mAb RIB5/2 failed to increase the delayed-type hypersentivity (DTH) to Mycobacterium tuberculosis, increased the in vitro tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α secretion, and more strongly induced NF-κB binding activity after anti-CD4 preincubation and subsequent TCR/CD3-stimulation. Depending on their epitope specificity, different anti-CD4 mAbs differentially influence individual proinflammatory functions of T cells. This fine regulation may explain the differential efficacy in the treatment of AA and may contribute to the understanding of such treatments in other immunopathologies.


CD4+ T cells and their cytokine products play an important role in rheumatoid arthritis and experimental models of arthritis, therefore representing potential therapeutic targets [1]. A specific therapeutic approach is the direct targeting of CD4+ T cells by use of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against the CD4 coreceptor. Anti-CD4 mAbs induce either cell depletion [2] or functional inactivation of T cells [3, 4], although activation of T-cell functions has also been reported [5]. These contrasting effects may explain the variability in the clinical efficacy of different anti-CD4 mAbs in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, i.e. promising initial efficacy in open anti-CD4 trials [6, 7], subsequent disappointing double-blind clinical trials (reviewed in [8]), and, finally, a revival of the anti-CD4 treatment principle with new, humanized anti-CD4 mAbs [9, 10].

The focus of the present study was to analyze the effects of the anti-CD4 mAbs W3/25, OX35, and RIB5/2 in rat adjuvant arthritis (AA), a well-known, clearly CD4+ T-cell-dependent experimental arthritis model [1113]. These mAbs target different epitopes of the CD4 molecule and do not compete for CD4 binding [14]. They are equally effective in suppressing AA upon treatment of established disease [11, 12] (and authors own unpublished observations). In contrast, preventive treatment with the anti-CD4 mAbs W3/25, OX35, and RIB5/2 (on days -1, 0, 3, and 6, i.e. 1 day before AA induction, on the day of induction [day 0], and thereafter) had opposite effects in the induction phase of AA. In order to explain this differential efficacy, several parameters were analyzed.


For animals, arthritis model, antibodies, and affinity determination (surface plasmon resonance), see Supplementary material.

T-cell reactivity was measured in vivo by delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) and in vitro by proliferation assay or mixed lymphocyte culture, and cytokines were measured by bioassay or ELISA (see Supplementary material; for tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α [15]).

Cells were stimulated by preincubation with anti-CD4 mAbs and subsequent stimulation of T-cell receptors. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) was as described in the Supplementary material. For statistical analysis, we used the Mann–Whitney (U) test/Spearman rank correlation (P ≤ 0.05; see Supplementary material).


Clinical effects

Preventive treatment with the anti-CD4 mAbs W3/25 and OX35 led to a marked, significant suppression of the arthritis score from day 13 to 30 in comparison with PBS-treated animals (P ≤ 0.05; Fig. 1). In contrast, the anti-CD4 mAb RIB5/2 significantly accelerated the onset of the arthritis by approximately 2 days (P ≤ 0.01; days 11, 12; see Fig. 1), resulting in an aggravated clinical score on these days, and ameliorated clinical signs only from day 27 (P ≤ 0.05; see Fig. 1). The accelerating effect of the mAb RIB5/2 was reproduced in two additional treatment experiments, and this effect was observed despite a variable onset of AA in the PBS-treated animals (day 9 to 11); i.e. in all experiments, the onset of AA occurred 2 days earlier than in the controls. In order to identify potential mechanisms for these differential effects, the molecular properties of the mAbs and their influence on T-cell effector functions in vivo and in vitro were investigated. For the sake of simplicity, we refer to the mAb RIB5/2 as 'accelerating' (although this term is applicable only to the onset of AA) and the mAbs W3/25 and OX35 as 'ameliorating'.

Figure 1

Arthritis score after preventive treatment of rat adjuvant arthritis (AA) with various anti-CD4 mAbs or PBS (controls) (means ± SEM; n = 6 for all groups). Arrows show the days of treatment (days -1, 0, 3, 6). Treatment with W3/25 and OX35 significantly suppressed AA from day 13 until day 30. In contrast, RIB5/2 accelerated the onset of AA by 2 days and led to significant improvement only in the late phase (from day 27). **P ≤ 0.01, *P ≤ 0.05, in comparison with PBS-treated rats. One representative of three experiments is shown.

Affinity of the monoclonal antibodies

Calculation of the affinity constant (KA) resulted in comparable values for OX35 and RIB5/2 (see Supplementary Table 1). In contrast, the affinity of W3/25 was 50-fold that for the two other mAbs. While the association rate constants (kass) for all three mAbs were within the same order of magnitude, striking differences (up to 40-fold) were observed for the dissociation rate constants (kdiss). Thus, although differences in overall affinity did not match differential clinical efficacy, the accelerating mAb RIB5/2 displayed the highest kdiss.

Supplementary Table 1 Affinity data of the anti-CD4 mAb

T-cell reactivity

T-cell reactivity was investigated on day 13 of AA, i.e. when the clinical differences between the accelerating and ameliorating anti-CD4 mAbs were maximal.

In vivo

Compared to the PBS-treated control group, the ameliorating mAb OX35 induced a significant increase of the DTH in response to the arthritogen Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Supplementary Fig. 1). The other ameliorating anti-CD4 mAb, W3/25, also induced an increase, but statistical significance was not reached. In contrast, treatment with the accelerating anti-CD4 mAb, RIB5/2, had virtually no influence on the DTH.

Supplementary Figure 1

In vivo delayed-type hypersensitivity to Mycobacterium tuberculosis on day 13 after preventive treatment of AA, i.e. when the clinical differences between the accelerating and ameliorating anti-CD4 mAbs were maximal. The data are expressed as means ± SEM (n = 6 for all groups, one representative of three in vivo experiments) of the difference between the swelling of the left (mycobacterium-treated) and the right (PBS-treated) ears. *P ≤ 0.05 in comparison with PBS-treated rats.

In vitro

Upon stimulation with concanavalin A (ConA), total T cells from RIB5/2-treated animals showed lower proliferation rates than those from W3/25- or OX35-treated rats (Supplementary Fig. 2). In the mixed lymphocyte culture, RIB5/2 was also the most potent inhibitor of T-cell activation in the case of total T cells; however, this was not observed in purified CD4+ T cells (Supplementary Fig. 4).

Supplementary Figure 2

Concanavalin A (ConA) reactivity of total spleen T cells (day 13 of adjuvant arthritis) from rats preventively treated with anti-CD4 mAbs. Proliferation data from two individual animals of each treatment group are expressed as means ± SEM of triplicate cultures from one in vivo experiment. The corresponding arthritis score for the animals is shown below the graph.

Supplementary Figure 4

Mixed lymphocyte culture of total (a) and CD4+(b) spleen T cells from normal Lewis rats with different densities of allogeneic (Wistar–Prob) stimulator cells, supplemented with isotype controls (IgG1, IgG2a), or the anti-CD4 mAbs W3/25, OX35, and RIB5/2 at 1 μg/ml. Data are expressed as means ± SEM of the relative absorbance from three independent experiments (triplicates in each experiment), normalized to the absorbance of PBS-treated cultures (=100%). *P ≤ 0.05 in comparison with the respective isotype control, #P ≤ 0.05 in comparison with W3/25, §P ≤ 0.05 in comparison with OX35.

Production of TNF-α after anti-CD4 preincubation

To simulate the preventive therapeutic application in AA, i.e. the activation of CD4+ T cells in the presence of anti-CD4 mAbs, purified spleen CD4+ T cells were incubated with anti-CD4 mAb and, after cross-linking, stimulated with plate-bound anti-T-cell-receptor (TCR) α/β mAb (so called anti-CD4 preincubation).

Interestingly, anti-CD4 preincubation with the accelerating anti-CD4 mAb RIB5/2 led to a significantly higher TNF-α secretion, in comparison both with the isotype control and with the two other anti-CD4 mAbs, W3/25 and OX35 (Fig. 2). Differential induction of TNF-α by RIB5/2 was also seen after CD4-cross-linking on the CD4+ T-cell clone A2b or on TCR-stimulated CD4+ T-cell blasts (both data sets not shown). For IFN-γ, IL-10, and IL-4, see Supplementary material.

Figure 2

Production of TNF-α by spleen CD4+ T cells after anti-CD4 preincubation, as measured by bioassay (means ± SEM of three experiments; pooled T cells from three normal rats each). The accelerating mAb, RIB5/2, induced a significantly stronger increase of secreted TNF-α than the other mAbs. Specificity was ensured by adding a neutralizing anti-TNF-α mAb to supernatants from RIB5/2-treated cultures. *P ≤ 0.05 in comparison with the isotype control, #P ≤ 0.05 in comparison with W3/25, §P ≤ 0.05 in comparison with OX35.

Signal transduction

Because the three anti-CD4 mAbs recognize distinct epitopes of the CD4 molecule, which is involved in signaling cascades, the influence of these mAbs on early signaling events was also investigated. No influence at all of the anti-CD4 mAbs was found for calcium influx (primary CD4+ spleen T cells), phosphorylation of src-homology-domain-containing protein (Shc), or the translocation of nuclear factor of activated T cells (NF-AT) (both primary CD4+ T cells and clone A2b), and the activity of p59fyn (A2b). The activity of the CD4-associated p56lck after CD4 cross-linking (A2b) was comparably increased by all three anti-CD4 mAbs (all the data not shown).

The binding activities of the transcription factors activator protein-1 (AP-1) and NF-κB were determined in nuclear extracts of spleen CD4+ T cells preincubated with anti-CD4 mAbs. The activity of AP-1 was slightly but significantly decreased by pretreatment with all three anti-CD4 mAbs, to a similar degree (Fig. 3). Interestingly, preincubation with the accelerating anti-CD4 mAb, RIB5/2, induced a significantly higher binding activity of NF-κB than did preincubation with the ameliorating W3/25 and OX35, which only moderately increased the NF-κB binding activity (see Fig. 3).

Figure 3

Electromobility shift assay (EMSA) of nuclear extracts from CD4+ T cells (preincubated with anti-CD4 mAbs or stimulated with PMA/ionomycin) for AP-1 (a) and NF-κB (b). One representative phosphoimage of three independent experiments is shown (upper panels). Quantification of the bands of all three experiments is shown below (means ± SEM). All three anti-CD4 mAbs slightly decreased the AP-1 activity, and RIB5/2 induced a profound, significant increase of NF-κB activity. *P ≤ 0.05 in comparison with the isotype control, #P ≤ 0.05 in comparison with W3/25, §P ≤ 0.05 in comparison with OX35, &P ≤ 0.05 in comparison with RIB5/2.


The present study shows differential clinical efficacy of three anti-CD4 mAbs in the preventive treatment of AA. The lack of differential clinical efficacy of the same mAbs in established AA may be explained by a completely divergent immunological constellation in connection with the known differential effects of anti-CD4 mAbs on naive and memory T cells. Although successful treatment with anti-CD4 mAbs has been achieved in various arthritis models [12, 1618], there is no evidence for a differential efficacy of anti-CD4 mAbs in arthritis models to date. Thus, this finding may represent the experimental counterpart of the conflicting results observed thus far in studies of human rheumatoid arthritis [6, 8, 10].

Role of molecular features of the antibodies

Isotype, affinity, and epitope

In contrast to a reported study of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis [19], the present study did not confirm a role for the mAb isotype in AA, as the isotypes of the three anti-CD4 mAbs did not match their differential preventive effects in AA. The ameliorating mAb W3/25 had a very high affinity, as previously reported [20], whereas the affinity of the other ameliorating mAb, OX35, was comparable to that of the accelerating mAb, RIB5/2. On the other hand, a contribution of the strikingly higher kdiss of the mAb RIB5/2 to its differential clinical effects cannot be excluded, in analogy to high and low kdiss for agonistic and antagonistic TCR-peptides, respectively [21]. In spite of these considerations, recognition of different epitopes by the mAbs [14], with distinct functional consequences for the target cells, remains the most likely explanation for their differential clinical efficacy [22]. While the binding sites of W3/25 and OX35 are situated in the C´–C´´ region of domain D1 and the B–C region of domain D2 of the CD4 molecule, respectively [23], we could roughly localize the epitope of RIB5/2 in the F–G region of domain D1, as demonstrated by effective competition with the mAb OX65 (data not shown), known to bind this region of the CD4 molecule [23]. Binding of anti-CD4 mAbs to separate epitopes of the CD4 molecule could result in differential effects on T-cell functions by inducing distinct conformational changes of the extracellular and the intracellular parts of the CD4, resulting in modified interaction with other signaling molecules, as has been discussed recently with regard to the aspartate receptor [24].

Influence on T-cell reactivity

In the present study, the ameliorating anti-CD4 mAbs W3/25 and OX35 (but not the accelerating mAb, RIB5/2) numerically/significantly increased the DTH to the arthritogen M. tuberculosis. In the total T-cell population, two of the three anti-CD4 mAbs (and in purified CD4+ T cells, all three anti-CD4 mAbs) increased the in vitro reactivity to ConA. In the case of CD4+ T cells, this increased reactivity was negatively correlated with the clinical score of individual animals. The successful mode of action of anti-CD4 mAbs in arthritides may therefore be based on increasing the reactivity of a subpopulation of regulatory T cells, an interpretation that is supported by i) the increase of T-cell reactivity in some patients successfully treated with anti-CD4 mAbs [6], ii) an increased DTH to antigens like tetanus toxoid in less active versus active rheumatoid arthritis [25], iii) the reduced responsiveness to poly-specific stimulation of spleen cells from rats with acute AA in comparison with healthy animals [26], and iv) the almost complete restoration of T-cell responsiveness upon disease resolution/transition into the chronic phase [27].

Production of TNF-α in vitro

The accelerating mAb RIB5/2 significantly increased the secretion of TNF-α, as observed in primary CD4+ T cells both upon anti-CD4 preincubation and upon CD4 cross-linking after stimulation with TCR (see Fig. 2). In view of the known local and systemic importance of TNF-α in experimental AA [2830] and human rheumatoid arthritis [31], this effect may contribute to the acceleration of the onset of AA after pretreatment with the mAb RIB5/2. This finding may be important for the understanding of pathogenesis in arthritis despite predominant production of TNF-α by macrophages/monocytes (reviewed in [32]), since TNF-α production by T cells has been demonstrated both in the synovial membrane [33] and in lymphoid organs (authors own unpublished observations).

Signal transduction in vitro

Since TNF-α production is known to be regulated predominantly by NF-κB [34], it was revealing that the accelerating mAb, RIB5/2, besides inducing TNF-α secretion, also strongly upregulated NF-κB binding activity. This was especially striking because binding of another major transcription factor involved in T-cell activation, AP-1 [35], was even slightly downregulated by the anti-CD4 mAbs, in line with recently published data in murine cells [36]. These findings in our study support, again, the notion that NF-κB-mediated upregulation of TNF-α secretion (or vice versa) may contribute to the acceleration of disease onset in AA upon preventive treatment with RIB5/2.

The differential clinical efficacy of anti-CD4 mAbs is not restricted to arthritis but is also observed in transplantation models [37]. However, while preventive treatment with the anti-CD4 mAb RIB5/2 leads to an acceleration of AA, it is a very effective anti-CD4 mAb for the induction of tolerance in transplantation models [14, 37]. This indicates that clinical efficacy (and its time course) may depend on the actual immunological constellation and that a given anti-CD4 mAb may have beneficial effects only in particular pathologies and/or stages of disease. From the results of the present study, it is evident that the individual features and effects of a particular anti-CD4 mAb have to be assessed before treatment trials in order to predict its clinical efficacy in vivo. This may require several in vivo, ex vivo, or in vitro assays of T-cell function in order to reveal subtle differences between anti-CD4 mAbs. Experimental models such as transgenic mice expressing human but not mouse CD4 may make it possible to address such questions in the future [38]. Recently, preclinical testing has been exploited in murine CD4-knockout/human CD4-transgenic (huCD4-transgenic) systems to assess the immunological effects of a particular anti-human-CD4 mAb in various disease models [39, 40]. Analogous preclinical testing may prove useful also for the comparison of anti-human-CD4 mAbs targeting distinct epitopes.

Supplementary material

Supplementary methods

Animals and antibodies

Female Lewis rats (8–16 weeks old; body weight 150–220 g) were obtained from Charles River (Sulzfeld, Germany) or from the Medical Experimental Center of the University of Leipzig. Female inbred Wistar–Prob rats (12–16 weeks old) were bred in the Medical Experimental Center. The animals were kept under standard conditions, two per cage, with food and water ad libitum and a 12 h/12 h light/dark cycle.

The mouse anti-rat-CD4 mAbs W3/25, OX35, and RIB5/2 (IgG1, IgG2a, and IgG2a, respectively) were used as ascites fluid for in vivo treatment or purified on Protein A–sepharose (for OX35 and RIB5/2) or Protein G–sepharose (for W3/25) columns (Pharmacia, Freiburg, Germany) for all in vitro experiments. The maximal endo-toxin content of the ascites was 58 IU/ml (W3/25), 17 IU/ml (RIB5/2), and 5 IU/ml (OX35); the final endotoxin concentrations for in vitro experiments were less than 1 IU/ml. For flow cytometry, directly FITC-labeled W3/25 and OX35 (gifts from P Kühnlein, Institute of Virology, University of Würzburg), and the mAbs G4.18 (anti-CD3, Pharmingen, Hamburg, Germany), OX8 (anti-CD8, Serotec, Oxford; UK), OX81 (anti-IL4, Pharmingen), A5-4 (anti-IL-10, Pharmingen), and DB-1 (anti-IFN-γ, Serotec) were used. MAbs MOPC21 (IgG1), UPC10 (IgG2a, both from Sigma, Deisenhofen, Germany) and mouse anti-glucose-oxidase FITC/phycoerythrin (PE) (IgG1, IgG2a, Dako, Hamburg Germany) served as isotype-matched control antibodies. The anti-TCRα/β mAb R73 was a kind gift of T Hünig (Institute of Virology, University of Würzburg). For sandwich ELISA analysis of cytokine concentrations, the following antibodies were used: DB-1 (anti-IFN-γ), biotinylated rabbit anti-rat IFN-γ (both Biosource, Ratingen, Germany); rabbit anti-rat IL-2, biotinylated A38-3 (anti-IL-2, both Pharmingen), A5-7, biotinylated A5-6 (both anti-IL-10, Pharmingen); OX81 (anti-IL-4), biotinylated rabbit anti-rat IL-4 (Biosource).


The mAbs were bound to a BIAcore surface via goat anti-mouse Ig-Fc and incubated with various concentrations of soluble rat CD4 (a gift of N Barclay, Oxford, UK). The data were analyzed in accordance with the method of Karlsson et al.[S1], and the association rate constant kass, the dissociation rate constant kdiss, and the affinity constant KA (kass/kdiss) were calculated.

Adjuvant arthritis and anti-CD4 treatment

Lewis rats (8–12 weeks old) were given 0.5 mg heat-inactivated M. tuberculosis (Difco, Detroit, MI, USA) in 100 μl paraffin oil (Riedel de Haën, Seelze, Germany), which was injected intradermally into the base of the tail. For preventive treatment, the rats (n = 6 in each group) received 3 mg of RIB5/2, 3 mg of W3/25, or 2 mg of OX35 intraperitoneally (corresponding to 17.1 and 11.4 mg/kg, respectively, on the basis of a mean body weight of 175 g) on days -1, 0, 3, and 6, i.e. 1 day before AA induction, on the day of induction (day 0), and thereafter. The lower dose of OX35 (2 mg) was chosen on the basis of previous experiments demonstrating its high clinical efficacy in AA [S2]. The control group received PBS [S3]. In addition, preventive treatment with an isotype-matched mAb from birth had shown no effect on rat AA in a previous study [S3].

For determination of the arthritis score, each paw was graded according to the extent of erythema and edema of the periarticular tissue, on a scale of 0–4, where 0=no inflammation, 1=unequivocal inflammation of one paw joint, 2=unequivocal inflammation of at least two paw joints or moderate inflammation of one paw joint, 3=severe inflammation of one or more paw joints, and 4=maximum inflammation of one or more paw joints [S4, S5]. The scores were then added to obtain the total score (maximal possible score of 16 for each animal).

Flow cytometry

For determination of cell depletion and modulation of surface molecules, blood samples (100 μl) were taken via retro-orbital puncture on day 8 or day 13 after induction of AA. Whole-blood cells were stained with saturating amounts of directly FITC-labeled W3/25, OX35, G4.18, OX8, or respective isotype, followed by erythrocyte lysis. Ten thousand events were analyzed using an Epics XL flow cytometer (Coulter, Krefeld, Germany) and the results displayed as histograms.

Delayed-type hypersensitivity

To assess the DTH, either 10 μg of the arthritogen M. tuberculosis in 50 μl PBS, or 50 μl PBS only, were injected intradermally into the pinna of the left or the right ear, respectively, on day 13 after induction of AA. One day after injection, the swelling of the ears was determined with a gauge (Hahn & Kolb, Stuttgart, Germany). Swelling was expressed as the difference (mm) between the thickness of the left and the right ear.

T-cell reactivity in vitro

T cells were purified from spleens as described elsewhere [S6]. Briefly, the spleens were passed through a stainless steel sieve and the resulting suspension was centrifuged through Lymphoprep (Pharmacia). Cells contained in the interphase were then washed twice and loaded onto a 10-ml syringe with 1.2 g nylon wool (Polyscience, Eppelheim, Germany). After incubation for 1 hour at 37°C, 5% CO2, the cells were eluted with RPMI 1640/GlutaMaxI con- taining 10% FCS, 15 mM HEPES, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (thereafter called R10F, all from GIBCO-BRL, Eggenstein, Germany). The resulting total T-cell suspension was ≥ 95% CD3+, as evaluated by flow cytometry. Either purified total T cells were directly used for proliferation assays, or CD4+ T cells were first negatively purified by adding 5 μg/1×107 cells OX8 mAb for 30 min on ice and, after washing, 75 μl Dynabeads-M450 coupled to goat anti-mouse IgG (Dynal, Hamburg, Germany). The suspension was again incubated for 30 min on ice and then separated by a magnetic particle concentrator (MPC®, Dynal). The purity of CD4+ T-cell populations was always ≥ 95%, as assessed by flow cytometry. For enrichment of dendritic cells (DC), suspensions of spleen cells from healthy rats were subjected to an overnight adhesion step on Petri dishes (Falcon®, Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany) and then centrifuged through 2 ml of a 14.5% metrizamide solution (Sigma) in R10F. DC were then irradiated with 15 Gy to prevent their proliferation in subsequent assays. For proliferation assays, 1 × 105 purified total or CD4+ spleen T cells per well of 96-well round-bottom plates were incubated with 1 × 104 DC per well and 1 μg/ml ConA (Sigma) for 72 hours. Then 1 μCi/well 3H-thymidine (Amersham-Buchler, Braunschweig, Germany) was added. After an additional incubation for 16 hours, cells were harvested onto fiber filters and cell-bound radioactivity was measured by β-scintillation counting (Matrix96®, Canberra Packard, Dreieich, Germany).

Primary allogeneic mixed lymphocyte culture

Total T cells or purified CD4+ T cells from spleens of healthy Lewis rats, and allogeneic DC from spleens of Wistar–Prob rats, were prepared as described above. Total or CD4+ T cells were seeded at 4 × 105 cells per well in 96-well flat-bottom plates, together with 1, 2, or 4 × 104 DC per well and 1, 5, or 10 μg/ml of the respective purified anti-CD4 mAb (or isotype control mAbs). After incubation for 72 hours (37°C, 5% CO2), bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) was added and incubation was continued for an additional 16 hours. The proliferation was determined by a BrdU cell-proliferation ELISA (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany) in accordance with the supplier's recommendations.

Cell stimulation

For anti-CD4 preincubation, spleen CD4+ T cells were incubated with the anti-CD4 mAbs or isotype control mAbs (10 μg per 1 × 107 cells) for 30 min at 4°C and washed once. The bound mAbs were then cross-linked with goat anti-mouse IgG (Jackson Lab, 20 μg/1 × 107 cells) for 1 hour at 37°C. After washing, the cells (1 × 106 per ml and per well) were seeded in 24-well plates previously coated with R73 and harvested after 24 and 48 hours.

Cytokine assays

Anti-CD4-preincubated cells were washed, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS, permeabilized (0.5% saponin in PBS, 1% FCS, 0.01% NaN3; for this step, supplemented with 10% rat serum), and incubated with 1 μg anti-IFN-γ FITC, anti-IL-4 PE, anti-IL-10 PE, or directly labeled isotype-control mAbs for 30 min at 4°C. FACS analysis was performed using a FACScan® flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson).

Detection of TNF-α was performed using a bioassay based on the lysis of the WEHI164/13 cell line after exposure to TNF-α. Assay specificity was ensured by adding a neutralizing mAb to rat TNF-α (100 μg/ml; clone 45418.111; R&D Systems, Wiesbaden, Germany).

Culture supernatants were analyzed for IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-4, and IL-10 by sandwich ELISA with the above-mentioned capture and detection antibodies. Recombinant cytokine standards were as follows: IFN-γ (Laboserv), IL-2, IL-10, and IL-4 (Pharmingen); range for IFN-γ, IL-2, and IL-10 was 39–5000 pg/ml; range for IL-4 was 9.85–1250 pg/ml. Cytokine concentrations in the culture supernatants were calculated from a standard curve using the software EasyFit (SLT, Crailsheim, Germany).

Electrophoretic mobility shift assays

Purified spleen CD4+ T cells were preincubated with the anti-CD4 mAbs as above and then either stimulated on anti-CD3 mAb-precoated 6-well plates (1 × 107 cells per well) or with a combination of phorbol myristoyl acetate (PMA; 10 ng/ml) and ionomycin (250 ng/ml) for 4 hours at 37°C. After stimulation, the cells were washed once with PBS and microcentrifuged (10,000 × g) at 4°C for 1 min. The pellet was resuspended in 400 μl ice-cold buffer A (10 mM HEPES, 10 mM KCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM EGTA, 0.5 mM PMSF, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and 1 mM Na3VO4) and placed on ice for 15 min. Subsequently, 25 μl of a 10% Nonidet P-40 solution (Boehringer Mannheim) were added to the sample and the cells were homogenized by vortexing for 30 s followed by microcentrifugation for 1 min. The nuclear pellets were resuspended in 50 μl of buffer B (20 mM HEPES, 400 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM EGTA, 2 mM PMSF, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and 1 mM Na3VO4) and shaken for 15 min at 4°C. After microcentrifugation for 5 min at 4°C, the supernatants were aliquoted and stored at -70°C until further use. The nuclear extracts (10 μg total protein) were than incubated with 2 × 108 cpm of 32P-labeled, double-stranded oligonucleotide probe (sense strand only; AP-1: 5'-CGC TTG ATG AGT CAG CCG GAA-3' ; NF-κB: 5'-AGT TGA GGG GAC TTT CCC AGG C-3' ; both from Promega, Mannheim, Germany; NF-AT: 5'-CGC CCA AAG AGG AAA ATT TGT TTC ATA-3' ; Santa Cruz, Heidelberg, Germany) in 25 μl binding buffer (1 M Tris, 1 M boric acid, 0.02 M EDTA, 5% glycerol) supplemented with poly [dI-dC] (0.16 mg/ml Pharmacia) and 2 mM dithiothreitol. The samples were separated on a 4% polyacrylamide gel at 200 V. After scanning in a phosphor imager (BAS-1000, Fuij Photo Film Co. Ltd, Japan), the bands were quantified using the PCBAS 2.09g software (Fuij Photo Film Co. Ltd).


Differences between experimental groups were evaluated with the two-tailed nonparametric Mann–Whitney (U) test. The Spearman rank correlation test was used to verify whether the ex vivo  3H-thymidine uptake of CD4+ T cells correlated with the arthritis score of individual rats. Statistical significance was accepted at P ≤ 0.05.

Supplementary results

T-cell reactivity in vitro

Total T cells and CD4+ T cells from spleens of individual rats (day 13 of AA) were stimulated in vitro with ConA. The in vitro proliferation rates of total T cells from OX35- and W3/25-treated animals in response to polyspecific stimulation with ConA were higher than those of PBS-treated rats, while T cells of the RIB5/2-treated rats showed proliferation rates similar to those of T cells from PBS-treated animals (Supplementary Fig. 2). ConA stimulation of CD4+ T cells resulted in generally lower proliferation rates than those of total T cells in PBS-treated rats. However, the values of CD4+ T cells from individual, anti-CD4-treated animals were always higher than those of the PBS-treated control group (Supplementary Fig. 3a). There was a highly significant negative correlation between the degree of the ConA-induced proliferation of CD4+ spleen T cells and the severity of the arthritis score, i.e. the lower the arthritis score, the higher the proliferation rate (Supplementary Fig. 3b).

Supplementary Figure 3

Concanavalin A (ConA) reactivity (a) of CD4+ spleen T cells (day 13 of adjuvant arthritis) from preventively treated rats with anti-CD4 mAbs. Proliferation data from two individual animals of each group are expressed as means ± SEM of triplicate cultures. The corresponding arthritis score for the animals is shown in the middle. The correlation between reactivity to ConA and the severity of arthritis is shown in (b). Normals = normal, untreated rats.

Mixed lymphocyte culture

In these experiments, the inhibitory potency of the anti-CD4 mAbs on the mixed lymphocyte culture, an equivalent of a transplant rejection, was investigated as a model for MHC-dependent T-cell activation. The anti-CD4 mAbs moderately inhibited the proliferation of total spleen T cells, depending on the stimulator cell concentration (Supplementary Fig. 4a). The accelerating mAb RIB5/2 led to significant inhibition at all concentrations of mAb (1, 5, and 10 μg/ml; only 1 μg/ml is shown in Supplementary Fig. 4a) and DC, whereas the other two anti-CD4 mAbs significantly inhibited the proliferation only in some cases. Furthermore, RIB5/2 inhibited the proliferation to a statistically significant degree at 1 μg/ml and 2 × 104 DC/well more strongly than both W3/25 and OX35. Thus, these differential results (inversely) match the differential clinical efficacy seen with the three mAbs.

The possibility that CD8+ T cells would mask the inhibitory potency of the anti-CD4 mAbs on the proliferation of CD4+ T cells in a total T-cell population was excluded by using purified CD4+ T cells. They showed a clearer inhibition of their proliferation rates (50 to 80% in comparison with the isotype) when used as responder cells. However, in contrast to the total T-cell population, there was no significant difference in the inhibitory potency among the three anti-CD4 mAbs (Supplementary Fig. 4b).

Depletion and modulation in peripheral blood in vivo

In order to characterize the depleting and modulating capacity of the three mAbs, FACS of peripheral blood mononu-clear cells was performed on days 8 and 13 of AA (Supplementary Table 2A,B). Two different anti-CD4 mAbs (W3/25 and OX35, which do not compete for CD4 binding) were employed to differentiate coating with therapeutic mAb from depletion of CD4+ T cells/CD4-modulation.

Supplementary Table 2 Cytofluorometric analyses of peripheral blood mononuclear cells on day 8 (A) and day 13 (B) of anti-CD4 treatment (data from one representative of three in vivo experiments).
Treatment with W3/25

After treatment with W3/25, the percentage and/or MFI (mean fluorescence intensity) of CD3+ cells in the peripheral blood on days 8 and 13 was numerically lower than in the PBS-treated control group, resulting in a significantly lower MFI on day 13 (note: the fact that on day 8 only two animals of the W3/25-treated group were investigated likely prevented statistical significance). Furthermore, a decrease of CD4+ cells was observed when the cells were stained with OX35 (more prominent on day 13; see Supplementary Table 2B). After ex vivo staining with W3/25 – the mAb also used for treatment – only 7% (day 8) and 28% (day 13) of the peripheral blood mononuclear cells were CD4+. This fact, and the positive staining with an anti-mouse IgG on days 8 and 13 (18% and 9%, respectively), showed that the therapeutic anti-CD4 mAb was present on the cells as long as 7 days after the last injection of the mAb. After treatment with W3/25, the percentage of CD8+ cells did not show any significant changes on days 8 or 13; however, the MFI for CD8 on day 13 was significantly decreased (see Supplementary Table 2B).

Therefore, the anti-CD4 mAb W3/25 induced only weak depletion of CD4+ cells, as indicated by unchanged percentages of CD8+ cells. In addition, there was modulation of the CD4 and co-modulation of the CD3 surface molecules and indirect modulation of the CD8 molecule (see Supplementary Table 2B). The anti-CD4 mAb W3/25 therefore represented a weakly depleting, but modulating antibody.

Treatment with OX35

In the peripheral blood of OX35-treated rats, the percentage of CD3+ cells was significantly lower than in PBS-treated animals (see Supplementary Table 2A,B). The percentage of CD4+ cells in the OX35-treated group was also significantly lower than that of the PBS control, both upon staining with W3/25 and OX35 (see Supplementary Table 2A,B). The therapeutically applied OX35 was no longer present on the cells at this stage, as demonstrated by negative staining for mouse IgG. The percentage of CD8+ cells of OX35-treated rats was either significantly or numerically increased compared to the PBS-treated control on day 8 or 13, respectively, whereas the MFI of the CD8 molecule was significantly decreased on both days.

In comparison with W3/25, the mAb OX35 induced a clearer depletion of CD4+ cells of the peripheral blood, as indicated by a significant increase in the percentage of CD8+ cells. In addition, the mAb OX35 induced CD4-modulation and CD3-co-modulation, as shown by a profound decrease of CD4+ cells and a decrease of the MFI for CD4. Thus, OX35 represented a depleting and modulating antibody.

Treatment with RIB5/2

RIB5/2 also induced a significant reduction of CD3+ cells in comparison with the PBS group (see Supplementary Table 2A,B). The percentage of CD4+ cells was also significantly decreased on days 8 and 13. In contrast, there was a significant increase of CD8+ cells in the periphery of RIB5/2-treated rats in comparison with the PBS-treated control (see Supplementary Table 2A,B). Similarly to the findings for mAb OX35, mAb RIB5/2 induced T-cell depletion and CD4 modulation; however, the degree of peripheral T-cell depletion was stronger than in the case of OX35.

Thus, since both ameliorating and accelerating mAbs (OX35 and RIB5/2) depleted CD4+ T cells from peripheral blood, and since all three mAbs were modulating, there was no apparent match of these parameters with the clinical efficacy.

Cytokine production after anti-CD4-preincubation


Intracellular staining of cells preincubated with anti-CD4 mAbs or isotype controls showed a uniformly high expression for IFN-γ (Supplementary Fig. 5a,b; between 80% and 100% positive cells; MFI approximately 30). There were no differences between the anti-CD4 mAb-treated or isotype-treated cultures for the concentration of IFN-γ in the supernatant (Supplementary Fig. 5c).

Supplementary Figure 5

Production of IFN-γ (a, b, c), IL-4 (d, e, f), and IL-10 (g, h, i) by spleen CD4+ T cells after anti-CD4-preincubation. Percentage of cytokine-positive cells (upper panels), their mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) after intracellular staining (middle panels), and secretion of the cytokine into cell culture supernatant as measured by ELISA (lower panels), shown as means ± SEM of three independent experiments (triplicate determinations in pooled cells from three normal rats in each experiment). *P ≤ 0.05 in comparison with isotype control, #P ≤ 0.05 in comparison with W3/25, §P ≤ 0.05 in comparison with OX35, &P ≤ 0.05 in comparison with RIB5/2. For key to bars, see Supplementary Figure 4.


The anti-CD4 mAb W3/25 induced a significantly higher percentage of IL-4-positive cells at 24 and 48 hours than did the isotype control (Supplementary Fig. 5d); the MFI was also significantly higher in comparison with OX35 and RIB5/2 (Supplementary Fig. 5e). In contrast, there were no significant differences of the IL-4 concentration in the supernatant of the cultures (Supplementary Fig. 5f). This observation may be attributable to a delayed secretion of IL-4 or consumption of the cytokine during culture.


At 24 h, a numerical increase of the percentage of IL-10-positive cells could be detected after preincubation with the ameliorating mAb W3/25 and the accelerating mAb RIB5/2, whereas the other ameliorating mAb, OX35, induced a significant increase (Supplementary Fig. 5g). This increase was no longer observed at 48 h (Supplementary Fig. 5g). In contrast, the MFI for IL-10 was increased both 24 h and 48 h after pretreatment with anti-CD4 mAbs. At 24 h, only the increase induced by the mAb OX35 was significant, but at 48 h all three mAbs induced a significant increase of the MFI (Supplementary Fig. 5h). Preincubation with all anti-CD4 mAbs induced a significantly higher secretion of IL-10 than did the isotype control, not only after 24 h, but also after 48 hours (the latter increase did not reach statistical significance in the case of OX35). None of the parameters, however, showed significant differences among the three different anti-CD4 mAbs (Supplementary Fig. 5i).

Supplementary discussion

Depleting/modulating capacity

The use of nondepleting anti-CD4 mAbs for treatment of human rheumatoid arthritis is being discussed at present; such treatment would be intended to influence the reactivity of CD4+ T cells, rather than remove them completely (particularly since depletion may induce transient immunodeficiency). In vivo, the depleting and modulating capacities of the three anti-CD4 mAbs were different. Whereas W3/25 was a weakly depleting, but clearly modulating, mAb, RIB5/2 and OX35 were moderately or strongly depleting and modulating mAbs, respectively; this pattern did not match the treatment effects of the three mAbs. In the present study, CD4+ T-cell depletion was assessed only in the peripheral blood, the compartment most easily accessible also in humans. Because depletion/modulation in peripheral blood may differ from that in other compartments (e.g. lymphoid organs), the use of the terms 'depleting' or 'nondepleting' has to be restricted to the blood. In the case of the mAbs W3/25 and OX35, however, studies with marked, antibody-coated cells indicate a redistribution of the cells from lymphoid organs to the liver, possibly including phagocytosis and depletion of the opsonized 'cells' by liver macrophages (unpublished observations). Contrasting earlier findings concerning the depleting capacity of the mAb RIB5/2 [S7, S8] may be attributable to different time points of investigation, different amounts of injected mAb or number of therapeutic injections, and different experimental models (personal communication, Dr M Lehmann, University of Rostock).

T-cell reactivity in vitro

Differential effects of the three anti-CD4 mAbs on the mixed lymphocyte culture were noted only occasionally, especially with total T cells as responders. The accelerating mAb RIB5/2 was again more effective. The observation of differential effects only with total T cells, but not in CD4+ T cells, indicates a differential contribution of the CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell subpopulation and suggests that interactions between CD4+ and CD8+ T cells [S9] are critical for T-cell activation and the effects of anti-CD4 mAbs on this process.

Cytokine secretion in vitro

Whereas IFN-γ secretion was completely unaffected by anti-CD4 preincubation and IL-4 was only increased by the mAb W3/25 (as previously reported; [S10]), IL-10 secretion was strikingly induced by all three anti-CD4 mAbs. At least in the case of the ameliorating mAbs W3/25 and OX35, this effect is compatible with the anti-inflammatory role of IL-10 in arthritis [S11, S12] and has been reported also after anti-CD4 therapy in transplantation [S13]. The fact that the total number of IFN-γ-positive and IL-4-/IL-10-positive T cells exceeds 100% indicates the presence of TH0 cells in this particular experimental system.



rat adjuvant arthritis


activator protein-1


concanavalin A


dendritic cells


delayed-type hypersensitivity


enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay




fetal calf serum


fluorescein isothiocyanate


N-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazine-N'-(2-ethanesulfonic acid)






affinity constant


association rate constant


dissociation rate constant


monoclonal antibody


mean fluorescence intensity


major histocompatibility complex


nuclear factor of activated T cells


phosphate-buffered saline




phorbol myristoyl acetate


phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride


Roswell Park Memorial Institute [medium]


standard error of the mean




tumor necrosis factor


T-cell receptor.


  1. 1.

    Kinne RW, Palombo-Kinne E, Emmrich F: T-cells in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis villains or accomplices?. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1997, 1360: 109-141. 10.1016/S0925-4439(96)00079-8.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Moreland LW, Pratt PW, Bucy RP, Jackson BS, Feldman JW, Koopman WJ: Treatment of refractory rheumatoid arthritis with a chimeric anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody. Long-term fol-lowup of CD4+ T cell counts. Arthritis Rheum. 1994, 37: 834-838.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Tsygankov AY, Bröker BM, Guse AH, Meinke U, Roth E, Ross-mann C, Emmrich F: Preincubation with anti-CD4 influences activation of human T cells by subsequent co-cross-linking of CD4 with CD3. J Leukoc Biol. 1993, 54: 430-438.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Jabado N, Pallier A, Le Deist F, Bernard F, Fischer A, Hivroz C: CD4 ligands inhibit the formation of multifunctional transduc-tion complexes involved in T cell activation. J Immunol. 1997, 158: 94-103.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Carrel S, Moretta A, Pantaleo G, Tambussi G, Isler P, Perussia B, Cerottini JC: Stimulation and proliferation of CD4+ peripheral blood T lymphocytes induced by an anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody. Eur J Immunol. 1988, 18: 333-339.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Horneff G, Burmester GR, Emmrich F, Kalden JR: Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with an anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody. Arthritis Rheum. 1991, 34: 129-140.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Herzog C, Walker C, Müller W, Rieber P, Reiter C, Riethmüller G, Wassmer P, Stockinger H, Madic O, Pichler WJ: Anti-CD4 antibody treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: I. Effect on clinical course and circulating T cells. J Autoimmun. 1989, 2: 627-642.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Epstein WV: Expectation bias in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. The monoclonal antibody experience. Arthritis Rheum. 1996, 39: 1773-1780.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Truneh A, MacDonald B, Elliott MJ, Singh K, Beecham S, Solinger A: Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with a PRIMATIZED anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody, SB-210396 (IDEC-CE9.1) – Responsiveness correlates with duration of monoclonal antibody coating, CD4 receptor modulation and decrease in number of activated lymphocyte subpopulations. Arthritis Rheum. 1997, 40(suppl): 191-

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Choy EH, Connolly DJ, Rapson N, Jeal S, Brown JC, Kingsley GH, Panayi GS, Johnston JM: Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and clinical effects of a humanized IgG1 anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody in the peripheral blood and synovial fluid of rheumatoid arthritis patients. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000, 39: 1139-1146. 10.1093/rheumatology/39.10.1139.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Pelegri C, Morante MP, Castellote C, Franch A, Castell M: Treatment with an anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody strongly ameliorates established rat adjuvant arthritis. Clin Exp Immunol. 1996, 103: 273-278. 10.1046/j.1365-2249.1996.d01-624.x.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Billingham MEJ, Hicks CA, Carney SL: Monoclonal antibodies and arthritis. Agents Actions. 1990, 29: 77-87.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    van Eden W, Holoshitz J, Nevo Z, Frenkel A, Klajman A, Cohen IR: Arthritis induced by a T-lymphocyte clone that responds to Mycobacterium tuberculosis and to cartilage proteoglycans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985, 82: 5117-5120.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Lehmann M, Sternkopf F, Metz F, Brock J, Docke WD, Plantikow A, Kuttler B, Hahn HJ, Ringel B, Volk HD: Induction of long-term survival of rat skin allografts by a novel, highly efficient anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody. Transplantation. 1992, 54: 959-962.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Espevik T, Nissen-Meyer J: A highly sensitive cell line, WEHI 164 clone 13, for measuring cytotoxic factor/tumor necrosis factor from human monocytes. J Immunol Methods. 1986, 95: 99-105. 10.1016/0022-1759(86)90322-4.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Pelegri C, Paz Morante M, Castellote C, Castell M, Franch A: Administration of a nondepleting anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody (W3/25) prevents adjuvant arthritis, even upon rechal-lenge: parallel administration of a depleting anti-CD8 monoclonal antibody (OX8) does not modify the effect of W3/25. Cell Immunol. 1995, 165: 177-182. 10.1006/cimm.1995.1203.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Van den Broek MF, Van de Langerijt LG, Van Bruggen MC, Billingham ME, Van den Berg WB: Treatment of rats with monoclonal anti-CD4 induces long-term resistance to streptococcal cell wall-induced arthritis. Eur J Immunol. 1992, 22: 57-61.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Chu CQ, Londei M: Induction of Th2 cytokines and control of collagen-induced arthritis by nondepleting anti-CD4 Abs. J Immunol. 1996, 157: 2685-2689.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Waldor MK, Mitchell D, Kipps TJ, Herzenberg LA, Steinman L: Importance of immunoglobulin isotype in therapy of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis with monoclonal anti-CD4 antibody. J Immunol. 1987, 139: 3660-3664.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Mason DW, Williams AF: The kinetics of antibody binding to membrane antigens in solution and at the cell surface. Biochem J. 1980, 187: 1-20.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kersh GJ, Kersh EN, Fremont DH, Allen PM: High- and low-potency ligands with similar affinities for the TCR: the importance of kinetics in TCR signaling. Immunity. 1998, 9: 817-826.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Baldari CT, Milia E, Di Somma MM, Baldoni F, Valitutti S, Telford JL: Distinct signaling properties identify functionally different CD4 epitopes. Eur J Immunol. 1995, 25: 1843-1850.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Simon JH, Stumbles P, Signoret N, Somoza C, Puklavec M, Sat-tentau QJ, Barclay AN, James W: Role of CD4 epitopes outside the gp120-binding site during entry of human immunodefi-ciency virus type 1. J Virol. 1997, 71: 1476-1484.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ottemann KM, Xiao W, Shin YK, Koshland DAJ: A piston model for transmembrane signaling of the aspartate receptor. Science. 1999, 285: 1751-1754. 10.1126/science.285.5434.1751.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Pope RM, Kniker WT, Talal N, Dauphinee M: Delayed type hypersensitivity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1993, 20: 17-20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Binderup L: Decreased T-suppressor cell activity in rats with adjuvant arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1983, 42: 693-698.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Gilman SC, Daniels JF, Wilson RE, Carlson RP, Lewis AJ: Lymphoid abnormalities in rats with adjuvant-induced arthritis. I. Mitogen responsiveness and lymphokine synthesis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1984, 43: 847-855.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Schmidt-Weber CB, Pohlers D, Siegling A, Schädlich H, Buchner E, Volk HD, Palombo-Kinne E, Emmrich F, Kinne RW: Cytokine gene activation in synovial membrane, regional lymph nodes, and spleen during the course of rat adjuvant arthritis. Cell Immunol. 1999, 195: 53-65. 10.1006/cimm.1999.1509.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Szekanecz Z, Halloran MM, Volin MV, Woods JM, Strieter RM, Kenneth Haines G, Kunkel SL, Burdick MD, Koch AE: Temporal expression of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in rat adjuvant-induced arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2000, 43: 1266-1277. 10.1002/1529-0131(200006)43:6<1266::AID-ANR9>3.0.CO;2-P.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Simon J, Surber R, Kleinstäuber G, Petrow PK, Henzgen S, Kinne RW, Bräuer R: Systemic macrophage activation in locally-induced experimental arthritis. J Autoimmun. 2001, 17: 127-136. 10.1006/jaut.2001.0534.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Alsalameh S, Winter K, Al-Ward R, Wendler J, Kalden JR, Kinne RW: Distribution of TNF-alpha, TNF-R55 and TNF-R75 in the rheumatoid synovial membrane: TNF receptors are localized preferentially in the lining layer; TNF-alpha is distributed mainly in the vicinity of TNF receptors in the deeper layers. Scand J Immunol. 1999, 49: 278-285. 10.1046/j.1365-3083.1999.00458.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Kinne RW, Bräuer R, Stuhlmüller B, Palombo-Kinne E, Burmester GR: Macrophages in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res. 2000, 2: 189-202. 10.1186/ar86.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Steiner G, Tohidast-Akrad M, Witzmann G, Vesely M, Studnicka-Benke A, Gal A, Kunaver M, Zenz P, Smolen JS: Cytokine production by synovial T cells in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 1999, 38: 202-213. 10.1093/rheumatology/38.3.202.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Jongeneel CV: Transcriptional regulation of the tumor necrosis factor α gene. Immunobiol. 1995, 193: 210-216.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Serfling E, Avots A, Neumann M: The architecture of the inter-leukin-2 promoter: a reflection of T lymphocyte activation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1995, 1263: 181-200. 10.1016/0167-4781(95)00112-T.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Chirmule N, Avots A, Tamma LSM, Pahwa S, Serfling E: CD4-mediated signals induce T cell dysfunction in vivo. J Immunol. 1999, 163: 644-649.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Arima T, Lehmann M, Flye MW: Induction of donor specific transplantation tolerance to cardiac allografts following treatment with nondepleting (RIB 5/2) or depleting (OX-38) anti-CD4 mAb plus intrathymic or intravenous donor alloantigen. Transplantation. 1997, 63: 284-292. 10.1097/00007890-199701270-00019.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Andersson EC, Hansen BE, Jacobsen H, Madsen LS, Andersen CB, Engberg J, Rothbard JB, McDevitt GS, Malmstrom V, Holmdahl R, Svejgaard A, Fugger L: Definition of MHC and T cell receptor contacts in the HLA-DR4-restricted immunodomi-nant epitope in type II collagen and characterization of collagen-induced arthritis in HLA-DR4 and human CD4 transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998, 95: 7574-7579. 10.1073/pnas.95.13.7574.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Bugelski PJ, Herzyk DJ, Rehm S, Harmsen AG, Gore EV, Williams DM, Maleeff BE, Badger AM, Truneh A, O'Brien SR, Macia RA, Wier PJ, Morgan DG, Hart TK: Preclinical development of kelix-imab, a Primatized anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody, in human CD4 transgenic mice: characterization of the model and safety studies. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2000, 19: 230-243. 10.1191/096032700678815783.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Herzyk DJ, Gore ER, Polsky R, Nadwodny KL, Maier CC, Liu S, Hart TK, Harmsen AG, Bugelski PJ: Immunomodulatory effects of anti-CD4 antibody in host resistance against infections and tumors in human CD4 transgenic mice. Infect Immun. 2001, 69: 1032-1043. 10.1128/IAI.69.2.1032-1043.2001.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Supplementary references

  1. S1.

    Karlsson R, Michaelsson A, Mattsson L: Kinetic analysis of monoclonal antibody-antigen interactions with a new biosensor based analytical system. J Immunol Methods. 1991, 145: 229-240. 10.1016/0022-1759(91)90331-9.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. S2.

    Billingham MEJ, Hicks CA, Carney SL: Monoclonal antibodies and arthritis. Agents Actions. 1990, 29: 77-87.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. S3.

    Pelegri C, Kühnlein P, Buchner E, Schmidt CB, Franch A, Castell M, Hünig T, Emmrich F, Kinne RW: Depletion of gamma/delta T cells does not prevent or ameliorate, but rather aggravates, rat adjuvant arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1996, 39: 204-215.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. S4.

    Kinne RW, Schmidt-Weber CB, Hoppe R, Buchner E, Palombo-Kinne E, Nürnberg E, Emmrich F: Long-term amelioration of rat adjuvant arthritis following systemic elimination of macrophages by clodronate-containing liposomes. Arthritis Rheum. 1995, 38: 1777-1790.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. S5.

    Wood FD, Pearson CM, Tanaka A: Capacity of mycobacterial wax D and its subfractions to induce adjuvant arthritis in rats. Int Arch Allergy. 1969, 35: 456-467.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S6.

    Coligan JE, Kruisbeek AM, Margulies DH, Shevach EM, Strober W, Eds: Current Protocols in Immunology. New York: John Wiley & Sons;. 1991

    Google Scholar 

  7. S7.

    Lehmann M, Sternkopf F, Metz F, Brock J, Docke WD, Plantikow A, Kuttler B, Hahn HJ, Ringel B, Volk HD: Induction of long-term survival of rat skin allografts by a novel, highly efficient anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody. Transplantation. 1992, 54: 959-962.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S8.

    Siegling A, Lehmann M, Riedel H, Platzer C, Brock J, Emmrich F, Volk HD: A nondepleting anti-rat CD4 monoclonal antibody that suppresses T helper 1-like but not T helper 2-like intra-graft lymphokine secretion induces long-term survival of renal allografts. Transplantation. 1994, 57: 464-467.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S9.

    Surman DR, Dudley ME, Overwijk WW, Restifo NP: Cutting edge: CD4+ T cell control of CD8+ T cell reactivity to a model tumor antigen. J Immunol. 2000, 164: 562-565.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. S10.

    Stumbles P, Mason D: Activation of CD4+ T cells in the presence of a nondepleting monoclonal antibody to CD4 induces a Th2-type response in vitro. J Exp Med. 1995, 182: 5-13.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S11.

    Apparailly F, Verwaerde C, Jacquet C, Auriault C, Sany J, Jorgensen C: Adenovirus-mediated transfer of viral IL-10 gene inhibits murine collagen-induced arthritis. J Immunol. 1998, 160: 5213-5220.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. S12.

    Katsikis PD, Chu CQ, Brennan FM, Maini RN, Feldmann M: Immunoregulatory role of interleukin 10 in rheumatoid arthritis. J Exp Med. 1994, 179: 1517-1527.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. S13.

    Mottram PL, Han WR, Purcell LJ, McKenzie IF, Hancock WW: Increased expression of IL-4 and IL-10 and decreased expression of IL-2 and interferon-gamma in long-surviving mouse heart allografts after brief CD4-monoclonal antibody therapy. Transplantation. 1995, 59: 559-565.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


B Niescher, B Müller, and D Claus are acknowledged for technical assistance, Prof N Barclay for providing sCD4, and E Palombo-Kinne for helpful suggestions. This work was supported by the Bundesminis-terium für Bildung und Forschung (grants 01VM9311/3, 01ZZ9602 to RW Kinne), by the Graduiertenkolleg 'Molekular- und Zellbiologie des Bindegewebes', University of Leipzig (D Pohlers), and by the Graduiertenkolleg 'Autoimmunität, Infektion und Entzündung', Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (CB Schmidt-Weber).

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raimund W Kinne.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pohlers, D., Schmidt-Weber, C.B., Franch, A. et al. Differential clinical efficacy of anti-CD4 monoclonal antibodies in rat adjuvant arthritis is paralleled by differential influence on NF-κB binding activity and TNF-α secretion of T cells. Arthritis Res Ther 4, 184 (2002).

Download citation


  • adjuvant arthritis
  • anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody
  • TNF-alpha
  • NF-kappaB